kernel build error on install-perf

Hi. Way at the end of the build process, when I already have the linux-image deb ready to install, it stops with the following error message: -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x- install -m 644 Documentation/tips.txt -t '/home/storage/no-backup/kernel-debia

Re: Kernel Build Problem: dpkg-gencontrol

David Baron wrote: Building rt patched kernel using: make-kpkg --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image Whatif you did: make-kpkg --revision 1 --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Kernel Build Problem: dpkg-gencontrol

Building rt patched kernel using: make-kpkg --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image dpkg-gencontrol -DArchitecture=i386 -isp \ -plinux-image-2.6.29-davidb-rt - P/usr/src/linux/debian/linux-image-2.6.29-davidb-rt/ dpkg-gencontrol: error: package linux-image-2

Debian Kernel Build

Question: How accurate is the mini HOW TO at the below quoted site? It seems not to have been updated for 2.6 series kernels. Is there a better tutorial? http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html I have the : http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ Running Debian Unstable > canno

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:13 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > > leave the others. A lot quicker SNIP > As for the time 'saved', while the compile is chugging

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

David Baron: > > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not > used! A good idea. > How do I know what to change from "m" to "no"? If it does not appear on lsmod? It depends. For hardwa

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:13:57AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > > leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not > > used! >

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not > used! > > How do I know what to change from "m" to "no"? If it does not appear

Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not used! How do I know what to change from "m" to "no"? If it does not appear on lsmod? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Kernel Build failing: cannot stat `./debian/po': No such file or directory

I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.15 kernel under a "stable" system using the debian source packages. It compiles fine, but when trying to build the actual binary packages (i.e. "debian/rules binary"), it fails like this: for dir in Config docs examples ruleset scripts pkg po; do

Re: recipe for kernel build...

Re my earlier post: > > So how does this look as a recipe for rebuilding my 2.6.8-2-386 > > kernel from source: > > apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8 > > apt-get install pcmcia-source > > cd /usr/src > > tar jxf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2 > > tar -xvzf pcmcia-cs.tar.gz > >

Re: recipe for kernel build...

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:06:51PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote: > Great, that was the clue I needed - thanks! > > So how does this look as a recipe for rebuilding my 2.6.8-2-386 > kernel from source: > apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8 > apt-get install pcmcia-source > cd /usr/src

Re: recipe for kernel build...

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 06:38:34AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > > I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I > > want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can > > recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source > > for what I am running on

Re: recipe for kernel build...

Great, that was the clue I needed - thanks! So how does this look as a recipe for rebuilding my 2.6.8-2-386 kernel from source: apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8 apt-get install pcmcia-source cd /usr/src tar jxf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2 tar -xvzf pcmcia-c

Re: recipe for kernel build...

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:32:02PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote: > I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I > want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can > recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source > for what I am running on hand.. It

Re: recipe for kernel build...

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:32:02PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote: >I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I >want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can >recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source >for what I am running on hand.. > >I am

recipe for kernel build...

I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source for what I am running on hand.. I am doing this on a 233MHz 'Mobile Pentium MMX', and so during the insta

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

Jon D. Irish wrote: Hi Nick, Thanks for the help! It fixed my problem and I was able to finish compiling the kernel. I installed it and tried to boot to it, but I keep getting a kernel panic. This stinks because right before the panic I can see ALSA discovering the sound card. The error state

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

Jon D. Irish wrote: > I am trying to build a kernel off of 2.6.12.3 I want to do this to get > sound working. Thus, I downloaded everything from www.kernel.org > and uncompressed it to /usr/src. Upon running > "make xconfig" I load the default debian config from /boot.Next,

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

jon, i don't know where you got the instructions for building that kernel, but that is not the way i have read about and have followed instructions from the kernel sites i have followed. use your HOWTO's about building a kernel and try again.. good luck and Peace.ed *

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

Jon D. Irish wrote: I am trying to build a kernel off of 2.6.12.3 I want to do this to get sound working. Thus, I downloaded everything from www.kernel.org and uncompressed it to /usr/src. Upon running "make xconfig" I load the default debian config from /boot.Next, I

Re: kernel-build-2.6.8 for i386 doesn't exist?!

