On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:38:42 -0500
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
> > I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of
> > apt sources.
> >
> > I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to m
On 2025-02-08, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 02:25:51PM -, Greg wrote:
>>On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
>>> suppliers upgrade what they ship.
>>
&
On 2025-02-08, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
>> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
>> sources.
>>
>> I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
&g
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
> sources.
>
> I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
> method intended for some future date? As everything w
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 02:25:51PM -, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
suppliers upgrade what they ship.
I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
sources.
I
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:25:51 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
> >
> > I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
> > suppliers upgrade what they ship.
>
> I haven't been following the long thread abo
On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
> suppliers upgrade what they ship.
I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
sources.
I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to mod
On Saturday, 08-02-2025 at 01:35 Boyan Penkov wrote:
> Hello George,
>
> No problem -- and to be clear, as Joe pointed out, it's not clear that
> there's actually an issue that would warrant *not* running
> modernize-sources; synaptic does work fine, just won't s
to copy the backup files created
during the modernization back to their original names. E.g:
cd /etc/apt
cp -p sources.list.bak sources.list
and then get rid of the modernized files:
find -type f -iname '*.sources' | xargs rm
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
George at Clug wrote:
>
> 4) Do you know of any method to "undo" this modernization?
You can do it by hand, or write a small script to produce the
one-line format from the deb822 format.
Here's one I haven't tested:
https://github.com/ErikMichelson/apt-deb822-tool
-dsr-
Hello George,
No problem -- and to be clear, as Joe pointed out, it's not clear that
there's actually an issue that would warrant *not* running
modernize-sources; synaptic does work fine, just won't show you the
relevant sources.
Cheers!
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:13 AM George
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 01:13:28 +1100, George at Clug wrote:
> On Saturday, 08-02-2025 at 00:39 Boyan Penkov wrote:
> > After upgrading apt this week on testing (trixie), it defaults to the
> > apt822 sources
> > (https://repolib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/deb822-form
On Saturday, 08-02-2025 at 00:39 Boyan Penkov wrote:
> After upgrading apt this week on testing (trixie), it defaults to the
> apt822 sources
> (https://repolib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/deb822-format.html#deb822-format),
> which can then be enabled by a ``sudo apt modernize-sourc
After upgrading apt this week on testing (trixie), it defaults to the
apt822 sources
(https://repolib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/deb822-format.html#deb822-format),
which can then be enabled by a ``sudo apt modernize-sources``
However, in Synaptic, clicking on Settings -> Repositories shows a
bl
On Friday, 07-02-2025 at 19:23 Boyan Penkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After updating my apt sources to the modernized ones, the synaptic
> settings ard preferences are blank (and don't show the usual sources).
If you could give some more detail, I might understand what you did?
Hello,
After updating my apt sources to the modernized ones, the synaptic
settings ard preferences are blank (and don't show the usual sources).
Updates and selection though the program still works fine, so I
imagine this is a small oversight somewhere...
Cheers!
--
Boyan Penkov
With the previous discussion on modernizing one's apt sources files, I
went ahead and did it on two of my trixie installations.
The two original sources files were preserved, which might be useful
for some oddball installations.
Note that sources.list, which resides in /etc/apt, is replac
Hi Michal,
Michal Maruska wrote:
> sid has version 1:2.47.2-0.1
> https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/git mentions as git source:
> https://repo.or.cz/w/git/debian.git/
>
> which indeed has the relevant branch:
> https://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/shortlog/refs/heads/debian-sid
>
> but it's
Hi,
sid has version 1:2.47.2-0.1
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/git mentions as git source:
https://repo.or.cz/w/git/debian.git/
which indeed has the relevant branch:
https://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/shortlog/refs/heads/debian-sid
but it's not pointing to anything related to "1:2.47.2
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 05:08:10PM +0800, justzx wrote:
Error message:
Ign:39 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/non-free Sources
Stretch (Debian 9) probably no longer has a debian-security repo, if
it was recently
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:08:10 +0800
justzx wrote:
Hello justzx,
>W: The repository 'http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-current
>stretch-backports Release' does not have a Release file.
Usually means your url is malformed. The 404 errors later seem to
corroborate this.
