> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer
> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and
> routing to the host.
Try it!
If you notice an important performance penalty, *then* come back with
the numbers and the details of your setup, so someone c
Hans writes:
> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer
> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and
> routing to the host.
Every packet is routed by the kernel. There is no seperate "AP".
How much delay matters? Ping should be under a millis
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:40:07 +0200
Hans wrote:
>
> Then use NGINX with RTMP-module listening on its standard port and
> streaming with RTMP from Computer A to Computer B to the standard
> port.
>
> Everything without any AP or router between.
>
> The stream can then be made visible with VLC
Hans writes:
> yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will be then
> again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose, a software router is
> sklower than a hardware device).
I haven't tried this, but take a look at:
https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc
https://help.u
On 2025-03-30, John Hasler wrote:
> Hans writes:
>> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer
>> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and
>> routing to the host.
>
> Every packet is routed by the kernel. There is no seperate "AP".
>
> How much
Am Sonntag, 30. März 2025, 21:41:30 CEST schrieb debian-u...@howorth.org.uk:
> Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > If you make the storage server the access point
>
> What storage server?
> I thought this was about live video display from a drone?
Oh sorry, maybe I did the wrong expr
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:29 AM Hans wrote:
> Am Samstag, 29. März 2025, 19:21:39 CEST schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> > >> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> > >
> > > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will
> > > be then again a new hop, w
Hi folks,
thank you very much for all your respose! It was so hepfull amnd I have again
again a lot.
You showed me different ways using software AP, ad-hoc and gave me many
informations.
I will test all these things now, what will take me some time.
All my questions are fully answered and so
Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[snip]
> If you make the storage server the access point
What storage server?
I thought this was about live video display from a drone?
ne host, A, and leave B untouched: B knows how
> > to connect to an AP, so you can focus all your attention
> > on getting hostA to work, and test it with any normal wifi
> > device that happens to be on hand.
>
> I do not know, if that is possible with wlan at all. Howeve
th:
> >
> > hostAP≡∈ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ∋≡hostB
>
> That is, what I wanted to do. The idea is, to manually set both
> computers with fixed IP's on its wlan interface for example:
>
> Computer A
> IP: 192.168.1.10
> GW: 192.168.1.1
>
>
both computers with
fixed IP's on its wlan interface for example:
Computer A
IP: 192.168.1.10
GW: 192.168.1.1
Computer B
IP: 192.168.1.20
GW: 192.168.1.1
Then use NGINX with RTMP-module listening on its standard port and streaming
with RTMP from Computer A to Computer B to
Am Samstag, 29. März 2025, 19:21:39 CEST schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> >> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> >
> > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will
> > be then again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose,
> > a software router
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 16:37:39 +0100
Hans wrote:
> > You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so
> > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just
> > ignore that.
> >
> > Example at:
> >
> >
>> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will
> be then again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose,
> a software router is sklower than a hardware device).
No, if one of the PCs is the AP, then c
On Sat 29 Mar 2025 at 16:37:39 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> > You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so
> > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just
> > ignore that.
> >
> > Example at:
> >
>
> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so
> that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just
> ignore that.
>
> Example at:
>
> http://souktha.github.io/misc/create-ap-linuxpc/
>
> Cheers,
>
On 29/3/25 23:41, Hans wrote:
It is not important, if a router is givng the devices an IP-address. So I do
not need any dhcp. The IP-addresses can of course be set manually by me.
The more problem I see, will be the encryption and passkey-exchange, if
needed. However, I do not need encryption,
To clarify the access point will typically assign a subset of a class-C
> range for DHCP. It will usually be O.K. to assign static addresses in
> the same class C but out of the DHCP range
>
> An alternative depending on the router is to configure the router to
> have fixed DHCP addresses based o
On 29/3/25 23:01, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 29/3/25 22:53, Hans wrote:
But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed
IP`s and
give computer A the IP-address from computer B as gateway, and the
other way
round. Of course I my thinking was wrong (otherwise it would have be
On 29/3/25 22:53, Hans wrote:
But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and
give computer A the IP-address from computer B as gateway, and the other way
round. Of course I my thinking was wrong (otherwise it would have been
worked).
