Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

ections can be redirected to a repository with > > > > obsolete, vulnerable packages. > > > > > > No they can't, there's a signed timestamp in the metadata and apt will > > > warn > > > if the repository isn't up to date. > >

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

can't, there's a signed timestamp in the metadata and apt will warn if the repository isn't up to date. There's no mention of such a timestamp there: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/aidxwa/why_does_apt_not_use_https/ well, I don't really care about a random

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On 2025-09-21 13:11:28 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 07:09:54PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > With HTTP, connections can be redirected to a repository with > > obsolete, vulnerable packages. > > No they can't, there's a signed timesta

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 07:09:54PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: With HTTP, connections can be redirected to a repository with obsolete, vulnerable packages. No they can't, there's a signed timestamp in the metadata and apt will warn if the repository isn't up to date.

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On 2025-09-19 14:27:59 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > The list of MD5 sums of each package is signed, so their authenticity > can be verified using the signature. See > . The authenticity is not the only requirement

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On 19/09/2025 14:32, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, is there some way to tell apt the path to the root CA certificate, so it could verify the certificate chain provided by a private debian repository via https? I had added tho root CA to /usr/local/share/ca-certificates seem and ran update-ca

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

Hi, the relevant man page is sources.list(5). The legacy format is, for example, deb [ signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg ] https://deb.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free-firmware in a file named /etc/apt/sources.list. The now recommended entry in deb822

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

Greg Wooledge wrote: > > hobbit:/usr/share/doc/apt$ zgrep FTP * > changelog.gz: * Change multi sources.list entry example from FTP to HTTPS > > But it's not clear whether that means FTP support is *gone* or simply > no longer given as an example. > As of Trix

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 15:13:28 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > There was a similar topic to this a while back and I do not believe APT > supports HTTPS only HTTP and FTP. APT supports HTTPS and HTTP. Many years ago, HTTPS support was new, and required a separate package. This

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 2:55 PM Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > is there some way to tell apt the path to the root CA certificate, so it > could > verify the certificate chain provided by a private debian repository via > https? > I had added tho root CA to /usr/local/

apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

Hi folks, is there some way to tell apt the path to the root CA certificate, so it could verify the certificate chain provided by a private debian repository via https? I had added tho root CA to /usr/local/share/ca-certificates seem and ran update-ca-certificates, but this did not help

Re: apt config options to specify the CA of the https repository?

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 1:45 PM Harald Dunkel wrote: > > is there some way to tell apt the path to the root CA certificate, so it could > verify the certificate chain provided by a private debian repository via > https? > I had added tho root CA to /usr/local/share/ca-certificat

Re: Unusual errors during apt-get update

On 2025-09-14 01:12:07 +0300, monodev wrote: > It has been pointed out in the Reddit thread by the user notR1CH that these > messages are not really errors, but are caused by apt deciding to download > the whole file instead of the patch once the ratio of the size of the patch > vs th

Re: Unusual errors during apt-get update

It has been pointed out in the Reddit thread by the user notR1CH that these messages are not really errors, but are caused by apt deciding to download the whole file instead of the patch once the ratio of the size of the patch vs the whole file exceeds a certain threshold (as determined by the

Re: Unusual errors during apt-get update

On 2025-09-11 18:13:44 +0300, monodev wrote: > A few hours ago I ran apt-get update and ran into the following error > messages: > > """ > > Err:8 http://deb.debian.org/debian trixie-updates/main Sources.diff/Index >   Need 2877 compressed bytes, but limit

Re: Unusual errors during apt-get update

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 12:51:40 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2025-09-11 18:13:44 +0300, monodev wrote: > > A few hours ago I ran apt-get update and ran into the following error > > messages: > In my case, reexecuting the command does not yield an error, but > it doe

Re: Unusual errors during apt-get update

On 2025-09-12 07:25:39 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > The bug appears to be absent from Sid. Note: I was using sid. It seems that URLs for the "unstable" distribution are no affected. But even in sid, stable-updates is needed (for the packages whose latest version is still the stable one). -- Vinc

Re: Unusual errors during apt-get update

The bug appears to be absent from Sid. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Unusual errors during apt-get update

Hello everyone, A few hours ago I ran apt-get update and ran into the following error messages: """ Err:8 http://deb.debian.org/debian trixie-updates/main Sources.diff/Index   Need 2877 compressed bytes, but limit is 2788 and original is 2788 Get:9 http://deb.debian.org/debian

official debian repos supporting apt-transport-s3?

