Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-03 Thread Charlie
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:34:48 + Vincent mentioned this: Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > If you open /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook and take a look at the first > few lines, it says that the file is auto-generated (which is the

Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-03 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Charlie wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:47:43 +1000 Charlie sent: > >> >> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: >> Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires >> gvfs). >> >> &

Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-02 Thread Charlie
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:47:43 +1000 Charlie sent: > > On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: > Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires > gvfs). > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie > > wrote: > > >

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-02 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: > >

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-01 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: > Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires > gvfs). > >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie >> wrote: >> > >&

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-30 Thread Charlie
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: > >

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-29 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: > Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires > gvfs). > >> >> >> Steve Litt writes: >> >> >> >> Becau

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-27 Thread lee
Charlie writes: >> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: >> >> Please check out [1] --- let me know if it works for you and how you >> like it. >> >> >> [1]: https://github.com/lee-/fvwm > >Hello Lee, > > I've just had a cursory read and you have put a lot of effo

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-27 Thread Charlie
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > > >> Steve Litt writes: > >> > >> Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some > >> documentation o

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-27 Thread lee
>> Steve Litt writes: >> >> Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some >> documentation on it. Please check out [1] --- let me know if it works for you and how you like it. [1]: https://github.com/lee-/fvwm -- Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power. -- To

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-23 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:40:21 +0200 lee sent: > These two functions are described in the man page. > > BTW, either IconMan or IconBox are deprecated --- I don't remember > which one. Thanks Lee, It was ButtonBar for laptop. I removed that entry in my menudefs.hook and it is gone, no longer a wor

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-23 Thread lee
Charlie writes: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent: > >> Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what >> things? > > Lee, > > If I can jump in here re: fvwm. [fvwm 2.6.5] On my desktop I have this > thing. I has two columns of squares which are labelled FileMGR - xv > -gview an

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-23 Thread Charlie
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent: > Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what > things? Sorry for the noise Lee. I found what the thing was called. It was a laptop ButtonBar and I got rid of it. So it's done. Thanks for your help, Charlie -- Registered Linux User:

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-22 Thread Charlie
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent: > Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what > things? Lee, If I can jump in here re: fvwm. [fvwm 2.6.5] On my desktop I have this thing. I has two columns of squares which are labelled FileMGR - xv -gview and all sorts of things. To write

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-22 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more >> flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to >> arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even >> wastes less

fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-21 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200 lee wrote: > So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more > flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to > arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even > wastes less screen space than i3 because I

Re: i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-21 Thread green
lee wrote at 2014-09-21 10:48 -0500: > With fvwm, I can have sticky floating windows that stay on top. This > allows me to watch the movie, no matter to which desktop I switch, and > no other window will come up above the movie, so I can always watch it. > > Moreover, fvwm is somewhat capable of

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-21 Thread lee
Reco writes: > Hi. > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:34:28 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> > My biggest problem is I can't yet get qemu to run Debian or Ubuntu VMs >> > on OpenBSD, for those few programs that don't run on OpenBSD. >> >> And you can't use xen? > > You're probably mistook NetBSD (which can ser

Re: i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-21 Thread lee
green writes: > lee wrote at 2014-09-20 13:34 -0500: >> There's also i3, if you can live with a tiling WM that doesn't support >> sticky floating windows yet. > > I enjoy using i3. What is this "sticky floating windows" feature that > I am missing? After searching, it seems to be almost the sam

Re: qemu on OpenBSD (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-20 Thread green
green wrote at 2014-09-20 21:33 -0500: > Reco wrote at 2014-09-20 15:35 -0500: > > Presumably you can build qemu for OpenBSD, but it would be > > un-accelerated one (i.e. turtle-slow and very hungry for the CPU). > > Yes, qemu needs kvm support for good performance. This has been > ported to Free

Re: qemu on OpenBSD (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-20 Thread green
Reco wrote at 2014-09-20 15:35 -0500: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:34:28 +0200 lee wrote: > > > My biggest problem is I can't yet get qemu to run Debian or Ubuntu VMs > > > on OpenBSD, for those few programs that don't run on OpenBSD. > > > > And you can't use xen? > > You're probably mistook NetBSD

