Thanks for pointing me in right direction. I uncommented "auto" in
/etc/modules and rebooted. But I still got the same error. Then I saw
that the top of /etc/modules suggests "no auto" if you don't want
kerneld to run.
The error message indicated that I shouldn'
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:24:02PM -0400, Ken Januski wrote:
> Thanks for pointing me in right direction. I uncommented "auto" in
> /etc/modules and rebooted. But I still got the same error. Then I saw
> that the top of /etc/modules suggests "no auto" if you don'
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 08:10:58PM -0400, Ken Januski wrote:
> I've been getting messages on bootup for last few months saying "you
> almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld". I'm running 2.2.17
> and from what I've read that's true: I don&#
I've been getting messages on bootup for last few months saying "you
almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld". I'm running 2.2.17
and from what I've read that's true: I don't want to be running kerneld.
But I have no idea how to change this. Do I
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:41AM -0500, Keith & Cecile Schooley wrote:
> After compiling a kernel (2.2.17) for the first time, I received a startup
> message indicating that I was using kerneld and almost certainly didn't want
> to. I don't know how I turned it on, so I
After compiling a kernel (2.2.17) for the first time, I received a startup
message indicating that I was using kerneld and almost certainly didn't want
to. I don't know how I turned it on, so I don't know how to turn it off.
I have enabled kmod in the kernel, but don't unde
t; On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:59:48 Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:47:37PM -0500, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > It is strictly speaking not a Debian question, but since I am
> > > using
an... please help!! I am having trouble trying to sort out what
> > each
> > > one of these things do: hotplug, kmod, kerneld, devfs, devfsd. I know
> > they
> > > are not the same, but I don't know the differences. I check out the
> > man,
> > > h
Bruce Elliott wrote:
> Do I need to add kerneld manually to my init sequence? Shouldn't installing
> a kernel package that has that option automatically add it to one of the rc
> files? Just wondering if that should be a 'bug' or it's expected.
kerneld in 2.2 is
ing modconf, it tells me the modules are
available, but I have no idea (yet, I'll do some looking) where it's looking
to find them.
Do I need to add kerneld manually to my init sequence? Shouldn't installing
a kernel package that has that option automatically add it to one of the rc
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:47:37PM -0500, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It is strictly speaking not a Debian question, but since I am
> using
> > Debian... please help!! I am having trouble trying to sort out what
> each
> > one of
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:47:37PM -0500, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It is strictly speaking not a Debian question, but since I am using
> Debian... please help!! I am having trouble trying to sort out what each
> one of these things do: hotplug, kmod,
Hi everyone,
It is strictly speaking not a Debian question, but since I am using
Debian... please help!! I am having trouble trying to sort out what each
one of these things do: hotplug, kmod, kerneld, devfs, devfsd. I know they
are not the same, but I don't know the differences. I
Hello,
I build a new kernel v2.2.17. I choosed to enabeld the 'Kernel module
loader' in the 'Loadable module support' section while make config.
I took a look at Documentation/kmod.txt and found that enabling this feature
doesn't need the kerneld anymore.
Then, I boo
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 11:51:22PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am I supposed to continue running kerneld or not? When it does run
> > it says I don't want to run it with 2.2.x but everytime a fixed
> > modutils
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I supposed to continue running kerneld or not? When it does run
> it says I don't want to run it with 2.2.x but everytime a fixed
> modutils deb is released it readds it to rc2.d
$ head -9 /etc/init.d/kerneld
#!/bin/sh
#
# Star
Am I supposed to continue running kerneld or not? When it does run
it says I don't want to run it with 2.2.x but everytime a fixed
modutils deb is released it readds it to rc2.d
--
Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
> > > Perhaps you should file a bug on it?
> >
> > Don't be that fast.
>
> Why not? A bug is a bug. 'man kerneld' is quite clear that kerneld
> should -not- be run on a 2.2 kernel. Yet /etc/init.d/kerne
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:05:42PM +0300, Pavel M. Penev wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> > > David Wright wrote:
> > > > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kern
Quoting brian moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> > David Wright wrote:
> > > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You wil
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> > David Wright wrote:
> > > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You wil
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> > this by testing for the presence of /pro
Quoting Jonathan Heaney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> David Wright wrote:
> > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> > this by testing for the presence of /proc/sys/kernel/mo
David Wright wrote:
> The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> this by testing for the presence of /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe which
> only exists under 2.2.
