Re: No Display was Nvidia Problems

On Wednesday 13 November 2013 10:01 AM, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote: Dear List After removing all th eNvidia d\riversd I fouind that I did not have a default window manager. /etc/X11/default-desktop- manager did not exist. so nano /etc/X11/default-desktop-manager and set the

No Display was Nvidia Problems

Dear List After removing all th eNvidia driversd I fouind that I did not have a default window manager. /etc/X11/default-desktop-manager did not exist. so nano   /etc/X11/default-desktop-manager and set the value to /etc/gdm3 dpkg-configure gdm3 service gdm3 start reboot Login scre

Re: nvidia-problems

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:06:25 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: Hello Camaleón, > Yeah, but as I don't have such file installed on my system I wanted to > know the "exact" source, just to be sure we were reading the same > information. Ah, sorry. Anyhow, I see from reading the remainder of the threa

Re: Legacy nvidia driver fails to compile with kernel 3.0.x (was: nvidia-problems)

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:41:56 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: >> It seems that's something already known... >> >> http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=206412 >> >> And: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/576648 >> >> As I said, you can open a bug

Re: Legacy nvidia driver fails to compile with kernel 3.0.x (was: nvidia-problems)

> It seems that's something already known... > > http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=206412 > > And: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/5766 > 48 > > As I said, you can open a bug report (which will help others users facing > the same problem) o

Re: nvidia-problems

On 08/10/11 15:53, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Okay, let's back then to your very first thread and see what can be done, taking in mind *your card is FX5700 Ultra* and not a GeForce 7300 GT Ultra ;-) Greetings, I am so ashamed! It is just because on my work I build many used computers with 7300G

Legacy nvidia driver fails to compile with kernel 3.0.x (was: nvidia-problems)

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:53:07 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: >> Okay, let's back then to your very first thread and see what can be >> done, taking in mind *your card is FX5700 Ultra* and not a GeForce 7300 >> GT Ultra ;-) >> >> Greetings, > > I am so ashamed! It is just because on my work I buil

Re: nvidia-problems

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:27:13 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 14:00:46 + (UTC) Camaleón > wrote: > > Hello Camaleón, > >> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:48:18 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: >> > I found it now: >> > See /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/NEWS.Debian.gz where you can >

Re: nvidia-problems

> > Okay, let's back then to your very first thread and see what can be done, > taking in mind *your card is FX5700 Ultra* and not a GeForce 7300 GT > Ultra ;-) > > Greetings, I am so ashamed! It is just because on my work I build many used computers with 7300GT, so this was in my head. Well,

Re: nvidia-problems

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 14:00:46 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: Hello Camaleón, > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:48:18 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > I found it now: > > See /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/NEWS.Debian.gz where you can ^^ > Hans, can

Re: nvidia-problems

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:15:55 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011 schrieb Camaleón: (...) >> Hans, can you please tell us *what file* is that so we can read what it >> says? > > Yes, likely! The file I read belonges to the package > "nvidia-kernel-source", you find it in

Re: nvidia-problems

Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011 schrieb Camaleón: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:48:18 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Me again. > > Good, but better keep all the postings in the same thread or at least > change the subject ;-) > Sorry, my fault. Accidently deleted the last mail. So the subject was gone

Re: re: nvidia-problems

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:48:18 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Me again. Good, but better keep all the postings in the same thread or at least change the subject ;-) > I found it now: See /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/NEWS.Debian.gz > where you can read, that legacy cards are no more suppo

re: nvidia-problems

Me again. I found it now: See /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/NEWS.Debian.gz where you can read, that legacy cards are no more supported since version 177.80-1. I excamined the further changelog, so it looks like I still have to use legacy drivers - despite what Nvidias tells. So, am I wro

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

> first, otherwise you may have todo: > #m-a -t clean,a-i nvidia-kernel-source > again! ;) I don't know about now but recently if you didn't do apt-get update and dist-upgrade after the compile you wouldn't get the glx updated drivers, maybe that step has been eliminated. Debian uncertain, my fa

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:35:55PM -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote: > > It is? How do you do that? > > Make sure you have installed: > > nvidia-glx > nvidia-glx-dev > > nvidia-kernel-source > > compile the source with the following command: > > #m-a -t clean,a-i nvidia-kernel-source > > enjoy th