Hi folks, are there official Debian package repositories supporting S3? I would like to use S3 locally, but it would be nice to have a first impression first. https://www.debian.org/mirror/list doesn't show Regards Harri

Re: Where to report missing packages after an 'apt install'?

> > I just installed pyspread on my Debian 12 system and when I ran it > there were two missing packages:- > > chris$ pyspread > Warning: Required module setuptools not found. > Warning: Required module markdown2 not found. > chris$ > > So should this be reported to Debian maintaine

Re: Where to report missing packages after an 'apt install'?

Chris Green wrote: > I just installed pyspread on my Debian 12 system and when I ran it > there were two missing packages:- > > chris$ pyspread > Warning: Required module setuptools not found. > Warning: Required module markdown2 not found. > chris$ > > So should this be reported t

Where to report missing packages after an 'apt install'?

I just installed pyspread on my Debian 12 system and when I ran it there were two missing packages:- chris$ pyspread Warning: Required module setuptools not found. Warning: Required module markdown2 not found. chris$ So should this be reported to Debian maintainers somewhere or i

Re: apt: WTH is a "second pre-image resistance"?

@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: apt: WTH is a "second pre-image resistance"? On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 5:05 PM Darac Marjal wrote: > > > On 02/06/2025 12:49, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > trying Trixie "apt update" shows a warning about my loc

Re: apt: WTH is a "second pre-image resistance"?

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 5:05 PM Darac Marjal wrote: > > > On 02/06/2025 12:49, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > trying Trixie "apt update" shows a warning about my local repo > > (managed by reprepro on Bookworm) I don't know how to ha

Re: apt: WTH is a "second pre-image resistance"?

On 02/06/2025 12:49, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, trying Trixie "apt update" shows a warning about my local repo (managed by reprepro on Bookworm) I don't know how to handle: Warning: http://debian.example.com/debian/dists/trixie-backports/InRelease: Policy will reject sig

Re: apt: WTH is a "second pre-image resistance"?

On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 13:49:05 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > trying Trixie "apt update" shows a warning about my local repo > (managed by reprepro on Bookworm) I don't know how to handle: > > Warning: http://debian.example.com/debian/dists/trix

apt: WTH is a "second pre-image resistance"?

Hi folks, trying Trixie "apt update" shows a warning about my local repo (managed by reprepro on Bookworm) I don't know how to handle: Warning: http://debian.example.com/debian/dists/trixie-backports/InRelease: Policy will reject signature within a year, see --audit for deta

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

from the line that starts with > > ALIASES > > Yes, but my original objection to the utility of 'apt --list upgradable' > in comparison to 'apt upgrade', which provides the same information and > doesn't update without user approval (Y/N), is not taken a

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 at 22:44, Lee wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:51 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:33:54 -0400, Lee wrote: > > > > Also, you should quote "$tempf". [...] > > But why take the chance? > You're right - I should be working on the habit of putting quote

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:51 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:33:54 -0400, Lee wrote: > > > Also, you should quote "$tempf". > > > > > > [ -s "$tempf" ] && notify-send ... > > > > is there any way that > > $(mktemp -q --tmpdir=/tmp -t updX) > > would return a 0 status a

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:33:54 -0400, Lee wrote: > > Also, you should quote "$tempf". > > > > [ -s "$tempf" ] && notify-send ... > > is there any way that > $(mktemp -q --tmpdir=/tmp -t updX) > would return a 0 status and a filename with embedded spaces .. or with > anything that would req

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:50 AM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Just a few notes: thanks for the feedback! > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:39:58 -0400, Lee wrote: > > #!/bin/bash > > # see if there are any Debian updates and pop-up a notice if there are > > > > # need

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On 2025-04-25, David Wright wrote: >> >> Considerable extra typing susceptible to error, and as I suffer from a >> digital deformity, I prefer less to more. > > You could read man bash from the line that starts with > ALIASES Yes, but my original objection to

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

Just a few notes: On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:39:58 -0400, Lee wrote: > #!/bin/bash > # see if there are any Debian updates and pop-up a notice if there are > > # needs an /etc/sudoers.d/adm-apt-privs that has > # Cmnd_AliasADM_COMMANDS = /usr/bin/apt update > # %adm

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri 25 Apr 2025 at 14:23:52 (-), Greg wrote: > On 2025-04-25, Lee wrote: > >> > >> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same > >> info, while offering the chance to say no. > > > > ^shrug^ > &g

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:24 AM Greg wrote: > > On 2025-04-25, Lee wrote: > >> > >> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same > >> info, while offering the chance to say no. > > > > ^shrug^ > &

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On 2025-04-25, Lee wrote: >> >> I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same >> info, while offering the chance to say no. > > ^shrug^ > it's harder to fuck up 'apt list --upgradable' if all you want is a &g

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:08 AM Greg wrote: > > On 2025-04-24, Lee wrote: > > > > "apt update" just gets the latest package info > > "apt list --upgradable" shows you what packages have updates > > I never run 'apt list --upgradable'

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On 2025-04-24, Lee wrote: > > "apt update" just gets the latest package info > "apt list --upgradable" shows you what packages have updates I never run 'apt list --upgradable' because 'apt upgrade' shows the same info, while offering the chance to say no.

