Bug#88986: chpp

Hi, Is chpp still being maintained? A while ago I forwarded to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but I haven't heard back from you. Thanks, Matej

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

Hi Jérôme! You wrote: > Bas, you disgust me! CCing RMS is not our business! If we consider that > we should not package it, then we don't, _end-of-story_. Well, I think mldonkey, how useful their program may be, seems actually to be abusing the FSF's infrastructure for a non-free project. I

Bug#157878: ITP: bogofilter -- a Bayesian spam filter

...and, as someone pointed out to me, Judy has been relicensed under the LGPL, so bogofilter is at least packagable (though I probably won't do so). Matt

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 23:28, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Bas, you disgust me! CCing RMS is not our business! If we consider that > we should not package it, then we don't, _end-of-story_. > > You are proposing denouncement, we cannot tolerate that! I agree, the best we had to do was : do nothin

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 23:28, Jérôme Marant wrote: > >> Bas, you disgust me! CCing RMS is not our business! If we consider that >> we should not package it, then we don't, _end-of-story_. >> >> You are proposing denouncement, we cannot tolerate

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Robert! > > You wrote: > >> I am sorry, but after reading upstreams explanation [1] and verifying >> that they don't have any plans to remove the non-free bytecode, all i >> have to say is that the savannah companions should know they are >> unvolunta

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 23:11, Robert Millan wrote: > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/pipermail/mldonkey-users/2002-July/97.html > > For one side, it is clear that the non-free code will never be removed. > > On the other, I don't see why do we want in Debian a network that is > insecure by d

Bug#154312: non-free software in savannah

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:48:58PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > Please do, and cc RMS, citing [1]. okay, this is a notification for RMS and RFP #154312 On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:00:50PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been told that the mldonkey project that is > hosted i

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:46:53PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 22:49, Robert Millan wrote: > > > In respect to this RFP, does anyone care if i close it? > > As mldonkey can still be uploaded to the non-free section if someone > wants to package it, or to main if the edo

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

Hi Robert! You wrote: > I am sorry, but after reading upstreams explanation [1] and verifying > that they don't have any plans to remove the non-free bytecode, all i > have to say is that the savannah companions should know they are > unvoluntarily providing resources for non-free software develo

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 22:49, Robert Millan wrote: > In respect to this RFP, does anyone care if i close it? As mldonkey can still be uploaded to the non-free section if someone wants to package it, or to main if the edonkey code is removed, I don't see any reason to close it. Greetings, -- .''

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > Please browse the mldonkey-users archives and make yourself an opinion. > Everything has already been discussed there. You should have pointed to that list in first place. I am sorry, but after reading upstreams explanation [1] a

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 145660 Bug#145660: ITA: most of my packages Bug closed, send any further explanations to Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:02:01AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Looking at mldonkey's source code, I wonder if it should be considered >> > as non-free. >> > There is a donkey/donkey.lam file, which

Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

> * kaffe and other GPL-licensed JVMs can only be used with GPL compatible > software (i.e. no Apache style licenses!). See > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL > Not to mention that kaffe's classlib is GPL [1] What exactly do you mean by this? The interpreter can b

Bug#100081: amkCrypto/pycrypto packaging status?

In a message of Sat, 24 Aug 2002 19:45:56 +0300, Tommi Virtanen writes: > Hi. I want to release a piece of software that > requires rc4 encryption. pycrypto/amkCrypto seems > like the sanest solution. As I have not heard > from you or your ITP for over three weeks, I'm >

Bug#88224: is this still actual ?

hello, do you still need somebody to take over haskell-doc ? I am not a debian developer (yet) but in a few weeks I will hopefully find the time to dig into it. What kind of work is associated with the package *upstream* ? You may wonder why I am not on any haskell mailing lists yet... howev

Processed: Retitle: Bug#158332: O: dhcp-dns

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 158332 O: dhcp-dns -- Dynamic DNS updates for DHCP Bug#158332: O: dhcp-dns Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Processed: RFP

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 153006 RFP: eccp109 -- internet distributed effort to solve > Certicom's ECCp-109 challenge. Bug#153006: ITP: eccp109 -- internet distributed effort to solve Certicom's ECCp-109 challenge. Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#154312: Is mldonkey DFSG-Free ?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:02:01AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Looking at mldonkey's source code, I wonder if it should be considered > > as non-free. > > There is a donkey/donkey.lam file, which seems to be in some sort of > > portable bytecode

Bug#158336: O: jdresolve -- fast alternative to apache logresolve

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26 Severity: normal I orphaned the speedy-cgi-perl package on Dec 18 2001. The package description is: The jdresolve application resolves IP addresses into hostnames. To reduce the time necessary to resolve large batches of addresses, jdresolve open

Bug#158335: O: speedy-cgi-perl -- speed up perl scripts by making them persistent.

