Dne, 01. 01. 2011 12:36:14 je Lisi napisal(a):
On Sunday 19 December 2010 23:18:19 Bob Proulx wrote:
> I wouldn't transition to
> single user mode from multiuser mode directly myself.
I have never had any problems with init 1, wherever I used it from,
other than
that KDE doesn't shut down very
On Sunday 19 December 2010 23:18:19 Bob Proulx wrote:
> I wouldn't transition to
> single user mode from multiuser mode directly myself.
I have never had any problems with init 1, wherever I used it from, other than
that KDE doesn't shut down very cleanly in the sense that it does not save
every
On 12/19/2010 06:02 PM, Lisi wrote:
> So - Oh my friends be warned by me! init 1 is fine. init s is not. Paul
> has
> given a very clear exposition of the facts either above of below, depending
> on how you thread your emails.
I guess ( after reading Bob's reply) I forgot to mention, NORMALL
Lisi wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > probably about to tell me that it would. ;-)
> > Yes. I am going to say, "It should work." :-)
>
> My curtiosity being even more 'satiable than the elephant's child, I tried.
>
> The short answer is it doesn't work.
Note that I didn't say that it /did/ w
On Sunday 19 December 2010 19:09:46 Bob Proulx wrote:
> I don't think that "init s" would work - but you are
>
> > probably about to tell me that it would. ;-)
>
> Yes. I am going to say, "It should work." :-)
My curtiosity being even more 'satiable than the elephant's child, I tried.
The sho
On 12/19/2010 02:09 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> tty) I use "init 1". I don't think that "init s" would work - but you are
>> > probably about to tell me that it would. ;-)
> Yes. I am going to say, "It should work." :-)
>
> Personally I wouldn't move from multiuser to single user directly. I
> w
Lisi wrote:
> If I want to boot into single user from a cold start, I do it via GRUB. But
> if I am in a GUI and I want to actually change (rather than just bring up a
> tty) I use "init 1". I don't think that "init s" would work - but you are
> probably about to tell me that it would. ;-)
Ye
On Sunday 19 December 2010 18:46:18 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Runlevel 1 is almost universially used to implement single user mode.
> When you ask why not use 1 instead of "single" the answer is that
> there isn't any reason. I just think it more clear to ask for single
> user mode directly and not jump
Lisi wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > The traditional solution would be to boot single user mode with S or
> > 'single' and make corrections from there. Alternatively you can
> > disable gdm/kdm/xdm temporarily and then reboot to the full system
> > which will then be a text console.
>
> Once we ar
and I lose the keyboard again... do you know of a
> > > way of changing the runlevel to just console (no X) or aborting X
> > > startup during Linux boot process (some key combination or anything).
> >
> > I searched it and turned up to be pretty simple.
> >
t before X crashes and I lose the keyboard again... do you know of a
> > way of changing the runlevel to just console (no X) or aborting X
> > startup during Linux boot process (some key combination or anything).
> >
> > I'm running Debian Lenny.
>
> In addition
store the
> previous xorg.conf. But as X starts automatically I can't manage to do
> that before X crashes and I lose the keyboard again... do you know of a
> way of changing the runlevel to just console (no X) or aborting X
> startup during Linux boot process (some key combination
the runlevel to just console (no X) or aborting X startup during Linux boot
> > process (some key combination or anything).
>
> I searched it and turned up to be pretty simple.
>
> It's just needed to append the runlevel number to the kernel line, something
> like this e
: *Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:06:31 +0100
> *To: *
> *Subject: *Spontaneously aborting X startup during Linux boot process
>
> Hello,
>
> I broke my X (again) trying to install a graphics device driver on my
> Vostro 1000, so now I don't have video and the keyboard does not respond.
>
audio
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:06:31
To:
Subject: Spontaneously aborting X startup during Linux boot process
Hello,
I broke my X (again) trying to install a graphics device driver on my Vostro
1000, so now I don't have video and the keyboard does not respond.
I just need to be able to c
to do that before X
crashes and I lose the keyboard again... do you know of a way of changing
the runlevel to just console (no X) or aborting X startup during Linux boot
process (some key combination or anything).