The WiFi router usually assi
On Sat 29 Mar 2025 at 15:53:01 (+0100), Hans wrote:
>
> just a question: Is it possible, to connect two computers with linux via wlan
> without any router?
>
> I know, it is working with ethernet cable and crossover-cable.
>
> But is this possible with wifi, too? My
Dear list,
just a question: Is it possible, to connect two computers with linux via wlan
without any router?
I know, it is working with ethernet cable and crossover-cable.
But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and
give computer A the IP-address from
On 02/02/2025 21:01, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
root@outdoor:~# cat /etc/network/interfaces
[...]
auto wlan0
Is there a chance that "allow-hotplug wlan0" might help? I use
NetworkManager for WiFi interfaces, so my remarks may have no sense.
Simply ignore them that case. My expectation is that hot
found in how-to tutorials online.
It's been working flawlessly for months so I had to poke and prod again
to relearn it. "Edit a connection" offers an "Add" option. My hope is
that something in the resulting dropdown menu will provide a viable fix
here.
Nmtui doesn't sp
George at Clug writes:
> iptables (which I like), nftables (which I ask, Why?)
For a few years now, well, almost a decade, iptables has been a hollow
shell with nftables inside. Why nftables? Because it unifies firewall
for ipv4, ipv6 and bridges, so we don't need to have separate iptables,
ip6t
Rainer,
I believe others have responded.
Just for my curiosity, Is Network Manager installed? Would you be able to use
nmclli to set a static IP address? Or maybe systemctl ?
I find Linux Networking confusing, so many different systems for managing
networking, for example /etc/network/interf
On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 15:01:27 +0100
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>
> I am trying to bringup the wifi network with an ipv4 address on a
> Cubox-i automatically after boot.
>
> Manually, it works:
> [...]
> root@outdoor:~# ifdown wlan0
> [...]
> ifroot@outdoor:~# ifup wlan0
> [...]
> Any hint or advice is
Looks like your firmware is not available. For broadcomm cards there is an
extra installer, which downloads it seperately.
In Debian the firmware is not shipped in the repo, but an installer is
shipped.
Check for any broadcom related packages.
Hope this helps.
Best
Hans
> In the kernel messa
Rainer,
Apologies I cannot help you. I have been hoping someone might who is
able to do so, would respond.
I searched the Internet and it would seem you are not alone with this
issue.
Is network manager installed in your system?
Is your system Debian 12 (Bookworm)?, I would presume so.
He
Hello,
I am trying to bringup the wifi network with an ipv4 address on a Cubox-i
automatically after boot.
Manually, it works:
root@outdoor:~# cat /etc/network/interfaces
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, s
On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 21:57:20 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:59:01PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 18:58:43 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:44:04AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57
On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 21:57:20 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:59:01PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 18:58:43 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:44:04AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:59:01PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 18:58:43 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:44:04AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > > On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > ( https://lists.debian.org/debian
On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 18:58:43 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:44:04AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> > ( https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/01/msg01038.html )
> > > [7.854942] iwlwifi :02:00.
Am 21.01.2024 um 18:58:43 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers:
> It does report "hard blocked", but rfkill can't change it.
Look for a hardware switch or a keystroke (mostly combined with FN) to
enable it.
talled package `rfkill` (it wasn't installed before)
and tried it.
It does report "hard blocked", but rfkill can't change it.
root@nero:~# rfkill
ID TYPE DEVICE SOFTHARD
0 bluetooth tpacpi_bluetooth_sw blocked blocked
1 wwan
df
> gemacht und per Email versandt.
> Auf die Schnelle habe ich nun ein HP ENVY 6020e gekauft.
> Das Ding ist über WLAN anzusprechen mit HP Smart. Dann habe ich aber mit
> meinen SAMSUNG Smartphone habe keine andere Verbindungen mehr und kann das
> nicht mehr gleich als Email vers
ENVY 6020e gekauft.
