On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 13:35 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael R. Head wrote:
> > What should I use to run a Debian server as a NAT box these days that
> > works as simply as ipmasq?
>
> The closest I have been able to find is arno-iptables-firewall. I have
> not replaced
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Michael R. Head
wrote:
> I recently noticed that ipmasq has been removed from the archive,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538384
>
> I've been using the package for years now, and I'm happy to migrate to a
> modern repl
Michael R. Head wrote:
> I recently noticed that ipmasq has been removed from the archive,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538384
>
> I've been using the package for years now, and I'm happy to migrate to a
> modern replacement, but I don't know
I recently noticed that ipmasq has been removed from the archive,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538384
I've been using the package for years now, and I'm happy to migrate to a
modern replacement, but I don't know which package I should choose (the
removal reques
Dear List,
I am on Etch, and I use NetworkManager, DHCP to obtain dynamic address
of my broadband provider UPC, along with /etc/init.d/networking scripts,
plus ipmasq. All is standard 'apt-get installed' through sources lists.
Always when a new lease is negotiated by dhcp client
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:52:58PM +0100, Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime wrote:
> > On Debian, you shouldn't have to do the rout add thing. ipmasq will
> > likly just work on its own, and you may just confuse it.
>
> I added it because without it, it does not work eith
answer in
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Debian/2008-01/msg02116.html
]
> On Debian, you shouldn't have to do the rout add thing. ipmasq will
> likly just work on its own, and you may just confuse it.
I added it because without it, it does not work either.
I will remove it, anyway.
(N
ding to the source address.
# Packets from go to 4122. All other port 22 packets
# are undisturbed.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s --sport 22 -j REDIRECT
--to-port 4122
#=
Does that seem reasonable?
My remaining concerns involve interactions of openvpn, tun,
ipmasq &am
On 9/8/06, George Borisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,You need to add some rules on the FORWARD chain, as well asenable forwarding in the kernel(echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward)Yes it did help, an easy way to fix the ipmasq for the routing table was just to copy the files in /
Prepaid wrote:
>
> With some fumbling around I was able to make it so that the host running
> openswan was reachable via the VPN, I had to edit
> /etc/ipmasq/rules/I10l.def and add:
> $IPTABLES -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -i ipsec0
> $IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT -o ipsec0
>
Hello allI'm running a Debian testing box, and am trying to use Openswan to connect to some IPSEC VPNs to create network to network VPNs.I have no issues configuring OPENSWAN to connect to the remote end, but the problem that I am having is that the ipmasq firewall rules I assume are droppin
Hi Everyone!
I have been a very happy user of the Ipmasq program for many years. It
has allowed me to very easily setup a home network that doesn't require a
router.
However, I recently bought a webcam which I use on a networked computer
running Debian testing. The server runs Sarge at
Hello!
I want to ask about ipmasq Version: 4.0.2 on Debian GNU/Linux Sarge
operating system, with kernel-2.6.8 .
I have two computers: Pentium I & Pentium IV connected together. I want
to set up P1 to be a firewall & IP translator for P4, and therefore I
want to use ipmasq package.
B
Hi,
first of all, I am new to the linux scene so bear with me. I have just
installed ipmasq. I want to allow an ipaq connected to my debian system to
connect to the internet. So when I installed ipmasq, I chose the "yes" when
it asked if I wanted ppp to reconfigure the firewall. I th
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:13:56PM +0100, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
> I installed the ipmasq package and since then appears messages on the
> console all the time.
>
> I try
> klogd -c 1
> to reduce these messages but with no success.
but I forget to run:
/etc/init.d/klogd
Hello!
I installed the ipmasq package and since then appears messages on the
console all the time.
I try
klogd -c 1
to reduce these messages but with no success.
How can I stop these messages on the console?
I appreciate any advices!
--
Regards,
Debian Junior Project, DebianEdu, Moodle
uestion is should I go back to a 2.4 kernel
because the computer worked just fine w/IPmasq before
or should I compile a newer kernel 2.6.x? I need to
compile a new kernel regardless since it doesn't
recognise all of the memory.
If you anyone can help me I'd be very appreciative :)
Not sur
Scarletdown wrote:
As per the subject line, the following three questions are unrelated
to each other. However, I felt it best to put them all in one post
instead of doing 3 seperate posts.
1: I'm having some minor problems with ipmasq on a router I just
built (Deabian Sid). Afte
As per the subject line, the following three questions are unrelated
to each other. However, I felt it best to put them all in one post
instead of doing 3 seperate posts.
