On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:02:01AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Looking at mldonkey's source code, I wonder if it should be considered > > as non-free. > > There is a donkey/donkey.lam file, which seems to be in some sort of > > portable bytecode, but it is certainly not an editable format, and I > > won't qualify it as "source code". > > That's it. I don't consider it as source code either.
Upstream web site (http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/mldonkey) reads: "mldonkey, a free e-Donkey client" that bytecode looks like come sort of Objective-Caml file. perhaps it can be understood and converted into a human-readable form with the proper ocaml tool. Savannah does not host non-free software either, would you mind contacting the upstream author to ask him/her about this? If it really comes to be non-free, the savannah account must be terminated also. cheers, -- Robert Millan "5 years from now everyone will be running free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5" Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992
