that probably won't change
much). You could also try mailing Daenzig if you prefer.
The dev packages need to be hacked to fix them as they depend on
specific versions (I don't know of the dri tree can build the dev
packages, need to check).
There shouldn't be any problems with r
ether?
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
> provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I
> changed that so I am not sure what the original package said)
>
> As for
understand. Guarddog?, The qt library?
>
Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I
changed that so I am not sure what the original package said)
As for qt (I thing its the dev, right) IIRC it
It seems to "provide"/"replace" the modules that would cause all those
programs to be removed. There are apparently more recent versions around so
might look at those.
There are alternative mach64 DRI packages, "flgr" which is linked at ATI's
site. These replace the whole xlibmesa business so I
Hi. I think, from the content of this post, that you're replying to
me; but I'm not sure, because your post didn't quote anything for
context (and in general, your posts don't include an "In-Reply-To:"
header, so they don't thread).
If this wasn't a reply to me, sorry . . .
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004
If this module replaces the other three, does it not offer the same "entry
points", functions, or in Java parlance, implements the same interface?
Otherwize, nothing would work.
So if Guarddog or Rosegarden or any othe the tens of others on the list are
calling into the graphics interface, they
iger for this
> dri stuff but I do not believe this is theirs--they offer sources for a
> drm-mach64 which I cannot get to work and will not compile at all for
> 2.6 kernels.
Well, I have no idea where xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 is from. I just know
that it's not from D
nfo.
>
> It's hard to be more specific than that, because the package you're
> referring to (xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64) doesn't appear to be a Debian
> package (that is, it doesn't show up at all at p.d.o).
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:09:48PM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> If one installs this one, the following would be removed:
>
> Remv libqt3-mt-dev (3:3.2.3-2 Debian:testing)
> Remv x-window-system (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
> Remv x-window-system-core (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
> Remv xlibmesa-dri (4.3
r a particular package. man apt-cache for more info.
It's hard to be more specific than that, because the package you're
referring to (xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64) doesn't appear to be a Debian
package (that is, it doesn't show up at all at p.d.o).
-c
--
Chris Metzler
If one installs this one, the following would be removed:
Remv libqt3-mt-dev (3:3.2.3-2 Debian:testing)
Remv x-window-system (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Remv x-window-system-core (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Remv xlibmesa-dri (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Remv xlibmesa-glu-dev (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Rem
11 matches
Mail list logo
