Compile VLC from source enabling with live555 RTSP streaming support

Hi folks, Our product is using VLC with RTSP support with live555 (http://www.live555.com/) - which was disabled in Debian because of licensing changes by live555. I want compile VLC with live555 RTSP streaming support, most of the tutorials or hints I found resulted-in to be outdated. I'm sur

Re: Compile VLC from source enabling with live555 RTSP streaming support

ttp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main contrib non-free Then you want to: # apt update # apt install build-essential # apt-get source vlc vlc-bin from man apt-get: source source causes apt-get to fetch source packages. APT will examine the available packages to decide

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On 05/05/2025 15:59, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: Hello, Has anyone experienced the following setup: On a standard system (Debian GNU/Linux): - install keepassxc, create a master password and a database file [ alternative: keepass2, but mono dependancy ] - make sure that database file is on a git

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On 2025-05-07, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > Actually I went the git path because my first idea was to use the Debian pass > package, on Termux, with multiple password-GPG encrypted files that > don't change that often. That works for me, but for end-users a solution > like keepass2/keepasscx and keepass

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

Hello, On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 08:41:00AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > syncthing does what it calls file versioning. > https://docs.syncthing.net/users/versioning.html Aha, interesting! Thank you.

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:30:57 +0200 Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > e.g. syncthing (without > history apparently) syncthing does what it calls file versioning. https://docs.syncthing.net/users/versioning.html -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/b

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

Hello, On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 10:53:08AM +0300, Anssi Saari wrote: > > Has anyone experienced the following setup: > > I wonder how fast the git repo grows as you add stuff in the keepass > database? That's indeed a good question. I liked the idea of having an history of the password database

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On Wed, 7 May 2025 08:39:32 +0700 Max Nikulin wrote: > On 06/05/2025 16:25, Stanislav Vlasov wrote: > > I put keepassxc database in ~/Sync folder and use it on every comp + > > phone (keepass2android), sometimes simultaneously. > > Even if i does not have link to any other device (sometimes inter

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On 06/05/2025 16:25, Stanislav Vlasov wrote: I put keepassxc database in ~/Sync folder and use it on every comp + phone (keepass2android), sometimes simultaneously. Even if i does not have link to any other device (sometimes internet is broken), i can use credentials from local copy of database.

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

Charles Curley writes: > On Tue, 06 May 2025 07:57:53 +0200 > "Loris Bennett" wrote: > >> I run a Nextcloud instance on a RaspberryPi and then use the Nextcloud >> client on my laptop and on my Android phone to sync my important >> files, including my KeepassXC database. Additionally the Nextcl

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On Tue, 06 May 2025 07:57:53 +0200 "Loris Bennett" wrote: > I run a Nextcloud instance on a RaspberryPi and then use the Nextcloud > client on my laptop and on my Android phone to sync my important > files, including my KeepassXC database. Additionally the Nextcloud > instance creates periodic s

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

вт, 6 мая 2025 г. в 00:16, Marc SCHAEFER : > On a standard system (Debian GNU/Linux): > > - install keepassxc, create a master password and a database file > [ alternative: keepass2, but mono dependancy ] > - make sure that database file is on a git, pushable to a > remote repository (I like

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

Marc SCHAEFER writes: > Has anyone experienced the following setup: I wonder how fast the git repo grows as you add stuff in the keepass database? Personally, for sharing a keepass database between Linux/Android/Windows computers I use keepass2 and keepass2android and the database is online, a

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

Marc SCHAEFER writes: > Hello, > > Has anyone experienced the following setup: > > On a standard system (Debian GNU/Linux): > > - install keepassxc, create a master password and a database file > [ alternative: keepass2, but mono dependancy ] > > - make sure that database file is on a git, push

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On 05/05/2025 21:59, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: - install keepassxc, create a master password and a database file [ alternative: keepass2, but mono dependancy ] - make sure that database file is on a git, pushable to a remote repository (I like git-on-SSH), and push/commit it when required

