hugo vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There was a post on this list a while ago on g++-3.3. I find that if I > use *that* on rolling Qt, things fall apart. I now use 3.2 for > everything.
There was a new g++-3.3 last week in testing. I haven't seen any problems with that one (although, haven't really tested much) -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
