Re: New newbieDoc articles

2004-06-14 Thread Chris Lale
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 19:08, Chris Lale wrote: > Today I have committed some new and changed files to CVS. Will someone > OK them and add links to the newbieDoc home page, or can I do that > myself? Can anyone link these articles to the newbieDoc homepage, or tell me how to do it? Pe

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Tom
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 04:51:22AM +, Pigeon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:58:15PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > > > apt-cache sea

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Pigeon
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:58:15PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > > newbiedoc > > > > I thou

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Hoyt Bailey
- Original Message - From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 12:27 Subject: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working] > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > apt-cach

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Wayne Topa
Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > newbiedoc > > I thought I'd read newbiedoc. The read a bit about runlevels (since I > didn't kno

newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Tom
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > newbiedoc I thought I'd read newbiedoc. The read a bit about runlevels (since I didn't know about them), the first thing I read is incorrect: file:///home/tom/usr/share/doc/ne

Re: New "Creating Custom Kernels" newbiedoc

2003-03-26 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:43:32 -0500 (EST) > Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you for your feedback. > > > > Just one more. I think that you need tk*-dev in section 2.

re: New "Creating Custom Kernels" newbiedoc

2003-03-26 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank you for your feedback. > > >1) The pcmcia option merits special mention, since by default it is > >turned on (at least for the kernels I have used) and you explicitly > >need to turn it off if you aren't using it, otherwise the compilation > >

re: New "Creating Custom Kernels" newbiedoc

2003-03-26 Thread Faheem Mitha
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Thank you for your feedback. Just one more. I think that you need tk*-dev in section 2.2, not just tk*, to do "make xconfig", since this amounts to doing a compilation. Faheem -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: New "Creating Custom Kernels" newbiedoc

2003-03-25 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:38:55 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A new version of "Creating Custom Kernels With Debian's Kernel-Package System" > is available at: > > http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html > > I'm interested in feedback, especially about mistak

New "Creating Custom Kernels" newbiedoc

2003-03-25 Thread kjmck
A new version of "Creating Custom Kernels With Debian's Kernel-Package System" is available at: http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html I'm interested in feedback, especially about mistakes or useability issues. Thank you, Kevin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[RFC] Newbiedoc: setting up new hardware devices

2002-02-09 Thread Romain Lerallut
Greetings, I've worked for quite some time on a guide on how to install/configure new hardware. (highly x86-centric) http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/tutorials/hardware/index-hardware.html The aim of this doc would be to help somebody who's familiar with the basics of Linuxing configure some not

Re: OT // Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] Re: cvs server saga -- continued

2001-07-10 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:23:23PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:10:15PM -0400, D-Man wrote: > > Maybe just "touch syslog damon.log"? > > i did that, but it didn't seem to be all that was needed. > i got 'round to "telinit 1" and then falling through back to > runlevel

OT // Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] Re: cvs server saga -- continued

2001-07-08 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:10:15PM -0400, D-Man wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 09:58:29PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > > | now that i've renamed the huge logfiles (syslog and > | daemon.log among them) i've restarted various servers > | (mysql, postgresql, apache) but how to i re-es

Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] limiting "ps" command on every user..

2001-07-03 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:48:53AM +0800, louiem+ wrote: > > is it possible to limit the "ps ax"/etc.. ? commands on every user? > i mean, example i have the id/user "luwi" > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ps ax > > > it will only show the process which i ran, and not all the process that > the machine ru

Re: OT: newbieDoc and XML -- can you help?

2001-06-18 Thread Dave Carrigan
will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > who among us debianistas has knowledge of the names of the tools > we'd need in order to: > > 1) get started with the right command-line XML gizmo >(maybe a document-structure-definition thing, too?) > > 2) do cgi/mod_perl interface for a web front

Re: OT: newbieDoc and XML -- can you help?

2001-06-18 Thread Noah Meyerhans
x ..." > > ideas (and, of course, newbieDoc xml volunteers) welcome... > Check out http://www.xml.com. You want to use XML::Simple, which is in libxml-simple-perl (in woody and sid, anyway). I would be happy to volunteer some time to help you get this working. From the little

OT: newbieDoc and XML -- can you help?

2001-06-18 Thread will trillich
okay. see the tip-of-the-moment at the bottom of this email? they're getting rave reviews for the newbieDoc team at http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ -- but there's a problem: right now these tips are in a home-grown text format that's only slightly more ugly than your av

Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] Re: Tutorial for kernel compiling the Debian way, RFC

2001-04-22 Thread Jesse Goerz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 22 April 2001 08:13, David Raeker-Jordan wrote: > Jesse > > In "Making sure you have everything you need," you wrote: > > "This should create a directory called kernel-source-2.2.19. Inside that > directory you should find another called Docu

Re: newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-13 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:03:01PM -0400, D-Man wrote: > It is titled "The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e, or LaTeX2e in > 90 minutes". (It appears that the time has changed in various > editions of the doc) The number of minutes printed on the cover is actually the number of pages in the d

