On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 04:51:22AM +0000, Pigeon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:58:15PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > > > newbiedoc > > > > > > I thought I'd read newbiedoc. The read a bit about runlevels (since I > > > didn't know about them), the first thing I read is incorrect: > > > > > > file:///home/tom/usr/share/doc/newbiedoc/newbiedoc-html/runlevels-intro/init.html > > > Section 3.3: > > > $ /etc/runlevel > > > S 2 > > > > > > On my machine: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /etc/run* > > > ls: /etc/run*: No such file or directory > > > > You should report that as a bug. > > Clarification: you should file a bug against newbiedoc. Executables > don't go in /etc. runlevel is in /sbin. Try typing /sbin/runlevel > instead.
I done it. :-) So far my bug stats are 2 good ones, 2 rejected ones, and 1 black hole :) It feels good to be useful -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
