On Sun 23 Mar 2025 at 01:12:29 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> songbird composed on 2025-03-22 08:16 (UTC-0400):
> > Felix Miata wrote:
> >> I'm not sure the subject is asking the right question, but determining
> >> available
> >> versions of any Debian package has always vexed me. In opensuse, it'
On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:25:31 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
> 0 upgraded, 48 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> Need to get 6,874 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 23.0 MB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
> Abort.
> #
> :~(
Yes, I'm gettin
David Wright composed on 2025-03-23 13:27 (UTC-0500):
> On Sun 23 Mar 2025 at 01:12:29 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Looks perfect, but for 43 things:
>> # rmadison linux-image
>> Command 'rmadison' not found, but can be installed with:
>> apt install devscripts
>> # apt-get install devscripts
>
Felix Miata wrote:
> songbird composed on 2025-03-22 08:16 (UTC-0400):
...
>> i'm not able to dig into this further (way behind on this list)
>> but rmadison works ok for something like that:
...
> Looks perfect, but for 43 things:
> # rmadison linux-image
> Command 'rmadison' not found, but ca
songbird composed on 2025-03-22 08:16 (UTC-0400):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> I'm not sure the subject is asking the right question, but determining
>> available
>> versions of any Debian package has always vexed me. In opensuse, it's pretty
>> simple
>> from shell prompt to get a list of packages
Felix Miata wrote:
> I'm not sure the subject is asking the right question, but determining
> available
> versions of any Debian package has always vexed me. In opensuse, it's pretty
> simple
> from shell prompt to get a list of packages available in currently configured
> repos,
> one line each
Le 12/03/2025 à 13:54, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]
But however, your current kernel 6.1 from Bullseye Backports does seem
affected by a bug?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=linux-
image-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64;dist=unstable
=> But however, your current kernel 6.1 from Bullse
Hello again Felix,
Fist thing first: sorry for having not read your first post carefully
enough :-)
From what I gather, the LTS team has provided the
linux-image-6.1.0-0.deb11.31-amd64-unsigned package through Bullseye
Security, without modifying the linux-image-amd64 package nor providing
s 10 months old (released last May). Why is explained here:
https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/
[quote]
While old stable releases may have Long Term Support, old-stable-backports
are only made available for a period of one year after a new Debian stable
release has been madePackages in
*
distributions) on the Debian Packages website indeed points to a 6.1
kernel available in Bullseye Backports
- in order to determine what kind of linux support (and from which
version of the kernel), I find linux-hardware.org useful. Here for the
Intel 730 graphic card:
https://linux-hardware.org
oldstable§ion=all
It looks like the kernel in the newest Debian Installer is:
kernel-image-5.10.0-34-amd64-di
But, trying to determine hardware support based on software versions is
something that has always vexed me as well I suggest downloading the
newest d-i and doing a fresh install onto
-1 from 2024-05
works as expected.
<https://packages.debian.org/bullseye-backports/kernel/linux-image-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64>
Current Bullseye kernel (as on kernel.org) 5.10.234-1 boots, but acts as though
it
lacks needed GPU support:
(limited to VESA/FBDEV 1024x738)
# dmesg | grep aile
#
doesn't boot
The sha is fail permanently.
On today I've got a fail message during a test - download on youtube.
It mentioned there is no dirmanager but it is on my computer.
I have to repair the bootpartition on a dual boot system and the iso
files provide maybe support to repair the dama
On 1/21/25 23:23, Johannes Krottmayer wrote:
Hi!
I have planned to upgrade my (very old) system. The new system will be
a mainboard with X870-E chipset and a AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (the CPU isn't
currently available), so have written AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in the mail
subject.
Has somebody such a combi
Hi!
I have planned to upgrade my (very old) system. The new system will be
a mainboard with X870-E chipset and a AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (the CPU isn't
currently available), so have written AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in the mail
subject.
Has somebody such a combination running with Debian 12? Are there any
tr
On 1/12/25 1:05 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 11 Jan 2025 at 06:58:04 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
[ … ]
However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
(currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI
took up a very minimal amount of screen real estate. I w
Paul M. Foster wrote:
> I would suggest moc (Music On Console). It's a terminal app, but it's very
> easy to operate. Simple single character commands, but no real menus. It's
> not a GUI per se, but uses ncurses. If you can deal with the terminal
> visually, moc should work for you.
I use moc re
was more of a "I wonder if..." question than a specific "How do I.."
I don't think you're serious about wanting to write some sort of
multimedia application combining editing and presenting text and
audio clips, so I think it's safe to ignore these asides.