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On 2009-09-17 21:05:15 -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote: > > the correct instructions (but I haven't tried yet). And I suppose > > that these are official instructions (as being on debian.org). > > Try these instructions: > > http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/debian/debian-nvidia-dri-howto.html They w

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

Paul Cartwright wrote: > Every time I boot up & GDM doesn't start, my network is broken too. Is it possible that you've got something within your GUI environment that configures the network? (Network Manager springs to mind. Ugh.) Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On Fri September 18 2009, Jaime Tarrant wrote: > > >> Rebuilding and reinstalling the nvidia driver is almost always > > >> required after kernel or OpenGL library upgrades. > > > > marc wrote: > > > It is? How do you do that? > > > > Google for sgfxi and use that. > > Chris > >   > +1 for sgfxi.

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

* Chris Davies (chris-use...@roaima.co.uk) wrote: > >> Rebuilding and reinstalling the nvidia driver is almost always required > >> after kernel or OpenGL library upgrades. > > marc wrote: > > It is? How do you do that? > > Google for sgfxi and use that. > Chris +1 for sgfxi. It works a treat

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

> the correct instructions (but I haven't tried yet). And I suppose > that these are official instructions (as being on debian.org). Try these instructions: http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/debian/debian-nvidia-dri-howto.html -- CK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

>> Rebuilding and reinstalling the nvidia driver is almost always required >> after kernel or OpenGL library upgrades. marc wrote: > It is? How do you do that? Google for sgfxi and use that. Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On 2009-09-17 18:32 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > It seems that http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers contains > the correct instructions (but I haven't tried yet). And I suppose > that these are official instructions (as being on debian.org). The wiki is open for anyone, so content foun

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

It seems that http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers contains the correct instructions (but I haven't tried yet). And I suppose that these are official instructions (as being on debian.org). -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On 2009-09-16 17:08:58 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > marc wrote: > >It is? How do you do that? > > Another 'I can't be bothered to ask Google' user. > > These instructions seem to be buggy: The nvidia-* packages don't

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

Wayne Topa wrote: > Another 'I can't be bothered to ask Google' user. > > > > Would be a start. -- Best, Marc "Change requires small steps." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

> It is? How do you do that? Make sure you have installed: nvidia-glx nvidia-glx-dev nvidia-kernel-source compile the source with the following command: #m-a -t clean,a-i nvidia-kernel-source enjoy the show then: apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade see what happens. -- CK "How we as co

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

marc wrote: Kevin Ross wrote: From: Christopher Judd [mailto:j...@wadsworth.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:02 PM Hi, After some recent upgrades, I can no longer start the xserver using the nvidia driver. I get the following errors: -Chris Rebuilding and reinstalling the

RE: nvidia problems after upgrade

Kevin Ross wrote: >> From: Christopher Judd [mailto:j...@wadsworth.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:02 PM >> >> Hi, >> >> After some recent upgrades, I can no longer start the xserver >> using >> the nvidia driver. I get the following errors: >> >> (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"

RE: nvidia problems after upgrade

> From: Christopher Judd [mailto:j...@wadsworth.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:02 PM > > Hi, > > After some recent upgrades, I can no longer start the xserver > using > the nvidia driver. I get the following errors: > > (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" > (WW) Warning, couldn't open

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 15:01:57 -0400, Christopher Judd wrote: > Hi, > > After some recent upgrades, I can no longer start the xserver using > the nvidia driver. I get the following errors: > > (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" > (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia > (II) UnloadModule: "nvi

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:01:57 -0400 Christopher Judd wrote: Hello Christopher, > Any ideas what has happened? Thanks. Did this involve a kernel upgrade? Seems like classic kernel/driver mismatch to my less than expert eye. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is

nvidia problems after upgrade

Hi, After some recent upgrades, I can no longer start the xserver using the nvidia driver. I get the following errors: (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia" (EE) Failed to load module "nvidia" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) No driv

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

Steven Demetrius wrote: Please list the full contents of the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file and the kernel version you are using. Ok, I've attached my xorg.conf file to this message, and my kernel version is 2.6.26-1-686 (as reported by "uname -r"). You can also get xorg to generate a xorg.conf file

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

Aidan Gauland wrote: Hello, I just upgraded to lenny without any problems, except for one: I'm using the vesa xorg driver, because using the free nv driver causes the display to freeze after a few minutes of use (I can move the mouse, but I can't even switch to a virtual console). I was usi