>
> Perhaps you have a
Quoting Erik van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
> > kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
> >with >= 2.2.x
>
> Thanks a lot for the various responses. I
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 23:41:42 +0200, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
>
> kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
>with >= 2.2.x
>
Thanks a lot for the various respons
> You should check your startup scripts. Somewhere, you have enabled
> starting kerneld, you need to find that place and disable it.
cd /etc/init.d
mv kerneld kerneld.old
reboot
Jonathan
Ragga Muffin wrote:
>
> Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > I have just compiled my first kernel (!) on my Debian frozen box. It is
> > 2.2.15
> > After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
> >
> > kerneld:
Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I have just compiled my first kernel (!) on my Debian frozen box. It is
> 2.2.15
> After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
>
> kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
I have just compiled my first kernel (!) on my Debian frozen box. It is
2.2.15
After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
with >= 2.2.x
I assume that to be true. I am not sure if this just
Hello all!
What is Ouch, no kerneld for message 2147418946 in syslog?
The story:
I configured my first linux server to provide ppp connections via
modems, and samba services.
Now everithing work fine, but in few days the system is overloaded and
finally die for the users. The server itself is
Greetings!,
When I boot up, I get a warning message that kerneld is obsolete and I
should use kmod instead, if I was using kernel 2.2.x.(I am using 2.2.x) I
would like to know how I can accomplish this upgrade.
thank you.
__
Get Your
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:55:06PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> From: "Eric G . Miller"
> > >
> > There's no guarantee that an update of modutils won't wipe out those
> > changes. Better to change the links in the runlevels.
> >
> > $ upda
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 03:02:30AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> What's the recommended way to remove kerneld? I
> didn't want to go mucking about in the rdN.d
> directories, so I just modified /etc/init.d/kerneld
> (which is what the links in the rcN.d directories
I'm running potato, with a locally compiled 2.2.14
kernel.
kerneld is installed by potato in the /etc/rcN.d
directories for runlevels 0-5. When it starts, I
get a message letting me know that "I really don't
want to be running kerneld in a 2.2+ kernel."
I've read t
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 09:57:15AM +1100, Martin Bishop wrote:
> >From the docs that I've read in the kernel source, I gathered
> that kerneld and kmod are two different utils to load modules.
>
> But how do I know which one is being used on my system, and
> does it reall
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hello,
>
> >From the docs that I've read in the kernel source, I gathered
> that kerneld and kmod are two different utils to load modules.
>
> But how do I know which one is being used on my system, and
&
Hello,
>From the docs that I've read in the kernel source, I gathered
that kerneld and kmod are two different utils to load modules.
But how do I know which one is being used on my system, and
does it really a make big difference?
Thanks,
MB
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:25:13AM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> just out of curiousity, why are you trying to kill kerneld?
>
> are you trying to set kmod properly?
>
> if yes, could someone provide sample docs/configuration
> for kmod? The only info i was able to
Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> just out of curiousity, why are you trying to kill kerneld?
I'm trying to kill kerneld just because I get the message "you almost
certainly don't want to be running kerneld with 2.2 kernels". So I'm
assuming that I don't want to be
just out of curiousity, why are you trying to kill kerneld?
are you trying to set kmod properly?
if yes, could someone provide sample docs/configuration
for kmod? The only info i was able to find is
1K file in kernel sources
thank you
OK
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Brendon Baumgartner wrote:
>
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 09:57:20PM +, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Why is it that, even after religiously running update-rc.d -f kerneld
> remove and /etc/init.d/kerneld stop, kerneld keeps coming back every
> time the modutils package is upgraded?
>
Leave at least one kill lin
I added a line "noauto" in /etc/modules file
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Stuart Ballard
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 1:57 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: kerneld won't go away!
Why is it that, even af
Why is it that, even after religiously running update-rc.d -f kerneld
remove and /etc/init.d/kerneld stop, kerneld keeps coming back every
time the modutils package is upgraded?
I get a warning that I almost certainly shouldn't be running it, and
then it starts it back up and installs it
r?
2. Use the "pre-install" directive in /etc/conf.modules to effect the behavior
I want, such as: "pre-install pcd modprobe epat"?
3. In some other way convince depmod that pcd depends on epat?
I would also like to convince kerneld that when I access the device /dev/pc
Good [morning|afternoon|evening],
Can someone give me a little help with kerneld and my sound modules?
kerneld loads every module automagicly when needed, but not my sound
modules. It was working fine then just broke one day. Probably when
I got the new modutils. I have modutils 2.1.121-23
Hello All:
I am trying to find out how to activate kerneld. I notice that in
/etc/init.d/kerneld, there is a test for /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe before
kerneld is loaded. In my system, this is not present and thus kerneld
does not load. How do I get this to be set on boot?