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 7:12 PM Van Snyder wrote: > > KDE discover put a popup on my screen saying there are updates available. > > I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on." "apt update" just gets the latest package info "apt l

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On 24/04/2025 03:54, Van Snyder wrote: I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on." So I pushed the little button in the tool tray with the little red dot and Discover said there were 250 updates occupying 454 MB. What does apt list --upgradable s

Re: apt update vs. KDE Discover?

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 20:54, Van Snyder wrote: > > KDE discover put a popup on my screen saying there are updates available. > > I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on." > > So I pushed the little button in the tool tray with the li

apt update vs. KDE Discover?

KDE discover put a popup on my screen saying there are updates available. I ran "apt update" and it said "nothing to see here; move on." So I pushed the little button in the tool tray with the little red dot and Discover said there were 250 updates occupying 454 MB.

Re: replacement for apt-xapian-index?

On 16/04/2025 08:36, Mike Kupfer wrote: I see that apt-xapian-index has been removed from Debian (and it looks like Ubuntu, too). I can't say I entirely understand the reasons for the removal. Perhaps the package has no maintainer. Moreover debtags have been abandoned. After reading

Re: add-apt-repository broken

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:27 PM Van Snyder wrote: > I'm using Debian 12. > > I tried to add a PPA repository but it failed: > PPA's are an Ubuntu creation and do not work on Debian. > > root@Blue:~# add-apt-repository ppa:mkusb/ppa > Traceback (most recent c

add-apt-repository broken

I'm using Debian 12. I tried to add a PPA repository but it failed: root@Blue:~# add-apt-repository ppa:mkusb/ppa Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/add-apt-repository", line 362, in sys.exit(0 if addaptrepo.main() else 1) ^ File "/usr/bi

Re: add-apt-repository broken

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:38:38PM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > I'm using Debian 12. > > I tried to add a PPA repository but it failed: > PPAs are primarily for Ubuntu and only used in Ubuntu. There's every likelihood that you can't use this one with Debian. You might try asking Joern Shoenyan ht

Re: add-apt-repository broken

Am 17.04.25 um 23:38 schrieb Van Snyder: I'm using Debian 12. I tried to add a PPA repository but it failed: PPAs are an Ubuntu thing.

Re: replacement for apt-xapian-index?

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:36:14 -0700 Mike Kupfer wrote: > I see that apt-xapian-index has been removed from Debian (and it looks > like Ubuntu, too). I can't say I entirely understand the reasons for > the removal. At least one justification that was given for Ubuntu is &

Re: replacement for apt-xapian-index?

Mike Kupfer wrote: > I see that apt-xapian-index has been removed from Debian Sorry, I should clarify: it's been removed from Testing (Trixie). It's still in older releases, of course. mike

replacement for apt-xapian-index?

I see that apt-xapian-index has been removed from Debian (and it looks like Ubuntu, too). I can't say I entirely understand the reasons for the removal. At least one justification that was given for Ubuntu is the poor user experience for Synaptic when the index is being rebuilt. And wh

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:56:47AM +, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:45:32 +0100 > wrote: > > Hello to...@tuxteam.de, > > >I thought that too, but according to the man page, apt-get update does > {snipped} > > Okay, fair enough. I'm new to

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On 2025-03-13, wrote: > > You don't need apt-file update anymore. Apt update or apt-get update do > the trick. (Apt-file update won't hurt, though). Maybe you could fix the wiki in this case. https://wiki.debian.org/apt-file

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:29:56PM -, Greg wrote: > On 2025-03-13, wrote: > > > > I thought that too, but according to the man page, apt-get update does > > that job, too (I was always wondering to find my apt-file database > > up to date and suspected some well

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On 2025-03-13, wrote: > > I thought that too, but according to the man page, apt-get update does > that job, too (I was always wondering to find my apt-file database > up to date and suspected some well-meaning cron job, but that seems > to be the secret :-) apt-get update o