On 7/19/05, Saman Ghannadzadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile > some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8 > package available for i386. > > What can I do

kernel-build-2.6.8 for i386 doesn't exist?!

Hello, I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8 package available for i386. What can I do? are there any alternative packages available? Regards, Saman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

kernel-build-2.6.8 for i386 doesn't exist?!

Hello, I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8 package available for i386. What can I do? are there any alternative packages available? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

kernel build: unresolved errors during dpkg -i

When trying to install the kernel image I get numerous 'unresolved symbols' errors - could somebody explain why (I had presumed the 'make menuconfig' and subsequent 'make-kpkg' would have ensured all dependencies were resolved) and whether I can ignore them (I presume not). Thanks, Michael Here's t

Re: 2.6.7 kernel build using make-kpkg no initrd.img produced

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:21:30PM +0100, robin wrote: > Using make menuconfig, initrd set to built-in under device drivers / > block devices You don't need an initrd for kernels you compile yourself. Remove it, and ensure you compile in (statically) support for block IDE, and your filesystem(s)

2.6.7 kernel build using make-kpkg no initrd.img produced

Using make menuconfig, initrd set to built-in under device drivers / block devices After configuring run make-kpkg buildpackage following debs produced: kernel-doc-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_all.deb kernel-image-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_i386.deb kernel-headers-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_i386.deb kernel-source-2

Kernel build breaks

In the interests of (trying) to read my macdisk, I decided to build a new kernel using Sid/Sarge source. Why do computers hate me so? Look what happened: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/summer/kernels/kernel-image-2.4.26-i386-2.4.26/build-386/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-stric

Re: kernel build questions

Ben Edwards wrote: Maybe I am not building the kernel in the most elegent way. I seem to be using a mixture of EXTRAVERSION and -rev. Not quite sure of the ramifications of these. Douse the .deb file put stuff into /lin/modules? What would you recomend to be the best use of EXTRAVERSION/-re

Re: kernel build questions

Ben Edwards wrote: Colin wrote: Do a "make-kpkg clean" before changing the revision number should do the trick. Ta, that did the trick. When I dpkg -i the image it complaines that '/lib/modules/2.6.3 (may) belongs to a old install', I have been moving it to .old but douse this mean that if I

Re: kernel build questions

Colin wrote: Ben Edwards (lists) wrote: I use the command make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.1 kernel_image to build the kernel, whitch workes fine. However if i use Custom.2 (so I can keep my old kernel) I get the following:- blue:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.2 kernel_im

Re: kernel build questions

Ben Edwards (lists) wrote: I use the command make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.1 kernel_image to build the kernel, whitch workes fine. However if i use Custom.2 (so I can keep my old kernel) I get the following:- blue:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.2 kernel_image I note that

kernel build questions

I have sucsesfult managed to build a 2.6 kernel (whitch I am now using). This is great as CD burning works out of the box and startup/application launch is noticably faster. However I have a few questions. I used the hoto at http://www.desktop-linux.net/debkernel.htm which is nice and strightforw

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

hugo vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There was a post on this list a while ago on g++-3.3. I find that if I > use *that* on rolling Qt, things fall apart. I now use 3.2 for > everything. There was a new g++-3.3 last week in testing. I haven't seen any problems with that one (although, h

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hell, depends on gcc 3.2? Is that true? Do I really need another gcc > install? Weird. I only have gcc-3.3 (g++-3.3) installed on my system and have no problems recompiling the kernel (with qt3). I did check, and I had installed libqt3-mt-dev instead

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Bill Moseley wrote: Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so trying to build from source using the new QT interface. Here's my gcc: laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401) Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is fre

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Here's my gcc: laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401) So I need the qt3 library: laptop:/home/moseley# apt-get install libqt3-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: g++-3.2 gcc-3.2 l

Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so trying to build from source using the new QT interface. Here's my gcc: laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401) Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the