Thanks,
Carlo
Hi All,
I've recently set up my parallel zip dive on my linux box, which seems
to work nicely, with one small (almost insignificant) problem.
I've compiled the ppa module for the kernel. I use kerneld to load all
the other modules on my system, but it doesn't seem to like the ppa
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 01:50:27AM +1000, Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan wrote:
> Do you have a kernel with support for the auto loading of modules?
> Failing that just write a script whic will insmod the relevant
> drivers, put it in /etc/init.d set the correct ownership and
> permissions, and then use
Shaleh wrote:
> Yes I did compile it w/ module support. I want to make it work, or find out
> why it does not work. No hacks please (-:
Module support and module auto loading (kerneld support) are two different
settings that must both be set to Y in the kernel config for kerneld t
Just for grins I recompiled the kernel -- I changed none of the config options.
It works now. I can only assume that the module load "magic" was not done w/
the last kernel.
On 16-Oct-98 Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Shaleh wrote:
>
>> Yes I did compile it w/ module s
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> Yes I did compile it w/ module support. I want to make it work, or find out
> why it does not work. No hacks please (-:
ahh yes you did module support, but there are 2 other options that go
with modules, allow me to past from a make menuconfig
[*] Ena
Yes I did compile it w/ module support. I want to make it work, or find out
why it does not work. No hacks please (-:
On 16-Oct-98 Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Shaleh wrote:
>
>> My work machine is unable to load modules via kerneld. The file
>> /
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> My work machine is unable to load modules via kerneld. The file /etc/modules
> has the "auto" line uncommented. What else can I do?
Do you have a kernel with support for the auto loading of modules?
Failing that just write a script whic
My work machine is unable to load modules via kerneld. The file /etc/modules
has the "auto" line uncommented. What else can I do?
Damn, C-x and C-c are to near to each other on the keyboard.
I solved it with help from #debian: kerneld 2.1.121 is broken.
Downgrading to modutils 2.1.85-11 solved the problem.
Sorry for the inconviniencee.
Jens
Jens Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hallo all,
>
> I
Hallo all,
I have a strange problem with kerneld 2.1.121 with a 2.0.34 kernel.
hilbert:/etc# mount -t isofs /dev/scd1 /cdrom
-85800:job (0804b960) scheduled, type request_module ('s')
-85800:job (0804b960) stored, pid=361
-85800:finish_jobs
-85800:SIGCHLD: job=0x804b960, pid=361, statu
tions fine for days, when all of a sudden, kerneld gets stuck
trying to unload the ppp module, and the following error messages
appear in /var/log/kern.log (system Debian 1.3.1):
-
Jan 30 23:36:52 intech4 kernel: PPP: ver
Is there any way to get this work with kerneld? 'cat /dev/sndstat'
loads the "sound" module, and then reports that there are no input or
output devices since there are no device-specific modules loaded. I
tried putting 'alias sound sb' in /etc/conf.modules, b
I wrote:
> I just upgraded my Debian 1.2 to Debian 1.3, and am having a problem
> with the scripts that are supposed to start kerneld.
>
> The script /etc/init.d/kerneld doesn't start kerneld (when it is run
> automatically boot time).
>
...
> So, h
I fixed the binfmt_java problem. It seems that there was an alias (I
know not from where it is not in conf.modules) for binfmt-310
binfmt_java. When I try to run java progs it looks for binfmt--310
(note the two dashes), so I added an alias to binfmt--310 and voila it
worked.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE
On 8 Aug, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Softdog is the software implemetation of the watchdog, I believe. If
> you're not using that then you probably don't need to alias ..
>
Well, I don't use it either, but have the alias with no problems.
You could try to alias char-major-10-130 off.
If you did
PROTECTED]
PGP Key ID: 0xA33B86E9 - Public key available at keyservers
PGP Key fingerprint: CE03 10AF 3281 1858 9D32 C2AB 936D C472
On Fri, 8 Aug 1997, Shaleh wrote:
:It works now. I ran a depmod -a and reorganized my conf.modules. The
:kerneld/module docs all say they are going to be removed -
It works now. I ran a depmod -a and reorganized my conf.modules. The
kerneld/module docs all say they are going to be removed -- so I had no
where to turn for info. The only two problems left are my
char-major-10-130 (which is an alias to softdog, whatever that is) and I
can not load
>On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Shaleh wrote:
>> Do not quote me, but my fstab reads something like:
>>
>> ...
