Felipe G. Nievinski wrote:
> *PROBLEM*: I get the following error messages
> dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x24
> lost interrupt
> DMA interrupt recovery
> when trying to
> fdisk /dev/hde
Shouldn't *fdisk /dev/hde* have raised a flag as it is a SATA disk and
should be detected as
initialization, too.
*BACKGROUND*: I'm installing a SATA hard drive (Seagate ST3500630as) and
an expansion card (Adaptec 1210SA). I'm using Debian 3.1, kernel 2.4.27.
dmesg shows that the drive and the card are recognized properly (see below).
*SOLUTION*:
- booting from Knoppix 5.1 (kernel 2.6.
lostson wrote:
> > > > I am using debian testing and am itching to install kernel 2.4.27.
> > >
> > > 2.4.32 is the latest. 2.4.27 is 19 months old.
> > >
> > > > Will this pose any problems because im using the testing branch ??
> > >
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 18:46 -0500, lostson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:07:40 -0500
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:17 -0500, lostson wrote:
> > > I am using debian testing and am itching to install kernel 2.4.27.
> >
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:07:40 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:17 -0500, lostson wrote:
> > I am using debian testing and am itching to install kernel 2.4.27.
>
> 2.4.32 is the latest. 2.4.27 is 19 months old.
>
> > Will thi
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 18:07 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:17 -0500, lostson wrote:
> > I am using debian testing and am itching to install kernel 2.4.27.
>
> 2.4.32 is the latest. 2.4.27 is 19 months old.
>
> > Will this pose any problems beca
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:17 -0500, lostson wrote:
> I am using debian testing and am itching to install kernel 2.4.27.
2.4.32 is the latest. 2.4.27 is 19 months old.
> Will this pose any problems because im using the testing branch ??
Itching to install a 2.4 kernel??? It's b
I am using debian testing and am itching to install kernel 2.4.27. Will this
pose any problems because im using the testing branch ??
--
LostSon
http://www.lostsonsvault.org
I Want To Believe
pgpRqWtbc2H1c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Serena Cantor wrote:
--- Robert Kopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
--- "Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Serena Cantor wrote:
I want to customize sarge kernel 2.4.27-2, so I
install kernel-build-2.4.27-2, then
[...]
scripts/Con
Thanks! I installed kernel-source-2.4.27, it did not
help.
--- Robert Kopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- "Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Serena Cantor wrote:
> > > I want to customize
--- "Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Serena Cantor wrote:
> > I want to customize sarge kernel 2.4.27-2, so I
> > install kernel-build-2.4.27-2, then
> > [...]
> > scripts/Configure: line 556: arch/i386/config.i
Serena Cantor wrote:
I want to customize sarge kernel 2.4.27-2, so I
install kernel-build-2.4.27-2, then
[...]
scripts/Configure: line 556: arch/i386/config.in: No
such file or directory
make: *** [config] Error 1
What's wrong? Your reply will be appreciated!
It sounds like you nee
I want to customize sarge kernel 2.4.27-2, so I
install kernel-build-2.4.27-2, then
cd /usr/src/kernel-build-2.4.27-2/386
make config
Below is output:
rm -f include/asm
( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
/bin/sh scripts/Configure arch/i386/config.in
#
# Using defaults found in .config
I have sarge, could you explain the difference?
As the precompiled kernel does not work with my ISA
sb16 card, I compile 2.4.27, try to load sb module in
2.4.27-2-386, it fails:
/lib/modules/2.4.27-2-386/kernel/drivers/sound/sb.o:
kernel-module version mismatch
/lib/modules/2.4.27-2-386/k
time.
###
pivot_root: No such file or directory
/sbin/init:432:cannot open dev/console: No such file
kernel panic: Attempted to kill init
###
I can still boot kernel 2.4.27.
Im using the grub boot loader, and everything looks fine at the
menu.l
such file or directory
/sbin/init:432:cannot open dev/console: No such file
kernel panic: Attempted to kill init
###
I can still boot kernel 2.4.27.
Im using the grub boot loader, and everything looks fine at the menu.lst, i dont have a
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:38:48 +0200, Michael Wuest wrote:
> For some days now I am trying to teach my Debian Sarge
> with Kernel 2.4.27 to use Bootsplash.
>
> I read many articles and HOW TO´s, but my results are
> not what I want.