You say y
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 1/11/25 8:06 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> *SNIP*
> >>
> >> Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using
> >> graphics or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for
On 2025-01-11 14:18, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 07:01:23 -0700, Fred wrote:
On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
> However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
> (currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took
> up a very minimal a
hose VLC as most straight forward.
>
> Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics or
> requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or mailing
> lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
>
> I didn't find anyt
On 1/11/25 10:24 AM, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 1/11/25 09:01, Fred wrote:
On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took up
a very minimal amount of screen real estate. I was referred to several
overpowered complex candidates and chose VLC as most straight forwar
On 1/11/25 9:00 AM, Paul M. Foster wrote:
On 1/11/25 07:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
*SNIP*
However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
(currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI
took up a very minimal amount of screen real estate.*SNIP*
I would sug
On 1/11/25 8:06 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
*SNIP*
Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using
graphics or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET
groups &/or mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based
fora)
hat plays mp3s.
>
> But, as indicated above, I'm explicitly looking for a GUI .
> VLC includes desired features and has small visual footprint.
> I have problems with its documentation and their support channel.
>
It has been assumed that you can use a terminal and that su
tation and their support channel.
eal estate. I was referred to
several overpowered complex candidates and chose VLC as most straight
forward.
Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ u
On 1/11/25 09:01, Fred wrote:
> On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>> I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took up
>> a very minimal amount of screen real estate. I was referred to several
>> overpowered complex candidates and chose VLC as most straight forward.
>>
> Hi,
> mpg123 is a comma
nd perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
I didn't find anything at www.videolan.org (and linked pages).
Searching for alternativ
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 07:01:23 -0700, Fred wrote:
> On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
> > (currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took
> > up a very minimal amount of screen real estate.
> mpg12
forward.
>
> Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using
> graphics or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET
> groups &/or mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based
> fora).
>
> I didn't find anything at www.videolan.or
nd perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
I didn't find anything at www.videolan.org (and linked pages).
Searching for alternative
using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
I didn't find anything at www.videolan.org (and linked pages).
Searching for alternative support channels, I went to
https://manpages.debian.
Sent from my iPhone
On 24/12/24 02:10, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 12/23/24 12:43, koffie wrote:
Forwarded Message
Subject: fail message dirmanager
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
From: koffie
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Ubuntu / Oracular
Hello,
It is not possible to download an iso fil
On 12/23/24 12:43, koffie wrote:
>
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: fail message dirmanager
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
> From: koffie
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Ubuntu / Oracular
> Hello,
>
> It is not possible to download an iso file.
From where? How
fail permanently.
On today I've got a fail message during a test - download on youtube.
It mentioned there is no dirmanager but it is on my computer.
I have to repair the bootpartition on a dual boot system and the iso
files provide maybe support to repair the damage.
Anyone who can help?
On 2024-11-15 22:19, Farblos wrote:
> any comment from your side on below mail or a general pointer on
> "the future of Debian and utmp"?
Ok, my bad.
I have been focusing on/searching in debian-user, but debian-devel
would have been the more appropriate place. If anybody else comes
across this
oked an existing discussion ...]
>
> systemd version 256.7-2 on Debian disabled UTMP support (from the
> Debian changelog):
>
> ,
> | [ Luca Boccassi ]
> | * systemd-boot: depend on systemd for kernel-install (Closes: #1085012)
> | * Disable utmp support, not y2038 safe. utmp
> I am guessing from the version number that this is on trixie/sid. On
Correct, thanks for guessing.
> November 4th, systemd 256.7-3 came through. Have you tested whether
> that fixed the issue?
Nothing has changed with that version (note the "-UTMP"):
,
| [~]$ systemctl --version
| systemd
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:18:33 +0100
Jens Schmidt wrote:
> [I hope this is the right way to address this question - apologies
> if not or if I have overlooked an existing discussion ...]
>
> systemd version 256.7-2 on Debian disabled UTMP support (from the
> Debian changelog):
I a
[I hope this is the right way to address this question - apologies
if not or if I have overlooked an existing discussion ...]
systemd version 256.7-2 on Debian disabled UTMP support (from the
Debian changelog):
,
| [ Luca Boccassi ]
| * systemd-boot: depend on systemd for kernel-install
On 10/31/24 6:14 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 10/30/24 10:49 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/s
* On 2024 31 Oct 09:07 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/31/24 7:46 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2024 31 Oct 06:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Currently, my Debian 12 installations have Firefox 128.3.1esr-1~deb12u1.
> > Aptitude also shows that this version is from the Debian Security
On 10/31/24 7:46 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2024 31 Oct 06:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 10/30/24 10:12 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https
* On 2024 31 Oct 06:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/30/24 10:12 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
> > > seems to be only available as a PDF document [
> > > https://fns-prod.azureedge.u
On 10/30/24 10:49 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pd
On 10/30/24 10:12 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pdf
].