Das Ding ist über WLAN anzusprechen mit HP Smart. Dann habe ich aber
mit meinen SAMSUNG Smartphone habe keine andere Verbindungen mehr und
kann das nicht mehr gleich als Email versenden.
Ist das so gewollt oder mache ich einen Denkfehler wie man das sonst
alles anders machen
ENVY 6020e gekauft.
Das Ding ist über WLAN anzusprechen mit HP Smart. Dann habe ich aber
mit meinen SAMSUNG Smartphone habe keine andere Verbindungen mehr und
kann das nicht mehr gleich als Email versenden.
Ist das so gewollt oder mache ich einen Denkfehler wie man das sonst
alles anders machen
ENVY 6020e gekauft.
Das Ding ist über WLAN anzusprechen mit HP Smart. Dann habe ich aber
mit meinen SAMSUNG Smartphone habe keine andere Verbindungen mehr und
kann das nicht mehr gleich als Email versenden.
Ist das so gewollt oder mache ich einen Denkfehler wie man das sonst
alles anders machen
On Saturday, September 05, 2020 10:35:24 AM Lee wrote:
> On 9/3/20, riveravaldez wrote:
> > What could I do to check/test the health/performance of the connection
> > in order to diagnose if there's effectively a problem?
>
> You can use iperf to see how bad wireless thruput is. LinSSID
> htt
On 9/3/20, riveravaldez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm under the impression that one of my LAN-SSH connections is working
> poorly. When I SSH from a wired desktop machine (generic) to a
> Wi-Fi-ed notebook (ThinkPadX220) things take irregular and seemingly
> excessive amounts of time to happen (you type an
On 2020-09-03 06:48, riveravaldez wrote:
Hi,
I'm under the impression that one of my LAN-SSH connections is working
poorly. When I SSH from a wired desktop machine (generic) to a
Wi-Fi-ed notebook (ThinkPadX220) things take irregular and seemingly
excessive amounts of time to happen (you type an
Might try variants of:
ssh -v -v -v theu...@thedomain.tld
to see what ssh/sshd are doing.
John
Bob Weber writes:
> On 9/3/20 9:48 AM, riveravaldez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm under the impression that one of my LAN-SSH connections is working
> > poorly. When I SSH from a wired desktop
On 9/3/20 9:48 AM, riveravaldez wrote:
Hi,
I'm under the impression that one of my LAN-SSH connections is working
poorly. When I SSH from a wired desktop machine (generic) to a
Wi-Fi-ed notebook (ThinkPadX220) things take irregular and seemingly
excessive amounts of time to happen (you type and
Hi,
I'm under the impression that one of my LAN-SSH connections is working
poorly. When I SSH from a wired desktop machine (generic) to a
Wi-Fi-ed notebook (ThinkPadX220) things take irregular and seemingly
excessive amounts of time to happen (you type and the text appears a
moment later, etc.). T
On Mon 30 Jul 2018 at 17:27:04 (+0200), Markus Grunwald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While wake on lan works well on my T570 with debian buster, I'm not able
> get wake on WLAN working...
>
> % sudo iw phy0 wowlan show
> WoWLAN is enabled:
> * wake up on disconnect
Hello,
While wake on lan works well on my T570 with debian buster, I'm not able
get wake on WLAN working...
% sudo iw phy0 wowlan show
WoWLAN is enabled:
* wake up on disconnect
* wake up on magic packet
% /sbin/ifconfig wlp4s0 | grep ether
ether e4:70:b8:fb:25:89 txqueuelen
solitone wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 July 2017 10:05:56 CEST Dan Purgert wrote:
>> That being said, most network admins worth anything will be approaching
>> the problem from their side too (e.g. with band steering), in order to
>> "encourage" client devices to connect to the 5 GHz signal.
>
> I've tr
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 10:05:56 CEST Dan Purgert wrote:
> That being said, most network admins worth anything will be approaching
> the problem from their side too (e.g. with band steering), in order to
> "encourage" client devices to connect to the 5 GHz signal.
I've tried the band steering op
solitone wrote:
> [...]