See http://cdn-fast
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 05:08:10PM +0800, justzx wrote:
> Error message:
>
> Ign:39 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
> stretch/updates/non-free Sources
Stretch (Debian 9) probably no longer has a debian-security repo, if
it was recently moved to the archive. Remo
Error message:
Ign:39 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/non-free Sources
Ign:40 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/contrib Sources
Ign:41 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/main amd64 Packages
Ign:42 http
es buster-main.sources buster-security-main.sources
$
And then I have - mostly autogenerated packages:
$ apt-cache search bullseye- | sed 's/ for installation .*//'
bullseye-backports-contrib-sources - List of apt-sources
bullseye-backports-contrib-src-sources - List of apt-sources
bullseye-bac
inst image has been pruned to a minimal set of
> > packages that are able just to install a system, which can then,
> > in turn, install anything and everything else from the internet.
> >
> > Unsurprisingly, just installing a Debian system can be achieved
> > usin
t installing a Debian system can be achieved
> using only Debian software, ie from main. During the installation,
> you can add non-free (pulls in contrib) to your own list of sources.
>
> However, because so many people run machines having hardware devices
> that require non-free firmware blo
ebian software, ie from main. During the installation,
you can add non-free (pulls in contrib) to your own list of sources.
However, because so many people run machines having hardware devices
that require non-free firmware blobs /before/ any initial installation
step, (mainly laptops being insta
Hello everybody. The DVD-1 image is coming with contrib enabled on the cd-rom,
security and update lines. This is normal? The netinstall image is just with
main.
P.S.: Sorry for my english.
Ramon Mulin
Professor de História
On 2021-05-06 14:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:49:09PM +0300, ellanios82 wrote:
- please, for MX , what would be an appropriate Sources List ??
https://mxlinux.org/support/
being curious and looked.
https://mxlinux.org/wiki/system/repos-mx-19/
mick
--
Key ID
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:49:09PM +0300, ellanios82 wrote:
> - please, for MX , what would be an appropriate Sources List ??
https://mxlinux.org/support/
Dear List ,
- i am , unfortunately, a very confused newby :((
- please, for MX , what would be an appropriate Sources List ??
...
thank you
.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 07:52:20AM +, Eerapu, Nipuna Sri wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am trying to download kernel sources for kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64 and getting
> below error.
>
> As part of my project, I want to compile drivers for this kernel version.
>
> root@linux
Hi Team,
I am trying to download kernel sources for kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64 and getting
below error.
As part of my project, I want to compile drivers for this kernel version.
root@linux-ndeb106:/usr/src# uname -r
4.19.0-12-amd64
root@linux-ndeb106:/usr/src# apt-get install linux-headers
On 11/15/20 9:26 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-11-15 at 11:23, Fred wrote:
Hello,
What is the proper sources.list for Jessie?
I have tried:
http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/
but apt-get is not happy with update.
Per https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive :
If you are using APT t
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:23:57AM -0700, Fred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the proper sources.list for Jessie?
>
> I have tried:
>
> http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/
>
> but apt-get is not happy with update.
>
> I am in the process up upgrading but I need to install a Debian package
> f
On 2020-11-15 at 11:23, Fred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the proper sources.list for Jessie?
>
> I have tried:
>
> http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/
>
> but apt-get is not happy with update.
Per https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive :
>> If you are using APT the relevant sources.list
Hello,
What is the proper sources.list for Jessie?
I have tried:
http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/
but apt-get is not happy with update.
I am in the process up upgrading but I need to install a Debian package
first.
Best regards,
Fred Boatwright
On 4/1/20 6:46 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 01 apr 20, 15:49:25, dalios wrote:
>> On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>
[...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in
>>> sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway).
>>
>> Can you be so kind and ex
On Mi, 01 apr 20, 15:49:25, dalios wrote:
> On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> >> [...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in
> > sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway).
>
> Can you be so kind and explain to me how is that a good idea? I am
> _
On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
(snip)
>> [...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in
> sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway).