Re: i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-20 Thread green
lee wrote at 2014-09-20 13:34 -0500: > There's also i3, if you can live with a tiling WM that doesn't support > sticky floating windows yet. I enjoy using i3. What is this "sticky floating windows" feature that I am missing? After searching, it seems to be almost the same as i3's "scratchpad" fe

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-20 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:34:28 +0200 lee wrote: > > My biggest problem is I can't yet get qemu to run Debian or Ubuntu VMs > > on OpenBSD, for those few programs that don't run on OpenBSD. > > And you can't use xen? You're probably mistook NetBSD (which can serve as dom0 for xen) with OpenB

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-20 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:11:50 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> Martin Read writes: >> >> > On 13/09/14 20:54, lee wrote: >> >> Can you have, say, KDE on Gentoo without systemd? "Without >> >> systemd" means *all* of systemd, like systemd-login0 etc.. >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > The b

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-20 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:24:10 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> Steve Litt writes: >> > >> And who knows what kind of problems you run into when you switch to >> some BSD. Are there NVIDIA drivers for some BSD? Is everything I'm >> using now available for some BSD? > > My biggest p

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:24:10 +0200 lee wrote: > Steve Litt writes: > > And who knows what kind of problems you run into when you switch to > some BSD. Are there NVIDIA drivers for some BSD? Is everything I'm > using now available for some BSD? My biggest problem is I can't yet get qemu to r

Let's have a vote! (was: Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs))

2014-09-15 Thread lee
Lisi Reisz writes: > On Saturday 13 September 2014 21:46:31 lee wrote: >> You users, and the community members, >> whoever they are, need to speak as well. > > Perhaps, just perhaps, many of them don't agree. Well, I've now seen two people speaking up in response, and 0% of them spoke in favour

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-15 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:54:56 +0200 > lee wrote: >> >> Can you have, say, KDE on Gentoo without systemd? "Without systemd" >> means *all* of systemd, like systemd-login0 etc.. > > But in answer to your question, my official answer is "I don't know." > Now I'll give you a gu

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-15 Thread Peter Nieman
On 13/09/14 22:46, lee wrote: I'd be happy to see some support. I cannot speak for "the users" or for "the free software community". You users, and the community members, whoever they are, need to speak as well. OK, so I'll "speak as well". :-) But first of all I'd like to thank you and some

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-15 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 9/15/2014 3:27 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2014 19:42:40 Steve Litt wrote: >> Every time you tell one of us to keep silent, three more of us speak >> up. I don't know whether we're a minority, but if you and your cohorts >> keep shushing us, we just might be the majority prett

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/15/2014 03:27 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 14 September 2014 19:42:40 Steve Litt wrote: Every time you tell one of us to keep silent, three more of us speak up. I don't know whether we're a minority, but if you and your cohorts keep shushing us, we just might be the majority pretty soon

Re: systemd vs debian soc (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-15 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:46:51 -0300 Andre N Batista napísal: > The way I see it, there is a large amount of doubt on who's > insterested in systemd and there is no doubt that many users are > being forced into using it and, according to your recent post on the > subject, those users have c

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-15 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:46:43 +0200 lee napísal: > Slavko writes: > > > BTW, if someone is interested in, while this investigation i > > generated graphs of dependencies on some systemd packages on my > > system, they will be accessible for some time here: > > > > http://anfo.slavino.sk/

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-15 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 14 September 2014 19:42:40 Steve Litt wrote: > Every time you tell one of us to keep silent, three more of us speak > up. I don't know whether we're a minority, but if you and your cohorts > keep shushing us, we just might be the majority pretty soon. I wasn't telling anyone to keep sile

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:06:35 -0400 Doug wrote: > On 09/14/2014 01:00 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > By the way, if you wonder why I'm being so hard on KDE, these three > > articles explain: > > > > http://troubleshooters.com/lpm/201202/201202.htm#_editors_desk > > I didn't read any further than this

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-14 Thread Doug
On 09/14/2014 01:00 PM, Steve Litt wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:54:56 +0200 lee wrote: Steve Litt writes: /snip/ Can you have, say, KDE on Gentoo without systemd? "Without systemd" means *all* of systemd, like systemd-login0 etc.. LOL, If I were the kinda guy who used KDE, I'd *love*

