On Wed, 1 May 2013 00:04:48 +0200,
Jean-Marc wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>
>I followed you discussions about MUAs and I have some questions about
>the same.
>
>Running a Debian Testing, I use Sylpheed (3.2.0) and Claws-mail
>(3.8.1), the second being a fork of the first one if I u
Hi everybody,
I followed you discussions about MUAs and I have some questions about the same.
Running a Debian Testing, I use Sylpheed (3.2.0) and Claws-mail (3.8.1), the
second being a fork of the first one if I understand everything.
They are difficult to disentangle but I have to say I
On 11-06-23 06:39 PM, lee wrote:
Frank McCormick writes:
Just finished Googling the subject but there doesn't seem to be any
easy way to get mail from Sylpheed into Thunderbird. Does anyone have
suggestions?
, [ http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/doc/faq/en/sylpheed-faq-1.html#d0e177 ]
|
Frank McCormick writes:
> Just finished Googling the subject but there doesn't seem to be any
> easy way to get mail from Sylpheed into Thunderbird. Does anyone have
> suggestions?
, [ http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/doc/faq/en/sylpheed-faq-1.html#d0e177 ]
| Mails are stored in t
Just finished Googling the subject but there doesn't seem to be any easy
way to get mail
from Sylpheed into Thunderbird.
Does anyone have suggestions?
Thanks
Frank McCormick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
ll learn to
> > write my own. I'm glad I asked, though. Thanks.
>
> I'm a Sylpheed fan, and not a particularly expert one, and I control it
> almost exclusively via keyboard. You can bind custom key combos to
> functions using the standard GTK method.
>
I just in
+0200
> > Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying
> > > > Sylpheed started to
M -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > >
> > > Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying
> > > Sylpheed started to segfault everytime I sent out mail. I have it
> > > setup to put a copy into the "sent" folder so each time it tried
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:49:30 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> > Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying
> > S
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying Sylpheed
> started to segfault everytime I sent out mail. I have it setup to put a
> copy into the "sent" folder so each time it tried it c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying Sylpheed
started to segfault everytime I sent out mail. I have it setup to put a
copy into the "sent" folder so each time it tried it crashed.
Any ideas ?
Cheers
Frank
; > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wrote:
> > > > I'm using thread view (...) and sorting by date.
> > > > When I delete a message, Sylpheed jumps to the next message by date,
> > > > not to what I want, the next message in the current th
ng by date.
> > > When I delete a message, Sylpheed jumps to the next message by date,
> > > not to what I want, the next message in the current thread.
> > > Is there any way to change this?
> >
> > Yes, sorting should be switched off: View > Sort > Do
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:26:41 +0200
Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wrote:
> > I'm using thread view (...) and sorting by date.
> > When I delete a message, Sylpheed jumps to the next message by date,
> > not
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wrote:
> I'm using thread view (...) and sorting by date.
> When I delete a message, Sylpheed jumps to the next message by date,
> not to what I want, the next message in the current thread.
> Is there any way to change this?
Yes,
Hi,
[I posted this on the Sylpheed mailing list but received no response,
so I'm trying here.]
Please excuse this question if I've missed some obvious menu setting or
piece of documentation. I'm using thread view, separate message view
and sorting by date. When I delete a me
ot;s. keeling"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My .sig explicitly says not to Cc: me, and that's ignored too.
> > > > Why am
> > >
> > > Hhhm, Sylpheed-Claws is automatically adding the Reply-To:
> >
tly says not to Cc: me, and that's ignored too.
> > > Why am
> >
> > Hhhm, Sylpheed-Claws is automatically adding the Reply-To: address
> > to the Cc:. Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought this was the purpose of
> > the Reply-To: header and I trusted Sylpheed to ha
Hi,
Using Sylpheed Claws GTK2 on an up-to-date Etch system:
$ dpkg -l sylpheed* | grep ^ii
ii sylpheed-claws-gtk2 2.6.0-1Fast,
lightweight and user-friendly GTK2 bas ii
sylpheed-claws-gtk2-doc 2.6.0-1User documentation
for Sylpheed-Claws GTK2 m
-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can Sylpheed access MS-Exchange
On 11/2/06, Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you've been using Evolution to access an Exchange server, then
> > > Outlook Web Access is enabled on the server, in which case you c
On 11/2/06, Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you've been using Evolution to access an Exchange server, then
> > Outlook Web Access is enabled on the server, in which case you can
> > use a web browser for the same purpose.
>
> How do access it with the web browser?
>
>
Depends on h
:37 +0200
> > > "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if
> > > > Sylpheed can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
&
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> *I* have absolutely *no* say as to whether my company uses Exchange
> or not.
I know the feeling. :-(
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/06 10:13, George Borisov wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> But only for email. Not other useful things like calendar/meeting
>> support.
