+1 Although it is technically a release, I can't imagine why any external
entity would directly use it. Even if they do they would have to test it no
matter what we do. Having a less formal procedure for this just makes sense to
me.
Ralph
On Apr 18, 2011, at 2:40 PM, sebb wrote:
> As suggest
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 2011-04-18, sebb wrote:
> On 18 April 2011 06:22, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2011-04-18, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>> A suggestion: if the library has logging capability, then log a
>>> warning saying that the archive was closed in the finalize
>>> method. That will serve as a clue to the library
On 4/18/11 10:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-04-18, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> The problem is that without logging in to vmbuild, there does not
>> appear to be a way to get to /target and see all the little
>> surefire-reports files that maven creates so you can see which test
>> case failed.
On 2011-04-18, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The problem is that without logging in to vmbuild, there does not
> appear to be a way to get to /target and see all the little
> surefire-reports files that maven creates so you can see which test
> case failed. Does anyone know of a way to get to /target onli
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 18 April 2011 23:11, Paul Benedict wrote:
> -1
>
> POM changes can have big impacts, especially if an erroneous one is
> released. It's not that I don't trust the person who makes the changes, but
> I would like several people to approve the changes before the ecosystem is
> impacted. Checks an
-1
POM changes can have big impacts, especially if an erroneous one is
released. It's not that I don't trust the person who makes the changes, but
I would like several people to approve the changes before the ecosystem is
impacted. Checks and balances.
If it turns out I am the only -1 vote, I wil
As suggested by Hen, we should be able to use lazy consensus voting
for Commons Parent pom releases.
[ ] +1 let's use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent pom in future
[ ] -1 why not?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
My +1
Gary
On Apr 18, 2011, at 16:43, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1.
>
> I'm perfectly happy with lazy consensus as voting for commons-parent.
> Our Maven build system is not an external product and does not need
> standard voting. Consider me +1 for any future commons-parent release
> vote unless
On 18 April 2011 21:42, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1.
+1
> I'm perfectly happy with lazy consensus as voting for commons-parent.
> Our Maven build system is not an external product and does not need
> standard voting. Consider me +1 for any future commons-parent release
> vote unless I (unlikely) s
On 18 April 2011 21:40, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>>
>> I guess I had more to say, or rather ask.
>>
>> In message , sebb writes:
>>>really necessary, because of the additional work that it causes all
>>>downstream users.
>>
>> What addition
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release commons-parent 21 based on version 21-RC3.
>
> The VOTE is open until Thursday April 21 16:00 EDT = UTC Thursday, April
> 21, 2011 at 20:00.
>
> Changes:
>
> - Upgrade maven-gpg-plugin to 1.2 from 1.1.
> - Replace deprecated assembly
+1.
I'm perfectly happy with lazy consensus as voting for commons-parent.
Our Maven build system is not an external product and does not need
standard voting. Consider me +1 for any future commons-parent release
vote unless I (unlikely) send a -1.
Hen
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Gary Grego
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
> I guess I had more to say, or rather ask.
>
> In message , sebb
> writes:
>>really necessary, because of the additional work that it causes all
>>downstream users.
>
> What additional work? As far as I know, end users--as in people who don't
> write code--don't do
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
> I guess I had more to say, or rather ask.
>
> In message , sebb writes:
>>really necessary, because of the additional work that it causes all
>>downstream users.
>
> What additional work? As far as I know, end users--as in people who
On 18 April 2011 21:03, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
> In message , sebb writes:
>>If binary compat. is to be broken, then it needs to be done once, and
>>done properly so it does not have to be done again. That's not
>>something I personally have any inclination to tackle at present, so
>>I'm tryi
Hi All:
This is a VOTE to release commons-parent 21 based on version 21-RC3.
The VOTE is open until Thursday April 21 16:00 EDT = UTC Thursday, April 21,
2011 at 20:00.
Changes:
- Upgrade maven-gpg-plugin to 1.2 from 1.1.
- Replace deprecated assembly goal "attached" with "single".
- Add test j
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:11 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 April 2011 18:02, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > The vote to release commons-parent 21 based on version 21-RC2 has failed.
> >
> > There was one +1 vote (from me)
>
> That does not mean the vote has failed. It merely means that the vote
> has not pas
On 18 April 2011 15:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/18/11 3:12 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 16 April 2011 09:45, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 16/04/2011 00:57, Gump a écrit :
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please v
On 18 April 2011 18:02, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The vote to release commons-parent 21 based on version 21-RC2 has failed.
>
> There was one +1 vote (from me)
That does not mean the vote has failed. It merely means that the vote
has not passed.
If there had been a -1 with a valid reason, that could
The vote to release commons-parent 21 based on version 21-RC2 has failed.
There was one +1 vote (from me)
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
On 4/18/11 3:12 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 April 2011 09:45, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 16/04/2011 00:57, Gump a écrit :
>>> To whom it may engage...
>>>
>>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>>> and/or
On 18 April 2011 13:48, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> Can you try with the latest source in subversion?
>>
>
> I tried with a latest Commons VFS build and the problem still occurs :(
And what is the stack trace now?
> Thanks,
> Hiranya
>
Hello infra,
can request like the below somehow be blocked from sending mail to:
iss...@commons.apache.org
Cheers,
Christian
>
>
> 2011/4/18 XXL Webhosting BV :
>> Tomofumi Kitano (JIRA),
>>
>> Wij hebben uw bericht ontvangen. Een van onze medewerkers zal uw bericht zo
>> spoedig mogelijk behan
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Can you try with the latest source in subversion?
>
I tried with a latest Commons VFS build and the problem still occurs :(
Thanks,
Hiranya
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:46 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > We are
On 18 April 2011 06:22, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-04-18, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> A suggestion: if the library has logging capability, then log a
>> warning saying that the archive was closed in the finalize
>> method. That will serve as a clue to the library user that they forgot
>> to close
On 16 April 2011 09:45, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 16/04/2011 00:57, Gump a écrit :
>> To whom it may engage...
>>
>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.
On 15 April 2011 20:34, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
> In message <-2240415941472220542@unknownmsgid>, Gary Gregory writes:
>>If your are going to break binary compatibility then a major release
>>is the time to do it. Is there any question that the design is wrong?
>
> I got the impression the cha
Something to contact Infra about. I don't see anything obvious -
unless we have multiple users who are all redirecting their email to
the .nl address and something just broke.
Very odd.
Hen
2011/4/18 Christian Grobmeier :
> BTW, why do I get this stuff? Am I missing something? Can we block
> thi
BTW, why do I get this stuff? Am I missing something? Can we block
this? Its going to iss...@commons.apache.org
2011/4/18 XXL Webhosting BV :
> Tomofumi Kitano (JIRA),
>
> Wij hebben uw bericht ontvangen. Een van onze medewerkers zal uw bericht zo
> spoedig mogelijk behandelen en indien nodig ve
32 matches
Mail list logo