Re: newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-12 Thread Glyn Millington
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:47:10PM -0500, will trillich wrote: >| > >| > Can I write it in LaTeX? I want to learn to use latex effectively. Benji Fisher has some nice stuff for writing Latex with Vim on his site http://sites.netscape.net/bbenjif

Re: newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-11 Thread D-Man
are of a different nature, but use the same name. I just thought it funny that a modeless editor has so many modes. | > | wanna write up a vim intro at sourceForge.net/projects/newbiedoc/? | > | > Can I write it in LaTeX? I want to learn to use latex effectively. | | i think some of th

newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-11 Thread will trillich
ode... "w" goes forward a word in edit mode "w" inserts a "w" in insert mode "w" writes to a file in command mode ... ! > | wanna write up a vim intro at sourceForge.net/projects/newbiedoc/? > > I should. I've tried to introduce som

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 08:23:04AM -0500, David B . Harris wrote: > To quote will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > # please run your eyeballs over them -- and any of the other > # documents we've got there -- and feel free to post some feedback > # to the newbieDoc proje

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:42:33PM -0900, Britton wrote: > > Are these docs going to be included somewhere in the distro when complete, > or live permanently on the web? They look handy. > > Britton Kerin > > On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, will trillich wrote: > > i&#x

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread Britton
Are these docs going to be included somewhere in the distro when complete, or live permanently on the web? They look handy. Britton Kerin On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, will trillich wrote: > i've got another newbieDoc that scratches the surface of > Debian runlevels... > > http:

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread David B . Harris
To quote will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # please run your eyeballs over them -- and any of the other # documents we've got there -- and feel free to post some feedback # to the newbieDoc project at # # http://www.eGroups.com/messages/newbieDoc Well, I must admit I don&

newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread will trillich
i've got another newbieDoc that scratches the surface of Debian runlevels... http://www.eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc/runlevels-intro.html also updated the apt-get introduction at http://www.eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc/apt-get-intro.html please run your eyeballs over them -

Re: newbieDoc

2000-11-16 Thread will trillich
Myles Green wrote: > > Hi Will, > > I saw your posts on the debian-user list and saw something in your sig > about a project you are involved in: > > volunteer to document your experience for next week's > newbies -- http://www.eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc >

newbieDoc - need some peer review

2000-11-14 Thread will trillich
we're developing newbie-oriented docs over at http://eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc/ so hop on by and check out our scant offerings. if you think we need to tweak one or two items here or there, please post a message and we'll see what we can do. (tom huckstep posted a bunch to

Re: Workstation and IP-Masquerading -> newbieDoc?

2000-11-13 Thread will trillich
in the 192.168.0.XXX range, and tell them that 192.168.0.1 is their > gateway. It > was so easy, I was surprised. any chance we could talk you into fleshing that out a bit and posting it to eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc? :) ? -- There are only two places in the world where time takes prece

Re: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc [WAS newbiedoc.intranets.com]

2000-11-09 Thread will trillich
see if I get any difference. Why can't people just write > good HTML like they used to? :) Anyway, I'll take a screen capture and > send it to them if I can reproduce it. on your suggestion, we're moving newbieDoc volunteers to http://www.eGroups.com/messages/newbieDoc to a

newbiedoc at eGroups.com (MOVED from intranets.com)

2000-11-09 Thread will trillich
aked some of it already and it's wonderful to be able to do so! you can sign up with your email address and make changes -- BUT there's not much peer review before any changes are committed, so i'm still in favor of getting newbie volunteers together at http://eGroups.com/message

Re: newbiedoc at intranets.com -- bad dog?

2000-11-08 Thread Chris Gray
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 03:18:20PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > and here everything seemed to be perfect... until... > > fooey. intranets.com is windo~1-based and relies heavily > on cookies and javascript. if enough of you have trouble > getting in, we'll have to look for another venue; but > ri

RE: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved!

2000-11-08 Thread Brett Singer
EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved! Kent West wrote:

RE: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved!

2000-11-08 Thread Brett Singer
EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved! Kent West wrote: > > will trillich or

RE: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved!

2000-11-08 Thread Brett Singer
D] Subject: eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved! Kent West wrote: > > will trillich originally wrote something like this: > > [ EGROUPS.COM/group/newbiedoc was founded way back at 5pm, > > as a gathering point for VOLUNTEERS who want to pass on > > what they've learned

eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc <- we moved!

2000-11-08 Thread will trillich
Kent West wrote: > > will trillich originally wrote something like this: > > [ EGROUPS.COM/group/newbiedoc was founded way back at 5pm, > > as a gathering point for VOLUNTEERS who want to pass on > > what they've learned to next week's newbies. probably > >

newbiedoc at intranets.com -- bad dog?

2000-11-08 Thread will trillich
and here everything seemed to be perfect... until... fooey. intranets.com is windo~1-based and relies heavily on cookies and javascript. if enough of you have trouble getting in, we'll have to look for another venue; but right now, we've got ten volunteers so far (excluding me). so the success rat