>
> Indeed and if you don't like that, don't use such a proprietary
> system. ;-)
*I* have absolutely *no*
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> But only for email. Not other useful things like calendar/meeting
> support.
Indeed and if you don't like that, don't use such a proprietary
system. ;-)
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/06 04:18, George Borisov wrote:
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if Sylpheed
>> can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
>
>
pang Lekhonkhobe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/2/2006 5:53 AM
To: Liam O'Toole
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can Sylpheed access MS-Exchange
On 11/2/06, Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:59:37 +0200
> "Tshepang Lekhonk
>
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if
> > > Sylpheed can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > If you've been using Evolution to access an Exchange server,
On 11/2/06, Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:59:37 +0200
"Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if Sylpheed
> can access MS-Exchange accounts. Any
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if Sylpheed
> can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
If your Exchange server supports IMAP then you can use pretty
much any client. If it doesn't then as far as I kno
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:59:37 +0200
"Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if Sylpheed
> can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
>
>
If you've been using Evo
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if Sylpheed
can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
The last time I looked into GUI mail clients, the popular ones with
active support were Thunderbird, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Balsa.
Hi,
I'm looking for an alternative to Evolution, and wonder if Sylpheed
can access MS-Exchange accounts. Anything else that does?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
i finally as able to set up my personal mailserver and now i have to
migrate 2 mailboxes from the local storage to the server.
the current format is MH from sylpheed-claws which should be quite
similar to the internal cyrus storage format and i&#
ter ALL your
> tiles to suit...
>
> A
I'd wonder about How Sypheed or Sylpheed-claws would work with that
since they are paned programs, themselves.
Even though you can separate the three panes, each would take up one of
the tiles on your WM. This might be a little too busy.
C
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:35:23 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > does it behave well in a tiled WM?
> > >
> > > A
> >
> > I don't know what you mean. I use IceWM and have no issues whatsoever.
>
> Well, now I'm repeating myself, but I've fallen in love with WMII
Sorry
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:05:35PM -0700, Michael M. wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >
> >Well, now I'm repeating myself, but I've fallen in love with WMII
> >lately and it dynamically sizes windows based on how many windows are
> >open. The problem is some apps are slightly broken vis
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Well, now I'm repeating myself, but I've fallen in love with WMII
lately and it dynamically sizes windows based on how many windows are
open. The problem is some apps are slightly broken vis a vis some of
the protocols, or they do lots of window rezising and respawn
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:04:41PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > WMII is a dynamic windowmanager that defaults to a "tiled" setup. Each
> > window occupies a set area of the screen which is adjusted depending
> > on how many windows you open. The windows don't overlap,
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> WMII is a dynamic windowmanager that defaults to a "tiled" setup. Each
> window occupies a set area of the screen which is adjusted depending
> on how many windows you open. The windows don't overlap, they are laid
> out on the screen like tiles would be on a floor.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:14:49AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > You should give
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable and it
> > has never crashed on me. The on
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:34:31AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > You should give
08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable
> > > > and it has never crashed on me. The only strange thing I'm
> > > > noticing is that sometimes mail I just read is marked as un
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:34:31 -0700 Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > > You should give Sylpheed-Cl
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable and it
> > has never crashed on me. The on
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable and it
> has never crashed on me. The only strange thing I'm noticing is that
> sometimes mail I just read is marked as unread again, p
7;s the benefit of -claws, or the difference?
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > > Ron Johnson, Jr.
> > > Jefferson, LA USA
> > >
> >
> > Now therein lies a very good question. I have never used sylpheed,
> >
-
> > Ron Johnson, Jr.
> > Jefferson, LA USA
> >
>
> Now therein lies a very good question. I have never used sylpheed,
> always SC. It had more features from the beginning, and was trying
> different approaches to things.
fwiw, I just dumped sylpheed the other day as I got t
; > > solved
> > > > > many of the problems. I am answering my own questions here for the
> > > > > sake of
> > > > > archives.
> > > >
> > > > Also for sake of archives I would like to defend my Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2
> > &g
ju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Frank. I finally made the move and am happy with the change. I
> > > > solved
> > > > many of the problems. I am answering my own questions here for the sake
> > > > of
inally made the move and am happy with the change. I
> > > solved
> > > many of the problems. I am answering my own questions here for the sake of
> > > archives.
> >
> > Also for sake of archives I would like to defend my Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2
>
> syl
own questions here for the sake of
> > archives.
>
> Also for sake of archives I would like to defend my Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2
sylpheed is at v2.2.4-1, but sylpheed-claws-gtk2 is still back at
v2.1.0-1. What is the con
Not sure what the problem was.
I did the windos move. re-install debian etch, and now it works like a
champ.
