On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:10:16AM +0200, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Are you aware of "libreoffice --convert-to pdf --outdir . document.doc"?
Yes.
> It seems to work well, so I'm not sure what lloconv brings to the table :-).
It's faster for a start - on a random .doc I have to hand:
$ time lloconv d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olly Betts
* Package name: lloconv
Version : 6.1.0
Upstream Author : Olly Betts
* URL : https://gitlab.com/ojwb/lloconv
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : command line document converter
Control: block 807866 by 819936
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:09:19AM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> I've started packaging for this in
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/hub.git/ (cgit hasn't
> updated yet, but it should show up shortly). I've noted in the changelog
> which deps I coul
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I originally packaged this module as it was being used by one of my
clients in a project, but they've switched to using
libapache2-mod-auth-kerb instead, so I no longer have access to an
environment where I can test the package, which means I can't usefully
maintain
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 11:14:53AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> W: dolphin-emu source: space-in-std-shortname-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2 and
> bsd-3-clause (paragraph at line 130)
Ignore that one - it is lintian that's buggy:
https://bugs.debian.org/760642
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:52:43PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, I packaged wx3.0 doc, and after that I discovered this ITP and the
> package on mentors...
I'm happy someone's packaging it, but slightly surprised that nobody
thought to mention it to the wx maintainers.
> For the maint
tag 734799 + pending
thanks
I've uploaded a package, which is currently in NEW:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/wxpython3.0_3.0.0.0+dfsg-1.html
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Have you tried building wxastrocapture against wxwidgets3.0?
>
> I admit that I was only caring for the bare essentials and had not tried
> 3.0 compatibility. I'll go for it. Should it not be possible, we can also
> remove wxAstr
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:59:36PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> * Package name: wxastrocapture
> * URL : http://arnholm.org/astro/software/wxAstroCapture/
> * License : GPL-2+
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : acquisition of astronomical images with web cams
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:33:25PM +0100, mateusz.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
> Recent version of python-wxgtk3.x is used now in development, for instance
> in kicad.
> Can you please update the package, since 2.8 version is outdated, and not
> used in new projects ?
There's already an ITP for wxpython
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olly Betts
* Package name: wxpython3.0
Version : 3.0.0.0
Upstream Author : Robert Roebling et al
* URL : http://wxpython.org/
* License : wxWindows Licence; wxWindows Free Documentation Licence,
Version 3
Programming
I would encourage you to package this to use wxwidgets3.0 (now in
unstable) rather than 2.8, as we're hoping to remove 2.8 for jessie.
The upstream changelog mentions fixes for 2.9 compatibility, so chances
are good it will work with 3.0.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 01:46:44PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> good news: it seems that after seven (!!) years there is finally a new stable
> wxwidgets release in sight [1]. They say they release in September but even if
> they that doesnt happen, the list of blocker bugs for the 3.0 release
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:17:48PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> What's the status of your packaging? wxWidgets 2.9.5 has been
> released roughly a month ago. I would like to update aegisub to 3.x
> branch, since 2.x branch is no longer maintained by upstream
> maintainers.
I've been on vacati
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:04:32AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> * Package name: wxpdfdoc
> Version : 0.9.4
> Upstream Author : Ulrich Telle
> * URL : http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/components/wxpdfdoc/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
You're meant to
unblock 712303 with 713864
block 712303 with 613431
close 713864
thanks
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 01:57:05PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Reading #644571 I understand that only updateing to wxwidgets2.9 will
> solve this (or keeping libgnomeprintui2.2 some longer).