> Is there some tweak I can do on the kernel module, so that the choice
> doesn't rely on any specific configuration on the AP?
Not directly (usually), it's a mix of a few things (as you'd done/
mentioned). You may be able to set some preferences in Network Manager
/ wicd
Although this issue is widely discussed, but I didn't find a way to solve it.
My access point provides both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, and I'd like my WiFi
adapter chose 5 GHz over 2.4.
To accomplish this, I reduced the AP's TX power for 2.4 GHz, and increased
that for 5 GHz. The point is that wh
On 2017-06-25, Hans wrote:
> I read the original post now (in German, and as I am German, no problem).
> In his case I think "kismet" is a good start. So he can see, if there are
> other AP on the same frequency. I also suggest "wavemon", which shows all AP
> and its strenth.
>
> If the neighbou
I read the original post now (in German, and as I am German, no problem).
In his case I think "kismet" is a good start. So he can see, if there are
other AP on the same frequency. I also suggest "wavemon", which shows all AP
and its strenth.
If the neighbour is sending weired pckages (maybe with
Hi,
Reco wrote:
> Using aireplay-ng for the purpose of lowering signal quality
> for neighbor WiFi can be subject to criminal penalties
That would be a good catch in a neighborhood feud which normally is
rather faught by unnecessary lawn mowing, loud music, stinking garbage
cans, or obscene garde
Hi.
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:06:38 +0200
Hans wrote:
> I believe tshark (and wireshark of course) is also be capable of showing bad
> or corrupted traffic. You can set filters, i.e. to filter out rejects and
> similar,
> and if they are abnormal high, you know, something is bad.
>
> Ju
I believe tshark (and wireshark of course) is also be capable of showing bad
or corrupted traffic. You can set filters, i.e. to filter out rejects and
similar,
and if they are abnormal high, you know, something is bad.
Just an idea...
Best
Hans
ser-ger...@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
> > Just in case somebody knows a program for WLAN quality surveillance:
> >
> > The OP suspects that his neighbor after annoying the dogs has now
> > taken measures to hamper the WLAN. The question is whether there are
> > pr
Hi.
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 09:36:57 +0200
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> debian-user ist englischsprachig. Probier's mal auf dem deutschen Ableger:
> debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org
>
>
> Just in case somebody knows a program for WLAN qualit
Hi,
debian-user ist englischsprachig. Probier's mal auf dem deutschen Ableger:
debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org
Just in case somebody knows a program for WLAN quality surveillance:
The OP suspects that his neighbor after annoying the dogs has now
taken measures to hamper the WLAN
Hallo,
mein neuer Nachbar ist ein bisschen komisch. Er hat schon einen
Ultraschallvertreiber gegen unsere zwei Hunde direkt an unserem Zaun
eingesteckt. Als er mitbekommen hat das wir das gemerkt haben hat er den
schnell entfernt.
Nun haben wir laufend Probleme mit dem WLAN, mal kommt keiner
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 11:23:29AM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
>
> My guess is that it has problems with the newer kernel, but without
> that file it's impossible to say why it failed to build. Another guess
> would be that you haven't installed the kernel headers, which are
> required to build tha
On Sunday 04 October 2015 15:46:36 Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> apt-get upgrade possible upgraded openjdk 6 to openjdk7 (possibly because
> backports are included in my sources, I don't know precisely), after which
> libreoffice didn't start even from terminal.
> After much guess work, I tried install
On Sunday 04 October 2015 13:29:32 Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> Yup! got it. I attached my sources.list file in the very first message of
> the thread. I would like to have suggestions on the same.
Read:
https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList
Then the following might be helpful - but beware, they are no
apt-get upgrade possible upgraded openjdk 6 to openjdk7 (possibly because
backports are included in my sources, I don't know precisely), after which
libreoffice didn't start even from terminal.
After much guess work, I tried installing libreoffice5, which was available
in backports.
Now, libreoffic
On Sunday 04 October 2015 11:39:55 Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> infact after updating java..
How? You need to give a lot more detail.