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:22:16 +0100 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Saturday 13 September 2014 21:46:31 lee wrote: > > I'd be happy to see some support.  I cannot speak for "the users" > > or for "the free software community". > > No, you can't. > > > You users, and the community members, > > whoever t

Re: OT: gas plant (was Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs))

2014-09-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:52:24 -0400 (EDT) david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, B wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 22:46:31 +0200 > > lee wrote: > > All interesting things you said, plus a bunch of other readings > > confort me in my first impression: Linux was becoming t

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:11:50 +0200 lee wrote: > Martin Read writes: > > > On 13/09/14 20:54, lee wrote: > >> Can you have, say, KDE on Gentoo without systemd? "Without > >> systemd" means *all* of systemd, like systemd-login0 etc.. > > > > [...] > > > > The best place to ask would be the user

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:54:56 +0200 lee wrote: > Steve Litt writes: > > > When Jessie goes stable, I'm actually going to try Jessie to see > > whether it will work reasonably, and if so I'll hold my nose and > > use the monolithic entanglement. > > FWIW, I can tell you that it works for Fedora.

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-14 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Saturday 13 September 2014 21:46:31 lee wrote: > I'd be happy to see some support.  I cannot speak for "the users" or for > "the free software community". No, you can't. > You users, and the community members, > whoever they are, need to speak as well. Perhaps, just perhaps, many of them do

Re: OT: gas plant (was Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs))

2014-09-14 Thread Bzzzz
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:52:24 -0400 (EDT) david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: > for those unfamiliar with the french figurative use of the term gas > refinery ("usine à gaz"): > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rube_Goldberg_machine#Similar_expressions_worldwide Oops, thanks Wes; I sometimes

OT: gas plant (was Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs))

2014-09-14 Thread davidson
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, B wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 22:46:31 +0200 lee wrote: All interesting things you said, plus a bunch of other readings confort me in my first impression: Linux was becoming too much secured for the taste of agencies (and which better candidate than a gas plant for tho

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-14 Thread lee
Martin Read writes: > On 13/09/14 20:54, lee wrote: >> Can you have, say, KDE on Gentoo without systemd? "Without systemd" >> means *all* of systemd, like systemd-login0 etc.. > > [...] > > The best place to ask would be the user community discussion spaces > (mailing lists / web forums / IRC ch

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-14 Thread Martin Read
On 13/09/14 20:54, lee wrote: Can you have, say, KDE on Gentoo without systemd? "Without systemd" means *all* of systemd, like systemd-login0 etc.. Many components of the KDE Software Collection have no identifiable dependency on systemd's support libraries. (Indeed, a significant fraction o

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-13 Thread Bzzzz
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 22:46:31 +0200 lee wrote: All interesting things you said, plus a bunch of other readings confort me in my first impression: Linux was becoming too much secured for the taste of agencies (and which better candidate than a gas plant that hammers its looong claws down to… dbus,

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-13 Thread lee
Slavko writes: > BTW, if someone is interested in, while this investigation i generated > graphs of dependencies on some systemd packages on my system, they > will be accessible for some time here: > > http://anfo.slavino.sk/libpam-systemd.png > http://anfo.slavino.sk/libsystemd-daemon0.png > htt

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-13 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > When Jessie goes stable, I'm actually going to try Jessie to see whether > it will work reasonably, and if so I'll hold my nose and use the > monolithic entanglement. FWIW, I can tell you that it works for Fedora. So with a new installation, it can potentially work for Debi

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-13 Thread lee
Slavko writes: > Ahoj, > > Dňa Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:15:59 +0200 lee napísal: > >> Supporting systemd violates Debians' social contract. > > Can you be more verbose about this, please? Why? How? By what? I'm finding it pretty obvious. The social contract says: "Our priorities are our users an

Re: systemd vs debian soc (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-13 Thread Andre N Batista
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Slavko wrote: > Ahoj, > > Dňa Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:15:59 +0200 lee napísal: > > > Supporting systemd violates Debians' social contract. > > Can you be more verbose about this, please? Why? How? By what? > Item 4 says: "We will be guided by the needs o