No direct answers f
On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 17:50:27 (+), debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
> > > seems to be only available as a PDF document
> > > [
>
David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
> > seems to be only available as a PDF document
> > [
> > https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pdf
> >
On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
> seems to be only available as a PDF document [
> https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pdf
> ].
Is this actually true? The docu
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
> seems to be only available as a PDF document [
> https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pdf
> ].
No direct answers from me, I'm afraid but some suggestions.
(1) Alt
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pdf
].
I have a combination of vision and perception problems which make using
a PDF viewer impractical.
> > > Hello,
> > > I am using a Kali Linux
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=kali+linux+support
> >
> >
Aleix,
That's not a Debian kernel version, potentially.
Kali Linux? We've tried to tell you - most of us don't run / have
never
When I boot Trixie 6.8.12 kernel from nvme:
# lsmod | grep nvme | sort
nvme 57344 15
nvme_core 188416 16 nvme
t10_pi 20480 1 nvme_core
#
When booting the Trixie NET installer, it reports cannot find the only available
storage, and installation target
S/2 connected keyboards are not hot-pluggable. Never plug or unplug while
powered up, else risk damaging the motherboard port.
3-try a different keyboard
4-try resetting the BIOS
5-Most PC's BIOS for USB has legacy support that can be turned off. Check yours
&
try changing the setting.
6-Try co
On 7/17/24 20:13, Erik Eduardo Alcala Salero wrote:
Good day,
I have been using Debian 12 stable in my dell vostro 15 3530, I wanted to ask
if some one else is using this machine or having issues with the keyboard, I
have manjaro installed also, when I boot and see the manjaro boot-loader the
Good day,
I have been using Debian 12 stable in my dell vostro 15 3530, I wanted to ask
if some one else is using this machine or having issues with the keyboard, I
have manjaro installed also, when I boot and see the manjaro boot-loader the
keyboard does not work, this was not the case in the p
is list.
> >
> > Kali is _derived_ from Debian and isn't Debian. As such, I'd respectfully
> > suggest that you go and find Kali support elsewhere.
> >
> > Thanks for reading, with every good wish as ever
> >
> > Andrew Cater
> > (amaca...@de
sys
import pwd import time #docker handling code ( import w4sp and this module
fails) import argparse import netifaces import traceback import subprocess
Kali Linux Community and Support - start here https://www.kali.org/community/
Already posted, before the poster posted the same query again
time #docker handling code ( import w4sp and this module
> fails) import argparse import netifaces import traceback import subprocess
Kali Linux Community and Support - start here https://www.kali.org/community/
Virtualbox - see another thread in debian-user today. Debian doesn't
support vi
import * and I cannot change
the w4sp or * how do I do it?
Hi Aleix,
Please go and read the FAQ that I post almost every month on this list.
Kali is _derived_ from Debian and isn't Debian. As such, I'd respectfully
suggest that you go and find Kali support elsewhere.
Thanks for rea
gt; the w4sp or * how do I do it?
Hi Aleix,
Please go and read the FAQ that I post almost every month on this list.
Kali is _derived_ from Debian and isn't Debian. As such, I'd respectfully
suggest that you go and find Kali support elsewhere.
Thanks for reading, with every good wish
Welcome to TNG eWallet Careline Support! We have received your inquiry and
happy to assist you.
In order for us to assist you further, please sign up an account by clicking
the link at the bottom of this email.
Upon signed up, a ticket number will be sent to you in a separate email and our
On 4/6/24 09:15, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
But what if next time the back-doored software _does_ build without error?
The initial build problems did not cause suspicion.
It was the CPU load of sshd and an obscure complaint by valgrind which
caused the discovery.
ht
Hi,
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> But what if next time the back-doored software _does_ build without error?
The initial build problems did not cause suspicion.
It was the CPU load of sshd and an obscure complaint by valgrind which
caused the discovery.
https://boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-abo
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 1:39 PM wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:27:03PM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> > Hi, All..
> >
> > This just hit my emails seconds ago. It's the most info that I've
> > personally read about the XZ backdoor exploit. I've been following
> > NextGov as a friendly, plain l
Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> Continues to sound like one single perp is destroying the TRUST
> factor that an untold number of future programmers must meet. That's
> heartbreaking.
It has never sounded like a single perp to me. 'Jia Tan' is an obvious
sock puppet as are the other names who pushed L
I will note that open source software has, by definition, a lot more
eyes looking at the source. Which is probably why (as Tomas said)
"proprietary software tends to fare significantly worse."
