27/06/2025 12:44, Thomas Monjalon: > 20/06/2025 15:37, Bruce Richardson: > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > > This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive, > > > because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_socket_id_by_idx` only report > > > information about physical sockets, and these specific calls are made > > > during EAL initialization, so no other sockets (i.e. external) could have > > > been available, so it is pretty much impossible to get invalid return > > > here. > > > > > > Still, to avoid future false positives, we can fix it here. > > > > > > Coverity issue: 470131 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > Applied, thanks?
Sorry for this typo, it was not supposed to be a question mark. Yes you absolutely deserve some thanks for your continuous maintenance of the DPDK memory subsystem. Thank you Anatoly :)
