Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:02:01AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Looking at mldonkey's source code, I wonder if it should be considered >> > as non-free. >> > There is a donkey/donkey.lam file, which seems to be in some sort of >> > portable bytecode, but it is certainly not an editable format, and I >> > won't qualify it as "source code". >> >> That's it. I don't consider it as source code either. > > Upstream web site (http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/mldonkey) reads: > > "mldonkey, a free e-Donkey client" > > that bytecode looks like come sort of Objective-Caml file. perhaps it > can be understood and converted into a human-readable form with the > proper ocaml tool. > Savannah does not host non-free software either, would you mind contacting > the upstream author to ask him/her about this? If it really comes to be > non-free, the savannah account must be terminated also.
Please browse the mldonkey-users archives and make yourself an opinion. Everything has already been discussed there. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org