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:45:32 +0100 wrote: Hello to...@tuxteam.de, >I thought that too, but according to the man page, apt-get update does {snipped} Okay, fair enough. I'm new to apt-file so haven't fully absorbed all required knowledge yet. >Hanlon's Corollary: it's

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:19:12AM +, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:59:49 +0200 > Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > > Hello Henrik, > > >> Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens? > >Just to confirm, you ran `apt-get update` before that, c

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:59:49 +0200 Henrik Ahlgren wrote: Hello Henrik, >> Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens? >Just to confirm, you ran `apt-get update` before that, correct? apt-*file* update (emphasis is mine), surely? -- Regards _ "Valid si

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

Modaresi Soft Hard writes: > I added our Repo to sources.list.d/ > > Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens? Just to confirm, you ran `apt-get update` before that, correct?

Re: Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:13:05AM +, Modaresi Soft Hard wrote: > We created several packages in > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:celenity (OBS) Apt-file relies on the Contents file, which your repository must provide (possibly you have to tell your instance of apt-file

Why installed files of my package doen't show with apt-file

We created several packages in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:celenity (OBS) I added our Repo to sources.list.d/ Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens? What should I observe in the packaging? You can download deb files and the files we use to create a deb

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

2025-03-06[Thu]15:23 🦓 read that 2025-03-06[Thu]08:38 Geoff wrote You can use dpigs from debian-goodies package: debian-goodies' dpigs does a great job: debian)czyborra@localhost:~$ dpigs -H 142.3M libgl1-mesa-dri 79.3M libpython3.7-dev 65.2M emacs-common 57.7M libllvm7 43.1M guile-2.

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

Greg Wooledge writes: > Why are you assuming that the space you want can be freed by removing > packages? > > For the vast majority of people, if disk space is running low, it's > because *data* files are piling up, and may be in need of some trimming. Pro tip: running &q

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 23:26:55 +0100, 🦓 wrote: > 2025-03-07[Fri]23:14 🦓 read that > 2025-03-07[Fri]07:21 Greg Wooledge wrote > > That's conceptually similar to the little program that I wrote, which > > you can get from . It's in perl. > > Wow! Looks backward comp

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

2025-03-07[Fri]23:27 🦓 read that 2025-03-07[Fri]10:20 Jonathan Dowland wrote I favour "duc" (as opposed to, e.g. ncdu) duc index / duc ui / There are several duc browsers: ui is an ncurses-style TUI; there's also CLI, GUI and web-based ones. The GUI and web-based ones use a nice

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

2025-03-07[Fri]23:14 🦓 read that 2025-03-07[Fri]07:21 Greg Wooledge wrote That's conceptually similar to the little program that I wrote, which you can get from . It's in perl. Wow! Looks backward compatible with perl4.036 - what do i need to write to make ds i

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

Runamile Czyborra wrote: > my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install > python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use > to ergonomically present installed candidates to apt purge a few gigabytes? i run apt-get

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:20:30 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > For Debian packages specifically, you can use dpigs from the debian-goodies > package. I wrote an alternative for situations where I don't want to install > debian-goodies and its transitive dependencies: > > awk -v RS='' '/St

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Wed Mar 5, 2025 at 2:22 PM GMT, Runamile Czyborra wrote: my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use to ergonomically present installed candidates to apt purge a few gigab

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 15:46, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > > Pro tip: running "sudo apt clean" often frees up significant disk space > (relatively, in machines with tiny storage capacity) by removing all > cached package files from /var/cache/apt/archives. Hi, another pro-tip

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

> manager that goes through all of said requirements and removes them if > they now have no dependents. That's what "apt autoremove" is supposed to do. Use at your own risk.

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On 3/6/25 00:21, David Wright wrote: On Wed 05 Mar 2025 at 17:04:12 (-0500), Eben King wrote: On 3/5/25 09:22, Runamile Czyborra wrote: my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and wh

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 15:21:32 +0100, 🦓 wrote: > what would i want to sudo aptitude purge here to free 1 gig? Why are you assuming that the space you want can be freed by removing packages? For the vast majority of people, if disk space is running low, it's because *data* files are piling up, a

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

xsel:amd64 96 main/adminncdu:amd64 100 main/net iputils-ping:amd64 103 main/admincommand-not-found:all 109 main/x11 xbindkeys:amd64 152 main/oldlibs apt-transport-https:all

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Wed 05 Mar 2025 at 17:04:12 (-0500), Eben King wrote: > On 3/5/25 09:22, Runamile Czyborra wrote: > > my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install > > python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use > &g