I'm running Debian Lenny.
Thanks!
Pall Gone wrote on Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:38:14AM +0100:
> Hi Joey
>
> I'm experiencing exactly the same problem.
>
> > Now here is where it gets strange. Testing a workaround...
> Ha, pressing a key and it works. Funny...
> I've tried to delay it before, but in the background, where this doesn
Hi Joey
I'm experiencing exactly the same problem.
> Now here is where it gets strange. Testing a workaround...
Ha, pressing a key and it works. Funny...
I've tried to delay it before, but in the background, where this doesn't work :)
This seems to be a general Linux related problem as I am havi
Klistvud wrote on Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:49:47PM
+0100:
> On one of my Lenny installs, I had a somewhat similar (albeit by no
> means identical) problem that turned out to be due to some missing
> lines in my xorg.conf. The lines I had to add to xorg.conf in order
> to make things work as expect
Dne, 05. 02. 2010 05:26:59 je Joey Morris napisal(a):
On one of my Lenny installs, I had a somewhat similar (albeit by no
means identical) problem that turned out to be due to some missing
lines in my xorg.conf. The lines I had to add to xorg.conf in order to
make things work as expected we
#x27;t help.
Next, I found a few threads reporting similar problems and possible
workarounds. One suggested that numlockx was the culprit, which
sounded promising because I had recently installed numlockx.
Unfortunately, though, uninstalling it didn't help.
Other posts pointed to xkbcomp. See this
On 02 Feb 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> >
> > Did you try running the xmodmap -e e stuff at the command line in an
> > xterm? That might give you a clearer idea of what is wrong.
>
> Yes, I've done that. In fact, since this problem started, the first
> thing I do after restarting X is to run the fol
Anthony Campbell wrote on Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at
08:35:29AM +:
> On 01 Feb 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> > Anthony Campbell wrote on Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at
> > 09:13:41AM +:
> > > On 31 Jan 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> > > > I start my X session with startx, and lately I've noticed that some
> >
On 01 Feb 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> Anthony Campbell wrote on Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at
> 09:13:41AM +:
> > On 31 Jan 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> > > I start my X session with startx, and lately I've noticed that some
> > > (but not all) of my .Xmodmap settings are being lost once my X session
> >
Anthony Campbell wrote on Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at
09:13:41AM +:
> On 31 Jan 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> > I start my X session with startx, and lately I've noticed that some
> > (but not all) of my .Xmodmap settings are being lost once my X session
> > is up. I think this behavior started sometim
On 31 Jan 2010, Joey Morris wrote:
> I start my X session with startx, and lately I've noticed that some
> (but not all) of my .Xmodmap settings are being lost once my X session
> is up. I think this behavior started sometime in the past month or two.
>
[snip]
I also use startx, with Icewm. I en
I start my X session with startx, and lately I've noticed that some
(but not all) of my .Xmodmap settings are being lost once my X session
is up. I think this behavior started sometime in the past month or two.
I'm using xmodmap to make Caps_Lock key a second Control_L. These are
the contents of m
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Try adding a line
>
> options i915 powersave=0
>
> to /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf. Does that help?
>
> Sven
I just disabled KMS entirely and that seemed to fix it. I filed a new
bug report since there didn't seem to be anything that quit
On 1/26/10, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-01-26 08:43 +0100, Joe Neal wrote:
>
> > I just rebooted my sid box for the first time in about a week to find
> > that my monitor goes into sleep mode following X startup.
> > Ctl-Alt-F1-F6 wakes it up and lets me log int
On 2010-01-26 08:43 +0100, Joe Neal wrote:
> I just rebooted my sid box for the first time in about a week to find
> that my monitor goes into sleep mode following X startup.
> Ctl-Alt-F1-F6 wakes it up and lets me log into a console. Ctl-Alt-F7
> puts it back to sleep.
Looks like
Howdy
I just rebooted my sid box for the first time in about a week to find
that my monitor goes into sleep mode following X startup.
