Hi,
On 2022-01-25 03:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 24 ian 22, 07:47:01, max wrote:
>> January 22, 2022 2:23:48 PM CET max wrote:
>>
>>> https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
>>
>> I've
On Lu, 24 ian 22, 07:47:01, max wrote:
> January 22, 2022 2:23:48 PM CET max wrote:
>
> > https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
>
> I've updated the post taking into account the feedback so far (There
&g
On 2022-01-24 at 16:35, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> max wrote on 24/01/2022 at 06:15:12+0100:
>
>> January 23, 2022 11:21:31 AM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue"
>> wrote:
>>> Now that I read the press release paragraph and the reference to
>>> Pocock's "excommunication", I start wondering if Max
max wrote on 24/01/2022 at 05:26:45+0100:
> January 22, 2022 3:51:28 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> wrote:
>
>> Debian does fix security problems
>
> The question is when: 0 days or 6 months after the CVE announcement? I
> mean, if you need 6 months, that's fine. Just don't claim that you do
>
max wrote on 24/01/2022 at 06:15:12+0100:
> January 23, 2022 11:21:31 AM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue"
> wrote:
>
>> I wonder if these bugs aren't also impacting chromium? I did not have
>> time to look into it so I may be wrong.
>
> But of course they were. Otherwise why would Debian fix them,
January 22, 2022 2:23:48 PM CET max wrote:
> https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
I've updated the post taking into account the feedback so far (There weren't
any corrections, but there were misunderstandings, and I
Hi
On 2022-01-24 01:07, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:01:57AM -0500, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Polyna,
>
> with due respect for your patience... I have the impression that you are
> feeding trolls here.
>
Tomas @ TuxTeam,
Thanks for remindin
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:01:57AM -0500, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
[...]
Polyna,
with due respect for your patience... I have the impression that you are
feeding trolls here.
Cheers
--
tomás
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 2022-01-23 23:26, max wrote:
> January 22, 2022 3:51:28 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> wrote:
>
>> Debian does fix security problems
>
> The question is when: 0 days or 6 months after the CVE announcement? I mean,
> if you need 6 months, that's fine. Just don't claim that you do it in 0
January 23, 2022 11:21:31 AM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" wrote:
> I wonder if these bugs aren't also impacting chromium? I did not have time to
> look into it so I may be wrong.
But of course they were. Otherwise why would Debian fix them, after a long
wait? Why would it list them on its securi
January 22, 2022 3:51:28 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> Debian does fix security problems
The question is when: 0 days or 6 months after the CVE announcement? I mean, if
you need 6 months, that's fine. Just don't claim that you do it in 0 days.
That's dishonest. Does this make sense?
>
January 22, 2022 2:42:39 PM CET Jim Popovitch wrote:
> I was interested, until I realized your Medium post is that Google Chrome is
> not updated fast enough by Debian.
Not at all. It's about the fact that the claims on debian.org/security are
counterfactual.
--
Sent with https://mailfence
;
> Huh... this is about Chrome, again. Is your post about Debian or about
> Chrome?
>
>> I suspected that at least some Debian developers (unlike its users) were
>> aware that debian.org/security was taking liberties with the truth.
>
> I think you're just misreading the of
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 07:01:24PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2022, max wrote:
>
> >
> > WHY IS DEBIAN NOT TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT ITS SECURITY FIXES?
> >
> snip rant.
>
> I could have the opposite rant. WHY IS DEBIAN NOT TELLING THE TRUT
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022, max wrote:
WHY IS DEBIAN NOT TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT ITS SECURITY FIXES?
snip rant.
I could have the opposite rant. WHY IS DEBIAN NOT TELLING THE TRUTH
ABOUT ITS STABLE DISTRIBUTION.
Because I have a machine (actually more than one) sat running buster
that has SSH
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 02:23:48PM +0100, max wrote:
> This is a text-only version of my post on
> https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
>
> It is missing hyperlinks and illustrations. Comments, corrections and
>
max wrote:
> This is a text-only version of my post on
> https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
>
> It is missing hyperlinks and illustrations. Comments, corrections and
> suggestions are very welcome.