Re: Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

On 05/05/2025 11:59, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: Has anyone experienced the following setup: On a standard system (Debian GNU/Linux): - install keepassxc, create a master password and a database file [ alternative: keepass2, but mono dependancy ] - make sure that database file is on a git, pushabl

Open source, multiplatform password manager with sync capability

Hello, Has anyone experienced the following setup: On a standard system (Debian GNU/Linux): - install keepassxc, create a master password and a database file [ alternative: keepass2, but mono dependancy ] - make sure that database file is on a git, pushable to a remote repository (I like gi

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 00:08:54 +, David wrote: > I would have recognised this > echo a{1..5}b > as brace expansion, but I hadn't absorbed the extra glorious > capabilities of its commas. The commas were the original form. The .. range feature was added in bash version 3.0.

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 16:24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:43:51 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > Em 19/01/2025 08:57, David escreveu: > > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 02:51, Default User > > > wrote: > > > > time sudo rsync -aHSxvvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-id

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:43:51 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > Em 19/01/2025 08:57, David escreveu: > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 02:51, Default User > > wrote: > > > time sudo rsync -aHSxvvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-ids -- > > > info=progress2,stats2,name2 -- > > > exclude={"/dev/

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Em 19/01/2025 08:57, David escreveu: On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 02:51, Default User wrote: time sudo rsync -aHSxvvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-ids -- info=progress2,stats2,name2 -- exclude={"/dev/*","/proc/*","/sys/*","/tmp/*","/run/*","/mnt/*","/media /*","/lost+found"} /media/user/DRIVE1

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 21:01:14 -0700 Charles Curley wrote: > I suggest that instead of using rsync directly you use rsnapshot. You > can set it up so that it only copies if DRIVE2 is there. The cron > entries let it happen automatically. Another advantage to rsnapshot is that you don't have to fid

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 02:51, Default User wrote: > I may just delete everything on DRIVE2 overnight, and then try rsync > with: > > time sudo rsync -aHSxvvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-ids -- > info=progress2,stats2,name2 -- > exclude={"/dev/*","/proc/*","/sys/*","/tmp/*","/run/*","/mnt/

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On 2025-01-19, e...@gmx.us wrote: > I've never used LUKS before, so we're even. With a non-encrypted > filesystem, you would > unmount the partition > mkfs -t whatever /dev/whatever > mount it again It's the same with luks and the device used is a mapping in /dev/mapper

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 08:27:17PM -0500, Default User wrote: > Hi! [...] > Every night, I have been using rsync to copy from DRIVE1 to DRIVE2, > doing: > > time sudo rsync -avvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-ids > --info=progress2,stats2,name2 -- > exclude={"/dev/*","/proc/*","/sys/*","/t

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On 1/18/25 22:21, Default User wrote: > Hi, Eben! > > I hate to sound stupid, but how would I do that. I have never used mkfs > before. I've never used LUKS before, so we're even. With a non-encrypted filesystem, you would unmount the partition mkfs -t whatever /dev/whatever mount it again

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On 1/18/25 17:27, Default User wrote: Hi! I have two identical 4Tb usb external drives, Western Digital Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. My computer is a Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511 (a very modest laptop), from early 2024, running Debian 12 Stable, always kept updated. Thank you for that info

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Hi, Charles! Thanks for the reply. I will have to ponder that.

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:36:42 -0500 Default User wrote: > So, back to the original question: what in the world am I supposed to > do to have rsync copy so that the size change in the two drives is > equal, and DRIVE2 has (theoretically) the same data, taking up the > same space, as DRIVE1? I sugg

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Hi, Eben! I hate to sound stupid, but how would I do that. I have never used mkfs before.

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

On 1/18/25 21:50, Default User wrote: > Hi Andy! > > Thanks for the reply. > > I may just delete everything on DRIVE2 overnight, Might be faster to mkfs than to rm *.

