+1 On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> > wrote: > > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear > blocker > > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on > 1.0.4 by > > removing it from the website (and I broke the debian upgrade to 1.0.4), > but we > > need a fix asap. > > > > I've taken the 1.0.4 artifacts and on top of that I've: > > - reverted CASSANDRA-3407 (to 'fix' CASSANDRA-3540) > > - committed CASSANDRA-3539 > > I thus propose the following artifacts for release as 1.0.5. > > > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-1.0.5@1208016 > > Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-269/org/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/1.0.5/ > > Staging repository: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-269/ > > > > The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~slebresne/ > > > > Given the situation, and given that the proposed artifacts differs only > > slightly from the one of 1.0.4, I propose an expedited vote of 24 hours > > (longer if needed). > > I don't think it's anything new, but in addition to the previously > discussed ConsistencyLevelTest, I get the occasional failure of > CompactionsTest due to a timeout. It is pretty long running, maybe we > just need to extend the timeout. > > Other than that, +1 > > -- > Eric Evans > Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu > -- http://twitter.com/tjake
