On Fri 25 Apr 2025 at 15:29:39 (-), Greg wrote:
> On 2025-04-25, David Wright wrote:
> >>
> >> Considerable extra typing susceptible to error, and as I suffer from a
> >> digital deformity, I prefer less to more.
> >
> > You could read man bash from the line that starts with
> > ALIASES
>
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 at 22:44, Lee wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:51 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:33:54 -0400, Lee wrote:
> > > > Also, you should quote "$tempf".
[...]
> > But why take the chance?
> You're right - I should be working on the habit of putting quote
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:51 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:33:54 -0400, Lee wrote:
> > > Also, you should quote "$tempf".
> > >
> > > [ -s "$tempf" ] && notify-send ...
> >
> > is there any way that
> > $(mktemp -q --tmpdir=/tmp -t updX)
> > would return a 0 status a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:33:54 -0400, Lee wrote:
> > Also, you should quote "$tempf".
> >
> > [ -s "$tempf" ] && notify-send ...
>
> is there any way that
> $(mktemp -q --tmpdir=/tmp -t updX)
> would return a 0 status and a filename with embedded spaces .. or with
> anything that would req
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:50 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> Just a few notes:
thanks for the feedback!
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:39:58 -0400, Lee wrote:
> > #!/bin/bash
> > # see if there are any Debian updates and pop-up a notice if there are
> >
> > # needs an /etc/sudoers.d/adm-apt-privs that
On 2025-04-25, David Wright wrote:
>>
>> Considerable extra typing susceptible to error, and as I suffer from a
>> digital deformity, I prefer less to more.
>
> You could read man bash from the line that starts with
> ALIASES
Yes, but my original objection to the utility of 'apt --list upgra
Just a few notes:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:39:58 -0400, Lee wrote:
> #!/bin/bash
> # see if there are any Debian updates and pop-up a notice if there are
>
> # needs an /etc/sudoers.d/adm-apt-privs that has
> # Cmnd_AliasADM_COMMANDS = /usr/bin/apt update
> # %adm ALL = (root)
On Fri 25 Apr 2025 at 14:23:52 (-), Greg wrote:
> On 2025-04-25, Lee wrote:
> >>
> >> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same
> >> info, while offering the chance to say no.
> >
> > ^shrug^
> > it's harder to fuck up 'apt list --upgradable' if all you want is a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:24 AM Greg wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-25, Lee wrote:
> >>
> >> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same
> >> info, while offering the chance to say no.
> >
> > ^shrug^
> > it's harder to fuck up 'apt list --upgradable' if all you want is a
> > l
On 2025-04-25, Lee wrote:
>>
>> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same
>> info, while offering the chance to say no.
>
> ^shrug^
> it's harder to fuck up 'apt list --upgradable' if all you want is a
> list of what updates are available, but whatever works for you.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:08 AM Greg wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-24, Lee wrote:
> >
> > "apt update" just gets the latest package info
> > "apt list --upgradable" shows you what packages have updates
>
> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same
> info, while offering the
On 2025-04-24, Lee wrote:
>
> "apt update" just gets the latest package info
> "apt list --upgradable" shows you what packages have updates
I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same
info, while offering the chance to say no.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 7:12 PM Van Snyder wrote:
>
> KDE discover put a popup on my screen saying there are updates available.
>
> I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on."
"apt update" just gets the latest package info
"apt l
On 24/04/2025 03:54, Van Snyder wrote:
I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on."
So I pushed the little button in the tool tray with the little red dot
and Discover said there were 250 updates occupying 454 MB.
What does
apt list --upgradable
s
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 20:54, Van Snyder wrote:
>
> KDE discover put a popup on my screen saying there are updates available.
>
> I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on."
>
> So I pushed the little button in the tool tray with the li
KDE discover put a popup on my screen saying there are updates
available.
I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on."
So I pushed the little button in the tool tray with the little red dot
and Discover said there were 250 updates occupying 454 MB.
