On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:43:11 -0800 ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 31 January 2002 06:46 pm, csj wrote: > [snip] > > > > http://www.browsex.com/ > > > > And like the real thing it's free (Artistic License). Says the site: > > "BrowseX has been written primarily in C and Tcl and clearly > > demonstrates that Linux applications can indeed bridge to Windows." The > > claim is also worth noting: "lightweight: starting at 3.8 Meg and works > > on a 12M/386 (in X!)." > > that's what i meant when i mumbled about xbrowser or some such. > > ben
Your earlier post said "small browser (albeit non-free) called xbrowse." Are there any religious reasons why the Artistic License is considered non-free? -- Humanity's future is in the stars: support a manned mission to Mars! http://www.thinkmars.net/petition/addpetition.html