>> /dev/cdrom /cdrom iso9660 user,noauto
>
>If /dev/cdrom is a link to /dev/hdX you may find that umount won't work
>properly. Mount will follow the link and mount the right device, but put
>t
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Shaleh wrote:
> Do not quote me, but my fstab reads something like:
>
> ...
> /dev/cdrom /cdrom iso9660 user,noauto
If /dev/cdrom is a link to /dev/hdX you may find that umount won't work
properly. Mount will follow the link and mount the right device, but put
the real n
I moved isofs alias further up the conf.modules (before the char-major-10-130
aliases to softdog). Now mount works like it is supposed to. Go fig.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Hi, everyone --
I am having the same problem as the original poster; my kerneld (yes, I
_do_ have _only_ auto enabled in /etc/conf.modules) doesn't want to
mount the floppy in msdos automagically. However, when I do (as root)
insmod /lib/modules/2.0.30/fs/fat.o ;followed by
insmod /lib/mo
> Don't get me wrong, but maybe you don't use the mount command the right
> way ?
>
> To mount a CD-Rom you have to use something like mount -t iso9660
> /dev/hdb /cdrom
>
> To mount a fat Partition mount -t fat /dev/hda6 /mnt
You are right to ask -- no offense taken. My understanding is that b
On 7 Aug, Shaleh wrote:
> I do have auto in etc modules and nothing else. PPP/serial/slhc loads
> as a module when I use pon/poff without my intervention, but isofs and
> msdos/fat do not when I use mount.
>
Don't get me wrong, but maybe you don't use the mount command the right
way ?
To mount
0
I have my mouse, ethernet card and DOS filesystems loaded by kerneld,
so obviously it is possible. The iso9660 and minix filesystems are
compiled as modules and are loaded as needed too.
(BTW, psaux is char-major-10, along with some other things.)
--
Carey Evans <*&
> I don't know what char-mode-10 is (maybe you could check the
I mistyped ( I was not at my box ) it says char-major-10
>
> Regarding the second question:
>
> do you have a line "auto" in your /etc/modules ?
>
I do have auto in etc modules and nothing else. PPP/serial/slhc loads
as a module whe
On 6 Aug, Shaleh wrote:
> During boot modprobe comes back and tells me that char-mode-10 could not
> be found. My other question: can kerneld load fs modules as needed. I
> loaded msdos and isofs as modules and I must load the appropriate one
> before I can mount floppies or cd
During boot modprobe comes back and tells me that char-mode-10 could not
be found. My other question: can kerneld load fs modules as needed. I
loaded msdos and isofs as modules and I must load the appropriate one
before I can mount floppies or cd's. I can do an insmod -k but I
thought the
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Brian N. Borg wrote:
> I don't know that any low level drivers need to explicitly specified
> in /etc/modules. My ethernet card, scsi hostadapter, filesystems,
> etc. all load and unload on demand, as long as the right aliases
> are set in /etc/conf.modules.
>
You are cor
ork.
> Another point to note: Modules specified explicitly (in addition to auto)
> will never be unloaded by kerneld even if they are never used. I used this
> feature to keep the serial module in memory so that its particu
ied explicitly (in addition to auto)
will never be unloaded by kerneld even if they are never used. I used this
feature to keep the serial module in memory so that its particular
interupt settings would not be lost by kerneld unloading it.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-_-
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> Do you have a line in /etc/conf.modules at the beginning that says:
>
> alias binfmt-332 iBCS
>
> If not, try adding this by hand and see what happens. I think this ought
> to fix your problems.
I tried that and it didn't help. However, I did figur
To use all of your modules, do you need only to put "auto" in your
/etc/modules file, or do you need to put all of the modules that you
want loaded on demand as well?