> libreoffice4 failed and i had to install
> libreoffice5 from jessie backports.
Lisi
Hallo,
* Himanshu Shekhar [Sun, Oct 04 2015, 04:09:55PM]:
> thanks dude ! i upgraded my driver. But can you tell why some packages
> break after updating to newer version and still debian stable version is
> named so.
> infact after updating java.. libreoffice4 failed and i had to install
> libreof
here's the sources.list file
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Himanshu Shekhar
wrote:
> Yup! got it. I attached my sources.list file in the very first message of
> the thread. I would like to have suggestions on the same.
> Also, I have installed few packages from tarballs, as my realtek r8101
>
Yup! got it. I attached my sources.list file in the very first message of
the thread. I would like to have suggestions on the same.
Also, I have installed few packages from tarballs, as my realtek r8101
ethernet driver, skype.
That's all!
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Su
On Sunday 04 October 2015 11:39:55 Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> thanks dude ! i upgraded my driver. But can you tell why some packages
> break after updating to newer version and still debian stable version is
> named so.
> infact after updating java.. libreoffice4 failed and i had to install
> libreo
thanks dude ! i upgraded my driver. But can you tell why some packages
break after updating to newer version and still debian stable version is
named so.
infact after updating java.. libreoffice4 failed and i had to install
libreoffice5 from jessie backports.
Is this normal or and issue?
Thanks for
Hallo,
* Himanshu Shekhar [Sun, Oct 04 2015, 03:06:34PM]:
> I have no idea of what has happened to my system. My sources.list is
> attached along with make.log. If I need to downgrade my kernel, please
> provide a fix.
> Thanks for replying... I was waiting!
Downgrade the kernel or upgrade the dri
I have no idea of what has happened to my system. My sources.list is
attached along with make.log. If I need to downgrade my kernel, please
provide a fix.
Thanks for replying... I was waiting!
I would appreciate any help!
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 13:22:44 +0530
Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> I updated my system last night after which I was not able to use network on
> my laptop. I tried to install ethernet driver as I had it locally but could
> not make the wifi work.
> Earlier the /lib/modules folder had 3.16* directory onl
I updated my system last night after which I was not able to use network on
my laptop. I tried to install ethernet driver as I had it locally but could
not make the wifi work.
Earlier the /lib/modules folder had 3.16* directory only, now I could see
some 4.1* alongside. Also, the driver in use was
Am Donnerstag, 6. August 2015, 06:47:52 schrieb Beco:
Hi Beco,
is wlan0 existent? Try ifconfig -a
If yes, try wicd instead of network manager.
FYI I had trouble with my network devices with kernel 4.0, but reverting to
3.16 did the trick.
Also see, if the correct kernel module for your card is
>
> On 6 August 2015 at 02:28, Beco wrote:
> Earlier today I picked at BIOS to see if there was something there I could
> change. The only reference to network there is to select where to boot from.
>
> But I'll double check to be sure.
Ok, I got some results.
I found on BIOS an option to dis
boot up into BIOS and see if there's anything
> at all in there about your WLAN hardware.
>
>
Earlier today I picked at BIOS to see if there was something there I could
change. The only reference to network there is to select where to boot from.
But I'll double check to be
can't boot into Windows on this machine, right ?
>
> Let me put lspci here. Maybe I'm mistaken.
you don't appear to be mistaken.
that's just weird.
Sure seems like a hardware failure.
oh- one other thing to try. boot up into BIOS and see if there's anything at
all
>
> there is often a hardware switch which disables WLAN.
>
> Is it possible that it's been turned off ?
>
> lspci should _absolutely_ show it's existence regardless of whether or not
> the drivers have been loaded. Either it's off, if it's a separate card
>
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 23:23:35 -0300
Beco wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Something odd happened today, on my first clean boot of the day.
> (notebook DELL vostro v131)
>
> Simply, no wlan0 at all.
>
there is often a hardware switch which disables WLAN.
Is it possible that it'
Hi guys,
Something odd happened today, on my first clean boot of the day.
(notebook DELL vostro v131)
Simply, no wlan0 at all.
