On Lu, 24 ian 22, 07:47:01, max wrote: > January 22, 2022 2:23:48 PM CET max <maxwi...@mailfence.com> wrote: > > > https://medium.com/@maxwillb/why-is-debian-not-telling-the-truth-about-its-security-fixes-85f0f85f19a0 > > I've updated the post taking into account the feedback so far (There > weren't any corrections, but there were misunderstandings, and I try > to avoid those). Please don't share (on reddit or HN) until it's > perfect. Let me know if there is anything else that can be improved. If your intention is to troll (Debian? d-u subscribers?), or demonstrate basic misunderstanding of disclaimers, then it's too "in your face".
Really good trolling requires more subtlety ;) If neither was your intention the article only reflects badly on you, without helping in any way improve the matter you're upset about[1]. In any case, it's probably better to just take it down completely. [1] Debian's security support is imperfect - what a surprise. If you're unhappy with that please do contact Debian's Customer Relations department for a full refund of the license fee you paid[2]. [2] Yes, the above is intended as humorous, but Poe's law... Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