...
> Wil
On Sat, 2022-01-22 at 14:23 +0100, max wrote:
>
> WHY IS DEBIAN NOT TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT ITS SECURITY FIXES?
>
I was interested, until I realized your Medium post is that Google
Chrome is not updated fast enough by Debian.
-Jim P.
This is a text-only version of my post on
https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
It is missing hyperlinks and illustrations. Comments, corrections and
suggestions are very welcome.
---
WHY IS DEBIAN NOT TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT
nipponm...@firemail.cc wrote:
> Oh great, threats and power-plays.
>
> Alexandre François Garreau:
Got curious who is lexandre François Garreau
https://hackernoon.com/avatars/2G4JnXIXjRVO9GPsF8rTiRgmEUm1.png
:D :D :D :D
Brother, I don't know you, but please, relax!
There are 1000s of that ki
Have you read the short book "The Present" yet? It's available free here.
Just go to the website: www.truthcontest.com
Click on the entry called The Present. What it says will turn this world
right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when
you read the first page.
Thanks,
associated misperceived glory vs poise.
Natural law seeks city lore of solidarity confidential chemistry in space abundant truth
as website situated of psyche aligned objectivity working with plenty resolute basicity.
Telecommunications daily focus, speaking to humans in generalized world perception
È«ÊÀ½ç·¢ÐÐ×î¶àµÄÊé¾ÍÊÇÌìÖ÷½ÌµÄ"Ê¥¾","Ê¥¾"ÂîÖйúÈËÊÇɵµ°,×çÖäÖйúÈËÊÇħ¹í,ÎÒÒªÇóÌìÖ÷½Ì½Ì»áÏòÈ«ÌåÖйúÈ˵ÀǸ£¡
ÒÔÏÂÊÇÌìÖ÷½Ì"Ê¥¾"µÄ²¿·ÝÄÚÈÝ,¼º¾×çÖäÖйú¶þǧ¶àÄ꣡ÎÒÒªÇóÌìÖ÷½Ì½Ì»áÏòÈ«ÌåÖйúÈ˵ÀǸ£¡
> >
>Õ⡸¸¾ÈË¡¹ÊÇÔ¤±í½ñÌìµÄ½Ì»
Damon Muller wrote:
>
> Quoth Sebastian Silva,
>
> > The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too
> > tight. Mi solution was simply to give it all the permissions it wants
> > (of course NOT setuid). Now the other thing is that Mozilla wont
> > download the X-install packag
Quoth Sebastian Silva,
> The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too
> tight. Mi solution was simply to give it all the permissions it wants
> (of course NOT setuid). Now the other thing is that Mozilla wont
> download the X-install packages himself. You have to do it for h
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:29:05AM -0600, Joe piman Wreschnig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> > The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too tight.
> No, they're fine, Mozilla is just horrid about multiuser systems.
correct
> > Mi s
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> I tried all this with the Java plugin from sun (yes, I am brave)
> I had done this with Mozilla on my previous distro and it had worked,
> but now, even though Java seems to be installed, no applets recognize
> it.
>
> For the bra
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too tight.
No, they're fine, Mozilla is just horrid about multiuser systems.
> Mi solution was simply to give it all the permissions it wants (of
> course
> NOT setuid)
I have been playing with Mozilla (the one that comes with debian) and I
have
seen lots of postings about different issues with it. Since I have been
able
to work around some of them, I thought I might help.
The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too tight.
Mi solution was
The truth about 'C++' revealed...
On the 1st of January, 1998, Bjarne Stroustrup gave an interview to
the IEEE's 'Computer' magazine.
Naturally, the editors thought he would be giving a retrospective
view of seven years of obje
I managed it :-)
I decoded the hidden messages in /usr/debian/debian-manifesto. The key is
the perl code /usr/doc/perl/examples/travesty. Run it on the file with the
hidden message, and you will find out the truth. Here is what I saw:
* The Truth about the quality of Debian
31 matches
Mail list logo