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26 Severity: normal I orphaned the speedy-cgi-perl package on Dec 18 2001. The package description is: SpeedyCGI is a way to run perl scripts persistently, which usually makes them run much more quickly because it avoids the overhead of starting up

Bug#158334: O: speedy-cgi-perl -- apache module to speed up perl scripts by making them persistent.

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26 Severity: normal I orphaned the speedy-cgi-perl package on Dec 18 2001. The package description is: SpeedyCGI is a way to run perl scripts persistently, which usually makes them run much more quickly because it avoids the overhead of starting up

Bug#158333: O: timeoutd -- Flexible user timeout daemon

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26 Severity: normal I orphaned the timeoutd package on Dec 18 2001. The package description is: timeoutd enforces the time restrictions specified in /etc/timeouts. . When invoked in daemon mode (without any parameters) timeoutd backgrounds itself,

Bug#158332: O: dhcp-dns

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26 Severity: normal orphaned Dec 18 2001

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by weasel: webwml/english/devel/wnpp wnpp.pl

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:19:28AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > CVSROOT: /org/cvs.debian.org/cvs/webwml > Module name: webwml > Changes by: weasel 02/08/26 00:19:28 > > Modified files: > english/devel/wnpp: wnpp.pl > > Log message: > It seems that the move from klecker to

Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26 Severity: wishlist * Package name: cl-defsystem3 Version : 3.3ii Upstream Author : Mark Kantrowitz and Marco Antoniotti * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/clocc * License : DFSG compatible Description :

Processed: Re: Bug#158298: O: e2recover

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 158298 Bug#158298: O: e2recover Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kristis Makris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > retitle 120268 RFP: e2recover -- tools to help recover deleted files from > ext2 file systems Bug#120268: ITP: e2recover -- tools t

Hello!!!

ENGR.GEORGE MBA. DIRECTOR, MINERALS & NATURAL RESOURCES, SOUTH AFRICAN MINISTRY OF MINING & MINERAL RESOURCES, (SMMR) PRETORIA, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Sir, It is my pleasure to write you this letter on behalf of my colleagues. I have decided to seek a confidential co-operation with you in exe

Bug#156728: marked as done (ITP: spass -- An automated theorem prover)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:42:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#156728: fixed in spass 2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#157199: marked as done (RFP: libapache-mod-jk2 -- Apache2 connector for Tomcat servlet engine)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:27:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157199: fixed in tomcat4 4.1.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#157400: marked as done (ITP: libsdl-sge -- Set of graphic functions that use SDL)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:30:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157400: fixed in libsdl-sge 020104-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#157450: marked as done (ITP: libsdl-anim -- Library to load animations and blit them to surfaces)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:30:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157450: fixed in libsdl-anim 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#155925: marked as done (ITA: shaper -- Traffic Shaper for Linux)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:34:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#155925: fixed in shaper 2.2.12-0.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#155032: ITP: tcpreen -- Simple TCP re-engineering tool

Le Samedi 3 Août 2002 15:54, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:06:57AM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > > TCPreen is a small tool for monitoring a TCP connection. > > It works like a bridge between the server and the client in a TCP > > connection, displays any data that is sent e

Bug#157218: marked as done (ITP: bfm -- bastard child of wmtimefish and bubblemon)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:04:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157218: fixed in bfm 0.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#157154: marked as done (ITP: textdraw -- tool to draw geometric figures for ASCII-Art)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:57:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157154: fixed in textdraw 0.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#153117: marked as done (ITP: fragrouter -- Test a NIDS by attempting to evade using fragmented packets)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:10:25 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#153117: fixed in fragrouter 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#146534: marked as done (ITP: wmressel: A simple dockable X11 resolution selector)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:51:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#146534: fixed in wmressel 0.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#157182: marked as done (ITP: libpod-sax-perl -- Perl module for generating SAX events from POD)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:45:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157182: fixed in libpod-sax-perl 0.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#157133: marked as done (ITP: libtime-piece-perl -- Perl module for object oriented time objects)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:24:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157133: fixed in libtime-piece-perl 1.07-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#157151: marked as done (ITP: quick-lounge-applet -- An applet to orginize your preferred applications on the GNOME 2 Panel)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:27:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157151: fixed in quick-lounge-applet 0.5+cvs2002.08.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Processed: fixing wnpp bug titles

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 157104 ITP: totem -- A simple movie player for the Gnome desktop > based on xine. Bug#157104: wnpp: ITP: totem - A simple movie player for the Gnome desktop based on xine. Changed Bug title. > retitle 157810 ITP: passivetex -- Macros to proce

Bug#153740: marked as done (ITP: libvte2 -- Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 2.0)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:18:57 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#153740: fixed in vte 0.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#157009: marked as done (ITP: cl-asdf -- Another System Definition Facility (Lisp))

Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:01:31 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157009: fixed in cl-asdf 0.0+cvs.2002.08.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case