On Saturday 14 December 2013 02:22 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:06:15 +0530
Kailash Kalyani wrote:
Apt-get gave me the following error:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-image-3.11-0.bpo.2-686-pae : Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.110~)
but 0.109.1 is to b
Hi.
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:06:15 +0530
Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> Apt-get gave me the following error:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> linux-image-3.11-0.bpo.2-686-pae : Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.110~)
> but 0.109.1 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems,
On Saturday 14 December 2013 12:06 PM, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
On Friday 13 December 2013 02:32 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:33:45 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I experienced that synaptic for *buntu Saucy is broken, perhaps i
On Friday 13 December 2013 02:32 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:33:45 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I experienced that synaptic for *buntu Saucy is broken, perhaps it's for
Debian broken too. Sometimes nothing is inconsistent, b
Hi.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:33:45 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > I experienced that synaptic for *buntu Saucy is broken, perhaps it's for
> > Debian broken too. Sometimes nothing is inconsistent, but Synaptic
> > claims that a dependenc
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 23:03 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0530
> > Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> >
> > > My understanding is that it should be possible to install backports
> > > without breaking a stable in
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 23:03 +0400, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0530
> Kailash Kalyani wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that it should be possible to install backports
> > without breaking a stable install. What am I missing?
>
> Sure, it is possible. You're just using
Hi.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0530
Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> My understanding is that it should be possible to install backports
> without breaking a stable install. What am I missing?
Sure, it is possible. You're just using wrong tool for the task.
Try:
apt-get install -t wheezy-backpor
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> Well, re-sending since nobody replied...
>> P.S. no, I won't use grub.
Hmmm. Maybe the two sentences are related.
Even me, kicking and screaming, finally am using grub (grub2).
Let's see. Apparently I just use
$ tail /etc/default/grub
GRUB_TERMINAL=console
case $(
Well, re-sending since nobody replied...
On 02.06.09 18:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I noticed that in lenny, installing new linux image doesn't cause lilo to be
> run, therefore the system might get unbootable.
I don't see any info about lilo (or any boot loader) being called
> Is there
Mark Copper :
>
> I'm trying to update an older system to Etch. I'm following Release
> Notes for Debian GNU/Linux 4.0. For hardware reasons, I ran the command
>
> aptitude -t etch-backports install linux-image-2.6-686
>
> Output for the command
>
> aptitude show linux-image-2.6-686
>
>
Hi,
I'm trying to update an older system to Etch. I'm following Release
Notes for Debian GNU/Linux 4.0. For hardware reasons, I ran the command
aptitude -t etch-backports install linux-image-2.6-686
Output for the command
aptitude show linux-image-2.6-686
includes
State: installed
However,
Bob McGowan wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own f
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:03:07PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > >
> > >> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the defau
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:08:25AM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
> >>what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
> >>
> >U
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own filesystem.
Regards,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >
> >> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
> >> what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
>> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
>> what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
>>
>>
> Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
> what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
>
Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own filesystem.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Rober
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:54:14AM +, Graham Smith wrote:
> I tried to do an update this morning and ran into the problem below when
> it came to installing the kernel. I've looked in
> /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst and the new kernel 2.6.18-4 hasn't
I tried to do an update this morning and ran into the problem below when
it came to installing the kernel. I've looked in
/boot/boot/grub/menu.lst and the new kernel 2.6.18-4 hasn't been added
(I'm running 2.6.18-3 and that is the top kernel in the list).
Any ideas what's gone wrong?
dpkg: de
On 10/6/05, James Gibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/6/05, James Gibbon <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/5/05, Felipe Törnvall N. <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En español
haber si entiendo bien tu problema es en el momento
de la instalacion de debian ??? lo haces con la imagen que vi
On 10/6/05, James Gibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/5/05, Felipe Törnvall N. <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En español
haber si entiendo bien tu problema es en el momento
de la instalacion de debian ??? lo haces con la imagen que viene por defecto
???
Apesadumbrado, mi español es muy
I'm having a bit of trouble installing Debian on my inspiron
4100. I've identified the problem. The solution is in a
kernel rebuild. I can't get the kernel to rebuild because the system
freezes before the laptop can rebuild the kernel. It doesn't
usually stay alive for more than two or three min
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Vegard|drageV wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm experimenting with the linux kernels, and have so far tried to
> kernels available through apt-get, namely 2.4.27-1-386 (standard with
> the installation in sarge) and 2.6.8-2-686 (running today).