$ ifconfig -a #shows only eth0 and lo.
$ lspci #shows no wifi at all (should be a Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030
BGN Rev=0xB0)
$ lshw -C Network #shows only eth0
$ rfkil
Bonjour Stephan:
debian-user@lists.debian.org is an English spoken forum:
you may either expose your issue in English or send your
issue to the corresponding German forum.
Bonne chance,
Jerome
On 11/07/15 13:25, stephan roehling wrote:
> Hallo,
> meine wlan-Karte wird von linux nicht ge
Hallo,
meine wlan-Karte wird von linux nicht gefunden.
apt-get install firmware-linux-nonfree funktioniert nicht. Es erscheint
die meldung Paket nicht gefunden.
Kann jemand helfen.
Stephan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
apt-get purge macchanger
Done; I have no macchanger installed anymore.
> Then get back to your original problem. (Squirrel!) Stay on target.
>
>> Now the line is:
>> # USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", \
# USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", \
> ATTR{address}=="00:e0:4c:81:92:*", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", \
> ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="wlan*", NAME="wlan0"
Other people have been answering this part of your question.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tek Semiconductor Corp.)
It's the same MAC!!
So after this what should I do with udev rules in
70-persistent-net.rules ?
Now the line is:
# USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", \
ATTR{address}=="00:e0:4c:81:92:*"
Michael Biebl writes:
> Am 25.04.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Pascal Hambourg:
>> csanyi...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
>>> After that, when I replug the WLAN Adapter, I get in
>>> 70-persistent-net.rules another line:
>>> # USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
>&
Quoting Pascal Hambourg (pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org):
> csanyi...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> > After that, when I replug the WLAN Adapter, I get in
> > 70-persistent-net.rules another line:
> > # USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="a
csanyi...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>> I should wrote here like:
>> # USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="usb", \
>> ATTR{idVendor}=="0586", ATTR{idProduct}=="341f", \
>>
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Pal, what hardware is that specifically?
> Any idea why it changes the MAC?
Hmm... Is 'macchanger' involved in this in any way?
$ apt-cache show macchanger
Description-en: utility for manipulating the MAC address of network interfaces
Features:
* set specific M
Am 25.04.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Pascal Hambourg:
> csanyi...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> After that, when I replug the WLAN Adapter, I get in
>> 70-persistent-net.rules another line:
>> # USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", D
ules.d/70-persistent-net.rules I have the line:
>>> # USB device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
>>> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="usb",
>>> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0586", ATTRS{idProduct}=="341f", ATT
>>> R{manufacturer}=
B device 0x:0x (rtl8192cu)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="usb",
>> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0586", ATTRS{idProduct}=="341f", ATT
>> R{manufacturer}=="Realtek", ATTR{product}=="802.11n WLAN Adapter",
>> ATT
, ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="usb",
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0586", ATTRS{idProduct}=="341f", ATT
> R{manufacturer}=="Realtek", ATTR{product}=="802.11n WLAN Adapter",
> ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1"
> ,
CTION=="add", DRIVERS=="usb",
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0586", ATTRS{idProduct}=="341f", ATT
> R{manufacturer}=="Realtek", ATTR{product}=="802.11n WLAN Adapter",
> ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1"
> , KERNEL=="w
dor}=="0586", ATTRS{idProduct}=="341f", ATT
R{manufacturer}=="Realtek", ATTR{product}=="802.11n WLAN Adapter",
ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1"
, KERNEL=="wlan*", NAME="wlan0"
I did run:
# udevadm control --reload-ru
On Friday 31 October 2014 08:45:41 Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with configuring a server with a fixed IP
> address (=not use DHCP client), as long as you use the correct
> network, netmask and default gateway.
This would appear to me to be the obvious solution. Is there a pr
Hello,
On 31/10/14 09:45, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:28:33AM +0100, B. M. wrote:
Hi list,
I have a problem with my (w)lan setup. We use telephone and
internet over the cable network and the company gives us a wlan
modem for free. Unfortunately this modem doesn&#
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