>
> As the gnomeprint is supposed
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:23:24PM -0700, Brandon wrote:
> Hi Olly. What are your intentions toward packaging wxwidgets 2.9? Is it
> something you are still interested in? You are still listed as the
> owner of the ITP, but the bug report hasn't had any significant
> activity in the last 18 months.
retitle 492896 ITP: wxwidgets3.0 -- wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI toolkit
owner 492896 !
thanks
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> This is an automatic email to change the status of wxwidgets3.0 back from ITP
> (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), bec
retitle 613431 ITP: wxwidgets2.9 -- wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI toolkit
owner 613431 o...@survex.com
thanks
My current work pushing to eliminate wxwidgets2.6 from the archive is
progressing nicely, and I'm pretty confident we can get that done by the
end of the year, and we're nearly at the s
retitle 492896 ITP: wxwidgets3.0 -- wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI toolkit
owner 492896 o...@survex.com
thanks
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:37:08PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> It's perhaps worth pointing out that wxWidgets 3.0 hasn't been released
> yet (which was unsurprisingl
retitle 571979 ITA: sfftobmp -- SFF (Structed Fax File) Converter
thanks
I'm intending to adopt this package. I'll probably not get a chance to upload
a new version for a couple of weeks.
If someone else is seriously interested in this package, I'm happy to let them
maintain or to co-maintain.
retitle 561202 ITA: sffview -- Structured Fax File (SFF) Viewer
thanks
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:56:12PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> sffview has been orphaned.
>
> Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
> package if you will have enough time and attention to work
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 09:32:07PM +0100, Emil Langrock wrote:
> New version of software or new software appears on the horizon which uses
> wxwidget 2.9 only functionality. These software could be uploaded to
> experimental, but Debian doesn't provide this version at all.
Unfortunately 2.9 is a
It's perhaps worth pointing out that wxWidgets 3.0 hasn't been released
yet (which was unsurprisingly also true when the original ITP was filed
over 3 years ago). Upstream are hoping it'll be released in early 2012,
though they're also still adding substantial amounts of new code, so
it seems prob
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:11:34PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> * Package name: apache-mod-ntlm-winbind
The module is mod_auth_ntlm_winbind, and the upstream repo has the same name,
so I'm planning on making the source package apache-mod-auth-ntlm-winbind
instead.
Cheers,
Olly
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olly Betts
* Package name: apache-mod-ntlm-winbind
Version : 0.0.0+svn801
Upstream Author : Andreas Gal , Sverre H. Huseby
, Tim Potter , Andrew Bartlett
, Waider
* URL :
http://adldap.sourceforge.net/wiki/doku.php?id
Package: wnpp
Owner: Olly Betts
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libemail-outlook-message-perl
Version : 0.910
Upstream Author : Matijs van Zuijlen
* URL : http://github.com/mvz/email-outlook-message-perl
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Programming Lang
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:20:52PM +0300, Mikhail Lukyanchenko wrote:
> Do you think it's ok that LICENSE file exists in trunk, but not in
> released package?
Yes, that shouldn't be a problem. It's clear than the licence on the 2.3
release is intended to be BSD, so the change on trunk is clarifyi
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:57:50PM +0300, Mikhail Lukyanchenko wrote:
> 2009/11/30 Olly Betts
> > Also, the copyright statements must have year(s), or the ftpmasters will
> > reject the package:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
>
>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:29:20PM +0300, Mikhail Lukyanchenko wrote:
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-django-djapian/python-django-djapian_2.3-0.1.dsc
OK, thanks.
Mostly this looks good, but a deeper inspection found a few issues (don't
be scared by the length of t
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:20:59PM +0400, Mikhail Lukyanchenko wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mikhail Lukyanchenko
>
> * Package name: python-django-djapian
> Version : 2.2.1
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/djapian/
> * License : BSD
>
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 06:01:30PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package name: pinot
> Version : 0.76
> Upstream Author : Fabrice Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://pinot.berlios.de/
> License : GPL
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : sear
've not prodded him enough to make it actually happen yet.
I'll send him a mail about sorting that out - it's unhelpful that the version
on CPAN lags by several months.
The differences from 0.9.6.0 are minor but useful:
0.9.9.0 Mon Nov 09 02:31:09 2006
Just a quick status update:
I've now tidied up the loose ends in Richard's packaging. I'm not a DD
but Wookey has kindly offered to sponsor uploads. So we're now waiting
on him to get back from holiday and find enough time to check the
packages over and upload them.
If you're a DD with an inter
34 matches
Mail list logo