Re: Cleanly applying 3rd party patches to a make-kpkg kernel build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Gustafson wrote: | I've been doing regular sarge kernel builds (w/ debian kernel-source | that already has debian patches applied) with 'make-kpkg', in which I | need to apply some additional 3rd party patches. My goal is to be able | to have inst

Cleanly applying 3rd party patches to a make-kpkg kernel build

Greetings! I've been doing regular sarge kernel builds (w/ debian kernel-source that already has debian patches applied) with 'make-kpkg', in which I need to apply some additional 3rd party patches. My goal is to be able to have instructions others can follow for creating a custom kernel which

Re: 2.4.23 kernel build problems

Hello Karsten! On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:56:40AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: [...] 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) [...] Neither the Intel 82540EM (e1000) nor Realtek (8139too) controllers are supported in 2.4.18. Maybe I misunde

2.4.23 kernel build problems

I've updated kernels on all but one of my systems using the backported 2.4.18-12 kernel from the Debian archives. No problems (that I'm aware of yet). The remaining system is a Mocha P4 based on the Mini-ITX mobo form factor. It includes two onboard Ethernet controllers and an SIS graphics

Kernel build error & how do I fix & compile OK?

Hi Yall, I am trying to upgrade to 2.4.22, but after issuing... make-kpkg --initrd I eventually get make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22/drivers/scsi/aacraid' /usr/bin/make -C aic7xxx modules make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22/drivers/scsi/aic

Re: lilo vga= problems after new kernel build

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:26:09AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:09:06 +0200, > Olivier (skyshadow) Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > > Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard > > installation 2.4.18-bf

Re: lilo vga= problems after new kernel build

--- "Olivier (skyshadow) Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi, > > Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard > installation 2.4.18-bf2.4) > > It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble. > > * If set, my display won't show anything: bla

Re: lilo vga= problems after new kernel build

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:09:06AM +0200, Olivier Robert wrote: > Hi, > > Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard > installation 2.4.18-bf2.4) > > It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble. > > * If set, my display won't show anything: blac

Re: lilo vga= problems after new kernel build

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:09:06 +0200, Olivier (skyshadow) Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard > installation 2.4.18-bf2.4) > > It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes troubl

lilo vga= problems after new kernel build

Hi, Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard installation 2.4.18-bf2.4) It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble. * If set, my display won't show anything: black is black ;-) * If unset, all boot messages re-appear, as does xdm an

Kernel Build options to get an old Pentium booting 2.4.21

Hi, I've been trying to rebuild a 2.4.21 kernel on an older machine that I have, a Pentium 90, with 24Mb RAM. It boots fine with a kernel that arrives via the boot disks, but when I try to boot it from my home made kernel, the hard drive light goes on and I can here seeking for a little while and

Re: Kernel Build options to get an old Pentium booting 2.4.21

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:10:09 +0200, David Creelman wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to rebuild a 2.4.21 kernel on an older machine that I > have, a Pentium 90, with 24Mb RAM. > > It boots fine with a kernel that arrives via the boot disks, but when I > try to boot it from my home made kernel, t

Re: Kernel Build Methodology

On 01 Jul 2003 22:05:53 +0200 Johan Parin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've read through chapter 7 in the Debian Reference and man make-kpkg, > but I'm not sure I'm completely clear on the "Debian standard method" > to build the kernel. I built my first custom kernel the way it's > described, no p

Kernel Build Methodology

Hi all, I've read through chapter 7 in the Debian Reference and man make-kpkg, but I'm not sure I'm completely clear on the "Debian standard method" to build the kernel. I built my first custom kernel the way it's described, no problem. I used --append_to_version -486 --revision=rev.01 Now, I w

Logitech QuickCam 4000 Pro Driver Install and Kernel Build

I have driver files for the Logitech QuickCam 4000 Pro and need to install and build a new kernel. Where should the driver files be copied before I rebuild the kernel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DHCP dosen't work after kernel build

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> What have I missed out of my kernel build ? Under networking Paul> options I have dhcp, bootp and rarp support compiled in. ... Make sure the CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER options are enable

kernel build error 2.4.18

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings: I am attempting to build a kernel for a slow box that has an sis chipset mainboard. I keep getting this error, and I am at a loss for what I need to do to get the kernel to compile. Any help greatly appreciated. thank you drivers

Re: does 2.4.17-rc2 kernel build with latest woody binutils?

