On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:10:07AM EST, Aioanei Rares wrote:
[..]
>Elinks has tabs and supports ssl and javascript.
tabs - yes
frames support - yes
ssl support - yes.. afaik
javascript support - very patchy afaik
If you can post a screenshot of the google advanced search pa
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:26:52 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory?
>
> midori?
It looks good, but it crashed after 3 minutes. I'll try it some more,
maybe that was just bad luck ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andrei Popescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu,13.Nov.08, 02:33:25, lee wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
>> same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
>
> midori?
>
> Regards,
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Thu,13.Nov.08, 02:33:25, lee wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
> > same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
>
> midori?
>
> Regard
On Thu,13.Nov.08, 02:33:25, lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
> same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
midori?
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:33:25AM -0600, lee wrote:
> what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
> same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
>
>
> USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
> lee 24253 3.0 3
On Thu, 2008.11.13, 318, lee wrote:
> what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory?
You might want to check out midori (available in Sid), though I don't think it
is really ready for use yet. I hope to switch to midori eventually and leave
behind all the Gecko junk for webkits.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:59 AM, lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Dillo didn't work, I tried it. It's not even possible to get the fonts
> to a readable size ... And links2 shows text only in a totally messed
> up display, same as lynx.
For dillo, you can change the font size using a dillor
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:34:07 -0600
"elijah rutschman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dillo or links2 might be what you are looking for. They are both
> low-memory footprint, graphical web-browsers. I've used Dillo on a
> NetBSD machine that only had 16mb of RAM and it ran just fine.
Dillo didn't
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:33 AM, lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, all these browsers use a lot of memory. I've been using Mozilla
> (iceape) for years and lately stuck to it only because I needed the
> built-in mail client. Now I have replaced the mail client with claws,
> and I'm cur
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:33:25AM -0600, lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
> same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
>
>
> USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
> lee 2
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:33:25 +0800, lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
lee 24
Hi,
what's a good web browser that doesn't need so much memory? I have the
same group of tabs open in each browser to compare memory useage:
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
lee 24253 3.0 3.7 138688 77252 tty1 Sl 01:14 0:06 iceape-bin
lee
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:29 AM +0100, Karsten Heymann
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * Seneca Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020201 11:05]:
> > > David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a very good reason for not wanting to install GNOME or another
> > >
* Rob Mahurin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 06:20:18PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:58:06 -0800, "Karsten M. Self"
> > wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > It's not for older/slower boxen though. I'd recommend *NO LESS* than a
> > > PII-233, and think
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 06:20:18PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:58:06 -0800, "Karsten M. Self"
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > It's not for older/slower boxen though. I'd recommend *NO LESS* than a
> > PII-233, and think you'll be happier with a PIII-600+ CPU. For memory,
> > 1
* Karsten M. Self spake thus:
> I'll also strongly plug Galeon. If you're not violently allergic to
> GNOME libs (and yes, it does suck in a whole mess of them, along with
> all of Mozilla), it's an ass-kicking browser.
Just out of curiosity:
> use (I can easily get over 100 tabs/windows open)
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:58:06 -0800, "Karsten M. Self"
wrote:
[snip]
> It's not for older/slower boxen though. I'd recommend *NO LESS* than a
> PII-233, and think you'll be happier with a PIII-600+ CPU. For memory,
> 128 MiB minimum, 256 strongly recommended. Particularly under intensive
> use
on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:29 AM +0100, Karsten Heymann ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> * Seneca Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020201 11:05]:
> > David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a very good reason for not wanting to install GNOME or another
> > desktop manager. I tried GNOME ab
Karsten Heymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, galeon depends on the gnome libs installed, but it does not depend
> on gnome running. If your disk space is not a problem, you could try it
> out. Apart from that, w3m and links are very cool too (and don't forget
> netcat :-))
I use w3m, but d
* Seneca Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020201 11:05]:
> David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a very good reason for not wanting to install GNOME or another
> desktop manager. I tried GNOME about a month ago, and it's performance
> was similar to that of my 286 when windows 3.0 was ins
On Thursday 31 January 2002 07:25 pm, csj wrote:
[snip]
>
> Your earlier post said "small browser (albeit non-free) called xbrowse."
> Are there any religious reasons why the Artistic License is considered
> non-free?
i actually meant to say non-deb. the coffee just isn't kicking in today.
ben
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:43:11 -0800
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2002 06:46 pm, csj wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > http://www.browsex.com/
> >
> > And like the real thing it's free (Artistic License). Says the site:
> > "BrowseX has been written primarily in C and Tcl and clearl
On 31 Jan 2002 20:52:19 -0500
David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 20:44, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> > I have a small system (100MHz pentium, 900M /usr, 1024K video ram) that I
> > want to access the internet on. A problem that I have is that when the
> > network that I u
On Thursday 31 January 2002 06:46 pm, csj wrote:
[snip]
>
> http://www.browsex.com/
>
> And like the real thing it's free (Artistic License). Says the site:
> "BrowseX has been written primarily in C and Tcl and clearly
> demonstrates that Linux applications can indeed bridge to Windows." The
> cla
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:52:15 -0500
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:44:01 -0500
> > So I was wondering about if there are any good, _small_ browsers like
> > that. I tried mozilla on my system, and I had enough time to eat lunch
> > while it started up (I have sin
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 08:44:01PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
| I have a small system (100MHz pentium, 900M /usr, 1024K video ram) that I
| want to access the internet on.
'links' is real small and lightweight
| A problem that I have is that when the
| network that I use was set up, the gate
There's always hotjava.
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 17:44, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> I have a small system (100MHz pentium, 900M /usr, 1024K video ram) that I
> want to access the internet on. A problem that I have is that when the
> network that I use was set up, the gateway software that was decided
On Thursday 31 January 2002 05:52 pm, David Moore wrote:
[snip]
>
> Try Opera. It's non-free, but it seems like what you want. I personally
> would prefer Galeon, but that won't work if you don't want to install
> GNOME.
there's a small browser (albeit non-free) called xbrowse that won't force you
David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 20:44, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> > I have a small system (100MHz pentium, 900M /usr, 1024K video ram) that
I
> > want to access the internet on. A problem that I have is that when the
> > network that I use was set up, the gateway soft
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 20:44, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> I have a small system (100MHz pentium, 900M /usr, 1024K video ram) that I
> want to access the internet on. A problem that I have is that when the
> network that I use was set up, the gateway software that was decided upon
> requires the brows
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:44:01 -0500
> So I was wondering about if there are any good, _small_ browsers like
> that. I tried mozilla on my system, and I had enough time to eat lunch
> while it started up (I have since removed mozilla).
>
> I have X4 installed and working, but I don't want to install
I have a small system (100MHz pentium, 900M /usr, 1024K video ram) that I
want to access the internet on. A problem that I have is that when the
network that I use was set up, the gateway software that was decided upon
requires the browsers used to have java support. I can't get away from it, I
nee
33 matches
Mail list logo