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

🦓 wrote: sudo aptitude purge libqt5webengine5 blackmailed me to purge qutebrowser now. sudo aptitude purge libllvm7 demands i pure ffmpeg links2 xorg. sudo aptitude search l10n local | grep ^i finds no localedef. sudo aptitude purge liblocale-gettext-perl also purges console-setup debconf-i18n t

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On 3/5/25 09:22, Runamile Czyborra wrote: my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use to ergonomically present installed candidates to apt purge a few gigabytes? deborpha

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

-hl / > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mmcblk0p1 11G 8.7G 1.1G 90% / > > my pip3 install vosk had failed before even starting any install. > > my sudo apt install ncdu cost me 0.000981GB. > > bloats identified by ncd

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

Op wo 5 mrt 2025 om 18:05 schreef 🦓 : > my sudo apt install ncdu cost me 0.000981GB. > Merely 0.981GB alias 98K.

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

rting any install. my sudo apt install ncdu cost me 0.000981GB. bloats identified by ncdu -x / are --- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 99.4 MiB [##] libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.11.3 57.7 MiB [# ] libLLVM-7.so.1 44.7 MiB [ ] /guile 33.0 MiB [### ] /dri 25.

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

{ "emoji": "💪", "version": 1 }

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On 2025-03-05 07:22, Runamile Czyborra wrote: my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use to ergonomically present installed candidates to apt purge a few gigabytes? Start by

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

Le 3/5/25 à 15:22, Runamile Czyborra a écrit : my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use to ergonomically present installed candidates to apt purge a few gigabytes? Clea

Re: how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:22:15PM +0100, Runamile Czyborra wrote: > my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install > python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use to > ergonomically present installed candidates to

how do you find installed bloatware to apt purge?

my df -hl / is at 8.7G/11G=89% after sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3 pip && sudu pip3 install vosk in my crouton and what do you use to ergonomically present installed candidates to apt purge a few gigabytes?

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

Le 3/3/25 à 16:40, Greg Wooledge a écrit : On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote: dpkg won't install missing dependencies. gdebi will. So will apt-get and apt. It's just undocumented. apt install ./filename.deb apt-get install ./filename.deb The pathname

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On 03/03/2025 11:49, Steven Speek wrote: I would like this feature in apt-get. Counter Proposal: Ask whomever is providing you the packge, to offer it as a Debian Repository. That way, your custom application is just a "extrepo enable " away. OpenPGP_signature.asc Descriptio

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote: > Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit : > > You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...] > > dpkg won't install missing dependencies. > gdebi will. So will apt-get and apt. It&#x

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit : You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial task. I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple. So I'd say it depends on the software. Sometimes you're missing header files, in which case configure kindly shows you exac

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On 3/3/25 15:42, Yassine Chaouche wrote: Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit : You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial task. I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple. So I'd say it depends on the software. Sometimes you're missing header files, in

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit : You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...] dpkg won't install missing dependencies. gdebi will. Best, -- yassine -- sysadm http://about.me/ychaouche Looking for side gigs.

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 8:22 AM Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > On 3/3/25 12:49, Steven Speek wrote: > > I would like this feature in apt-get. > > This is a disaster feature from my point of view. Debian packages are > installed with root privileges, however, many systems are

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On 3/3/25 7:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote: I would like this feature in apt-get. Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is empowered to do what you ask. The proper procedure would be to report it as a

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote: I would like this feature in apt-get. Exactly *WHAT* feature?? You supply *NO* context. Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On 3/3/25 6:56 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote: I would like this feature in apt-get. Exactly *WHAT* feature?? You supply *NO* context. This is why I advise people NOT to put the

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On 3/3/25 12:49, Steven Speek wrote: I would like this feature in apt-get. This is a disaster feature from my point of view. Debian packages are installed with root privileges, however, many systems are configured to allow users to use sudo to install packages from configured and trusted

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

Hi, On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote: > I would like this feature in apt-get. Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is empowered to do what you ask. The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlist bug on apt-get in the Debian

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

Le 3/3/25 à 13:14, Richard Owlett a écrit : On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote: I would like this feature in apt-get. Exactly *WHAT* feature?? You supply *NO* context. Also this list is primarily user-to-user support. Happy now? Look how angry you made Steven Speek now

Re: Feature request: install package by passing URL to apt-get

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote: > > I would like this feature in apt-get. > > > > Exactly *WHAT* feature?? > You supply *NO* context. This is why I advise people NOT to put the detai

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >