Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: thinkingrock
Version : 2.2.x
* URL : http://www.trgtd.com.au/
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : GTD (Getting Things Done) centric personal organizer
Thinkingrock is a personal organizer,
retitle 422298 ITA: libvncserver -- VNC server to monitor a tty
owner 422298 !
thanks
KR,
Filip
--
http://www.sysfs.be/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Yves,
What's the status on xfburn getting added to Debian? You reopened the
ITP after it was closed a few months ago, but without any additional
info.
KR,
Filip
--
http://www.sysfs.be/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
>
> * Package name: libuser
> Description : a user and group account administration library.
>
> The libuser library implements a standardized interface for manipulating
> and administering user and group accounts. The li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: emifreq-applet
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Stephane Demurget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://zzrough.free.fr/emifreq.php
* License : GPL
Description : CPU Frequency Scaling applet
EmiFreq applet is
s and
> > some mathematical solutions,
> > which was filed against the wnpp package.
> >
> > It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
> > Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> Removed because RFP is old? :o
No, because it is a dup
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:38:49AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
> * Package name: gfile
> * URL : http://lab.erasme.org/gfile/index.html
Err... why
This software is solidly dead upstream, uses an obsolete toolkit (GTK+
1.x) and from looking at it's homepage does not offer any a
Hi,
Some time ago you submitted an ITP for FM.
Your last message on that bug page is well over a year old now. Do you still
plan to go on with it?
TBH, I think it would be more useful to spend effort on other packages if
you want to help Debian, or Free Software. FM appears to be dead upstream,
a
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:20:34PM -0300, Luiz Carlos Querino Filho wrote:
>
> * Package name: gtkscintilla
> Description : GTK wrapper for the Scintilla source code editing widget
Why, if I may ask so? This is an obsolete library for an obsolete (GTK+
1.x) toolkit. There already is an
auto-pgp is in contrib, because it requires pgp, which used to be in
non-free for woody and before.
In sarge and sid, there is not even a pgp package anymore. While auto-pgp
thus still qualifies to remain as it is (in contrib), it has an open ITO ||
RFA bug for over 5 years (#68134)
Apparently noo
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:17:04AM +0200, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: opengroupware.org
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://ww
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > This applications mixes two incompatible (advertising requirement 4-clause
> > BSD & GPL) licenses.
>
> I have tried to contact upstream about license changes;
> without response so far, as far as I can remember.
Which is mos
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:52:28PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> fre, 04.07.2003 kl. 12.48 skrev Filip Van Raemdonck:
> >
> > Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead
> > upstream, even it's website is gone.
> > Considering that t
I should point out that at least 3a of the licence as sent to this ITP, is
_NOT_ DFSG free.
This isn't a real issue as currently mahogany appears to be GPL
dual-licensed, but whoever packages this should make sure to record that
Debian can only (re)distribute it under the terms of the GPL because o
Hi,
Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead
upstream, even it's website is gone.
Considering that the main feature are probably vfolders, and other MUAs
have that too now; that you say yourself it doesn't even build anymore,
and the deadness of it, would you mind i
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:44:53AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
>
> The GNOME 2 port of gnome-network is still a work in progress, but the
> following tools are available now.
Did you actually get any of these to run? They just sat there, reacting at
nothing, at best, or crashed more often for me wh
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:29:02PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
>
> What prevents you from uploading to incoming?
Nothing. But it's stalled in NEW/.
Regards,
Filip
--
"It's not usually cost effective time wise to go do it. But if something's
really pissing you off, you just go f
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:37:21AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> Will you consider putting it on people.d.o while it hovers in NEW land?
Done, p.d.o/~mechanix/ (not aptable).
However, the .deb is for powerpc so unless you also use that arch you'll
have to rebuild the source package.
Regards,
F
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:16:58PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>
> Ross Burton has been doing gpdf packages for a while now. I think he
> intended to upload when it got a release.
He already replied to d-devel that he had done so, but doesn't have time
ATM for it.
> Maybe you could ask him
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name : gpdf
Version : 0.100
URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gpdf/
License : GPLv2
Description: Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer
Gpdf is a graphical viewer for documents in the Portable Document Format.
(These are some
Hi,
I'm investigating some groupware packages and I saw your ITP. How is it
going? Do you have anything preliminary? What's your progress?
Regards,
Filip
--
Welcome to CML2 Adventure, version 1.6.1.
You are in a maze of twisty little Linux kernel options menus, all different.
The main room.
Hi,
You indicated you wanted to package new-pinepgp. Is that still the case?
Otherwise, it should probably be retitled back to RFP.
(If I don't hear anything within a week or such, I'll retitle anyway)
Regards,
Filip
--
If you receive something that says "Send this to everyone you know",
PLE
unmerge 110734
close 110734
retitle 88327 "RFP: new-pinepgp - GPG and PGP support for pine
thanks
I'm retitling back to RFP as the address from the person who ITPed
bounces; I'm also unmerging and closing the duplicate report as it has
no useful information anyway (and thus only lengthens the alre
retitle 68638 O: dot-forward -- .forward compatibility for qmail
retitle 68639 O: fastforward -- aliases-style mail forwarding for qmail
thanks
The ITA's from 77741 and 77742 appear to not have gone anywhere.