--
Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux User #96112
ICQ#: AIM#: YAHOO:
18002350 mailman452 mailman42_5
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
0-2
> >
> > Sylphhed-claws-gtk is my preferred email client. Yet it seems while in
> > hospital it was broken.
> >
> > Everything is installed, yet when I run SC from within gdb, I get this
> > error message;
> >
> > gdb /usr/bin/sylpheed-claws-gtk2
> &
was broken.
>
> Everything is installed, yet when I run SC from within gdb, I get this
> error message;
>
> gdb /usr/bin/sylpheed-claws-gtk2
> GNU gdb 6.4-debian
> Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Licens
you may use strace command to find which objects this program looks for
and cannot find.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:57:35 -0800
"Rodney D. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian etch & SC-gtk 1.9.100-2
Same
> any ideas or should I submit a bug report?
For what it's worth, I'm writing this email in the same version of sylpheed on
the same distro :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
debian etch & SC-gtk 1.9.100-2
Sylphhed-claws-gtk is my preferred email client. Yet it seems while in
hospital it was broken.
Everything is installed, yet when I run SC from within gdb, I get this
error message;
gdb /usr/bin/sylpheed-claws-gtk2
Hi,
i'm in trouble; what means exactly and the difference between :
deb http://sylpheed-claws.sourceforge.net/debian/ unstable main
deb http://sylpheed-claws.sourceforge.net/debian/ unstable installed
??
Thanks for your help
mess-mate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I'm using Sylpheed-0.9.7 on Sarge. Before posting I did do some googling, but
of no luck.
How do we decrypt an encrypted email message in Sylpheed. I mean, there's no option I
see that asks for "Enter your pa
On Friday February 13 at 01:48pm
Marcio Merlone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know where can I find a sylpheed-claws newer than 0.8.2?
> I googled, searched at apt-get.org and backports.org and found none.
>
> For the first time I have nothing hand-compiled
Hello all,
Does anybody know where can I find a sylpheed-claws newer than 0.8.2? I
googled, searched at apt-get.org and backports.org and found none.
For the first time I have nothing hand-compiled on my workstation,
thanks to Debian. I just can't find a recent sylpheed-claws package...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:20:58 -0500
Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday December 13 at 04:01am
> Serge Gebhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > somehow I just can't get sylpheed-claws to send my outgoing mail. I
> > use IMAP for all m
On Saturday December 13 at 04:01am
Serge Gebhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> somehow I just can't get sylpheed-claws to send my outgoing mail. I
> use IMAP for all my mailboxes and when I click the "send" button it
> just says "Could no
Hi list,
somehow I just can't get sylpheed-claws to send my outgoing mail. I use
IMAP for all my mailboxes and when I click the "send" button it just
says "Could not queue message". On the console it reads
"sylpheed-warning: can't find queue folder".
I
Hello,
I've been using sylpheed-claws/unstable (together with
sylpheed-claws-plugins/unstable and dependants) VERY happily on my
testing system for a while now.
Recently I caused some mess on my system and had to reinstall it
afterwards ... Linux gives you the power to screw up whatever you
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:51:53AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote:
> Also, I know there's a way to keep copies of all recieved mail in one
> folder using procmail. Anyone know what lines I need to add to
> procmailrc for this?
I think it would be:
:0 c
backup_directory
For two very useful sources of in
uture. In fact this message probably has it too. How do I remove
that?
I've got mail coming in from several accounts, and not all have their
own folders (so I cant set folder reply/compose defaults). How do I get
sylpheed, or mutt, or anything to use the To address as the from
address? I under
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:16:39AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote:
> Its a repeated question, I know, but after considerable digging on
> google, I still haven't been able to figure out the best way to be able
> to use sylpheed (claws) and mutt together. There's just way too much
>
Its a repeated question, I know, but after considerable digging on
google, I still haven't been able to figure out the best way to be able
to use sylpheed (claws) and mutt together. There's just way too much
information out there!! If anyone knows of a good document that can help
me s
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:29:31 -0400
Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must say that I'm beginning to like sylpheed. (There must be > something wrong
> with me ;-) )
> I would only like to change the fonts used to display the received > mail subjects
> bu
; > don't have access to the mail server I saw the sylpheed-claws mail client
> > > that have a plug-in for spamassassin and other to use one antivirus.
> > > Have someone tried it?
> > >
> > >
> > Didn't work for me
>
> Why it didn't
m for people like me
> > that
> > > don't have access to the mail server I saw the sylpheed-claws mail
client
> > > that have a plug-in for spamassassin and other to use one antivirus.
> > > Have someone tried it?