Theres is also a simple solution: Just delete .text.edit form the DISCARD section in kernel-source/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds Works fine for me with kernel2.4.16 and binutils2.11.92.0.12.3 I read this in some mailing list, don't remember where though... tom On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:50:4

Re: does 2.4.17-rc2 kernel build with latest woody binutils?

On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Dragos wrote: > I have 2 disks on the motherboard controller (440bx); installed > kernel-image-2.4.16, which saw the hpt370 controller I have; now I want to > move the disks on that controller, but it seems that the debian standard > kernel doesn't have

does 2.4.17-rc2 kernel build with latest woody binutils?

I have 2 disks on the motherboard controller (440bx); installed kernel-image-2.4.16, which saw the hpt370 controller I have; now I want to move the disks on that controller, but it seems that the debian standard kernel doesn't have support for 'boot offboard chipsets first' compiled in (that wo

Re: Kernel build error

Daniel T. Chen wrote: > No, it appears the culprit is binutils. I just tried to compile 2.4.12-ac3 > + Rik's vm patches and ld bombed out with the exact error described at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=116041&repeatmerged=yes > > Downgrade to 2.11.92.0.5-2 (it resolved the is

Re: Kernel build error

No, it appears the culprit is binutils. I just tried to compile 2.4.12-ac3 + Rik's vm patches and ld bombed out with the exact error described at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=116041&repeatmerged=yes Downgrade to 2.11.92.0.5-2 (it resolved the issue for me) and put binutils on h

Re: Kernel build error

hi ya craig did you use "make bzlilo" or sound like you did "make bzImage" if so... take out stuff from the kernel ... - turn it off if you dont use it - PNP, Video for linux, ISDN, Linux Telephone, - turn off all the graphics controllers you're NOT useing - SCSI

Kernel build error

I've never seen this before when building a kernel. My guess is that it basically boils down to, "Your kernel's too bloody big, stop building it as a monolith and learn to use modules." Is that right? Craig make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/compressed' tmppiggy=_tmp_$$pig

Re: Help! I can't choose my network card in the kernel build options.

On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 04:22:57PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote: > I'm trying to rebuild my kernel, and my network card does not come up > as an option. The network card is an rtl8139. I have the options for > 3COM, AMD Lance, and WD cards, but the RealTek option is grayed out. > I enabled TCP/IP netw

Help! I can't choose my network card in the kernel build options.

I'm trying to rebuild my kernel, and my network card does not come up as an option. The network card is an rtl8139. I have the options for 3COM, AMD Lance, and WD cards, but the RealTek option is grayed out. I enabled TCP/IP networking. The last box I had this card in had a vanilla kernel, so I jus

Re: Make Errors During Kernel Build

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 09:52:04AM -0400, David Raeker-Jordan uttered: > ld -m elf_i386 -Ttext 0x0 -s --oformat > ld: unrecognized option '--oformat' > ld: use the --help option for usage information E? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep oformat ./linux/arch/i386/boot/Makefile $(LD) -Ttext 0x0

Re: Make Errors During Kernel Build

Steve, I tried changing -oformat to --oformat in /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/linux/arch/i386/boot/Makefile but I get the following new error: make[2]: Entering directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/linux/arch/i386/boot' gcc -E -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.2/linux/include -D__BIG_KERNEL__ -traditional -DS

Re: Make Errors During Kernel Build

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 07:52:53AM -0400, David Raeker-Jordan uttered: > Things seem to be going fine until the end of the build, when I get: > (Please excuse any typos, e.g., I can't get the ' to swing the other way ;) ) > > bbootsect.s: Assembler messages > bbootsect.s:253: Warning: indirect lca

Make Errors During Kernel Build

I successfully built a 2.4.2 kernel on an old Pentium but forgot a few things, so I am need to rebuild. First, I deleted the /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/ subdirectories and uncompressed and untarred linux-2.4.2.tar.bz2 into /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/ I then ran: make clean make menuconfig make-kpkg kerne

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote: > Is there any advantage to building the kernel outside of fakeroot? The fakeroot man page says quite clearly that "Thou shall never configure a anything under fakeroot", so I try to only do the install targets under fakeroot to avoid hard-to-track problems.