Hey there,
Hope you received my below email.
Shall I send you count and cost for the list.
Best Regards,
Nora Lawrence-Marketing Executive
From: Nora Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:15 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Discover who your competitors are - Vision Expo East
Hello,
I'm writing to check if you would be interested in obtaining Vision Expo East
2021. We do have the pre registered attendees database.
Visitors profile:- Optometrist, Buyer, Optician, Office/Practice Management and
many others.
It helps you with multi-channel marketing. that includes : E
oom from
(in response to a link on a google calendar entry).
It did have enough information for me to install zoom, with a few
workarounds. So thanks for providing the link to this page.
The main point is that gdebi needs to be used instead of plasma-discover.
Presumably my system only offered pl
Dan Hitt wrote:
> I'm in the process of seeing if i can install a zoom client on my debian 10
> system.
...
this sounds like a really good way to mess up a system.
google had the answer as the top result. no idea if it
works as i don't use such a thing myself.
https://support.zoom.us/hc
ox do with this file?"
Instead of just choosing "Save File", i'm trying to go with the "Open with"
flow.
The application listed to open the file is "Discover".
If i click "Open" in the firefox window, Discover comes up, and offers
several options, inc
Eric Barault composed on 2018-11-19 22:22 (UTC+0100):
> have you tried this version? It worked for me on top of debian stretch-slim:
> https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180701T205743Z/pool/main/f/firefox-esr/firefox-esr_52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb
I hadn't, but it's now installed and
have you tried this version? It worked for me on top of debian stretch-slim:
https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180701T205743Z/pool/main/f/firefox-esr/firefox-esr_52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb
have you tried this version? It worked for me on top of debian stretch-slim:
https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180701T205743Z/pool/main/f/firefox-esr/firefox-esr_52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:53:19AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Using Bash you could use functions or aliases:
>
> search_pkg() { aptitude search -F '%p %V' --disable-columns ${1}; }
You probably want "$@" there (with quotes) instead of $1.
Hi.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 06:12:12AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Reco composed on 2018-11-17 13:45 (UTC+0300):
>
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 05:36:25AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> I knew 52.9 was released upstream in June, so I kept trying June archive
> >> dates
> >> and stopped
Reco composed on 2018-11-17 13:45 (UTC+0300):
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 05:36:25AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>> I knew 52.9 was released upstream in June, so I kept trying June archive
>> dates
>> and stopped when I found one containing 52.9. Upstream release bz2 that I
>> previously wgeted turn
Hi.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 05:36:25AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> 2-http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/firefox-esr/ apparently has
> what I want for Stretch,
> esr52.9 by whatever name (Firefox-ESR or IceWeasel). How can I get the
> cmdline package management
>
Reco composed on 2018-11-17 11:14 (UTC+0300):
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 02:35:57AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Reco composed on 2018-11-17 09:53 (UTC+0300):
>>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
Web searches have not been helpful for these:
1-Which of apt*
songbird composed on 2018-11-17 03:55 (UTC-0500):
> Felix Miata wrote:
> ...
> was this version ever downloaded to begin with?
Not "to begin with".
> if so it may still be in the cache...
> check /var/cache/apt/archives
It's there because I put it there with wget, but that hasn't helped
Felix Miata wrote:
...
was this version ever downloaded to begin with?
if so it may still be in the cache...