(snip)
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
>
Can you be so kind and explain to me how is that a good idea? I am
_definitely
Hi,
looks like the culprit is a /etc/cron.daily/do-agent cron-job which
executes the /opt/digitalocean/do-agent/scripts/update.sh script which
includes following if statement:
if command -v apt-get 2&>/dev/null; then
apt-get -qq update -o
Dir::Etc::sourcelist="sources.list
> I did some further debugging and it is the
> /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily script executed by apt-daily systemd
> service unit which updates the package index from the sources:
I configured cron with one minute interval to log the output of "apt
policy" with a timestamp
nd it is the
/usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily script executed by apt-daily systemd
service unit which updates the package index from the sources:
# update package lists
UPDATED=0
UPDATE_STAMP=/var/lib/apt/periodic/update-stamp
if check_stamp $UPDATE_STAMP $UpdateInterval; then
Hi,
in order to test unattended-upgrades I downgraded yesterday(4.06)
packages iceweasel, qemu-utils and thunderbird:
# # "apt list --upgradable" command below was executed on 4.06
# apt list --upgradable
Listing... Done
iceweasel/stable 60.7.0esr-1~deb9u1 all [upgradable from: 52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1
Hi,
it seems I found a reason for my reprepro error.
aptmethod error receiving '.../dists/experimental/main/source/Sources'
The file main/source/Sources is absent in the repostory yet listed in
Release index file
$ grep 'main/source/Sources$'
/srv/mirrors/debian-updatin
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:29:09AM +0100, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
>
> In writing the presentation I am working on, I appears that there is
> some inconsistency with regard to languages Debian has been translated
> in to.
>
> 1, https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2019/20190415
>
On 2019-04-19, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
>
> In writing the presentation I am working on, I appears that there is
> some inconsistency with regard to languages Debian has been translated
> in to.
>
> 1, https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2019/20190415
>
> has
>
> Localization status
Hi
In writing the presentation I am working on, I appears that there is
some inconsistency with regard to languages Debian has been translated
in to.
1, https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2019/20190415
has
Localization status
76 languages are supported in this release.
On 1/2/19, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/01/2019 07:59 PM, David Wright wrote:
>> On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 13:45:48 (-0500), Lee wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/01/2019 08:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 06:07:21AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/01/2019 07:59 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 13:45:48 (-0500), Lee wrote:
On 1/1/19, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/01/2019 08:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 06:07:21AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I am trying to modify the partitioning of a 240GB US
releases (cf.
> >> FrankenDebian) or from alien repositories, this is just a first
> >> approximation.
> >
> > My system reports 9.1 {as I thought it was}
> > It was initially installed from a purchased DVD 1.
>
> If you've been keeping the system update
Karen Lewellen writes:
> If not, does anyone know of an alternative source that provides a
> collection of news stories from various outlets in one place?
Does collaboratively-edited publishing meet the need?
Anyone can contribute, and articles are written collaboratively for
a global a
the
> point the developers behind this source have shut down.
> they are open to others taking it on of course, which might have happened by
> now..fingers crossed.
> If not, does anyone know of an alternative source that provides a collection
> of news stories from various outlets in
Hi all,
When Google made major changes to its google news platform, someone
richly and kindly created an alternative that kept the old google news
format.
www.theoldgnews.com
Unfortunately word got back to google with their making more changes to
the point the developers behind this source hav
Zenaan Harkness writes ("wishlist script: “hegemon”: set up bare git mirror
farm for all debian sources"):
> git at alioth is coming along very nicely and was a great step
> forward for Debian (thank you Ian).
Why are you CCing me ? I had nothing to do with alioth or salsa.
(May
s wrote:
> > git at alioth is coming along very nicely and was a great step
> > forward for Debian (thank you Ian).
> >
> > What would be nice is a script e.g. called say "hegemon" which could
> > be used to greate a Debian git repo farm locally.
> >
is coming along very nicely and was a great step
> forward for Debian (thank you Ian).
>
> What would be nice is a script e.g. called say "hegemon" which could
> be used to greate a Debian git repo farm locally.
>
> Why?
>
> Well, I hold that this would be prefera
git at alioth is coming along very nicely and was a great step
forward for Debian (thank you Ian).
What would be nice is a script e.g. called say "hegemon" which could
be used to greate a Debian git repo farm locally.
Why?
Well, I hold that this would be preferable to adding sou
Op 06-06-17 om 16:00 schreef Fungi4All:
From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:59:20PM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> ONLY MORONS USE RETURN WITHIN THE SAME PARAGRAPH EVER
> SINCE TYPEWRITERS RUN OUT OF INK AND DIED.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855
In html there is for line bre
From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:59:20PM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> ONLY MORONS USE RETURN WITHIN THE SAME PARAGRAPH EVER
> SINCE TYPEWRITERS RUN OUT OF INK AND DIED.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855
In html there is for line break and for paragraph. How long or short
sho
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:19:40PM +0200, Siard wrote:
> I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different
> styles of responding; choosing between them depends on your purpose.