Ctl-Alt-F1-F6 wakes it up and lets me log into a console. Ctl-Alt-F7
puts it back to sleep.
There are some segfaults in the X log related to input drivers, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 07:22:31AM +, Bob Cox wrote:
> n article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:30:35PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
> >> >| my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: c
n article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:30:35PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
>> >| my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
>>
>> BTW, is a keysever something that cuts keys? Sorry!! ;-)
> In this case, a key is a public
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:07:30PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:30:35PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
> > >| my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
> >
> > BTW, is a keysever something that cuts keys? Sorry!! ;-)
> In this case, a key is a public gpg key,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:30:35PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
> >| my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
>
> BTW, is a keysever something that cuts keys? Sorry!! ;-)
In this case, a key is a public gpg key, half of the public-pri
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:51PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
>> dmesg shows nothing relevant, there are a few errors in the Xorg and kdm
>> logs, but these do not *seem* to be related, BICBW.
>>
> I like to try using 'X -config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:51PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
> dmesg shows nothing relevant, there are a few errors in the Xorg and kdm
> logs, but these do not *seem* to be related, BICBW.
>
I like to try using 'X -configure' as a comparison to see if th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew M.A. Cater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than hand hacking config file values: run (as root)
>
> dexconf
>
> [Branden Robinson's X configure and auto-guessing hardware script]
>
> then
>
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg -plow
>
> [Which asks you the ques
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:51PM +, Bob Cox wrote:
> I have used Linux for several years, but always in CLI only mode. I
> have a Debian box running mail and webservers and also a couple of NSLU2
> 'slugs' running Armeb Debian. And they're all fine.
>
> Recently, however,I installed Etch w
I have used Linux for several years, but always in CLI only mode. I
have a Debian box running mail and webservers and also a couple of NSLU2
'slugs' running Armeb Debian. And they're all fine.
Recently, however,I installed Etch with the default desktop settings, on
a PC of reasonably modern spec
--- Matt Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to have boxes a, b and c boot straight to the
> gdm of box d. When a user logs out of a, b or c, they
> should once again be taken back to gdm of box d.
There are a number of ways to do this, XDMCP is one of them, but ssh -X is
preferred, and
--- Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt
Johnson said:
> > 3. Now I want to hack the X startup scripts to
> > *automatically* go to one machine's log in screen
> > (I'll call that machine the "application server").
> I
> > know
Debian is impressive. I'm using testing and I'm
very pleased with the ease and quality of the software
so far.
2. It's been a breeze to set up XDMCP through GDM.
Nice for a novice. I can "choose" to log on to the
machine configured to allow it.
3. Now I want to hack the X startu
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:14:34AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:58:32PM -0500, Jaime Herazo B. wrote:
>
> > Is there a standard debian place for stuff like this? like a
> > $HOME/.startup file or something like that? that isn't dependant on the
> > windowmanager? if
linux to other
> people so they all go "wow!" :)
>
> The problem is that i want to keep starting some stuff on X startup,
> like a messaging client, some monitoring stuff, and other things. But i
> wanna do it independently of the windowmanager chosen.
>
> Is ther
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:58:32PM -0500, Jaime Herazo B. wrote:
> Is there a standard debian place for stuff like this? like a
> $HOME/.startup file or something like that? that isn't dependant on the
> windowmanager? if not, what would be a good place to start looking for
> this?
.xsession shou
oblem is that i want to keep starting some stuff on X startup,
like a messaging client, some monitoring stuff, and other things. But i
wanna do it independently of the windowmanager chosen.
Is there a standard debian place for stuff like this? like a
$HOME/.startup file or something like that? that isn
p starting some stuff on X startup,
like a messaging client, some monitoring stuff, and other things. But i
wanna do it independently of the windowmanager chosen.