check /var/cache/apt/archives
songbird
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 02:35:57AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Reco composed on 2018-11-17 09:53 (UTC+0300):
>
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> Web searches have not been helpful for these:
>
> >> 1-Which of apt* returns version numbers along with package n
On 11/17/2018 8:35 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Reco composed on 2018-11-17 09:53 (UTC+0300):
>
>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>>> Web searches have not been helpful for these:
>
>>> 1-Which of apt* returns version numbers along with package names, one line
>>> pe
Reco composed on 2018-11-17 09:53 (UTC+0300):
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Web searches have not been helpful for these:
>> 1-Which of apt* returns version numbers along with package names, one line
>> per result, when
>> searching? (in openSUSE, versions ar
Hi.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Web searches have not been helpful for these:
>
> 1-Which of apt* returns version numbers along with package names, one line
> per result, when
> searching? (in openSUSE, versions are returned by zypper search via the -s
Web searches have not been helpful for these:
1-Which of apt* returns version numbers along with package names, one line per
result, when
searching? (in openSUSE, versions are returned by zypper search via the -s
switch (one line per
package))
2-http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/firefox-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 09:33:04PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-06-24 at 21:24, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:08:44AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> What is your actual question, here?
> >
> > Welcome to an Owlett p
On 2018-06-24 at 21:24, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:08:44AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> What is your actual question, here?
>
> Welcome to an Owlett performance art "happening". Pull up a
> comfortable seat; this show is going to last a while.
Oh, I'm familiar with the u
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:08:44AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> What is your actual question, here?
Welcome to an Owlett performance art "happening". Pull up a
comfortable seat; this show is going to last a while.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Curt wrote:
>
> I'm reading when you plug this cable into a linux host the usbnet driver
> enters into the fray, creating a network interface (usb0?) that
> subsequently requires *configuration*.
>
> Like
>
> machine 1: ifconfig usb0 192.168.1.1
> machine 2: ifconfig usb0 192.168.1.2
>
> A suc
The Wanderer wrote:
> What is your actual question, here?
OP wanted to use usb-usb cable for ethernet and was recommended the prolific
one. HE bought it but can not configure network now.
On 2018-06-24, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> Thank you. I'm interested in only:
> Prolific Technology, Inc. PL25A1 Host-Host Bridge
>
> I'm missing understanding of "something" everyone takes for granted.
Many of your gooses seem a little wild.
> While followi
On 2018-06-24 at 10:51, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/24/2018 09:35 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2018-06-24 at 10:07, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>> discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
>>> gives
>>> 1912 0015 unknown unknown
>>
>> h
On 06/24/2018 09:35 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2018-06-24 at 10:07, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/24/2018 08:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
gives
1912 0015 unknown unknown
https://pci-ids.ucw.cz
On 2018-06-24 at 10:07, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/24/2018 08:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
>
> discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
> gives
> 1912 0015 unknown unknown
https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/read/
On Sun 24 Jun 2018 at 09:07:33 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/24/2018 08:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> >discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
>
> discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
> gives
> 1912 0015 unknown unknown
> 1bbb 0195 unknown un
On 06/24/2018 08:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
discover --vendor-id --model-id -t | grep unknown
gives
1912 0015 unknown unknown
1bbb 0195 unknown unknown
Thanks
On 06/24/2018 08:36 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2018-06-24 at 09:27, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/24/2018 08:16 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2018-06-24 at 08:10, Richard Owlett wrote:
The discover(1) manpage does not describe output format/fields.
The relevant output line is:> Proli
nown
> unknown" on a separate line, I think that "unknown unknown" represents a
> completely separate device; I don't think it's related to the Prolific
> Technology device at all. I think the fact that they appeared on one
> line in your mail is an artifact of a l
On 2018-06-24 at 09:27, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/24/2018 08:16 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2018-06-24 at 08:10, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>>> The discover(1) manpage does not describe output format/fields.
>>> The relevant output line is:> Pro
On 06/24/2018 08:16 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2018-06-24 at 08:10, Richard Owlett wrote:
The discover(1) manpage does not describe output format/fields.
The relevant output line is:> Prolific Technology, Inc. PL25A1 Host-Host
Bridge unknown unknown
There are two fields whose content
On 2018-06-24 at 08:10, Richard Owlett wrote:
> The discover(1) manpage does not describe output format/fields.