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Hi Andy! Thanks for the reply. I may just delete everything on DRIVE2 overnight, and then try rsync with: time sudo rsync -aHSxvvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-ids -- info=progress2,stats2,name2 -- exclude={"/dev/*","/proc/*","/sys/*","/tmp/*","/run/*","/mnt/*","/media /*","/lost+found"}

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Hi Default, On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 08:36:42PM -0500, Default User wrote: > So, back to the original question: what in the world am I supposed to > do to have rsync copy so that the size change in the two drives is > equal, and DRIVE2 has (theoretically) the same data, taking up the same > space,

rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Hi! I have two identical 4Tb usb external drives, Western Digital Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. My computer is a Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511 (a very modest laptop), from early 2024, running Debian 12 Stable, always kept updated. The first drive, Drive 1, is my "backup drive". I backup daily u

rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

Hi! I have two identical 4Tb usb external drives, Western Digital Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. My computer is a Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511 (a very modest laptop), from early 2024, running Debian 12 Stable, always kept updated. The first drive, Drive 1, is my "backup drive". I backup daily u

Re: Debian and open source scroungers

Hi, On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:46:05PM +0100, Andre Rodier wrote: > Please, tell me what are your thoughts on this. Am I too pessimistic ? Are > you, like me, thinking these companies as open source "scroungers" ? i Opinion: The largest recipients of welfare in the W

Re: Debian and open source scroungers

>> [...] >> Please, tell me what are your thoughts on this. Am I too pessimistic? >> Are you, like me, thinking these companies as open source "scroungers"? > I think it's more that "companies" tend to need assurances (i.e. someone > to call

Re: Debian and open source scroungers

I don't really contribute to > Debian, at least not directly. > > Still, I have a personal open-source project that relies on and promotes > Debian, and I am still passing some time on it. > I make great effort on the documentation, as well as using only Debian > packages.

Re: Debian and open source scroungers

On 11.10.2024 21:46, Andre Rodier wrote: ... Please, tell me what are your thoughts on this. Am I too pessimistic ? Are you, like me, thinking these companies as open source "scroungers" ? Thanks for your feedback. Andrew I think those are all valid examples and opinions, but there

Re: Debian and open source scroungers

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:46:05PM +0100, Andre Rodier wrote: > Dear Debian users, contributors, and enthusiasts, [...] > Please, tell me what are your thoughts on this. Am I too pessimistic ? Are > you, like me, thinking these companies as open source "scroungers" ? Yes,

Re: Debian and open source scroungers

On Oct 11, 2024, Andre Rodier wrote: > [...] > Please, tell me what are your thoughts on this. Am I too pessimistic ? Are > you, like me, thinking these companies as open source "scroungers" ? I think it's more that "companies" tend to need assurances (i.e. some

Debian and open source scroungers

ave a personal open-source project that relies on and promotes Debian, and I am still passing some time on it. I make great effort on the documentation, as well as using only Debian packages. I sometimes raise bug reports, or send detailed messages to reproduce or bypass issues to the packages maintainer

Re: Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source

Hi, i wrote: > https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/11.10.0/amd64/jigdo-16G/ > Whatever, there is no counterpart for this image in > https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/11.10.0/source/ > This shortcomming might be worth complaining at the debian-cd ma

Re: Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source

Hi, John Conover wrote: > Is Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source available? I am not aware that there was a 32 GB ISO of Debian 11 for amd64. Maybe you mean the 16 GB ISO ? https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/11.10.0/amd64/jigdo-16G/ Whatever, there is no counterpart

Re: Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 05:55:52PM -0700, John Conover wrote: > > Is Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source available? > Hi John, 32GB source? All of the source for Debian 11 is available: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/latest-oldstable/source/iso-dvd/ lists 18 DVDs. I&#

Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source

Is Debian 11 isolinux AMD64 USB 32GB source available? Help would appreciated, John -- John Conover, cono...@panix.com, http://www.johncon.com/

Laptop randomly powering off when unplugged from power source

Hello, i've been having an issue where my laptop powers off randomly when not connected to power. This has been happening since stable and currently i'm on unstable. I would like to use my laptop without power. Please advise on what logs you might need System Information Manufacturer: Ac

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On 10/07/2024 15:37, Ceppo wrote: but I couldn't build a working gs command. [...] [1]: https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/issues/85 There is a link to gs arguments

[SOLVED] Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 05:20:57PM GMT, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > The pdf-linter I use to verify a pdf document is qpdf, > . It is available on most distributions, > including Debian, Fedora and Red Hat. > > The command to check the document is `qpdf --check `. This com

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 5:56 PM Ceppo wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:38:51PM GMT, Richard wrote: > > From LaTeX, this is quite simple, there's a package for that - as for pretty > > much everything in the LaTeX world. Googling for just like 10 sec could have > > given you this great guide: h

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 12:13 PM Ceppo wrote: > > I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be > PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed > its > instructions, thus obtaining a file that should be PDF/A and pdfinfo > identifies > as such, bu

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:15:51AM GMT, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:06:56PM +, Ceppo wrote: > > A requirement of any solution is that it doesn't rely on non-DFSG-compliant > > software, including online conversion tools. > > Please looks at this thread at StackExchange.

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:36:17PM GMT, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:06:56PM +, Ceppo wrote: > > I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be > > PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed > > its instructions, thus o

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:38:51PM GMT, Richard wrote: > From LaTeX, this is quite simple, there's a package for that - as for pretty > much everything in the LaTeX world. Googling for just like 10 sec could have > given you this great guide: https://webpages.tuni.fi/latex/pdfa-guide.pdf I did my

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:52:06PM GMT, y...@vienna.at wrote: > Well, that is my way: Thanks for providing your script. I tried it with one tweak: > latex .../Nix.tex  .../Nix.dvi > dvips -o Nix.ps Nix.pdf ^^^ I guess here you meant Nix.dvi... > ps2pdf ... Nix.ps ... Ni

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:18:01AM GMT, Sarunas Burdulis wrote: > pdfinfo probably only reads metadata, but does not do any PDF/A compliance > validation. > > VeraPDF seems to work for validation (https://verapdf.org/software/). I don't know about pdfinfo, but it looks like veraPDF at least agrees

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

The first bit is just a warning, not an error. Of course, you could check what has changed in v9.11 that makes this not recommended anymore. Maybe they already handle it internally when you set -dPDFACompatibilityPolicy=1 and the old setting can interfere. But when the output of the validator doesn

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On 4/7/24 11:10, Stefan Monnier wrote: This might qualify as a bug in your MUA (it can make sense to require a small font for some parts of the message, but it seems this style applies to the whole message, which makes no sense), tho maybe it's due to some particularity of your configuration, o

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

Hi Richard, I don't see any problem because I'm reading this mailing-list from a MUA that's mostly text-only and doesn't try to use variable-size fonts, but looking at the HTML you send I see: > style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"> repeated several times. I have no i

small font (was: Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF)

I am in doubts what is more rude: On 04/07/2024 04:02, Richard wrote: Please stop using such a dinky font. There are plenty of old farts trying to read this list. - writing this before an attempt to hijack the thread using an already discussed question, Tell that to your mail progra

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On 04/07/2024 04:49, Greg Marks wrote: $gs -dQUIET -dUseCIEColor -sProcessColorModel=DeviceCMYK -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dPDFACompatibilityPolicy=1 -dCompressFonts=true -dSubsetFonts=true -sFONTPATH=/usr/share/fonts/ -o new.pdf old.pdf [...] The object number and generation number shall be sep