Is there a standard debian place for stuff like this? like a
$HOME/.startup file or something like that? that isn't dependant on t
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:22:12 -0400
Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey folks, my x setup at work functions perfectly -- clear, crisp, etc
> -- except that on startup, or when switching between x sessions or
> from console to an x session, there's a delay of close to a minute
> before th
Hey folks, my x setup at work functions perfectly -- clear, crisp, etc
-- except that on startup, or when switching between x sessions or
from console to an x session, there's a delay of close to a minute
before the monitor activiates (in between, it makes a couple of clicks
like it does on first
c/X11/XF86Config-4 but it may have caused
some X startup settings to get corrupted. Anwyay, next time I booted, it
went straight into Gnome, it wouldn't let me log in as root, only as me, a
user, and if logged out it presented the same login screen again. I
couldn't even shut dow
After installing woody on my home machine I've noticed severe delays in
X startup, specifically loading the window manager. I'm using blackbox
so the WM itself should not be an issue - I've ran this exact setup on
the machine in the past without problem. After looking the XFree8
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:17:22AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> [sorry for the broken thread - only saw John's message in the archives]
[fx: uses mutt's thread editing features to glue it back together]
> # apt-get remove xdm
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Th
[sorry for the broken thread - only saw John's message in the archives]
John Hasler writes:
>x-window-system is a dummy package which serves no purpose once the
>packages it depends on are installed. Remove it.
>Apt won't reinstall it if it has been removed.
Ah, thanks John. That's the key bi
* Bill Moseley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030206 20:02]:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > Frank's quite correct: there's no particular reason why xdm should be
> > reinstalled on upgrade, and you'll be told about it if for some bizarre
> > reason this is going to happen.
>
> Ah good, tha
David Turetsky wrote:
>
David Turetsky wrote:
>
[...]
> How do I abort the startup of x?
>
>
Kent West
>
> At the LILO: prompt, enter "linux single".
[...]
David Turetsky
>
> YES!!! Thank you. Now I can go on to experiment with corrections to
> my XF86Config file
[...]
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> Frank's quite correct: there's no particular reason why xdm should be
> reinstalled on upgrade, and you'll be told about it if for some bizarre
> reason this is going to happen.
Ah good, thanks for the clearing up what Frank was implying.
So if package a
Bill Moseley writes:
> I assume because x-window-system depends on xdm?
x-window-system is a dummy package which serves no purpose once the
packages it depends on are installed. Remove it.
> Or if xdm was updated in a apt-get dist-upgrade?
Apt won't reinstall it if it has been removed.
--
John
>>> David Turetsky wrote:
I finally have a partially working x configuration, but clearly my
keyboard is not being properly recognized, and my mouse is not being
recognized at all. I would like to stay at the command line prompt to
fix the config files, but my system automatical
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:16:16PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > > You can also probably remove the xdm package, but again I think it might
> > > also get reinstalled on update.
> >
> > W
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Turetsky wrote:
>
>My keyboard is dysfunctional under x so any remedy must be to trap
>the system at the command line before x windows starts. How can I do
>this?
Oh, sorry, I missed that point. Kent West's response to boot into single
user mode would be th
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > You can also probably remove the xdm package, but again I think it might
> > also get reinstalled on update.
>
> Why would it ?
Is that a rhetorical question?
I assume because x-window-
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Turetsky wrote:
I finally have a partially working x configuration, but clearly my
keyboard is not being properly recognized, and my mouse is not being
recognized at all. I would like to stay at the command line prompt to
fix the config files, but my system a
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> You can also probably remove the xdm package, but again I think it might
> also get reinstalled on update.
Why would it ?
Frank
> --
> Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:08:11 -0500, David Turetsky wrote:
[...] but my system automatically starts up gdm
How do I abort the startup of x?
>>> Julián Hernández Gómez:
update-rc.d -f gdm remove
>>> David Turetsky: Yes, but how do I get in to do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Turetsky wrote:
> I finally have a partially working x configuration, but clearly my
> keyboard is not being
>
> properly recognized, and my mouse is not being recognized at all. I
> would like to stay
>
> at the command line prompt to fix the config files, but my syst
David Turetsky wrote:
I finally have a partially working x configuration, but clearly my
keyboard is not being
properly recognized, and my mouse is not being recognized at all. I
would like to stay
at the command line prompt to fix the config files, but my system
automatically
starts up gdm
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:08:11 -0500, David Turetsky wrote:
[...]