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-12 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:15:59 +0200 lee napísal: > Supporting systemd violates Debians' social contract. Can you be more verbose about this, please? Why? How? By what? regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-11 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:15:59PM +0200, lee wrote: > > Supporting systemd violates Debians' social contract. Hogwash!! > Has this bug report already been filed? https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, an

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-11 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:45:10 +0200 Slavko wrote: > Ahoj, > > Dňa Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:14:01 +0100 Martin Read > napísal: > > > Some components of XFCE have a hard dependency on dbus (and this is > > conceptually legitimate). dbus has a build-time-optional dependency > > on libsystemd-login, an

packages that depend on systemd (was: Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-11 Thread Joel Roth
Slavko wrote: > Ahoj, > > Dňa Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:45:10 +0200 Slavko napísal: > > > I did small investigation. The dbus seems only a half of problem, > > because there is the same dependency in the libpulse0 (no, i don't use > > pulse audio, but dependencies...) and a lot of my applications > >

Re: Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-11 Thread lee
Chris Bannister writes: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:21:57PM +0200, lee wrote: >> John Hasler writes: >> >> > It appears that there is a good chance that the "upgrade" to Systemd >> > when upgrading to Jessie will not be automatic (or at least not silent). >> >> I would be majorly pissed if a

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-11 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:45:10 +0200 Slavko napísal: > I did small investigation. The dbus seems only a half of problem, > because there is the same dependency in the libpulse0 (no, i don't use > pulse audio, but dependencies...) and a lot of my applications > depends on it. I am afraid, th

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-11 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:14:01 +0100 Martin Read napísal: > Some components of XFCE have a hard dependency on dbus (and this is > conceptually legitimate). dbus has a build-time-optional dependency > on libsystemd-login, and a quick experimental check on my system > confirms that the most

Issues upgrading Wheezy --> Jessie (was ... Re: brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-09 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:21:57PM +0200, lee wrote: > John Hasler writes: > > > It appears that there is a good chance that the "upgrade" to Systemd > > when upgrading to Jessie will not be automatic (or at least not silent). > > I would be majorly pissed if a distribution upgrade would force m

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-09 Thread lee
Martin Read writes: > On 08/09/14 22:46, lee wrote: > [proposed social-contract bug against general] >> That's the bug report we need to file, accompanied by a detailed list of >> the reasons. The most likely outcome would be that we are being banned. > > There is at least one member of the tech

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-09 Thread lee
John Hasler writes: > It appears that there is a good chance that the "upgrade" to Systemd > when upgrading to Jessie will not be automatic (or at least not silent). I would be majorly pissed if a distribution upgrade would force me to suddenly use systemd and not give me a choice. Besides, how

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-09 Thread lee
The Wanderer writes: > On 09/08/2014 at 05:46 PM, lee wrote: > >> Rob Owens writes: >> >>> I'm smart enough to understand that a desktop environment (or a >>> cd burner) depending on a particular init system doesn't make >>> sense. But I have not yet figured out which package to file a bug >>>

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-09 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:31:25 +0100 Martin Read napísal: > Part of the underlying problem is that systemd-logind >= 205, > delivered in Debian as part of the systemd binary package, relies on > calls to a dbus interface of systemd in order to perform operations > that systemd-logind < 204

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-09 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:35:48 -0500 John Hasler napísal: > After reading some (extensive and very heated) discussions on > debian-devel I've changed my mind. File the bugs directly against > Systemd whenever justifiable. Please, can you point me? Or provide (really very) short descripti

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-09 Thread John Hasler
lee writes: > It would seem kinda logical to file the bug against the cd-burning > software because it depends on an init system. > > However, this is probably a more general issue in that a yet > unknown amount of packages suddenly somehow depends on a particular > init system. So it would seem

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/08/2014 at 05:46 PM, lee wrote: > Rob Owens writes: > >> I'm smart enough to understand that a desktop environment (or a >> cd burner) depending on a particular init system doesn't make >> sense. But I have not yet figured out which package

