Re: Wheezy is up and running.

2011-02-09 Thread Hans Vogelsberger
On 2011-02-07 08:45, Jimmy Johnson wrote: You all know by know that Squeeze has been released, thank you Debian Developers, now starts the development of the next Debian release, Wheeze, just change the sources.list from squeeze to wheeze and dist-upgrade, 369 upgrades for me. Ah, yes, I am on

Re: Wheezy is up and running.

2011-02-07 Thread Jimmy Johnson
Thierry Chatelet wrote: On Monday 07 February 2011 08:45:03 Jimmy Johnson wrote: You all know by know that Squeeze has been released, thank you Debian Developers, now starts the development of the next Debian release, Wheeze, just change the sources.list from squeeze to wheeze and ^

Re: Wheezy is up and running.

2011-02-07 Thread Lisi
On Monday 07 February 2011 09:36:44 Thierry Chatelet wrote: > On Monday 07 February 2011 08:45:03 Jimmy Johnson wrote: > > You all know by know that Squeeze has been released, thank you Debian > > Developers, now starts the development of the next Debian release, > > Wheeze, just change the sources

Re: Wheezy is up and running.

2011-02-07 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On Monday 07 February 2011 08:45:03 Jimmy Johnson wrote: > You all know by know that Squeeze has been released, thank you Debian > Developers, now starts the development of the next Debian release, > Wheeze, just change the sources.list from squeeze to > wheeze and ^ > dist-upgrade, 369

Wheezy is up and running.

2011-02-06 Thread Jimmy Johnson
You all know by know that Squeeze has been released, thank you Debian Developers, now starts the development of the next Debian release, Wheeze, just change the sources.list from squeeze to wheeze and dist-upgrade, 369 upgrades for me. -- Jimmy Johnson Debian Wheezy - AMD64 - EXT4 at sda13 Reg

Re: [PHP-DB] Help getting php up and running

2006-02-12 Thread John W. M. Stevens
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:19:05AM -0500, CasperLinux wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:54, David Kirchner wrote: > > On 2/11/06, CasperLinux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone have any input? I am googling till my fingers hurt and everything > > > I find says it should be running. Whe

Re: [PHP-DB] Help getting php up and running

2006-02-11 Thread CasperLinux
On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:54, David Kirchner wrote: > On 2/11/06, CasperLinux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone have any input? I am googling till my fingers hurt and everything > > I find says it should be running. Whenever I try to open a test.php file > > all I get is the web browswer

Re: Re: [PHP-DB] Help getting php up and running

2006-02-11 Thread David Kirchner
On 2/11/06, CasperLinux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have any input? I am googling till my fingers hurt and everything I > find says it should be running. Whenever I try to open a test.php file all I > get is the web browswer trying to save the file instead of serving up the php > content.

Fwd: Re: [PHP-DB] Help getting php up and running

2006-02-11 Thread CasperLinux
dModule includes_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_include.so > LoadModule includes_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so > > For the life of me I can't figure out why following the instructions won't > get this up and running this time. I think I'm missing a file

Re: Getting up and running

2004-08-10 Thread s. keeling
wing on a one on one basis and help me get up and running. Know There are many sources for support for a Linux "newbie" nowadays, and even Debian based distributions that are designed to be more newbie friendly. I'd suggest looking into Libranet (www.libranet.com). It's D

Re: Getting up and running

2004-08-10 Thread bob parker
on, at the same time trying to set up > and run Linux. Keep in mind I am 70 years old so learning comes much > slower these days. I have installed Debian 3.0r2 ,and have been > struggling on a now and then basis to get it up and running. I don't > have enough time to devote to lear

Getting up and running

2004-08-10 Thread Dougpol1
es much slower these days. I have installed Debian 3.0r2 ,and have been struggling on a now and then basis to get it up and running. I don't have enough time to devote to learn how to configure and get everything operating so that I can install Qcad and a CAM program and start working

Back up and running

2004-01-06 Thread David Baron
For those who have such a problem: Instead of following IBM's instructions, do it the way one of the debian forum posters suggested: 1..When the CD boot:? prompt appears type "knoppix single" This will configure and dump you in a working root shell. 2. Mount the disk yourself and that way you o

2.4.19 Up and running

2002-09-11 Thread J.S.Sahambi
I fixed the problem of RTL-8139. I used the following modules in /etc/modules file: 8139too mii Then it worked fine. Thanks for all of your help. :) Regards J. S. Sahambi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Still cannot get gnome up and running

2001-07-25 Thread Scott Adair
All that you have to do, is go to your home directory, and type this command echo 'gnome-session' > ~/.xinitrc It's ok that the file is not there, this will make it. That should do it, if X is properly configured (sounds like it is, if you can get twm up and going) * Alex Thomas ([EMAIL

Re: Still cannot get gnome up and running

2001-07-25 Thread Sam Varghese
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:07:49AM -0500, Alex Thomas wrote: > There is no ~/.xsession or ~/.xinitrc on my system. running gnome-session > produces error I take it that you have set up your X window system? If so, you can manually make an .xinitrc in your home directory and just enter one lin

Still cannot get gnome up and running

2001-07-25 Thread Alex Thomas
There is no ~/.xsession or ~/.xinitrc on my system.  running gnome-session produces error    Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: SESSION_MANAGER=local/debian:/tmp/.ICE-unix/321,tcp/debian:1064   Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:   Stumbling through two different books on how to set this

Up and Running!