> but my system automatically starts up gdm
>
>How do I abort the startup of x?
update-rc.d -f gdm remove
HTH
Julián Hernández Gómez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:08:11PM -0500, David Turetsky wrote:
> I finally have a partially working x configuration, but clearly my
> keyboard is not being
>
> properly recognized, and my mouse is not being recognized at all. I
> would like to stay
>
> at the command line prompt to fix the conf
I finally have a partially working x configuration, but
clearly my keyboard is not being
properly recognized, and my mouse is not being recognized at
all. I would like to stay
at the command line prompt to fix the config files, but my
system automatically
starts up gdm
How do I abo
ECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Drew Cohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: X startup & immediate shutdown (no errors)
>
>
> Can anyone please tell me why X shuts down on its own in the following
>
"Drew" == Drew Cohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Drew> Can anyone please tell me why X shuts down on its own in the
Drew> following situation? I want it to keep running continuously.
Drew> I have no window manager installed (don't need one), I've
Drew> got xserver-xfree86 inst
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan E Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: X startup & immediate shutdown (no errors)
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 11:53:12AM -0800, Charlie Re
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 11:53:12AM -0800, Charlie Reiman wrote:
> > Can anyone please tell me why X shuts down on its own in the following
> > situation? I want it to keep running continuously.
> >
> > I have no window manager installed (don't need one), I've got
> > xserver-xfree86 installed, I ca
> -Original Message-
> From: Drew Cohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: X startup & immediate shutdown (no errors)
>
>
> Can anyone please tell me why X shuts down on its own in the foll
Can anyone please tell me why X shuts down on its own in the following
situation? I want it to keep running continuously.
I have no window manager installed (don't need one), I've got
xserver-xfree86 installed, I can use startx fine. So I type startx, X
comes up, reads my .xsession file:
#
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:30:28PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> There is ooqstart-gnome, which on my system sometimes keeps Gnome from
> starting (ack!), but it is essentially the concept that is being asked
> for
Also, have a look at this document, which explains the available command
line param
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 19:19, Edward Guldemond wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:07:31PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> > Failing any built-in, background server type functionality, would
> > "cat > /dev/null &" in my .xinitrc be of any
> > /real/ use?
>
> >From a theoretical standpoint, not
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:07:31PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Failing any built-in, background server type functionality, would
> "cat > /dev/null &" in my .xinitrc be of any
> /real/ use?
From a theoretical standpoint, not really. It's not loading the
binary from disk that makes loading
Hi all -
anyone got any hints on preloading Openoffice.org when X starts, sort of
like the galeon -s option ... ?
It's great, n'all, but a bit of a pig to start on my 550 K6-3!
Failing any built-in, background server type functionality, would
"cat > /dev/null &" in my .xinitrc be of any
/real/
This one time, at band camp, Lance Hoffmeyer said:
> I don't think using ~/.Xsession will work with kdm. I put the items
> in ~/.Xsession and things worked fine with startx. Nothing happens
> when I start kdm. There is a /etc/kde2/kdm/Xsession file and I put a
> line in it to see if the program
I don't think using ~/.Xsession will work with kdm.
I put the items in ~/.Xsession and things worked fine
with startx. Nothing happens when I start kdm.
There is a /etc/kde2/kdm/Xsession file and I put
a line in it to see if the program would start. Still
no luck. Any ideas?
Lance
>
> On
On Fri Oct 25, 2002 at 06:15:52PM -0500, the boisterous
Lance Hoffmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote to me:
> Does it matter if I am running a startup manager like
> KDM?
I'm not aware of this, but maybe man Xsession will give you some hints.
Oh, and yes, I forgot to reply to debian-user, so here is
I have some programs I wish to run when
X starts up. I tried putting these in
my .xinitrc but I guess that is the
wrong place since they are not being
run. Where do I need to put these?