1: I'm having some minor problems with ipmasq on a router I just
built (Deabian Sid). After the network interface
ished
yet. When I try a ping to my ISP "ping www.t-online.de" the connection
is established, the pings comes through and answers. Now problem.
Now I installed ipmasq to make the connection available to the computers
in the LAN. After restarting ppp and trying the same ping command
I have a 2.6.7 Linux kernel system on testing, with an
Ethernet interface to the cable modem and another to the internal
network.
With Linux 2.4 IPMasq worked OK, but with 2.6 I canât anymore
reach localhost 127.0.0.1. This hinders me from using the squid proxy
cache, for example
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:06:44PM +0800, Brendan Bache wrote:
> I'm running debian woody on my gateway with the ipmasq package installed
> and I need to do some port forwarding. For instance, I need to forward
> some ports for BitTorrent running on a box on my LAN so I created
Hi,
I'm running debian woody on my gateway with the ipmasq package installed
and I need to do some port forwarding. For instance, I need to forward
some ports for BitTorrent running on a box on my LAN so I created a file
/etc/ipmasq/rules/F10bt.rul
---F10bt.rul---
ipnm_cache ppp0
btPorts=
Hi,
I recently upgraded to the ipmasq version 3.5.10c because of security
risks through apt-get upgrade. The problem is, now there is no working IP
masquerading.
when I issue the command: < dpkg-reconfigure ipmasq>
Initializing IP Masquerading...iptables: No chain/target/match by tha
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:24:57PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:32:30AM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> > After a kernel recompile the NAT problem is fixed.
> > I have added some modules to the kernel.
> >
> > I still get some "iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:32:30AM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> After a kernel recompile the NAT problem is fixed.
> I have added some modules to the kernel.
>
> I still get some "iptables: No chain/target/match by that name" error
> messages:
>
> /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -j LOG -i ! lo -s
gt; > >
> > > After upgrading the ipmasq package yesterday, NAT is not working
> > > properly.
> > >
> > > What do I need to do in order to solve it?
> > > I am using Debian woody.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > > Mihalis
> >
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:06:40PM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:37:29AM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> > Dear list,
> > I have the following problem:
> >
> > After upgrading the ipmasq package yesterday, NAT is not working
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:06:40PM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:37:29AM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> > Dear list,
> > I have the following problem:
> >
> > After upgrading the ipmasq package yesterday, NAT is not working
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:37:29AM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
> Dear list,
> I have the following problem:
>
> After upgrading the ipmasq package yesterday, NAT is not working
> properly.
>
> What do I need to do in order to solve it?
> I am using Debian woody.
&
Dear list,
I have the following problem:
After upgrading the ipmasq package yesterday, NAT is not working
properly.
What do I need to do in order to solve it?
I am using Debian woody.
TIA,
Mihalis
--
11:35:52 up 8 days, 15:16, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:06:19AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:09:27PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > * Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
> > > I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
> > > ke
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:09:27PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
> > I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
> > kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
> > system
* Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
> I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
> kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
> system works perfectly with the computers on the LAN using Woody or
> Testing but
I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
system works perfectly with the computers on the LAN using Woody or
Testing but I have been unable to use Netscape from a computer using
Windows ME. I can
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:44:42AM -0800, Ron Farrer wrote:
>
> Anyone got an idea why the ipmasq package in stable would fail to
> install? I'v got an old machine (486 vintage with an AMD 5x86 processor
> @133MHz) that I use as a firewall running latest stable. While
> a
Ron Farrer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Anyone got an idea why the ipmasq package in stable would fail to
> install? I'v got an old machine (486 vintage with an AMD 5x86 processor
> @133MHz) that I use as a firewall running latest stable. While
> attempting to install ipmasq it
Anyone got an idea why the ipmasq package in stable would fail to
install? I'v got an old machine (486 vintage with an AMD 5x86 processor
@133MHz) that I use as a firewall running latest stable. While
attempting to install ipmasq it goes through this series of events:
dmz:~# apt-get clea
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 12:13:28PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p any --dport 517 -j DNAT --to-destination
>192.168.0.4:517
> >
> > I also tried -p udp and that didn't work either. Any ideas?
>
> Try dumping the port specification - it should be remapped
This one time, at band camp, Paul Johnson said:
> I've been trying to get talkd to be redirected from my network's
> gateway to Ursine so ktalkd can actually be useful.
>
> What I've tried so far hasn't worked.
>
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p any --dport 517 -j DNAT --to-destination
I've been trying to get talkd to be redirected from my network's
gateway to Ursine so ktalkd can actually be useful.