>
> It seems to me that I have a very s
First of all, you posted this message three different times. That is
not really necessary.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:38:48PM +0200, Michael Wuest wrote:
> Hi.
>
> For some days now I am trying to teach my Debian Sarge
> with Kernel 2.4.27 to use Bootsplash.
>
> I read many a
Hi.
For some days now I am trying to teach my Debian Sarge
with Kernel 2.4.27 to use Bootsplash.
I read many articles and HOW TO´s, but my results are
not what I want.
It seems to me that I have a very simple problem.
after doing "make menuconfig" regarding the HOW TO´s
I need to e
Hi.
For some days now I am trying to teach my Debian Sarge
with Kernel 2.4.27 to use Bootsplash.
I read many articles and HOW TO´s, but my results are
not what I want.
It seems to me that I have a very simple problem.
after doing "make menuconfig" regarding the HOW TO´s
I need to e
Hello everybody,
for some days I am know trying to teach my debian
sarge with kernel 2.4.27 to use bootsplash.
I read many articles in the internet.
All I tried did not lead to a bootsplash screen
and now I have the following questions:
Why do I not get the option "Device-Dr
For information about the "Unresolved symbols" error message, read Debian
bug report #302188 at http://bugs.debian.org/302188 .
In order to eliminate the "alsactl restore" error message, run "alsactl
store" once as root.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Vegard|drageV wrote:
I've recently installed Debian stock kernel 2.4.27-2-686, and wich to
get alsa running properly. Following hints I got on this list earlier
I downloaded alsa-modules-2.4.27-2-686 with apt-get, followed by
alsaconf. Doing this gives me the errormessages listed below. I
I've recently installed Debian stock kernel 2.4.27-2-686, and wich to
get alsa running properly. Following hints I got on this list earlier
I downloaded alsa-modules-2.4.27-2-686 with apt-get, followed by
alsaconf. Doing this gives me the errormessages listed below. I also
found si
On Fri, 20 May 2005 21:34:11 +0200
Mirko Parthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:13:47AM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > > The Debian kernel is already patched to include a backport of the
> > > IPsec implementation from Linux 2.6. Although I havent't tried
> > > this myself, I w
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:13:47AM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > The Debian kernel is already patched to include a backport of the
> > IPsec implementation from Linux 2.6. Although I havent't tried this
> > myself, I would expect this to be the reason why you were not able to
> > apply the freeswan pat
Jacob S wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
are people using?
I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
while applying the patches. I'm using the provided debian/rules in
On Fri, 20 May 2005 11:21:30 +0200
Mirko Parthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4
> > kernel are people using?
> >
> > I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
> >
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
> are people using?
>
> I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
> kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
> while applying the
Hello,
Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
are people using?
I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
while applying the patches. I'm using the provided debian/rules in
freeswan-modu
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Michael Murphy wrote:
> Any one else? Googling's born no fruit. I'm brand new to debian (a
> recent redhat emigree) and am unsure where, or whether, to report
> this. Any insight or direction members of this list can share will
> be gratefully received.
Upgrading to 2.4.27-2-686 (from sid) does not fix the slowness problem
(at least for me). The bug corresponding to this problem is #288272:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288272
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:13:24AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Possibly a result of applications trying to play sound effects but sound
> not working.
I can play ogg files. Sounds like crap (since processor can't decode
quickly enough), but screen output for ogg123 is normal.
> Building your own
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:10:11 +0100, Jason Rennie wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Michael Murphy wrote:
>> After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I were
>> trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the screen
>> in shifting waves.
Possibly
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Michael Murphy wrote:
> After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I were
> trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the screen
> in shifting waves. Also, the soundcard couldn't be found and alsa
> didn't load. I restor
Just wondering if anyone has an 'official' timeline on how this will be
'officially' fixed? ... I got bit with the ALSA thing too (though I'm on
SID) and compiling isn't going so well ... different versions of source,
the new kernel, always wanting pcmcia ... just icky.
