On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:31:46 -0800 Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you objecting to the idea that a doc package and a binary package > can conflict simply because the documentation is for a different > version of the program? Or are you suggesting that apt should simply > refuse to install a doc package when a conflicting binary package is > already installed? In the latter case, your complaint is really with > apt, not with sylpheed or sylpheed-doc. I don't know if apt treats doc > packages differently from binary ones, and I don't see why it should. > It seems like needless complexity in a program that is quite complex > enough already. I'm saying there are probably several ways to resolve this, but throwing out a binary (without an available upgrade) because the doc package for a later release is available is not one of them. Kevin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
