+1 Although it is technically a release, I can't imagine why any external entity would directly use it. Even if they do they would have to test it no matter what we do. Having a less formal procedure for this just makes sense to me.
Ralph On Apr 18, 2011, at 2:40 PM, sebb wrote: > As suggested by Hen, we should be able to use lazy consensus voting > for Commons Parent pom releases. > > [ ] +1 let's use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent pom in future > [ ] -1 why not? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