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 06:57:48PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this: > > make-kpkg --revision... build > fakeroot make -f debian/rules kernel-image-deb > fakeroot make-kpkg modules_image > > The above sequence has never failed me. It buil

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:11:23PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > > Am I misreading the docs? > > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this: > > Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only > target

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > Am I misreading the docs? > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this: Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only target which knows how to deal with rootcmd is buildpackage. I never use it, though. I

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote: > I've successfully built a new kernel package with make-kpkg, but only if I > use: > > fakeroot -- make-kpkg --revision=custom.X.XX. kernel_image I'll usually run fakeroot make-kpkg ... I've never needed that -- > Am I misreading the docs?

Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:30:19AM -0700, Nuhn Yobiznez wrote: > > Debian is great for newbie kernel building > because it has a wonderful package called kpkg. This > package does ALMOST everything for you! I highly > recommend doing an apt-get for it! It simplifies the > process to the point

Re: Kernel build problems 2.2.17 - No modversion.h

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Keith Goettert wrote: > > After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product > with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header > file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked

Re: Kernel build problems 2.2.17 - No modversion.h

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Keith Goettert wrote: > After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product > with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header > file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked >

Kernel build problems 2.2.17 - No modversion.h

After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked away in.

Re: kernel build

Corey Popelier wrote: > Yeah it certainly looks like you need Perl 5.005 (note the .005 in the > path below). I have both 5.004 and 5.005 installed. It's one of the > strange things, Perl, as I installed from 2.1 floppy set, then upgraded to > Potato, and Perl-Base got really mad at me so I had to

Re: kernel build

Ok, a more accurate answer: Long.pm exists in the perl-5.004, and the perl-5.005 packages. Note you have perl-5.004 installed, but not perl-5.005 (altho you do have the -base package - buts its not in the base part.). The make-kpkg is looking specifically for the 5.005 version of that file. I don'

Re: kernel build

Yeah it certainly looks like you need Perl 5.005 (note the .005 in the path below). I have both 5.004 and 5.005 installed. It's one of the strange things, Perl, as I installed from 2.1 floppy set, then upgraded to Potato, and Perl-Base got really mad at me so I had to forcefully remove it for it to

kernel build

I'm trying to build a kernel, but I seem to have run into a snag: debian:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean Can't locate Getopt/Long.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5.005/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.005 /usr/local/lib/site_perl/i386-linux /usr/local/lib/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5 .) at /usr/

Re: kernel build error

as86 is in the bin86 package. The bin86 package contains the 16-bit assembler and loader. Use apt-get install bin86 or whatever method you use to install it - its under /main/devel. Cheers, Corey Popelier http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 14 May 20

Re: kernel build error

> Where is as86 and what does it do? TIA, > package bin86 this is the x86 16-bit-code assembler. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- If Windows is the answer, I want the problems back!

kernel build error

When building my 2.2.14 kernel I get: make[1]: as86: Command not found Where is as86 and what does it do? TIA, oge

Re: Module screwups after kernel build

Installing a new kernel is much easier if your are using the "kernel-package". Example: $ su # cd /usr/src/linux # make menuconfig # make-kpkg clean # make-kpkg --revision `hostname`.1 kernel_image # dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.0.36_`hostname`.1_i386.deb

Re: Module screwups after kernel build

On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Ron Hale-Evans wrote: > Good people-- > > I built a 2.0.36 kernel today so I could have SCSI support, among other > things. In fact, I did it a few times. Each time, I found that I had lost > support for my NE2000 Ethernet card, which I had previously installed with > modconf.