> The relevant output line is:> Prolific Technology, Inc. PL25A1 Host-Host
> Bridge unknown unknown
>
> There are two fields whose content is "unknown".
&g
The discover(1) manpage does not describe output format/fields.
The relevant output line is:> Prolific Technology, Inc. PL25A1 Host-Host
Bridge unknown unknown
There are two fields whose content is "unknown".
What are they?
TIA
Hi list,
when I see update notifications I use apt-get to update the
system, in this way a get news and changelogs via email by apt-listchanges.
Is there a mode to get news and changelogs using plasma-discover (kde
update manager) when you perform an update?
Debian GNU/Linux 9.1 (stretch
Hi,
On a laptop that was working, but that have remained
unused for a long time, avahi doesn't want to work any more.
I've reinstalled it on the laptop with
apt-get install avahi-daemon avahi-discover libnss-mdns
There is three computers, the network is not "configured"
You could use nmap
nmap -sP 192.168.0.*
performs a ping scan on all hosts in the network range provided.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jesus arteche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey,
> someone knows about some tool in debian to discover what ip's are up in my
> net...cc
Jesus arteche wrote:
hey,
someone knows about some tool in debian to discover what ip's are up in
my net...ccause i lost a router and i cant reset it...and i dont know
what ip it has.
thanks
Jesus,
I got the script below from this marvelous list in the past:
#!/bin/sh
lynx -dump
hey,
someone knows about some tool in debian to discover what ip's are up in my
net...ccause i lost a router and i cant reset it...and i dont know what ip
it has.
thanks
No matter how we feel about it, the one thing we can always count on is that
things are going to change. What we may not realize is that how we handle
change
affects the quality of our lives. Whether it is a new CEO, market opportunity,
corporate vision, product line or job responsibility, any
Hello.
I have an USB printer connected to my Debian Etch and can print via
CUPS.
Now I would like Apple Bonjour (rendezvous) to automatically discover
the printer.
How can I do that?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the past I clearly remember that my cdroms where automagiclly
> mounted in /media/cdrom by -I think- discover. Today when I put a cd
> in the cdrom I have to manually mount them. Is there something I need
> to setup ?
>
> Than
Hello,
In the past I clearly remember that my cdroms where automagiclly
mounted in /media/cdrom by -I think- discover. Today when I put a cd
in the cdrom I have to manually mount them. Is there something I need
to setup ?
Thanks for any documentation
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I'm currently trying to solve the same problem. It looks like maybe the discover1
package is the culprit? I'm about to fiddle with /etc/discover.conf &
/etc/discover.conf-2.6 and reboot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi all!
I'd like to discover my memory frequency (Mhz).
I try with
hwinfo --memory
and
hwinfo --bios
but with not wanted results.
Of course: without open case!!
Can you help me?
Thanks!
Hello,
I'd like to use discover / discover-modprobe on an initrd that will be
booting a bunch of things via pxe that have various kinds of custom
hardware installed, most of it pretty new, and all of it pretty new.
Is it better to just insmod/modprobe iterating through every custom
modu
he list members. I googled to no
> > avail in search of an answer.
> >
> > How do I discover which device drivers are built into a given kernel
> > image, not accessing the sources ?
>
> less /proc/modules
>
> oops that's all of them isn't it
I think that
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:42:26PM -0300, Paulo M C Aragão wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies in advance for the basic question. I'm counting on the
> everlasting patience and generosity of the list members. I googled to no
> avail in search of an answer.
>
> How do I discove
Keeling,
s. keeling wrote on May, 31:
> If it's installed, you might learn more than you want to by running
> "si":
>
> i si- /proc system information viewer
>
> aptitude update && aptitude upgrade && aptitude install si
I installed si (from stable) on my sarge laptop
Keeling,
s. keeling wrote on May, 31:
> If it's installed, you might learn more than you want to by running
> "si":
>
> i si- /proc system information viewer
>
> aptitude update && aptitude upgrade && aptitude install si
Do you know why `si' isn't included in sarge ?