What I've tried so far hasn't worked.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p any --dport 517 -j DNAT --to-destination
192.168.0.4:517
I also tried -p udp and that didn't work e
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:21:30PM +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> (iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT)
> iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Believe it or not, thi
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:31:20AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:42:36PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > It Just Worked for me, I think. The only config options I know of is
> > the one that lets you specify which remotes ports are to be considered
> > IRC or FTP (I think it's
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:22:52AM -0700, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> Jabber's icq functionality comes from a component called an "Agent"
That would be a "transport" or "gateway":
http://www.jabber.org/admin/componentadminguide.html#gateways
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:17:08AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
| > Yes, there is. iptables has modules for ftp (to support non-passive
| > mode) and irc (to support dcc, etc). They're called
| > ipt_{conntrack,nat}_{irc,ftp}, IIRC.
|
| D
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 05:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Someone should go tell the netfilter folks about the jabber icq server
> and the licq client sometime.
Re: jabber icq server
Link? As far as I'm aware, there is no such thing as a "jabber icq
server". Jabber's icq functionality comes from a compon
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:31:20AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:42:36PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> Yes, but DCC connections in IRC don't work,
I haven't tried this under iptables recently.
> FTP works passive mode only
With iptables there are connection tracking modu
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:42:36PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> It Just Worked for me, I think. The only config options I know of is
> the one that lets you specify which remotes ports are to be considered
> IRC or FTP (I think it's and 6667 and 21, by default). Does
> masquerading work for you
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday 19 December 2002 13:17
> To: debian-user List
> Subject: Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > Yes, there is. ip
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:17:08AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > Yes, there is. iptables has modules for ftp (to support non-passive
> > mode) and irc (to support dcc, etc). They're called
> > ipt_{conntrack,nat}_{irc,ftp}, IIRC.
>
> D
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> Yes, there is. iptables has modules for ftp (to support non-passive
> mode) and irc (to support dcc, etc). They're called
> ipt_{conntrack,nat}_{irc,ftp}, IIRC.
Does this work automagically once inserted, or is there some trick to
iptab
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:35:11AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go
> back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP
> Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel, either
> way works for me.
Yes, the
r 2.4 kernel, either
>way works for me.
>
i tried ipmasq a while back with ftp and it didn't work for me. (probably my fault :-)
So i switched to shorewall. It's a very nice package which lets you configure
everything with config files.
I like it.
Regards,
Benedict
--
To UN
Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go
back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP
Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel, either
way works for me.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and use
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:40:04AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
I notice that Gibraltar contains shorewall, so I may try that. I'm
also going to look at fiaif.
>
> Only problem i still have is that when i log on to the system say
> on ttys1 for instance, that i get log messages of unauthoriz
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: ipmasq and ftp
> I had this problem with a 2.4 kernel and iptables. Normal FTP uses a
> separat
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:08:43PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday i installed woody 3.0 (testing/unstable) on my server.
> I then installed ipmasq so it's able to share the cable connection.
> For the moment all works well except for ftp: i get this error
Hi,
yesterday i installed woody 3.0 (testing/unstable) on my server.
I then installed ipmasq so it's able to share the cable connection.
For the moment all works well except for ftp: i get this error in
my ftp program:
"Error opening data socket"
Does anybody know what rule (for
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:44:14PM -0800, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering if ipmasq has a max connections or if it has
> a limit of the number of IP's it can masq at the same time?
I'm pretty sure it cannot masq more than 65535 connections at
the same time :-)
Mike Egglestone said:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering if ipmasq has a max connections or if it has
> a limit of the number of IP's it can masq at the same time?
>
> I would like to guess that there is no limit, or maybe the limit
> is really high, like around 65,000 or somet
Hi,
I'm wondering if ipmasq has a max connections or if it has
a limit of the number of IP's it can masq at the same time?
I would like to guess that there is no limit, or maybe the limit
is really high, like around 65,000 or something.
but I have a subnet on my firewall running wit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-14 14:45:43 -0400]:
>> Setting up a new machine, I'm trying to run the openafs client from behind
>> a firewall.
>>
>> 1.) Is it possible to run an openafs client via NAT? and
>
> It might be that you will need to
Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-14 14:45:43 -0400]:
> Setting up a new machine, I'm trying to run the openafs client from behind
> a firewall.
>
> 1.) Is it possible to run an openafs client via NAT? and
In order to determine this I would run tcpdump on the firewall machine
and then m
Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, two questions:
> 1.) Is it possible to run an openafs client via NAT? and
no.