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread John Hasler
lee writes: > That's the bug report we need to file, accompanied by a detailed list > of the reasons. The most likely outcome would be that we are being > banned. Your bug might be closed but you won't be "banned". -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread Martin Read
On 08/09/14 22:46, lee wrote: It would seem kinda logical to file the bug against the cd-burning software because it depends on an init system. Sort of. It's perfectly reasonable for brasero to Depends: gvfs (brasero's part of GNOME and gvfs is the "standard" way for GNOME applications to acc

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread lee
Rob Owens writes: > I'm smart enough to understand that a desktop environment (or a cd burner) > depending on a particular init system doesn't make sense. But I have > not yet figured out which package to file a bug with. I suspect the package > maintainers are smart enough to realize this as

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread Rob Owens
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:47:50PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Rob Owens writes: > > I agree with you that this is a bug. But it is not simple to assign > > this to a particular package. It's a bug which is the result of the > > relations between many packages. But in order to get it fixed, we'r

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread John Hasler
Rob Owens writes: > I agree with you that this is a bug. But it is not simple to assign > this to a particular package. It's a bug which is the result of the > relations between many packages. But in order to get it fixed, we're > going to have to file a bug *somewhere*. Make your best guess an

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread Rob Owens
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:21:49AM +0200, lee wrote: > > A "desktop system" is merely a "desktop system", and an init system is > merely an init system. It is a bug when a "desktop system" like xfce > depends on a particular init system, or parts thereof, no matter if > directly or indirectly, es

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread lee
Martin Read writes: > On 08/09/14 15:51, lee wrote: >> If the problem is so easy to solve as you describe, i. e. by compiling >> software appropriately, it boils down to that Debian would have to have >> different versions of packages, compiled with appropriate options, which >> are picked from d

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread Martin Read
On 08/09/14 15:51, lee wrote: If the problem is so easy to solve as you describe, i. e. by compiling software appropriately, it boils down to that Debian would have to have different versions of packages, compiled with appropriate options, which are picked from depending on which init system the

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:14:01 +0100 Martin Read napísal: > Perhaps you should consider this option. > > (This is where I mention that Debian's binary packages of the Xorg X > server Depends: udev, and that the udev in Debian is the udev > maintained by the systemd maintainers in the syst

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread lee
Martin Read writes: > [...] > Perhaps you should investigate this approach in more detail; you seem > to have a legitimate and praiseworthy requirement for a higher level > of control over what runs on your system than a binary distribution > can realistically provide. If the problem is so easy

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/08/2014 at 08:14 AM, Martin Read wrote: > On 08/09/14 00:21, lee wrote: >> On the Debian VM, it says that dbus depends on >> libsystemd-login0, so how could I remove that without having to >> remove xfce? > > You can't. Well, you could 'apt

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-08 Thread Martin Read
On 08/09/14 00:21, lee wrote: I don't have gnome-settings-daemon installed on Fedora, which uses systemd. Indeed; on Fedora, systemd is IIRC the *only* init system. On the Debian VM, it says that dbus depends on libsystemd-login0, so how could I remove that without having to remove xfce? Yo

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Joel Rees
2014/09/08 9:19 "John Hasler" : > > The Wanderer writes: > > "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, > > teach gym" > > "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, teach > teachers" It was a PE teacher from whom I first heard that neo-proverb. It

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread John Hasler
The Wanderer writes: > "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, > teach gym" "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, teach teachers" We're gonna get flamed for being off-topic... -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNS

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread lee
Martin Read writes: > On 07/09/14 18:31, lee wrote: >> As to console-kit, it was awful in that it might create a ridiculous >> number of processes, and I used to disable it because I never needed >> it. Can you disable logind? > > If you don't need anything that depends on gnome-settings-daemon,

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 19:01:11 +0100 > Martin Read wrote: > >> If you aren't using a GUI, or your choice of GUI on Debian uses a >> traditional window manager (and doesn't use gdm3 or lightdm as its X >> display manager if it even has one) rather than being one of the >> "d

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/07/2014 at 06:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:10:47 -0500 John Hasler > wrote: > >> Patrick Bartek writes: >>> Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. >> >> Those who fail to learn from history doom t

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:10:47 -0500 John Hasler wrote: > Patrick Bartek writes: > > Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. > > Those who fail to learn from history doom the rest of us to repeat it. Those who fail history are doomed to become engineers or cab drivers. Stev