Incoming from Paulo M C Aragão:
> Hi Keeling, Jacob and Peter,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:52:58PM -0400, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> > If it's enabled in the kernel, you can also do
> >
> > zcat /proc/config.gz
> >
> > It's been a long time since I've used a stock Debian kernel, so I don't
Hi Keeling, Jacob and Peter,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:52:58PM -0400, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> If it's enabled in the kernel, you can also do
>
> zcat /proc/config.gz
>
> It's been a long time since I've used a stock Debian kernel, so I don't know
> if they have it enabled by default.
Thank
Hi Cameron,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:49:14PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> I don't know if this is the best way, but you can see
> the config file your kernel was built by in
> /boot/config*
Thanks a lot ! It's all there. I suppose all entries '=y' are built into
the kernel and the '=m' ent
On Tue 31 May 05, 1:51 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Incoming from Paulo M C Aragão:
> >
> > How do I discover which device drivers are built into a given kernel
> > image, not accessing the sources ?
>
> Check the config file that came with it?
Incoming from Paulo M C Aragão:
>
> How do I discover which device drivers are built into a given kernel
> image, not accessing the sources ?
Check the config file that came with it?
cd /boot
ls -l config*
uname -a
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently
On Tue, 31 May 2005 16:42:26 -0300
Paulo M C Aragão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies in advance for the basic question. I'm counting on the
> everlasting patience and generosity of the list members. I googled to
> no avail in search of an answer.
>
>
Hi,
Apologies in advance for the basic question. I'm counting on the
everlasting patience and generosity of the list members. I googled to no
avail in search of an answer.
How do I discover which device drivers are built into a given kernel
image, not accessing the sources ?
Thanks
(In Installation section):
>
> When asked during the installation if you want 'discover' to
> manage /media/cdrom0, choose 'no' otherwise gnome-volume-manager won't
> be able to auto-mount discs for you when inserted and logged in as a
> normal user. (this m
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:30 -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> On Monday 16 May 2005 10:04 am, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > discover issues:
> >
> > I have seen references to /media/cdrom0 and /media/cdrom2 not being created
> > as a result of a bug in discover.
>
> >
On Monday 16 May 2005 10:04 am, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> discover issues:
>
> I have seen references to /media/cdrom0 and /media/cdrom2 not being created
> as a result of a bug in discover.
>
> apt-cache show discover1 is what i have loaded. it is credited to the
> debian i
discover issues:
I have seen references to /media/cdrom0 and /media/cdrom2 not being created as
a result of a bug in discover.
apt-cache show discover1 is what i have loaded. it is credited to the debian
installer team version 1.7.7 is current.
discover2 is version 2.0.7-2.1
credited to the
kernel?
The 2.6 kernel changed the detection order for PCI devices compared to 2.4.
Adam
Just to clarify this, the detection was working okay in 2.4.26, 2.6.7
and also in 2.6.9. A new version of discover seems to have changed the
order, or so I think. Kernel version didn't seem to be the f
Apparently, _Jeremy Turner_, on 20/12/04 17:39,typed:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:59:15PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
I then realized that I had updated discover just recently. Maybe that
detected the NICs in a different way and made eth0 as eth1 and vice versa.
That sounds like what happened. When you
On Monday 20 December 2004 05:39 pm, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> (atleast a 2.4 to a 2.6) the order in which modules load might change.
>
> If you use a kernel with modules for your NICs, I would suggest using
> aliases to explicitly name your ethernet cards. Something like:
>
> # echo "alias eth0 3c5
H. S. wrote:
> Yesterday, due to some weird reason, my network went down yesterday.
> When I rebooted into Fedora to see if it worked, it did. Then I rebooted
> into 2.4.26 kernel in Debian. That worked too. Then I tried again in
> 2.6.9 and 2.6.7 kernels in Debian and networking failed again.
