Hi,

On 2022-01-25 03:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 24 ian 22, 07:47:01, max wrote:
>> January 22, 2022 2:23:48 PM CET max <maxwi...@mailfence.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0
>>
>> I've updated the post taking into account the feedback so far (There 
>> weren't any corrections, but there were misunderstandings, and I try 
>> to avoid those). Please don't share (on reddit or HN) until it's 
>> perfect. Let me know if there is anything else that can be improved. 
>  
> If your intention is to troll (Debian? d-u subscribers?), or demonstrate 
> basic misunderstanding of disclaimers, then it's too "in your face".
> 
> Really good trolling requires more subtlety ;)
> 
> 
> If neither was your intention the article only reflects badly on you, 
> without helping in any way improve the matter you're upset about[1].
> 
> 
> In any case, it's probably better to just take it down completely.
> 
> 
> [1] Debian's security support is imperfect - what a surprise. If you're 
> unhappy with that please do contact Debian's Customer Relations 
> department for a full refund of the license fee you paid[2].
> 
> [2] Yes, the above is intended as humorous, but Poe's law...
> 
Great answer Andrei,
Now to the original poster (Max aka, whatever).

On the blog post you created on medium.com you mention a press release
regarding the "excommuniation" of one of the developers.

What's the link between this and security vulnerabilities.

For me this smell quite bad, like a old fish that sat in the sun for
days on end.

First of all you appear from nowhere with complains regarding you
inability to understand properly disclaimers and the conditions in which
Debian is released (and the no imply warranties)

Second, you put lots of energy into this, not accepting the answer you
get from eminent member of the community (the ones that have been part
of the project for many years and can surely answer you with what's
really going on).

And thirdly, you link this up with a press release regarding a developer
who's wasn't "kicked out" but that got changed access to servers.

Seems like the third reason is mostly what took you here first and now
you are both trolling and spreading falsehood around.

We all know that someone who's mature won't act this way.

And we all saw in the answer of the unhappy developer that he sure
doesn't seem to be someone who has any respect for rules or that know
what the term moral means. And this by simply answering that because he
perceive a world lacking of moral this would justify him to do anything.

Seems like what we teach a 5 years old.

Don't do to others what you wouldn't like to get.
And if you feel they are bad with you, act like if you are the oldest
one and just ignore them.

And this is now exactly what I'll do with you.

So have fun and try to max-out your life experiences.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Andrei

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to