> 2.) If not, is it possible somehow to re-export an AFS filesystem? I'm
> thinking then of mounting AFS on the firwall machine and exporting it to
> the other machine v
Greetings-
Setting up a new machine, I'm trying to run the openafs client from behind
a firewall. The machine that is the firewall can use the client fine, but
when I try to start openafs on the machine behind the firewall I get:
joehill:~# /etc/init.d/openafs-client start
Starting AFS services
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Rohan Deshpande wrote:
> Hello,
> I was just wondering if this was possible to do in Linux.
> Thanks!
Sure, do it all the time; just enable ipaliasing on your one nic, then
ifconfig eth0:1, etc and set up routes before trying to config ipchains
or tables.
On Sunday 30 June 2002 16:13, Rohan Deshpande wrote:
> Hey wvl,
>
> I was reading the IPMasq howto, and it says this:
>
>
> Users should also understand that IP Masquerading will only work with a
> physical interface such as eth0, eth1, etc. MASQing out an aliased
> interfa
Hey wvl,
I was reading the IPMasq howto, and it says this:
Users should also understand that IP Masquerading will only work with a
physical interface such as eth0, eth1, etc. MASQing out an aliased interface
such as "eth0:1, eth1:1, etc" will NOT work.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
On S
irtual NIC. The real NIC is used for connecting
> to the cable or DSL modem and the virtual NIC is used to communicate with
> the other computers in your network.
>
> I was just wondering if this was possible to do in Linux.
Yup. See the IPMasq HOWTO.
- wvl
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hello,
This is an excerpt from http://soho.sygate.com/products/gate_ov.htm:
Sygate® OneNICTM Technology
Sygate Home Network makes it easier than ever for you to maximize your existing
hardware investment with the introduction of Sygate OneNIC technology. OneNIC
technology significantly simplif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 12:51 pm, John Hasler wrote:
> Jeremy writes:
> > I've read up on the Linux Documentation Project's articles on PPP and
> > IPMasq, but neither of them talk about the autodial section. Any other
> > referen
Jeremy writes:
> I've read up on the Linux Documentation Project's articles on PPP and
> IPMasq, but neither of them talk about the autodial section. Any other
> references or ideas?
Run pppconfig, configure your connection, select 'Advanced' in the
'Properties&
only shows up with one entry, listing the eth0
> device. I get perfectly routed packets through ppp0 when dialed up, but
> I want the box to be able to dial whenever a packet needs to be routed.
>
> I've read up on the Linux Documentation Project's articles on PPP and
>
x to be able to dial whenever a packet needs to be routed.
I've read up on the Linux Documentation Project's articles on PPP and
IPMasq, but neither of them talk about the autodial section. Any other
references or ideas?
Jeremy
--
***
Hi there,
Does anyone know how to stop the debugging messages alltogether? I get about 1
of these identical messages in my /var/log/messages that I tail every 3 minutes:
May 11 15:27:58 abyss kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=01:00:5e:00:00:01:00:20:40:05:3a:ad:08:00 SRC=192.168.100.1 DST=224.0.0.1
LE
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:34:43AM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:33:31PM +0300, George Karaolides wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running woody with kernel 2.2.20 and using the ipmasq Debian package
> > to set up packet filtering.
>
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:33:31PM +0300, George Karaolides wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running woody with kernel 2.2.20 and using the ipmasq Debian package
> to set up packet filtering.
>
> I find that on woody, ipmasq (well really, ipchains as ipmasq calls
> ipchain
Hi,
I'm running woody with kernel 2.2.20 and using the ipmasq Debian package
to set up packet filtering.
I find that on woody, ipmasq (well really, ipchains as ipmasq calls
ipchains with the -l option) logs to the console as well as
/var/log/messages which is a big pain; it makes the co
"Karl E. Jorgensen" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:10:24PM +0100, joe user wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Is it possible that IPMasq can disturb fetchmail?
> > The retrieving of messages always stalls when a message is between 2434- or
> > 2448 by
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:10:24PM +0100, joe user wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is it possible that IPMasq can disturb fetchmail?
> The retrieving of messages always stalls when a message is between 2434- or
> 2448 bytes in size.
>
> I have a small home-network with two boxes ru
Hello.
Is it possible that IPMasq can disturb fetchmail?
The retrieving of messages always stalls when a message is between 2434- or
2448 bytes in size.
I have a small home-network with two boxes running Woody.
