Jenkins build is still unstable: Cassandra-Coverage #178

2011-11-30 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See

Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra #1228

2011-11-30 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [brandonwilliams] Bulk loader is no longer a fat client, hadoop bulk loader output format. Patch by brandonwilliams, reviewed by Yuki Morishita for CASSANDRA-3045 -- [...truncated 2301 li

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
I'm counting 5 binding +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. I'll get the artifacts published. ps: I know it's been more like 23 hours but I want to get this out before it's too late here and I doubt one more hour would change anything here. -- Sylvain On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Eric Evans w

Re: Discussion: release quality

2011-11-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
There's a couple more points to be made here, I think. First, we've also gone to a great deal of effort to make upgrading seamless, and we recently (1.0.3) added support for seamless downgrading as well. Anyone with a staging cluster (which should be everyone) can drop 1.0.4 on a single node, see

Re: Distributed testing

2011-11-30 Thread Zach Richardson
One thing that I think would help with this, that I noticed when wanting to shoot myself in the head when trying to write unit tests to test anything, is getting rid of the ridiculously large number of static classes. I understand this would be a very large effort (and would make the code more ver

Distributed testing

2011-11-30 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
Cassandra needs distributed regression testing. The current unit tests and so-called 'system' tests are great, but limited in scope for a distributed system. As pointed by others very recently, this can only help towards the goal of having bullet-proof releases (this is obviously not enough, but i

Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra-quick #146

2011-11-30 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [brandonwilliams] Bulk loader is no longer a fat client, hadoop bulk loader output format. Patch by brandonwilliams, reviewed by Yuki Morishita for CASSANDRA-3045 -- [...truncated 16

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread Eric Evans
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, declan wrote: > PLEASE take me off this email distribution listthanks http://threepanelsoul.com/2008/12/02/on-sea-lions/ > -Original Message- > From: Jake Luciani [mailto:jak...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:00 AM > To: dev@cassa

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread declan
PLEASE take me off this email distribution listthanks All the Best Declan -Original Message- From: Jake Luciani [mailto:jak...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:00 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5 +1 On Wed, Nov 30, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear blocker > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on 1.0.4 by > removing it from the website (and I broke the debian upgrade to 1.0.4), but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Nov 29, 2011 1:28 PM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote: > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear > blocker > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on > 1.0.4 by > removing it from the website (and I broke the debian upgrade to 1.0.4), > bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread Jake Luciani
+1 On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne > wrote: > > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear > blocker > > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on > 1.0.4 by > > removin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5

2011-11-30 Thread Eric Evans
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear blocker > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on 1.0.4 by > removing it from the website (and I broke the debian upgrade to 1.0.4), but we

Re: Discussion: release quality

2011-11-30 Thread Bill Au
I think we definitely need better quality for the releases. Just looked at 1.0.3 and 1.0.4. I am willing to test out release candidate and report back my finding on the mailing list. Hopefully more folks can do that to make the testing more comprehensive. And folks with binding votes can take t