2000-02-03 Thread davidturetsky
What a difference a jumper makes!   After changing the two jumpers to max out my 34GB drive at 32GB, I installed Debian 2.2.99 (?) without further issue. The installation process smoothly led me by the hand   All of the partitions I created with Partition Magic were fully recognized   My sinc

Re: PPP stuff continued... (Up and running w apt-get, netscape!)

1999-11-07 Thread John Hasler
John Miskinis writes: > So should I persue trying to get my system to authenticate my ISP's > connection to my machine? No. They won't do it. > Or is this not typically used for systems that connect TO an ISP? Right. You called them, so you know who they are. > I'm hoping that it's OK to live

Re: PPP stuff continued... (Up and running w apt-get, netscape!)

1999-11-07 Thread John Miskinis
Hi, So should I persue trying to get my system to authenticate my ISP's connection to my machine? Or is this not typically used for systems that connect TO an ISP? I'm hoping that it's OK to live without out it, and not open my system up to possible intrusion. Thanks again, John ___

Re: PPP stuff continued... (Up and running w apt-get, netscape!)

1999-11-07 Thread John Miskinis
Hi, What I meant, was that if it I run with "auth" than the CHAPS authentication fails. If I run with "noauth", all works OK. I saw a note in "options" stating that the "auth" should not be disabled, and I'm not sure I should worry about this or not. I changed this in "options" prior to rerun

Re: PPP stuff continued... (Up and running w apt-get, netscape!)

1999-11-07 Thread John Hasler
> I've been tailing ppp.log and it still rejects a negotiation for > compression, but everything is working though. Don't worry about the compression negotiation. That just means that you and your ISP have no compression method in common. Software compression doesn't make much difference anyway,

Re: PPP stuff continued... (Up and running w apt-get, netscape!)

1999-11-07 Thread John Miskinis
Hi, I don't know what let me to think that pon and diald were related. I probably installed diald a while back in preparation to get PPP working after I got an ISP that supported PPP. In any case, I don't think there is anything wrong with any documentation at all. I just had a lot of new thing

setting up and running proftpd

1999-09-26 Thread Jim Ruby
I installed proftpd the other day and well read the man page and visited the proftpd web site. Maybe I should get a new hat, but in there I found that I should have an ftp group etc. Ok, here is what I want: I have a 5 gb partition set a side for ftp space, so I would mound /dev/hdc2 /ftp Now I w

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-12 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yup - you got it. The startkde macro starts kfm, but I don't see where it's > starting kfmclient - is that a separate operation? how can I turn it off? I > just don't want it to start when KDE starts up. It co

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-12 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 1/11/99 8:45:15 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I believe you are saying that you dislike the functions of kfmclient, not > kfm. You don't need to use kfmclient if you don't want to. You can use > tkdesk or X-Plorer or whatever you want to browse direct

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-12 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Put startkde in the first line of /etc/X11/window-managers. > > This just flat out doesn't work. I get my kdm window, log in, and then it > looks like kdm shuts down and restarts - I get a flash of windows and

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-12 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 1/10/99 11:16:54 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > That is a good point - but is there another way to do it? I could set up a > > start-kdm line in config, but wouldn't that also get overridden? > > No. Your config files are not overwritten. That t

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-11 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Remember that if you ever upgrade your xbase package (planning on moving > > to slink when it comes out?) that it will blow away kdm to replace it with > > the new version of xdm. > > > > That is a good poin

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-11 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 1/10/99 10:47:00 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > 1) Renamed /user/X11/bin/xdm to old.xdm and created a link from > > /usr/local/kde/bin/kdm to xdm in it's place. According to the KDE docs, > this > > is no problem - and in practice, it works like a ch

Re: Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-11 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1) Renamed /user/X11/bin/xdm to old.xdm and created a link from > /usr/local/kde/bin/kdm to xdm in it's place. According to the KDE docs, this > is no problem - and in practice, it works like a champ. Remember tha

Getting KDE up and running.