Regardless of this, the messages from that funguy person are unreadable.
It looks like he's using Micro
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:19:40 +0200
Siard wrote:
> Ric Moore:
> > Fungi4All:
> > > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate
> >
> > It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric
>
> I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different
> styles of respon
On Monday, June 05, 2017 07:19:40 AM Siard wrote:
> Ric Moore:
> > Fungi4All:
> > > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate
> >
> > It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric
>
> I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different
> styles of responding;
Ric Moore:
> Fungi4All:
> > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate
>
> It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric
I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different
styles of responding; choosing between them depends on your purpose.
Especially in a c
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 07:27:06PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
On 06/02/2017 10:41 AM, Fungi4All wrote:
Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate
It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric
I disagree. I think that top-posting is MOST appropriate when forwarding
a messag
On Sunday 04 June 2017 00:27:06 Ric Moore wrote:
> On 06/02/2017 10:41 AM, Fungi4All wrote:
> > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate
>
> It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric
+1
Lisi
On 06/02/2017 10:41 AM, Fungi4All wrote:
Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate
It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Onl
patched due to this security issue on jessie.
This is one package as an example.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch
Local Time: June 1, 2017 2:28 PM
UTC Time: June 1, 2017 11:28 AM
From: d...@randomstring.org
To: Dejan Jocic
debian-u
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 01-06-17, Fjfj109 wrote:
> > Hi - wondering if with a standard sources list in Jessie (or any stable):
> It is usually enough to change it to stretch, if you follow it up with
> all those update and upgrade com
On 01-06-17, Fjfj109 wrote:
> Hi - wondering if with a standard sources list in Jessie (or any stable):
>
> deb
> http://deb.debian.org/debian
> jessie main
> deb-src
> http://deb.debian.org/debian
> jessie main
>
> deb
> http://deb.debian.org/debian
>
Hi - wondering if with a standard sources list in Jessie (or any stable):
deb
http://deb.debian.org/debian
jessie main
deb-src
http://deb.debian.org/debian
jessie main
deb
http://deb.debian.org/debian
jessie-updates main
deb-src
http://deb.debian.org/debian
jessie-updates main
deb
http
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 14:24:15 -0700, Alan E. Davis wrote:
> I need to install the broadcom-wl wireless adaptor drivers. I have no
This was the first thing that struck me - there is no broadcom-wl package.
> connection to the internet on this new installation. So it's either this
This was the
On 7/26/2016 4:24 PM, Alan E. Davis wrote:
I need to install the broadcom-wl wireless adaptor drivers. I
have no connection to the internet on this new installation. So
it's either this or tethering the iphone to get this package
installed.[snip]
Might apt-offline address some of your issues?
I need to install the broadcom-wl wireless adaptor drivers. I have no
connection to the internet on this new installation. So it's either this
or tethering the iphone to get this package installed.
Both of these pathways require a plethora of steps to install various
dependencies for dependencie
ebian user, so this is
>> where I'm trying first
>>
>> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source isn't
>> silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
>>
>> It may be more clear if I describe my particular desire use c
n user, so this is
>> where I'm trying first
>>
>> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source isn't
>> silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
>>
>> It may be more clear if I describe my particular desire use case. I
&
where I'm trying first
>
> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source isn't
> silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
>
> It may be more clear if I describe my particular desire use case. I
> have a ham radio, whose audio output I can plug into m
...
Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source isn't
silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
It may be more clear if I describe my particular desire use case. I
have a ham radio, whose audio output I can plug into my sound card
input. I'd like to be liste
rlhar...@oplink.net writes:
> On Wed, August 12, 2015 10:22 pm, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>> On Wed, August 12, 2015 9:46 pm, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> ...
>>> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source
>>> isn't silent, and mute other sou
rlhar...@oplink.net writes:
> On Wed, August 12, 2015 9:46 pm, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source isn't
>> silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
>
> It does not directly address your need, but I think that
On Wed, August 12, 2015 10:22 pm, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, August 12, 2015 9:46 pm, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
...
>> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source
>> isn't silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
...