>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:59:15PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
> I then realized that I had updated discover just recently. Maybe that
> detected the NICs in a different way and made eth0 as eth1 and vice versa.
That sounds like what happened. When you move between kernel versions
(atleast a 2.
pppoeconf again (in Debain) and noticed with surprise
that it was detecting my pppoe connection on the different NIC. I have
two NICs, eth0 and eth1. Once connects to the ADSL modem and the other
to my LAN switch for masquarading.
I then realized that I had updated discover just recently. Maybe
Christian Convey wrote:
> I'm using Sarge with a 2.6.9-1 kernel. Can anyone help me understand the
> relationship between "discover" and "hotplug" in my system?
>
> The reason I'm confused is that both seem to be involved in making the
> system awar
Hey guys,
I'm using Sarge with a 2.6.9-1 kernel. Can anyone help me understand the
relationship between "discover" and "hotplug" in my system?
The reason I'm confused is that both seem to be involved in making the
system aware of connected hardware, but I'm
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 11:52 -0700, Gary wrote:
> >> > [snip]
> >> >
> >> > Make sure discover1 is installed and that will automatically find the
> >> > new card and load whatever kernel module it needs.
> >>
> >> discover is at v2.0.4, and de
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 11:52 -0700, Gary wrote:
> >> > [snip]
[snip]
> Excuse me, gentlemen? I run two Woodys, and neither have any version of
> discover. The OP needs to know the Woody way.
The reason I changed the Subject, was because I
installed and that will automatically find the
> new card and load whatever kernel module it needs.
discover is at v2.0.4, and depends on libdiscover2, while discover1
is v1.7.3 and depends libdiscover1 and discover1-data.
So, which is the preferred package? discover or discover1?
If I understand corre
d and load whatever kernel module it needs.
>
> discover is at v2.0.4, and depends on libdiscover2, while discover1
> is v1.7.3 and depends libdiscover1 and discover1-data.
>
> So, which is the preferred package? discover or discover1?
If I understand correctly, discover was moved
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 13:12 -0700, Eric Gaumer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 11:52 -0700, Gary wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Make sure discover1 is installed and that will automatically find the
> new card and load whatever kernel module it needs.
discover is at v2.0.4, and depends
A technique that your creditors don't want you to know about...
For the rest of the story about destroying debt, visit us here
http://po.p8.platinumitemsnews.com/e3/
Unlike other debt relief & debt reduction options, destroying your debt is
an 'administrative legal process' rather than a financia
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:30:38PM +0100, Mark Cooke wrote:
> John M Flinchbaugh wrote:
> >i've not used discover, but hotplug may be what's loading your sound
> >drivers by their pci device. you may need to blacklist the one you
> >don't want automatically
John M Flinchbaugh wrote:
i've not used discover, but hotplug may be what's loading your sound
drivers by their pci device. you may need to blacklist the one you
don't want automatically loaded by creating a file in
/etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/ and listing the modules you want ignor
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:06:05AM +0100, Mark Cooke wrote:
> I just upgraded from 2.4.26 to 2.6.8 from unstable, in the process I
> upgraded hotplug, alsa, and discover to version 2, everyhing is
> generally fine, apart from when I run the gnome-mixer, it shows a
> sigmatel soundc
Hi,
I just upgraded from 2.4.26 to 2.6.8 from unstable, in the process I
upgraded hotplug, alsa, and discover to version 2, everyhing is
generally fine, apart from when I run the gnome-mixer, it shows a
sigmatel soundcard?? and my SB live (alsa).
I have no alsa configuration files in /etc/alsa
So apparantly discover has nothing to do with this ... *sigh*
Reconfigured hotplug to ignore pci display devices... now it seems
to work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Failed to mention that the same problem exists with discover1 and
discover. (Of course the syntax in the /etc/discover.conf is somewhat
different).
I have no references to rivafb anyware in /etc/modutils or related
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