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread John Hasler
Patrick Bartek writes: > Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who fail to learn from history doom the rest of us to repeat it. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 07 September 2014 20:14:36 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:27:58PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > it will be the only. The more noise made, the better chance someone > > > will hear. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:27:58PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > it will be the only. The more noise made, the better chance someone > > will hear. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. > > "Silence is golden." > "Better to remain silent and be thoug

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 19:01:11 +0100 Martin Read wrote: > If you aren't using a GUI, or your choice of GUI on Debian uses a > traditional window manager (and doesn't use gdm3 or lightdm as its X > display manager if it even has one) rather than being one of the > "desktop environments", My rese

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 08:57:30 -0700 Carl Johnson wrote: > Steve Litt writes: > > > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 09:31:46 +0200 > > Sven Joachim wrote: > > > >> > The concept of free software has become a myth :( > >> > >> There is always Gentoo if libraries you consider useless bother > >> you. Binary

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Martin Read
On 07/09/14 18:31, lee wrote: As to console-kit, it was awful in that it might create a ridiculous number of processes, and I used to disable it because I never needed it. Can you disable logind? If you don't need anything that depends on gnome-settings-daemon, libpam-systemd, lighttpd, live-

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread lee
Sven Joachim writes: > On 2014-09-07 02:30 +0200, lee wrote: > >> Slavko writes: >> >>> Ahoj, >>> >>> Dňa Sat, 06 Sep 2014 02:08:47 +0200 lee napísal: >>> Doug writes: > It didn't need systemd before, so why should it need it now? Debian has decided to feature severa

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread lee
Slavko writes: > AFAIK, the logind is replacement for consolekit and this dependecy can > be good, when the logind will be able to work without systemd and with > the cmanager- but it is not working yet. How can it be good when your system depends on something you don't want to have on your syst

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Carl Johnson
Steve Litt writes: > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 09:31:46 +0200 > Sven Joachim wrote: > >> > The concept of free software has become a myth :( >> >> There is always Gentoo if libraries you consider useless bother you. >> Binary distributions tend to enable all possibly useful features. >> >> Cheers, >

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Sun, 07 Sep 2014 02:30:42 +0200 lee napísal: > Slavko writes: > > > Ahoj, > > > > Dňa Sat, 06 Sep 2014 02:08:47 +0200 lee > > napísal: > > > >> Doug writes: > >> > >> > It didn't need systemd before, so why should it need it now? > >> > >> Debian has decided to feature several in

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:12:47 +1200 Chris Bannister napísal: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:27:58PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > it will be the only. The more noise made, the better chance someone > > will hear. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. > > "Silence is golden." Not always, on

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 08:35:55 -0500 John Hasler wrote: > Joe writes: > > Sometimes it is the fool who points out that the Emperor has no > > clothes... > > Chris writes: > > Or a wise tailor? > > The wise tailor siezes the opportunity to get in on the ground floor > in the imaginary clothing mar

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 12:01:54 +0100 Joe wrote: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:12:47 +1200 > Chris Bannister wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:27:58PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > it will be the only. The more noise made, the better chance > > > someone will hear. The squeaky wheel gets the

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 09:31:46 +0200 Sven Joachim wrote: > > The concept of free software has become a myth :( > > There is always Gentoo if libraries you consider useless bother you. > Binary distributions tend to enable all possibly useful features. > > Cheers, >Sven Gentoo isn't the o

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:12:47 +1200 Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:27:58PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > it will be the only. The more noise made, the better chance someone > > will hear. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. > > "Silence is golden." > "Better to remain silen

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread John Hasler
Joe writes: > Sometimes it is the fool who points out that the Emperor has no > clothes... Chris writes: > Or a wise tailor? The wise tailor siezes the opportunity to get in on the ground floor in the imaginary clothing market. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSC

Re: brasero requires gvfs

2014-09-07 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/07/2014 at 01:27 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > Well, Jessie is a long way from being Stable. (Some say next > May.) But the "release freeze" date isn't nearly as far away; it was announced a long time ago as being, IIRC, November 5th, and I th

  1   2   >