> In the realm of broa
On Wed, August 12, 2015 9:46 pm, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Is there a pulseaudio module that will detect when an audio source isn't
> silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
It does not directly address your need, but I think that
pulseaudiovolumecontrol (pavucontrol) is almost ess
detect when an audio source isn't
silent, and mute other sources in that cases?
It may be more clear if I describe my particular desire use case. I
have a ham radio, whose audio output I can plug into my sound card
input. I'd like to be listening to music, but when a call comes in on
t
On 07/02/2015 08:46 AM, Peter Huber wrote:
This is semi off-topic as it's partly a hardware question, but I don't
really know a better place to ask.
I have a hardware mixer on my desk to connect four sources of audio to
one pair of headphones. It's breaking, I need replacement, a
> hardware feature, if Debian has the tools to do that as well, and if
> only specific sound cards are capable of that. If it's possible, how do
> I do it?
>
The people who main this distro can help:
see
http://www.64studio.com/
Regards
MF
> lspci identifies my current sound card a
On 15-07-02 5:46 PM, Peter Huber wrote:
> This is semi off-topic as it's partly a hardware question, but I don't
> really know a better place to ask.
>
> I have a hardware mixer on my desk to connect four sources of audio to
> one pair of headphones. It's breaking,
This is semi off-topic as it's partly a hardware question, but I don't
really know a better place to ask.
I have a hardware mixer on my desk to connect four sources of audio to
one pair of headphones. It's breaking, I need replacement, and I also
would like to free up the desk sp
Just a note of thanks to Joel, Andrei and Florent. :) I'll carry my
situation to the Audio users list and see what happens. Thanks for the
time and the courteous comments.
--hobie
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:56:12AM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> > On Jo, 27 nov 14, 03:03:33, ho...@r
On 11/27/2014 10:53 AM, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
[snip]
> Agreed. :) dpkg -l says:
>
> dpkg -l |grep pulseaudio
> ii gstreamer0.10-pulseaudio:amd64
> 0.10.31-3+nmu4+b1 amd64GStreamer plugin for
> PulseAudio
> ii gstreamer1.0-pulse
On Jo, 27 nov 14, 04:56:12, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> |
> Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
> |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name Version Architecture De
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:56:12AM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> > On Jo, 27 nov 14, 03:03:33, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Do you know if pulseaudio is installed?
> >> >
> >> > dpkg -l |
> On Jo, 27 nov 14, 03:03:33, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Do you know if pulseaudio is installed?
>> >
>> > dpkg -l | grep pulseaudio
>>
>> Hi, Joel - Thanks. :) Synaptic says "no" but running the dpkg -l
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:03:33AM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com
>> wrote:
>> >> For years, ALSA has allowed me to have two apps open at one time -
>> for
>> >> example, a YouTube video could be playing in my browser w
On Jo, 27 nov 14, 03:03:33, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> >
> > Do you know if pulseaudio is installed?
> >
> > dpkg -l | grep pulseaudio
>
> Hi, Joel - Thanks. :) Synaptic says "no" but running the dpkg -l command
>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:03:33AM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> >> For years, ALSA has allowed me to have two apps open at one time - for
> >> example, a YouTube video could be playing in my browser while vlc wa
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> For years, ALSA has allowed me to have two apps open at one time - for
>> example, a YouTube video could be playing in my browser while vlc was
>> also
>> open, paused on playback of a 3-hour mp3.
>>
>> That's changed wit
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> For years, ALSA has allowed me to have two apps open at one time - for
> example, a YouTube video could be playing in my browser while vlc was also
> open, paused on playback of a 3-hour mp3.
>
> That's changed with a recen
For years, ALSA has allowed me to have two apps open at one time - for
example, a YouTube video could be playing in my browser while vlc was also
open, paused on playback of a 3-hour mp3.
That's changed with a recent Debian update. Now, if a YouTube video is
playing and I try to start vlc, I get
On Lu, 06 oct 14, 21:13:17, Stuart Longland wrote:
>
> The beef I have, is this not what happens if you do an `apt-get
> download` or an `apt-get source`: in both those latter cases, it never
> asks the question, it just flatly refuses to give you the sources.
>
> Now, me
problem. It'll ask whether I wish to install them even though no one
> >> > can vouch (digitally) for them.
> >> >
> >> > However, it fails to ask the same question when I tell it to download
> >> > the package or its sources.
> > This
1 - 100 of 754 matches
Mail list logo