>
> Is there an
Hi everybody,
I'm experimenting with the linux kernels, and have so far tried to
kernels available through apt-get, namely 2.4.27-1-386 (standard with
the installation in sarge) and 2.6.8-2-686 (running today).
Is there an easy to understand howto on manually installing a kernel
from kernel.org e
Hi,
Anyone succeeded in installing a Debian Woody distribution on a Cobalt Raq(4)?
Pleasy help me out. Perhaps this is a more generic question, how to install a
Debian kernel on an empty machine (only with debootstrap initialized), which
is temporarly booted from the net with NFS.
I followed th
Hi,
Anyone succeeded in installing a Debian Woody distribution on a Cobalt Raq
(4)?
Pleasy help me out. Perhaps this is a more generic question, how to install a
Debian kernel on an empty machine (only with debootstrap initialized), which
is temporarly booted from the net with NFS.
I followe
on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:53:38PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:26:33PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> | on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> | > What version of the dhcp-client package do you have installed?
> |
> | 2.0pl5-
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:26:33PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| > | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| > [...]
| >
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:11:24PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> | on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated:
> | > I don't have a specific answer to your problem,
> | > but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems.
> | > Also, having testing, unstab
on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> [...]
> | > I haven't noticed any changes in networking, but that might be
> | > d
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:11:24PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| [back on-list]
|
| on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated:
| > I don't have a specific answer to your problem,
| > but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems.
| > Also, having testing, unstable, and stable all i
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
[...]
| > I haven't noticed any changes in networking, but that might be
| > dependent on the hardware and what modules I already had configured
| > to be loade
[back on-list]
on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated:
> I don't have a specific answer to your problem,
> but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems.
> Also, having testing, unstable, and stable all in
> /etc/apt/sources.list seems to get aptitude
> to converge on a working s
on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:41:54PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:47:26PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> | > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> [...]
> | >
Nori Heikkinen escribió:
on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:47:26PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| after hearing all the brouhaha about the 2.6 kernel, i thought i'd try
| it out. but a simple `apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.4-1
On Friday 09 April 2004 12:41 pm, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> of course, i've totally failed to show the slickness of apt to my
> coworker, because as soon as i booted up with 2.6.4, my mouse (neither
> USB nor PS2) didn't work, and i wasn't online. (right now, i've
> reverted to 2.4 to type this :-P
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:41:54PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:47:26PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
[...]
| > | how, then, should i go about installing the kernel image?
| >
| > Try aptitude.
on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:47:26PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> | after hearing all the brouhaha about the 2.6 kernel, i thought i'd try
> | it out. but a simple `apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.4-1-686` wants
> | to remo
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| after hearing all the brouhaha about the 2.6 kernel, i thought i'd try
| it out. but a simple `apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.4-1-686` wants
| to remove packages i don't want it to:
|
| homeruns:~# apt-get install kernel-image-2.
on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:16:34AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] insinuated:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > after hearing all the brouhaha about the 2.6 kernel, i thought i'd try
> > it out. but a simple `apt-get install kernel-image-2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> after hearing all the brouhaha about the 2.6 kernel, i thought i'd try
> it out. but a simple `apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.4-1-686` wants
> to remove packages i don't want it to:
do with the --no-re
after hearing all the brouhaha about the 2.6 kernel, i thought i'd try
it out. but a simple `apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.4-1-686` wants
to remove packages i don't want it to:
homeruns:~# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.4-1-686
Reading Package Lists... Done
B
The real problem is that your lilo.conf file makes reference
to an /initrd.img file which may not exist. The warning can
be skipped and means that your kernel was compiled with DEVFS_FS
support and you are not using it.
--
Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key-ID: 0xB29396EB
http://people.flu
Michael Bonert wrote:
I'm having some probs with lilo:
# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.4_cobalamin.1.0_i386.deb# install of a custom kernel
===
{SNIP}
You already have a LILO configuration in /etc/lilo.conf
Install a boot block using the existing /etc/lilo.conf? [Yes
I'm having some probs with lilo:
# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.4_cobalamin.1.0_i386.deb# install of a custom kernel
===
{SNIP}
You already have a LILO configuration in /etc/lilo.conf
Install a boot block using the existing /etc/lilo.conf? [Yes] yes
Testing lilo.co
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 11:17, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Am Mo, den 09.02.2004 schrieb Jeff Self um 16:30:
> > I tried installing kernel-source-2.6.0. I used Debian's make-kpkg and
> > created a deb file. But when I ran dpkg -i
> > kernel-image-2.6.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb, I got a segmentation fault.