TIA
-- Harmon
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail t
> However, when I don't load the iBCS module by hand, I find the following
> message in /var/log/daemon.log:
> May 27 14:10:24 terrapin modprobe: can't locate module binfmt-332
>
> Is there perhaps a bug in /etc/conf.modules? Any idea where else I could
> start looking to track this down? Cheers,
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:
> I never touched "/etc/conf.modules" in any case. Make sure that
> 'kerneld' gets actually started in "/etc/modules":
auto is all that is listed in my /etc/modules also and kerneld works fine
with my sound, floppy,
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Colin Telmer wrote:
> works perfectly. However, I have one more question: how do I get kerneld
> to automatically load and unload the iBCS module? I assume it has
> something to do with /etc/conf.modules, but looking through the
> mini-kerneld-HOWTO, it seems li
sco equivalent of fstab. It now
works perfectly. However, I have one more question: how do I get kerneld
to automatically load and unload the iBCS module? I assume it has
something to do with /etc/conf.modules, but looking through the
mini-kerneld-HOWTO, it seems like it should do it already:
---fro
1997, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when starting my Debian box I get the following error message:
>
> Loadin modules
> /etc/init.d/kerneld: cd: /proc/sys: No such file or directory
>
> It is the same for different kernel versions (2.0.29 from HD or
> 2.0.2
Hello,
when starting my Debian box I get the following error message:
Loadin modules
/etc/init.d/kerneld: cd: /proc/sys: No such file or directory
It is the same for different kernel versions (2.0.29 from HD or
2.0.25 from an old floppy).
What consequences could happen?
I get some warnings
Hi,
I don't use NFS with Linux, so I am not sure about that ...
As to compiling your own kernel, and the modules you have,
well, you configure a kernel by running make menuconfig (or xconfig
or config; the same basic configuration, the user interface is
nacurses, X, or the stan
o not worry about it much. However since I am
new to Debian I do not know whether this is bug of a feature of some kind
for kerneld
and so I do not think it would be right to file a bug report
( I don't think I asked anybody else to do this for me as Ioannis implied
). Anyway I am sorry to bothe
ore about your problem it is because you
did not try. Please refrain from suggesting that "you received no replies".
In that message I suggested that you compile the kdstat program in
/usr/src/modules-2.0.0/kerneld with "make kdstat". Then see what is
t be a bug. Some days ago I noticed
> after mounting an nfs system that the kerneld process would spawn other
> kernelds all the time ( sometimes also sh processses ) and then kill them
> only to do it again . I didn't pay much attention to it. This however
> happens also when
I have posted this query previously but I got no replies. I am trying
again because I think that this might be a bug. Some days ago I noticed
after mounting an nfs system that the kerneld process would spawn other
kernelds all the time ( sometimes also sh processses ) and then kill them
only
Hi,
I a new to this list and to Debian. I have a 2.0.0 kernel and debian 1.2
Some days ago I updated some packages from the unstable tree. The packages
were base-passwd bsdutils debianutils dpkg e2fsprogs fileutils and
findutils. I have noticed by runing pstree that kerneld
spawns new
Hi,
I a new to this list and to Debian. I have a 2.0.0 kernel and debian 1.2
Yesterday I updated some packages from the unstable tree. The packages
were base-passwd bsdutils debianutils dpkg e2fsprogs fileutils and
findutils. Today I have noticed by runing pstree that kerneld
spawns new
Just make a batch file with a ping command in it and call the file
'startinet.bat' Just ping your providers domain.
--
Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 on an Intel Pentium 150
Send a message with "Send PGP Key" in the subject to
Hi John, You wrote:
John>
John> Adam Heath writes: > I setup /sbin/request-route to run pppd...
John>
John> Where can I find documentation on request-route? I never heard
John> of it before this, and now I find that I have it.
/usr/doc/modules/README.ppp-slip
borik
--
Boris D. Beletsky [
Adam Heath writes:
> I setup /sbin/request-route to run pppd...
Where can I find documentation on request-route? I never heard of it
before this, and now I find that I have it.
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
--
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2096, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > I have set kerneld to automatically run pppd through
/sbin/request-route
> > whenever I need the internet. The only problem is that I still get a
> > timeout(or I just need to re-request the connection) from th
On Sat, 17 Nov 2096 16:03:16 EST "Adam Heath" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
g) wrote:
> I have set kerneld to automatically run pppd through /sbin/request-route
> whenever I need the internet. The only problem is that I still get a
> timeout(or I just need to re-request the connection)
I have set kerneld to automatically run pppd through /sbin/request-route
whenever I need the internet. The only problem is that I still get a
timeout(or I just need to re-request the connection) from the kernel. I
run FTP, then PPPD dials and connects, but FTP has timed-out. I get the
same
My friend owns to computers, one running linux, the other with win95. I
setup /sbin/request-route to run pppd whenever he needs the internet from
w95, and it works ok.
Is there a way that he could run some kind of batch file or script on the
Win95 machine to comunicate to linux to hang up the con
On Sat, 18 May 1996, Gerry Jensen wrote:
> I recently upgraded several packages in the unstable directory including the
> modules package. I am running kerneld. After the upgrade, when I tried
> to execute pppd I get "Sorry - this system lacks PPP kernel support".
> W
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