> > >
> > >
> > Didn't
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:40:46 -0300
klaus imgrund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 04 October 2003 15:58, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> > Looking for the easiest solution for the spam problem for people like me
> that
> > don't have access to the mail server I saw t
On Saturday 04 October 2003 15:58, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> Looking for the easiest solution for the spam problem for people like me
that
> don't have access to the mail server I saw the sylpheed-claws mail client
> that have a plug-in for spamassassin and other to use one ant
Looking for the easiest solution for the spam problem for people like me that
don't have access to the mail server I saw the sylpheed-claws mail client
that have a plug-in for spamassassin and other to use one antivirus.
Have someone tried it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Roy Pluschke wrote:
>
> Sylpheed doen't have spell checking -- use sylpheed-claws instead they call it
> a bleeding edge version but I have always found it stable enough for day to
> day use.
>
> Hope this helps
> R. Pluschke
Thanks Roy, that will do fine. I never
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:11:28 +0800
Russ Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been through both the FAQ and the sylpheed-doc manual and can't
> even find a mention of spellchecking anywhere.
While not an ideally simple solution, you can probably define an Action
to run t
On August 21, 2003 10:11 pm, Russ Pitman wrote:
> I tried for several times to sub to the sylpheed mail list to ask this but
> no go so far, probably my error, however perhaps someone using sylpheed can
> help.
>
> Briefly I installed a debian woody system for a elderly fri
I tried for several times to sub to the sylpheed mail list to ask this but
no go so far, probably my error, however perhaps someone using sylpheed can
help.
Briefly I installed a debian woody system for a elderly friend to use as a
browser and email and 'learn about computers'.
He
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:14:41 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > it's looking for a file called gtk-config, which appears NOT to be
> > installed;
>
> You will also need libgtk1.2-dev.
Yep. After I tinkered with alot of things using "apt-get install"
Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> it's looking for a file called gtk-config, which appears NOT to be
> installed;
You will also need libgtk1.2-dev.
--
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philosophy, when superficially studied, excites doubt; when thoroughly
explored, it dispels it. - Francis Bacon
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:28:12 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:32:27PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
> > Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > > > In attempting to ./configure ,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:32:27PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
> Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > > latest glibc;
> > > checking for GLIB - versi
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > latest glibc;
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
>
> glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of t
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > latest glibc;
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
>
> glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of t
Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> latest glibc;
> checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of the GNU C Library,
packaged as libc6. glib is a library used by GTK and Gnome apps. You
I'm running Debian "sarge".
I'm trying to get sylpheed-claws installed, the latest & greatest
version.
In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
latest glibc;
checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
*** The glib-config script installed
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:27:25 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I see merit in simply saying that binary packages
> cannot be automatically removed to allow for an upgrade of a doc
> package. I dislike the idea of having different rules for doc
> packages.
To the extent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I understand that apt doesn't know anything about packages other than
> what it't told about dependencies and conflicts.
>
> Let's get to the big picture -- is the doc there to support the use of
> the binary, or is the binary there to support the use of the doc?
The d
guessing, but I would guess that sylpheed-doc
and old sylpheed really do conflict and it isn't just a question of
keeping them in sync[ie they both contain the same file].
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I understand that apt doesn't know anything about packages other than
what it't told about dependencies and conflicts.
Let's get to the big picture -- is the doc there to support the use of
the binary, or is the binary there to support the use of the doc?
If we can agree that the binary is primar
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:57:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:21:34 +
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure; not one that filing's going to particularly help, though ...
>
> If you're saying the maintainer will ignore it, I guess that's possible.
No,
you are
assuming too much knowledge on apt's part. It probably has no idea that
sylpheed and sylpheed-doc are related. It knows about declared
dependencies and conflicts, and that's it. So if sylpheed-doc_X
conflicts with sylpheed_X-1, that's no different than libfoo-c102
conflicti
simply
> refuse to install a doc package when a conflicting binary package is
> already installed? In the latter case, your complaint is really with
> apt, not with sylpheed or sylpheed-doc. I don't know if apt treats doc
> packages differently from binary ones, and I don'
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:21:34 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure; not one that filing's going to particularly help, though ...
If you're saying the maintainer will ignore it, I guess that's possible.
But if the maintainer is in the habit of specifying dependencies this
way, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It may resolve itself when sylpheed moves into testing, but it's still a
> bug.
>
> Installing a doc package shouldn't cause removal of a binary package,
> even if the binary package an older version.
Does Debian policy say anything abo
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 04:56:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:30:44 -0800
> Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > version of sylpheed itself. Unstable has a newer sylpheed that is
> > compatible with sylpheed-doc, but it hasn't be
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:30:44 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> version of sylpheed itself. Unstable has a newer sylpheed that is
> compatible with sylpheed-doc, but it hasn't been moved into testing
> yet. That's what's causing your problem.
>
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