--
JHHL
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:38:36PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> No, on the contrary. First of all, it is great that it has been
> caught /before/ it could cause much harm [...]
...and of course kudos and thans to Andres Freund who spotted
the thing!
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Descri
ent:
>
> Linux backdoor was a long con, possibly with nation-state support, experts
> say;
> By David DiMolfetta; 2024.04.05 12:59pm EDT
To be honest, I think better coverage has been done by the F/OSS
community. The gist I got from this article was government types
speculating that
e about government:
>
> Linux backdoor was a long con, possibly with nation-state support, experts
> say;
> By David DiMolfetta; 2024.04.05 12:59pm EDT
>
> https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2024/04/linux-backdoor-was-long-con-possibly-nation-state-support-experts-say/395511/
Hi, All..
This just hit my emails seconds ago. It's the most info that I've
personally read about the XZ backdoor exploit. I've been following
NextGov as a friendly, plain language resource about government:
Linux backdoor was a long con, possibly with nation-state support, expert
Add your reply above this line.
Hello,
Thank you for submitting your support request!
This is an automated email to let you know we received your request and created
ticket 4575928 for you.
For fastest results, check our https://support.malwarebytes.com/hc/en/";>Malwarebytes Supp
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 02:58:34PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 01:24:58PM +0100, Pavel Lunix wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have Lenovo Thinkpad P14s Gen4 AMD and found the integrated microphone is
> > not working due to missing kernel module (+ the integraded dmic under the
>
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 01:24:58PM +0100, Pavel Lunix wrote:
> Hello,
> I have Lenovo Thinkpad P14s Gen4 AMD and found the integrated microphone is
> not working due to missing kernel module (+ the integraded dmic under the
> same structure):
> https://www.kernelconfig.io/config_snd_soc_amd_ps
>
>
Hello,
I have Lenovo Thinkpad P14s Gen4 AMD and found the integrated microphone is
not working due to missing kernel module (+ the integraded dmic under the
same structure):
https://www.kernelconfig.io/config_snd_soc_amd_ps
>From Debian stock kernel config:
# CONFIG_SND_SOC_AMD_PS is not set
What
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:16:50AM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> > you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the
> > so-called package's description
>
> Yes yes, so file a bug report as recommended.
>
> > three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound patronizin
> you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the
> so-called package's description
Yes yes, so file a bug report as recommended.
> three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound patronizing or
> condescending.
You started the war.
What's wrong with being old?
Yo
ately below it is the sub-heading that states
> >
> > client support for WPA and WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i)
> >
> > I fail to see WPA3 mentioned therein.
>
> Read more.
>
> client support for WPA and WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i)
>
> wpa-supplicant is a usersp
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:13:01AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
[...]
> Then "fail" seems to be the appropriate word.
[...]
> If all else fails, read the words in front of you.
Folks, please, no need to be snarky.
Everyone of us overlooks something at times; something obvious to
someone may escap
On Wed, Jan 03 2024 at 06:36:24 PM, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> My Debian distro has a kernel version of 6.1.69-1 and the installed
> wpasupplicant's version for Debian Bookworm is 2:2.10-12.
>
> I don't use Network Manager; instead I rely solely on the ifup and ifdown
> scripts to brin
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:57 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >> Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
> >> support. Even the package description says that.
> > Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
>
> I
>> Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
>> support. Even the package description says that.
> Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
I think it's better to refer to the actual behavior, since that's the
only thin
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
>
>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:13 AM
> > From: "Bret Busby"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't su
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:40:33 +0100
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have
> > the support. Even the package description says that.
> >
> Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
You can get the p
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:25 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> but, as you i
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:13 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> Then "fail&qu
On 4/1/24 07:20, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AM
From: "Pocket"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you com
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:16 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> It is unfortun
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AM
> From: "Pocket"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
>
> Are you compari
On 4/1/24 07:11, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:57 AM
From: "Bret Busby"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
I do not k
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:03 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
> On 4/1/24 06:18, to...@
On 1/3/24 17:57, Bret Busby wrote:
On 4/1/24 05:40, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support
WPA3-Personal authentication. What alt
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:04:52AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
> >
> The main heading of that web page is Package: wpasupplicant (2:2.10-12)
>
> Immediately below it is the sub-heading that states
>
> clie
On 4/1/24 07:04, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Hi Tomas
Thanks for your reply.
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:18 AM
From: to...@tuxteam.de
To: "Stella Ashburne"
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authe
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:57 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> I do not know whet
Hi Tomas
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:18 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authenticati
On 4/1/24 06:18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't suppor
On 4/1/24 05:40, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure
1 - 100 of 4331 matches
Mail list logo