Re: nvidia problems after upgrade

Hello, I just upgraded to lenny without any problems, except for one: I'm using the vesa xorg driver, because using the free nv driver causes the display to freeze after a few minutes of use (I can move the mouse, but I can't even switch to a virtual console). I was using the non-free nvi

nvidia problems after upgrade

Hello, I just upgraded to lenny without any problems, except for one: I'm using the vesa xorg driver, because using the free nv driver causes the display to freeze after a few minutes of use (I can move the mouse, but I can't even switch to a virtual console). I was using the non-free nvidia

Re: More Nvidia Problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:56:37 +0200 > Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Liam O'Toole wrote: >>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:14:26 +0300 >>> David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: More Nvidia Problems

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:56:37 +0200 Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Liam O'Toole wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:14:26 +0300 > > David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Any ideas or must we wait until Sid finally gets straightene

Re: More Nvidia Problems (solved)

On Tuesday 24 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >After accidently losing the (proprietory) kernel module, I rebuild it with > >their .run program (after having downgraded a lot of stuff to the lib6c > > from stable/testing since the Sid one produced unrunnable results). > > > >1. Kicks about i

Re: More Nvidia Problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: > > >> Just because you gave me this opportunity. ;-) > >> This is one of the reasons I run Sidux. I can sail the stormy waters of >> Sid in a boat that floats nicely on the waves, although I admit some of >>

Re: More Nvidia Problems

Joe Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liam O'Toole wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:14:26 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any ideas or must we wait until Sid finally gets straightened out? We'll be waiting a long time ;-) Just because you gave me this opp

More Nvidia Problems

>After accidently losing the (proprietory) kernel module, I rebuild it with >their .run program (after having downgraded a lot of stuff to the lib6c from >stable/testing since the Sid one produced unrunnable results). > >1. Kicks about its own libnvidiatls files. It puts them there. > >2. I can n

Re: More Nvidia Problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:14:26 +0300 > David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Any ideas or must we wait until Sid finally gets straightened out? > > We'll be waiting a long time ;-) > Just because you gave me this opportuni

Re: More Nvidia Problems

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:14:26 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any ideas or must we wait until Sid finally gets straightened out? We'll be waiting a long time ;-) -- Liam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

More Nvidia Problems

After accidently losing the (proprietory) kernel module, I rebuild it with their .run program (after having downgraded a lot of stuff to the lib6c from stable/testing since the Sid one produced unrunnable results). 1. Kicks about its own libnvidiatls files. It puts them there. 2. I can no longe

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade) (SOLVED)

El Dimarts 31 Octubre 2006 22:23, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > Finally, it might help to reboot after installing the new packages if > the problem is due to conflicts in the assignment of interrupts. Today I've tried with the new 1.0.8776-1 nVidia kernel and worked, but after one rmmod nvidia.

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 21:24:37 +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote: > El Dilluns 30 Octubre 2006 22:32, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > > One way would be to shut down X and remove the old nvidia-glx package > > before upgrading the nvidia-kernel-source package. After you > > auto-install the nvidia ke

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

El Dilluns 30 Octubre 2006 22:32, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > One way would be to shut down X and remove the old nvidia-glx package > before upgrading the nvidia-kernel-source package. After you > auto-install the nvidia kernel module with module-assistant you can > install the new nvidia-glx pac

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

Florian Kulzer wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:12:37 -0600, Damon L. Chesser wrote: [...] How do you install the nvidia installer? Every time I use it, I have to re-run it at boot time to get it to work. My guess is that you had the Debian nvidia-* packages installed at some point

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:12:37 -0600, Damon L. Chesser wrote: [...] > How do you install the nvidia installer? Every time I use it, I have to > re-run it at boot time to get it to work. My guess is that you had the Debian nvidia-* packages installed at some point. Check if you have these fil

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

Florian Kulzer wrote: On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 20:24:16 +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote: El Dilluns 30 Octubre 2006 09:54, Florian Kulzer va escriure: (Your old custom-built nvidia package provides "nvidia-kernel-1.0.8774", therefore it cannot satisfy the dependency of the new module.)

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 20:24:16 +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote: > El Dilluns 30 Octubre 2006 09:54, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > > (Your > > old custom-built nvidia package provides "nvidia-kernel-1.0.8774", > > therefore it cannot satisfy the dependency of the new module.) The > > linux-image-

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

El Dilluns 30 Octubre 2006 09:54, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > (Your > old custom-built nvidia package provides "nvidia-kernel-1.0.8774", > therefore it cannot satisfy the dependency of the new module.) The > linux-image-* package is installed because the nvidia-kernel-* package > depends on it.