1999-01-11 Thread MallarJ
Well, thought I'd put this up for anyone else running through what I had to go through to get my KDE running. I compiled my KDE, and it didn't create any start up files. The docs said to run startx and then startkde, but I wanted everything up when I booted my system up. So, how did I do it? PS

RE: up and running

1998-12-20 Thread AJArmstrong
mstrong -Original Message- From: Eric Drayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 20, 1998 1:50 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: up and running GA586 dual pent "2 processors activated" IDE cdrom and hd Matrox millinium 4Mb my monitor is randomly going maginta..

up and running

1998-12-20 Thread Eric Drayer
GA586 dual pent "2 processors activated" IDE cdrom and hd Matrox millinium 4Mb my monitor is randomly going maginta...but it started doing that with NT. only one OS ...Debian Linux soon to have mathematica installed. X good. emacs good. no real work other than the kernal recompile for SMP. do not h

Re: Getting Lyx up and running with Hamm

1998-09-16 Thread shaul
Lyx for Hamm needs libforms0.88 Package: lyx Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: contrib/text Installed-Size: 4576 Maintainer: Stuart Lamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 0.12.0.final-0.1 Depends: libc6, libforms0.88, libg++272 (>= 2.7.2.8), xlib6g (>= 3.3-5), xpm4g ( Recommen

Re: Getting Lyx up and running with Hamm

1998-09-15 Thread Stefan . Ehlen
Hi, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> After upgrading to Hamm, Lyx doesn't work any more, complaining that it >> "can't load library 'libforms.so.0.81' ". This is reported as bug #18477. >> >> Is there any work-around for this? > >D

Re: Getting Lyx up and running with Hamm

1998-09-15 Thread Johann Spies
On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After upgrading to Hamm, Lyx doesn't work any more, complaining that it > "can't load library 'libforms.so.0.81' ". This is reported as bug #18477. > > Is there any work-around for this? Did you install libforms? I have installed libforms-0.88.1-

Getting Lyx up and running with Hamm

1998-09-15 Thread Stefan . Ehlen
Hi! After upgrading to Hamm, Lyx doesn't work any more, complaining that it "can't load library 'libforms.so.0.81' ". This is reported as bug #18477. Is there any work-around for this? thanks Stefan

WHOOPS!: lfjokes is up and running :)

1997-05-29 Thread Adam Shand
WHOOPS! Sorry everyone. I was showing people how to do username completion in Eudora and forgot I'd used my debian-users address book as an example. Damn. Sorry for the waste of bandwidth. Adam. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

lfjokes is up and running :)

1997-05-29 Thread Adam Shand
The list of [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is only postable to by me or you (both froggy and wrightc) and has the distribution list installed (below). It should also be being archived at: http://www.earthlight.co.nz/lists/jokes/ Adam. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >(Only addresses below this line can be

Re: problem: getting nfs up and running

1997-05-06 Thread Michael J Devine
Trying to get nfs running, but something just isn't right... > > What does your /etc/exports look like ? > # /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be exported # to NFS clients. See exports(5). /home *.ewu (rw) > > Do you have the portmapper running ? > T

Re: problem: getting nfs up and running

1997-05-01 Thread Philippe Troin
On Thu, 01 May 1997 11:58:53 PDT Michael J Devine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm trying to get nfs to allow my users on the client machines to have > access to their home directories on the server. I recently was given > these helpful hints: [snip] > I did all this, and when I executed the nf

problem: getting nfs up and running

1997-05-01 Thread Michael J Devine
I'm trying to get nfs to allow my users on the client machines to have access to their home directories on the server. I recently was given these helpful hints: > Add this line to your server's export: > /home *. (rw) > Then reboot, or do /etc/init.d/netstd_nfs start > > Add th

Re: problem: getting nfs up and running

1997-04-29 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael J Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'm trying to get nfs to allow my users on the client machines to have >access to their home directories on the server. I recently was given >these helpful hints: > >> Add this line to your server's export: >> /hom

problem: getting nfs up and running

1997-04-29 Thread Michael J Devine
I'm trying to get nfs to allow my users on the client machines to have access to their home directories on the server. I recently was given these helpful hints: > Add this line to your server's export: > /home *. (rw) > Then reboot, or do /etc/init.d/netstd_nfs start > > Add thi

uucp (was Re: sendmail up and running or not)

1996-05-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, 8 May 1996, Nick Busigin wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 1996, Rob Leslie wrote: > > > To receive mail directly from the outside, you need to have > > a host or domain name for which mail will be routed to your > > machine. Sometimes this involves an MX record pointing to your > > machine. It assu

Re: sendmail up and running or not

1996-05-08 Thread Rob Leslie
> I have configured the sendmail in Debian 1.1, in either the following > two ways: > > 1) use /usr/sbin/sendmailconfig which comes with the sendmail Debian > package This is the preferred method. > 2) follow the instrucions in /usr/doc/sendmail to create a .mc file, > which is quit simple in fa

Re: sendmail up and running or not

1996-05-08 Thread Nick Busigin
On Wed, 8 May 1996, Rob Leslie wrote: > To receive mail directly from the outside, you need to have a host or domain > name for which mail will be routed to your machine. Sometimes this involves an > MX record pointing to your machine. It assumes your machine is always > connected to the net. If t

sendmail up and running or not

1996-05-08 Thread Godfrey
I have configured the sendmail in Debian 1.1, in either the following two ways: 1) use /usr/sbin/sendmailconfig which comes with the sendmail Debian package 2) follow the instrucions in /usr/doc/sendmail to create a .mc file, which is quit simple in fact, and use m4 to create the .cf file and cop