I would rather not put them in autostart
because I want them to be run no matter
which window manager I am
Billy Bump wrote:
ok the touch pad in not cracked but it does not work in any configuration
windows98, linux, mandrake kde. It quit and I have not fixed it yet. It
has been disabled in the cmos to stop the computer from looking for it
because it draws error messages when booting in dos for wind
Billy Bump wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent West [mailto:westk@;acu.edu]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: x startup
>
> ok the touch pad in not cracked but it does not work in any configuration
> windows9
question i'm not sure
-Original Message-
From: Vineet Kumar [mailto:debian-user@;virtual.doorstop.net]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: x startup
* Billy Bump ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021021 12:28]:
> I have just completed installing debian3.0 on m
Billy Bump wrote:
The laptop is a gateway 2300 p200 with neomagic video card and tft display
and a 4.1 gb harddrive. The touch pad does not work at all i have been
working to fix it but is broken now.
That doesn't quite answer Vineet's question. Is the touch pad physically
broken (cracks, smo
* Billy Bump ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021021 12:28]:
> I have just completed installing debian3.0 on my laptop. The touchpad does
> not work so i use a microsoft usb trackball. this trackball worked in my
> previous linux mandrake install. When i try to startx it fails and most of
> the error messag
I have just completed installing debian3.0 on my laptop. The touchpad does
not work so i use a microsoft usb trackball. this trackball worked in my
previous linux mandrake install. When i try to startx it fails and most of
the error messages are about the mouse not being present. anybody have a
1/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start file, and
> > put in the line
> >
> > exec /bin/sh /home/msoulier/.xsession
> >
> > It started up fine. So, something's wrong with
> > the X startup scripts, and
> > the $REALSTARTUP variable isn't ri
stating
> something like
>
> /usr/bin/ssh-agent sh /home/msoulier/.xsession: no
> such file or directory
>
> I just hacked the
> /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start file, and
> put in the line
>
> exec /bin/sh /home/msoulier/.xsession
>
>
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 12:23:41AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> So, I just upgraded, and suddenly X wouldn't startup anymore.
Look in the list archives. (It might be easier to find in the debian-x
archives.)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
put in the line
exec /bin/sh /home/msoulier/.xsession
It started up fine. So, something's wrong with the X startup scripts, and
the $REALSTARTUP variable isn't right, apparently.
I'll log the bug report, but watch out on your next upgrade.
Mike
--
M
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:10:30PM -0600, ray p wrote:
> The newest drivers work fine here and fix the problem you are having.
thanks. I will then have to try those new drivers anyway :)
--
Alex Suzuki ..:.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..:.. http://www.cynox.ch
GEEK code: GCS d+(-) s a--- C+++ UL
lex Suzuki | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cynox.ch
> > To send me an email, remove NOSPAM from the above address
> >
> G'day Alex,
>
> I'm using XFree 4.03, Nvdriver + GLX 0.9.769-1, kernel 2.4.4's
> AGP support, on a celeron 700 + 196 Mg RAM and have
info
> Alex
> --
> Alex Suzuki | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cynox.ch
> To send me an email, remove NOSPAM from the above address
>
G'day Alex,
I'm using XFree 4.03, Nvdriver + GLX 0.9.769-1, kernel 2.4.4's
AGP support, on a celeron 700 + 196 Mg RAM and have t
Hello friends,
This is already bothering me for a while, but I never really
cared. But now I just want it fixed.
The problem: I use X 4.0.3 as in testing, and the Nvidia kernel
and GLX drivers, I'm _not_ using the newest ones, because I
heard that there are problems with them.
When I start X with
I upgraded two machines to woody/testing a couple of days ago, starting from
the libranet 1.9.1 distribution. One seems fine; one
doesn't.
The problem is that regardless of the user logging in, if Windowmaker or
gnome is selected as the default window manager, it flashes up on the screen,
then
on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 06:42:29PM -0800, Erik Steffl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Christian Pernegger wrote:
> > After an /etc/init.d/xdm start nothing happens for 30-40 seconds, only
> > then X starts and the gdm login prompt pops up. startx works instantly,
> > no delay if I use gdm.
>
> grep
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