I'd like to just have apt-g
Michael Murphy wrote:
Hi Michael,
I guess you didn't notice my posting on this list dated 24/12/04
with the subject alsa mismatch... Anyway as Thomas Hood pointed out
this is known as kernel bug #284356. I would suggest the following:
1. apt-get update then apt-get upgrade then apt-get dist-upgrade
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Michael Murphy wrote:
>> After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I
>> were
>> trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the
>> screen
>> in shifting waves. Also, the soundcard couldn't be found and alsa
>> didn't load. I restored the p
Michael Murphy wrote:
After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I were
trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the screen
in shifting waves. Also, the soundcard couldn't be found and alsa
didn't load. I restored the previous version from the snapshots
archive
After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I were
trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the screen
in shifting waves. Also, the soundcard couldn't be found and alsa
didn't load. I restored the previous version from the snapshots
archive and all has returned
Adam Aube wrote:
Boot using the working kernel, then use diff to show the differences between
the kernel configs (both are in /boot). That might give you a hint.
There are a lot of differences between them. I think this is, because
the original kernel has almost everything built as a module and it
Michiel wrote:
> Yes, this is all built into the kernel (including ext3 and jbd).
> I read something about that you need to use an initrd image file when
> the root partition has an ext3 filesystem. But I guess this is only
> needed when the ext3 drivers are loaded as a module?
I have an ext3 ro
Michiel Jansen wrote:
> James Vahn wrote:
>> Michiel Jansen wrote:
>>>No my customized kernel does not load an initrd.img file. It is also not
>>>generated during kernel compilation.
>>Is ATA/IDE/MFM/RLL support built in?
>>PCI IDE chipset support?
> Yes, this is all built into the kernel (inclu
James Vahn wrote:
No my customized kernel does not load an initrd.img file. It is also not
generated during kernel compilation.
Is ATA/IDE/MFM/RLL support built in?
PCI IDE chipset support?
I'm out of guesses, sorry.
Yes, this is all built into the kernel (including ext3 and jbd).
I read s
> No my customized kernel does not load an initrd.img file. It is also not
> generated during kernel compilation.
Is ATA/IDE/MFM/RLL support built in?
PCI IDE chipset support?
I'm out of guesses, sorry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
James Vahn wrote:
Michiel wrote:
Everything boots fine, but I wanted to recompile a customized kernel,
because of a new video driver that I want to install, but I cannot get
it to boot with my customized kernel.
Look in /boot/grub/menu.lst and see if you are telling grub to use
a non-exista
Michiel wrote:
> Everything boots fine, but I wanted to recompile a customized kernel,
> because of a new video driver that I want to install, but I cannot get
> it to boot with my customized kernel.
Look in /boot/grub/menu.lst and see if you are telling grub to use
a non-existant initrd.img ..
Hello,
I've installed debian Sarge on my system successfully, using the iso
image sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Everything boots fine, but I wanted to recompile a customized kernel,
because of a new video driver that I want to install, but I cannot get
it to boot with my customized kernel.
Debian is insta
Hello,
I've installed debian Sarge on my system successfully, using the iso
image sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Everything boots fine, but I wanted to recompile a customized kernel,
because of a new video driver that I want to install, but I cannot get
it to boot with my customized kernel.
Debian is insta
I have two extra IDE [RAID] channels on my motherboard that use the
hpt366 driver and I am using as just regular IDE channels. There is
just one hard drive that is the master on the first of these channels
which has several data partitions. With linux-kernel 2.4.25 with debian
patches built w
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:01 +0300, Alexei Chetroi wrote:
> I've recently upgraded to kernel 2.4.27 and noticed that my disk
> doesn't use dma, though it was instructed to do so by hdparm. cat
> /proc/pci shows me
> Bus 0, device 31, function 1:
> IDE interface
Eric wrote:
Others may disagree, but I am of the opinion that all ide chipset and hard
disc related drivers should be compiled directly into the kernel instead
of getting loaded as a module. When you load the piix module the kernel
is being asked to make some major changes to an IDE subsystem that
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:10:08 +0200, Alexei Chetroi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently upgraded to kernel 2.4.27 and noticed that my disk
> doesn't use dma, though it was instructed to do so by hdparm. cat
> /proc/pci shows me
> Bus 0, device 31, function 1:
>
Hi,
I've recently upgraded to kernel 2.4.27 and noticed that my disk
doesn't use dma, though it was instructed to do so by hdparm. cat
/proc/pci shows me
Bus 0, device 31, function 1:
IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 18).
I/O at 0xfc00 [0xfc0
54 matches
Mail list logo