Re: Module screwups after kernel build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 6 Jun 1999 21:33:07 -0700, Ron Hale-Evans wrote: >Any thoughts? make modules make modules_install - -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to t

Module screwups after kernel build

Good people-- I built a 2.0.36 kernel today so I could have SCSI support, among other things. In fact, I did it a few times. Each time, I found that I had lost support for my NE2000 Ethernet card, which I had previously installed with modconf. When I ran modconf again, there was hardly anything th

Re: Trouble with Debian kernel build

On 17-May-99 Bob Nielsen wrote: > Hmmm, I thought that the installation did that, but I haven't an > installed kernel-source package to check. If you have kernel-source, you > don't need the kernel-headers (with hamm you did). > That is what I was confused about, the headers. thanks -- Andrew

Re: Trouble with Debian kernel build

On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 10:55:31PM -0400, Bryan Scaringe wrote: > I am trying to build a kernel the "Debian way" and am stuck. According > to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is: > make-kpkg --install kernel-package_2.0.36_all.deb > > However, there is no kernel-package_2.

RE: Trouble with Debian kernel build

On 17-May-99 George Bonser wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 1999, Pollywog wrote: > >> >> On 17-May-99 Bryan Scaringe wrote: >> > I am trying to build a kernel the "Debian way" and am stuck. According >> > to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is: >> > make-kpkg --install kernel-pa

RE: Trouble with Debian kernel build

On 17-May-99 Bryan Scaringe wrote: > I am trying to build a kernel the "Debian way" and am stuck. According > to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is: > make-kpkg --install kernel-package_2.0.36_all.deb I am going back to the old way of doing it because I am still uncertai

Trouble with Debian kernel build

I am trying to build a kernel the "Debian way" and am stuck. According to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is: make-kpkg --install kernel-package_2.0.36_all.deb However, there is no kernel-package_2.0.36.deb package. I am in the /usr/src directory, and there are files h

Re: Custom kernel build question. Help !!

On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Mahesh Padmanabhan wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Toshiba laptop and I have Debian 2.0 R1. I also have a PC which > I wanted to use to build a zImage kernel for this laptop since bzImage > and the tecra rescue disk sends the Toshiba to continuous reboot. > > My question is: > 1)

Re: Custom kernel build question. Help !!

On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Mahesh Padmanabhan wrote: > My question is: > 1) How can I cleanly build a new kernel image (zImage) without affecting > the Debian installation on my PC ? Use the regular make commands (I think: make mrproper; make menuconfig; make depend; make zImage; But look at the docs t

Custom kernel build question. Help !!

Hi, I have a Toshiba laptop and I have Debian 2.0 R1. I also have a PC which I wanted to use to build a zImage kernel for this laptop since bzImage and the tecra rescue disk sends the Toshiba to continuous reboot. My question is: 1) How can I cleanly build a new kernel image (zImage) without affe

Re: Kernel build

i forgot to say: you can continue where you ended, with make zImage time isn't lost - hey, i'ts linux ! -- Peter Rabenecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] one night is all that stands between them and freedom- but it's going to be one hell of a night --- Begin Message ---   Javier Velasco schri

Re: Kernel build

  Javier Velasco schrieb: hi javier  Hi Debian users:   I am trying to build a custom kernel based on hamm. Basically I am trying to generate a new kernel with Initio scsi card support, for Pentium processor and only the basic modules I need at home (no more scsi drivers, a few filesystems etc).

Re: Kernel build

Get bin86 package from debian site. ___ Never include a comment that will help | Andrew Ivanov someone else understand your code. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] If they understand it, they don't | ICQ: 12402354 need you.

Kernel build

Hi Debian users:   I am trying to build a custom kernel based on hamm. Basically I am trying to generate a new kernel with Initio scsi card support, for Pentium processor and only the basic modules I need at home (no more scsi drivers, a few filesystems etc).   My problem is that when "make

  1   2   >