>
Am Mo, den 09.02.2004 schrieb Jeff Self um 16:30:
> I tried installing kernel-source-2.6.0. I used Debian's make-kpkg and
> created a deb file. But when I ran dpkg -i
> kernel-image-2.6.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb, I got a segmentation fault.
> Now I can't upgrade my system because whenever I run apt-g
I tried installing kernel-source-2.6.0. I used Debian's make-kpkg and
created a deb file. But when I ran dpkg -i
kernel-image-2.6.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb, I got a segmentation fault.
Now I can't upgrade my system because whenever I run apt-get upgrade, I
get an error saying "The package kernel-imag
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 04:31:34PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:17:25PM -0500, Andrew A. Raines insinuated:
> > Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > now, upon restarting, i can't boot in without a rescue disk!
> > > before lilo even shows up, i get a screen
on Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:17:25PM -0500, Andrew A. Raines insinuated:
> Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > now, upon restarting, i can't boot in without a rescue disk!
> > before lilo even shows up, i get a screen of cascading 0 1 0 1
> > 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1s that just g
Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now, upon restarting, i can't boot in without a rescue disk!
> before lilo even shows up, i get a screen of cascading 0 1 0 1
> 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1s that just go on forever.
Boot with that rescue disk and mount your system under /mnt.
T
Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my ongoing quest to put Debian on this Dell Inspiron 8000, I
> recompiled the kernel and disabled framebuffer support (so the screen
> doesn't go all wacky). I hadn't seen some of the options presented me
> by the install menu when i did dpkg -i ker
In my ongoing quest to put Debian on this Dell Inspiron 8000, I
recompiled the kernel and disabled framebuffer support (so the screen
doesn't go all wacky). I hadn't seen some of the options presented me
by the install menu when i did dpkg -i kernel-image-.deb -- i
have a windoze and redhat partit
so, I screwed up pretty thoroughly yesterday. I tried to install the
new DeMuDi beta (a sub-distro of debian that focuses on sound
software) to my existing (mostly) woody machine. I was fairly
cavalier
about it, didn't pay such close attention to the installation process,
which involved a new ker
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 17:40, curtis wrote:
> I just compiled and installed a kernel and then after it made changes to
> lilo.conf, I typed lilo and got the following error:
>
> Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 0x48 returned different head/sector
> geometries for BIOS drive 0x80
>
> Doing a Google s
I just compiled and installed a kernel and then after it made changes to
lilo.conf, I typed lilo and got the following error:
Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 0x48 returned different head/sector
geometries for BIOS drive 0x80
Doing a Google search I only found one entry specific to this, but the
On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 03:41, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 01:45, Matthias Ellinger wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I've noticed that there is a k7-optimized 2.4.18 Kernel available via
> > apt-get.
> > I'm running the bf24 ver
On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 01:45, Matthias Ellinger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've noticed that there is a k7-optimized 2.4.18 Kernel available via
> apt-get.
> I'm running the bf24 version installed by the Woody CD.
>
> Now, is it worthwhile to chan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I've noticed that there is a k7-optimized 2.4.18 Kernel available via apt-get.
I'm running the bf24 version installed by the Woody CD.
Now, is it worthwhile to change it (1.2 GHz Duron) to the k7, and how can I do
so with apt?
Thanks,
-
modules.
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Robert Voigt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 3:12 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: kernel install - unres. symbols
I compiled a 2.4.5 kernel with kernel-package. I had no problems until I
installed the resulting .deb
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:46, Joost Kooij wrote:
> > Can you think of anything unusual in your configuration? Maybe your
> > version of kernel-package doesn't know how to deal with it.
>
> Good idea. I have kernel-package 7.20 from
On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:46, Joost Kooij wrote:
> Can you think of anything unusual in your configuration? Maybe your
> version of kernel-package doesn't know how to deal with it.
Good idea. I have kernel-package 7.20 from Progeny, a leftover from when I
upgraded a bunch of packages from a Pr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> # dpkg -i kernel-image-2.4.5_custom-2.4.5-1_i386.deb
> Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.4.5.