One of them is acting 'router' using the 'ipmasq'-package.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 07:30:44PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> The ipmasq rules files assume a ppp connection. I have a static ip so I
> need to use SNAT instead of MASQUERADE.
Congraturations.
FYI: For this kind of simple gateway machine, you can simply install
"ipmasq" pac
The ipmasq rules files assume a ppp connection. I have a static ip so I
need to use SNAT instead of MASQUERADE.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:27:38PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0500, Wayne wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 02:29:05PM -0500, Rick Paso
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0500, Wayne wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 02:29:05PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > I'm running a 2.4.16 kernel and the default ipmasq from woody. The
> > primary machine 192.168.0.1 (with 2 nics) talks to the internet just
> > f
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 02:29:05PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I'm running a 2.4.16 kernel and the default ipmasq from woody. The
> primary machine 192.168.0.1 (with 2 nics) talks to the internet just
> fine. The secondary machine 192.168.0.5 (running windows 98) can access
> th
I'm running a 2.4.16 kernel and the default ipmasq from woody. The
primary machine 192.168.0.1 (with 2 nics) talks to the internet just
fine. The secondary machine 192.168.0.5 (running windows 98) can access
the primary machine but cannot access the internet. I have samba set up
and the Ne
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> As only a true newbie could...
> I screwed up the configs for ipmasq. To start
> fresh I
> 'apt-get remove ipmasq' and 'rm -r /etc/ipmasq'.
>
> Of course, now when I reinstall it via apt-get, it does not give me
> any of
Thank you Tobias, Karsten, and all other debians,
I have me ipmasq pkg and confs back on my potato 2.2r3
machine, and have been reading ... I am a little
overwhelmed by how ipmasq works -- previously someone
suggested it would work "out of box" *harhar*
the default rules are blockin
As only a true newbie could...
I screwed up the configs for ipmasq. To start
fresh I
'apt-get remove ipmasq' and 'rm -r /etc/ipmasq'.
Of course, now when I reinstall it via apt-get, it does not give me
any of the config files -> the rules . How do I get
them back?!
How
Greetings,
I didn't receive a response to yesterday's query about ~killing~ ipmasq.
However, I imagine that my post was lost in the ruch of repeat messages sent
via the list today.
To sum up my previous post ...
I installed apt-get install'd 'ipmasq' in a knee jerk r
- Forwarded message from cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:54:17 -0400
From: cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Difficulties w/ ipmasq]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D
- Forwarded message from cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:52:37 -0400
From: cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debuser
Subject: Difficulties w/ ipmasq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Greetings,
I hope that someone cah help me with thi
Thanks,
All these rules are not quit clear to me but I will find it out.
I have a place to start now,
Hans
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:31:20PM +, Hans Steinraht wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have a set up my network at home and set some ip rules with the package
> ipmasq.
>
> N
set this up.
You can also use the ipmasq package and put scripts in
/etc/ipmasq/rules.
man ipmasq
man ipmasq-rules
My connection seems to be working fine through the cablemodem now, with very
little difficulty (although it's still slow-- I need to look into that)
the current problem is that we use IPMASQ, and play a game called "Dark Age
of Camelot" on the masqueraded win98 systems, which wor
Quoting Hans Steinraht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi,
>
> I have a set up my network at home and set some ip rules with the
> package ipmasq.
>
> Now I want to ad an extra rule, so in my xterm I type: ipchains -I input
> -p 2 -s 24.134.6.1 -d 224.0.0.1 -j DENY.
> So
hi,
I have a set up my network at home and set some ip rules with the package
ipmasq.
Now I want to ad an extra rule, so in my xterm I type: ipchains -I input -p 2
-s 24.134.6.1 -d 224.0.0.1 -j DENY.
So far this is working.
The problem is now that every time I restart Debian I have to do it
I'm running into trouble trying to get my webcam to work (upload a stream of
images to a website). Sadly the cam is hooked up to a Win2k laptop. It's a
creative webcam III plus.
Although it works fine when simply displaying video, when using it's software
to upload images to my homepage (using
tc.
There is no problem with ipmasq down, and workstations using my
Debian box to masquerade can contact these hosts just fine
through my Debain box.
The strange thing is that traceroute says the connect fails far
away, not here -
1 gw-081-147.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net (64.81.147.1)
2 bo
Hi all,
I'm running Debian ipmasq on the gateway machine in my company's LAN
(Debian potato). ipmasq worked great out of the box with the default
configuration; it was just what I needed. It correctly identified all the
internal interfaces and allowed forwarding between them, a
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