Regards,
Filip
--
"The software required Win95 or better, so I installed Linux."
retitle 68134 ITO: auto-pgp - PGP tools for command-line and emacs use
thanks
The ITA apparently didn't get anywhere.
Regards,
Filip
--
"Much blood has been spilled as a result of arguments about how many buttons
a mouse ought to have. Naive users prefer one (it is hard to push te wrong
but
reassign 34837 pccts
thanks
Hi,
At best an URL can be added to the pccts docs (if it hasn't already);
the document license itself is unsuitable to include in non-free even.
Regards,
Filip
--
Bill G., 1984 - "640 K ought be enough for everyone"
Bill G., 1995 - "The Internet is not a primary g
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of ubit on Debian :)
Actually, I'm not :-|
I've just cleaned up about two dozen merged wnpp bugs, I didn't cc: the
individual bug numbers because the list was so long.
I closed those which did not have a
unmerge 138039
close 138039
thanks
There's no good in merged O: (or other) bugs on wnpp; it only clutters
the web page.
Regards,
Filip
--
"I decry the current tendency to seek patents on algorithms. There are
better ways to earn a living than to prevent other people from making
use of one's
retitle 164408 "ITA: gnome-apt"
thanks
--
The Unixverse ends on Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:07 +
pgpUAHqlhX60Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:53:06AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
> In my respository you can find rox 1.3.4 packaged.
http://users.stone.pl/szczepan/apt/ ? That 403's on me.
Or is it somewhere else now (that's from google).
Regards,
Filip
--
"Those who are willing to sacrifice fr
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote:
> Marcin Juszkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef:
> >
> > Second thing is - what part of ROX-Filer functionality which I removed
> > in my package you want to have in it:
> >
> > - starting dir/AppRun just by click on dir fo
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:50:29PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
> And one more thing: Are you using ROX-Filer? And if yes - which
> packages :))
Yes. And I'm obviously using my packages.
It's true, the ones in the repository are a bit out of date. I'm slowly
porting things over to the dev
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
>
> I'm interested in the pacwars2 packaging. I've been looking at the site
> and it looks like they've gone for the full GPL license, so that
> shouldn't be a problem.
That part isn't, but there are other problems. They use some no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: blackpenguin
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Holger Priebs
URL : http://www.priebs.de/blackpenguin.html
License : GPL
Description : Q*Bert like game
Black Penguin is a game which bears much similarity to o
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:53:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> I would like to ask you if you have had any success with the
> rox* packages. If you want to I can take over this. I do not use the
> application so if you are more experienced I'll happily let you do
> that job. :)
Yes and no. Se
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:50:34 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:29:22 +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> > This is the upstream (and source) package name, binary will most likely be
> > gtk-theme-crux.
>
> why not gtk-engines-crux?
On Tue, Dec 11,
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: eazel-engine
Version : 0.3
* URL : http://gtk.classic.themes.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Crux theme for GTK+
This is the upstream (and source) package name, binary wil
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-19
Severity: wishlist
Package name: rox
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard
URL : http://rox.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : Risc Os on X - desktop environment
This is a small a
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:24:21PM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
>
> Description : Palatino-likes fonts for TeX
>
> Like txfonts(already in sid), this package contains a bunch of afm, pfb, tfm,
> and vf etc. to set up and use Adobe Palatino fonts (or its substitute) in your
> TeX documents.
retitle 96909 RFP: pacwars2
thanks
I do not currently have time or motivation to work on this. There are some
license issues with this, or at least there were when I last checked two
months ago.
Also the package is highly unstable.
I do have packages ready, if someone cares enough to resolve the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:28:17PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
>
> The openoffice suite however is LGPLed (dual-licensed actually, but hey) and
> it includes among others a nice set of truetype fonts, possibly even some
> replacements for the standard X fonts (like helvetica).
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-24
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
There's been a lot of font talking for the last few days, one of them being
a lack of free truetype fonts.
The openoffice suite however is LGPLed (dual-licensed actually, but hey) and
it includes among others a nice set of tr
Hiya all,
I'm CC:ing this to James Moss and the fam en imon ITP bugs for completeness.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:53:12AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> I just wanted to know the status of your fam-oss package. You might be
> interested to know that Alex Larsson has created a patch that uses
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-23
Severity: wishlist
Description:
Innovation3D or shorthand I3D is a 3d modeling program. Among it's features
are basic polygonal modeling, support for NURBS curves and surfaces, and
animation.
Homepage: http://innovation3d.sourceforge.net/
License:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 01:29:45PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > NURBS++ is a set of libraries written in C++ that provide manipulation
> > routines for NURBS curves and surfaces.
>
> Are yo
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-13
Severity: wishlist
License is LGPL.
short description:
NURBS++ is a set of libraries written in C++ that provide manipulation
routines for NURBS curves and surfaces.
Regards,
Filip
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architec
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-05-10
Severity: wishlist
homepage: pw2.sourceforge.net
license: GPL
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-28
Severity: wishlist
Home page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
License: GPL (for the daemon) and Lesser GPL (for the communication library)
Regards,
Filip
--
/-- Filip Van Raemdonck --\
<
: GPL
Regards,
Filip
--
/-- Filip Van Raemdonck --\
< GPG key at public keyservers. Signed or encrypted mail preferred. >
< Linux, because I'd like to *get there* today! >
\-- Debia
49 matches
Mail list logo