> (Reading database ... 37091 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking kernel-image-2.4.5 (from
> kernel
I compiled a 2.4.5 kernel with kernel-package. I had no problems until I
installed the resulting .deb file. I got the error messages you find below. I
was running a 2.2.18pre21 kernel.
After a reboot the new kernel loaded fine and I don't have any problems. But
those error messages don't look go
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 08:04:16PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:54:04PM +, Anthony Fairchild wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I recently upgraded all packages necessary to install a 2.4.x kernel on my
> > Debian 2.2 laptop. After downloading, compiling, and installing the 2.4.5
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:54:04PM +, Anthony Fairchild wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently upgraded all packages necessary to install a 2.4.x kernel on my
> Debian 2.2 laptop. After downloading, compiling, and installing the 2.4.5
> kernel I rebooted and was greeted with a screen reading only
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:54:04PM +, Anthony Fairchild wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| I recently upgraded all packages necessary to install a 2.4.x kernel on my
| Debian 2.2 laptop. After downloading, compiling, and installing the 2.4.5
| kernel I rebooted and was greeted with a screen reading only
Hello all,
I recently upgraded all packages necessary to install a 2.4.x kernel on my
Debian 2.2 laptop. After downloading, compiling, and installing the 2.4.5
kernel I rebooted and was greeted with a screen reading only "LIL-".
I have a boot floppy made when I originally installed and was able t
Bruce Elliott wrote:
> Do I need to add kerneld manually to my init sequence? Shouldn't installing
> a kernel package that has that option automatically add it to one of the rc
> files? Just wondering if that should be a 'bug' or it's expected.
kerneld in 2.2 is built into the kernel itself. no
New to the Debian distribution, like it so far. Small problem with modules
and such right now.
I just finished compiling & installing my own kernel using the kernel
package. Perhaps there were some path dependencies the packaging util was
looking for, but there were no error messages I noticed.
Dragón wrote:
>
>It doesn't give me any error message but when
> it starts is still running its oldest kernel.
>
> What's that I'm doing wrong?
>
> Thanks.
>
> In /
>
> total 100
> drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 dic 16 19:45 bin
> drwxr-xr-x2 root ro
It doesn't give me any error message but when
it starts is still running its oldest kernel.
What's that I'm doing wrong?
Thanks.
In /
total 100
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 dic 16 19:45 bin
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 ene 20 22:20 boot
drwxr-x
Scott Patterson wrote:
>
> I recently compiled and installed a 2.4.x kernel using the debian
> kernel-installer package. Everything seems fine except that when I run
> modconf,
> no modules appear. I was hoping to browse my modules this way, but no luck. I
> should mention that my modules do work
I recently compiled and installed a 2.4.x kernel using the debian
kernel-installer package. Everything seems fine except that when I run modconf,
no modules appear. I was hoping to browse my modules this way, but no luck. I
should mention that my modules do work fine, just modconf seems broken. I
debs,
i figured it out--(since i dual boot with loadlin, i
shouldn't have been focusing on lilo. i realized the
directory from where my old 2.0.36 kernel was booting
and copied the new kernel there). oh, well...
later.
bt.
//
cls--colo spgs wrote:
>
> debs,
>
> wanting to fully migrate
debs,
wanting to fully migrate from the 2.0.36 kernel, i need
to install a "floppy," custom 2.2.16 kernel on my
dual-boot, potato deskbox.
here's what i did to customize the kernel:
make menuconfig
make dep
make install
make modules
make modules_install
i rtmfm (oops, rtfm), which says to run "
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 02:07:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If all this is correct so far, what's the point in running lilo to update it?
Because LILO makes reference to the absolute location on disk of the vmlinuz
file (at the far end of the symlink) in the boot code it writes out. Chang
Thanks everyone, I got lilo dual booting the two kernels. I'm having some
trouble since the new kernel does not recognize hdd as a block device, and
therefore I can't mount my iomega zip drive. I've checked both
/boot/config-2.0.35 and /boot/config-2.0.34, and this might be the cause:
# CONFIG_B
Hi,
cd to /etc to edit the file lilo.conf as
original lilo.conf
===
boot=/dev/hdxn
where x = hard disk a or b; n = partition number 1, 2, 3 etc
(could be boot=/dev/hda if you have written the master boot record (MBR) during
your
initial install
Subject: New Kernel install (II)
Date: Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 02:15:55PM +0200
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I believe it's possible to maintain both kernel and have a dual boot (eg. one
> for kernel-2.0.34 and another
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It seems I've finally succeeded into compiling the kernel successfully (cross
> fingers). Now, for installation, I have to:
>
> # cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.35
> # cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map-2.0.35
--
I believe it's possible to maintain both kernel and have a dual boot (eg. one
for kernel-2.0.34 and another for kernel-2.0.35)... how do I go about this with
lilo?
