I'm counting 5 binding +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. I'll get the artifacts published.
ps: I know it's been more like 23 hours but I want to get this out before it's too late here and I doubt one more hour would change anything here. -- Sylvain On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, declan <dec...@bluelinkmarketing.com> wrote: >> PLEASE take me off this email distribution list....thanks > > http://threepanelsoul.com/2008/12/02/on-sea-lions/ > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jake Luciani [mailto:jak...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:00 AM >> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5 >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> >>> wrote: >>> > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear >>> blocker >>> > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on >>> 1.0.4 by >>> > removing it from the website (and I broke the debian upgrade to 1.0.4), >>> but we >>> > need a fix asap. >>> > >>> > I've taken the 1.0.4 artifacts and on top of that I've: >>> > - reverted CASSANDRA-3407 (to 'fix' CASSANDRA-3540) >>> > - committed CASSANDRA-3539 >>> > I thus propose the following artifacts for release as 1.0.5. >>> > >>> > SVN: >>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-1.0.5@1208016 >>> > Artifacts: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-269/or >> g/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/1.0.5/ >>> > Staging repository: >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-269/ >>> > >>> > The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here: >>> > http://people.apache.org/~slebresne/ >>> > >>> > Given the situation, and given that the proposed artifacts differs only >>> > slightly from the one of 1.0.4, I propose an expedited vote of 24 hours >>> > (longer if needed). >>> >>> I don't think it's anything new, but in addition to the previously >>> discussed ConsistencyLevelTest, I get the occasional failure of >>> CompactionsTest due to a timeout. It is pretty long running, maybe we >>> just need to extend the timeout. >>> >>> Other than that, +1 >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Evans >>> Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://twitter.com/tjake >> >> > > > > -- > Eric Evans > Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