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:58:02 +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote: > El Diumenge 29 Octubre 2006 20:41, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > > I would try this: > > Thanks for this tutorial! > > Only one question: what's the reason for those new packages: > linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

El Diumenge 29 Octubre 2006 20:41, Florian Kulzer va escriure: > I would try this: Thanks for this tutorial! Only one question: what's the reason for those new packages: linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-1-486 with nvidia-glx nvidia-kernel-source upgrade ? -- Benjamí http://blog.

Re: nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 19:30:21 +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote: > Hi, > > The yesterday dist-upgrade install two new packages: > linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-1-486 > > (I use a custom kernel) > > Also installs new versions of: > nvidia-glx nvidia-kernel-source > > After dist-

nvidia problems (Sid dist-upgrade)

Hi, The yesterday dist-upgrade install two new packages: linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-1-486 (I use a custom kernel) Also installs new versions of: nvidia-glx nvidia-kernel-source After dist-upgrade, xorg doesn't start: «no screens found». One new nvidia module-assistant (*) af

Re: Nvidia problems in kernel 2.6.7

H. S. wrote: Hi, I was using Nvidia drives in 2.4.26 and they were working pretty nicely (with the necessary changes in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. But Since using 2.6.7 (now about a day) the same drivers do not work for the new kernel. In 2.4.26, there is documentatoin in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kern

Nvidia problems in kernel 2.6.7

Hi, I was using Nvidia drives in 2.4.26 and they were working pretty nicely (with the necessary changes in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. But Since using 2.6.7 (now about a day) the same drivers do not work for the new kernel. In 2.4.26, there is documentatoin in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-2.4.26-1-6

Re: nVidia problems

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 02:20:05 +0200, Jose wrote: > I wrote earlier about the problems I was having with the onboard > graphics. I had a spare PCI card with the same video chip (Riva TNT2 > Mach64 16mb) There's a RIVA TNT2 chip by nVidia, and there's a Mach64 Chip by ATI. Who crossed the two? ;-)

nVidia problems

I wrote earlier about the problems I was having with the onboard graphics. I had a spare PCI card with the same video chip (Riva TNT2 Mach64 16mb) so I installed it, disabled the onboard and viola! I got video! The onboard will only work with the nv driver even though it is the same as the PCI

Re: Nvidia problems

While "nv" doesn't need a kernel module, the "nvidia" does. Your X start log seems to indicate that there's some kind of problem in that area. Do a "lsmod" and check for "NVdriver". If it isn't there then that's your problem! On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 22:31:45 -0400 Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Nvidia problems

On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 04:31, Jose wrote: > I am running Libranet 2.8 (based on sarge) and can't seem to get my > onboard graphics going. I can use "nv" and X works but only half-assed. > > Attached are the files and logs which i hope will provide someone with > enough info to help me with this.

Re: Nvidia problems

: Nvidia problems I am running Libranet 2.8 (based on sarge) and can't seem to get my onboard graphics going. I can use "nv" and X works but only half-assed. Attached are the files and logs which i hope will provide someone with enough info to help me with this. The onboard graphic is N

RE: Nvidia problems

Jose, Did you pick the framebuffer option? I found it was a real big problem. As soon as I installed without it the nv driver worked well. John > -Original Message- > From: Jose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Nvidia problems

I am running Libranet 2.8 (based on sarge) and can't seem to get my onboard graphics going. I can use "nv" and X works but only half-assed. Attached are the files and logs which i hope will provide someone with enough info to help me with this. The onboard graphic is Nvidia Riva TNT2 Mach64 (16

Re: nvidia problems on sid

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote: > Hi all > > I have a rather strange problem with my geforce2 card. When I try to run > Q3A or UT, the game starts up fine, but all textures are terribly messed > up - means I cannot play at all. > I've tried ou several kernels (from

nvidia problems on sid

Hi all I have a rather strange problem with my geforce2 card. When I try to run Q3A or UT, the game starts up fine, but all textures are terribly messed up - means I cannot play at all. I've tried ou several kernels (from 2.4.5 up top 2.4.14) and nvidia's drivers 1541 and 1251, in nearly all possi