TIAYA
Horacio
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver
o/or
Envía un mensaje vacío a [EMAIL PROTECTED] co
It seems I've finally succeeded into compiling the kernel successfully (cross
fingers). Now, for installation, I have to:
# cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.35
# cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map-2.0.35
# cp /usr/src/linux/.config /boot/config-2.0.35
Next, r
I am helping a friend installing debain on a laptop with a
backpack cdrom, and have some trouble.
(A compaq thing, 486/75 with 16M ram & 500 or so of harddisk)
The 2.0 install floppy was used for partitioning the disk, but
it couldn't see the backpack cdrom.
So I compiled a 2.2.2 kernel. This o
Found it. It was in hamm and not in slink yet. I installed it
and now I'm compiling. Hopefully, it will end up ok. Wish me
luck! :-)
On 9 Jan, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ok, now I cd to linux and I'm in 2.0.36
On 9 Jan, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ok, now I cd to linux and I'm in 2.0.36. This seems right to me,
>> but I must still missing something, because make menuconfig
>> produces the following errors:
>>
>> debian:/
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, now I cd to linux and I'm in 2.0.36. This seems right to me,
>but I must still missing something, because make menuconfig
>produces the following errors:
>
>debian:/usr/src/linux# make menuconfig
> rm -f include
Hi, folks
I want to update my kernel (2.0.34) to 2.0.36. I've already
upgraded the rest of my system slink, so today I used apt-get to
install the new kernel-source.
When I switched to the /usr/src/linux directory, I found it was
still pointing to kernel-so
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Scott Walker wrote:
> Ok, this is a BIG nasty weird problem.
> I'm runnig Debian With default Kernel 2.0.29
So we're in bo, I take it.
> I grabbed Kernel 2.0.33 from ftp.kernel.org
> and did the following steps:
> tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
> cd linux
> make mrproper
> mak
I found Dale Scheetz book helpful pg. 159-171 go over the traditional
linux way of compiling a custom kernel vs. the Debian way.
I got mine from www.linuxpress.com but you might find one in your local
bookstore "The Debian Linux User's Guide"
I'd have been pretty lost without it. Oh yeah, I don
My bad. Sorry for the misinformation then. I am new to
Debian... used
to old school Slackware.
Although it says it will break compilations... it seemed to work fine
for the most part. But from now on, I will not do it.
Carroll Kong
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:
> O
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
> > tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
>
> technically you forgot..
>
> cd /usr/include
> rm -rf asm linux scsi
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-386 asm
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/scsi scsi
NO, DON'T DO THIS.
Carroll Kong
> tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
technically you forgot..
cd /usr/include
rm -rf asm linux scsi
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-386 asm
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/scsi scsi
> cd linux
> make mrproper
> make menuconfig
> make dep
> make
Sounds like maybe you didn't redo your links for vmlinuz in / and didn't
edit lilo.conf (if you want to still have your old kernel available in
emergencys).
Henry Hollenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
There is not enough information to make a judgement. Please
provide the following:
% ls -asCF /lib/modules
% ls -als /
% ls -asCF /boot
BTW, on Debian, kernel-package offers a simple, convenient way
of upgrading and maintianing severl different versions of the kernel
on you
Install make-kpkg.
After make menuconfig
make-kpkg --revision kernel_image
Install the new kernel with dpkg.
Chuck
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Scott Walker wrote:
> Ok, this is a BIG nasty weird problem.
> I'm runnig Debian With default Kernel 2.0.29
> I grabbed Kernel 2.0.33 from ftp.kernel.org
> an
Ok, this is a BIG nasty weird problem.
I'm runnig Debian With default Kernel 2.0.29
I grabbed Kernel 2.0.33 from ftp.kernel.org
and did the following steps:
tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
cd linux
make mrproper
make menuconfig
make dep
make clean
make zlilo
make modules
make modules_install
reboot
99 matches
Mail list logo