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

> Now, for just random PDFs, this is a bit more tricky, but you can do so > with ghostscript. Now, this sadly doesn't have such a great guide, but > something like this should do the trick, though that's only PDF/A-1 for all > I can tell. If your contractor needs a different version, you'll have to

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

Well, guess what, I haven't done anything to change the way messages look. The only settings I ever change is how they are displayed to me. And never has anyone ever had an issue with that, in many years. Probably because other people are just not using unusable software. And quite frankly, punishi

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 23:02:16 +0200, Richard wrote: > > > > Please stop using such a dinky font. There are plenty of old farts trying > > to read this list. > > Tell that to your mail program. If it chooses to show you the mail that > way, don't blame me. Everything needed to display it any way

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

> > Please stop using such a dinky font. There are plenty of old farts trying > to read this list. Tell that to your mail program. If it chooses to show you the mail that way, don't blame me. Everything needed to display it any way you want is there, it just needs to be used. Thunderbird can defin

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 15:31 -0400, e...@gmx.us wrote: > On 7/3/24 15:20, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 18:38 +0200, Richard wrote: > > > For anything further, you'll have to research yourself as > > > ghostscript > > > is very complex but used by many people. > > > > Please stop usin

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On 7/3/24 15:20, Van Snyder wrote: On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 18:38 +0200, Richard wrote: For anything further, you'll have to research yourself as ghostscript is very complex but used by many people. Please stop using such a dinky font. That's what ctrl-shift-+ is for.

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 18:38 +0200, Richard wrote: > For anything further, you'll have to research yourself as ghostscript > is very complex but used by many people. Please stop using such a dinky font. There are plenty of old farts trying to read this list. Can ghostscript convert a PDF generate

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

>From LaTeX, this is quite simple, there's a package for that - as for pretty much everything in the LaTeX world. Googling for just like 10 sec could have given you this great guide: https://webpages.tuni.fi/latex/pdfa-guide.pdf Now, for just random PDFs, this is a bit more tricky, but you can do

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:05:59AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:36:17PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > > Uh-oh. We set the standards, but won't tell you what they are. > > But they did! They say PDF/A. But you have a point that this maybe is > not enough. W

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:06:56PM +, Ceppo wrote: > I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be > PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed > its > instructions, thus obtaining a file that should be PDF/A and pdfinfo > identifies > as s

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:36:17PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:06:56PM +, Ceppo wrote: > > I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be > > PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed > > its > > instructions,

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On 7/3/24 09:06, Ceppo wrote: I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed its instructions, thus obtaining a file that should be PDF/A and pdfinfo identifies as such, but my employer's upload form th

Re: Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:06:56PM +, Ceppo wrote: > I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be > PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed > its > instructions, thus obtaining a file that should be PDF/A and pdfinfo > identifies > as s

Creating PDF/A from LaTeX source and from existing PDF

I wrote a report with LaTeX, and afterwards discovered it must be PDF/A-compliant - which wasn't. I found the pdfx LaTeX package and followed its instructions, thus obtaining a file that should be PDF/A and pdfinfo identifies as such, but my employer's upload form thinks isn't. Is pdfinfo reliable

Re: Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

Am 31.01.2024 um 23:12 schrieb Tixy: On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 21:59 +0100, hw wrote: On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 08:02 +0100, Paul Leiber wrote: Am 25.01.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Paul Leiber: [...] Some people on xen-devel pointed out to me two unhandled SMC calls in the boot logs which could be the root

Re: Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 21:59 +0100, hw wrote: > On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 08:02 +0100, Paul Leiber wrote: > > Am 25.01.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Paul Leiber: > > [...] > > > Some people on xen-devel pointed out to me two unhandled SMC calls in > > > the boot logs which could be the root of the problem. I a

Re: Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

Am 31.01.2024 um 19:07 schrieb Andrew M.A. Cater: On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 08:02:47AM +0100, Paul Leiber wrote: Am 25.01.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Paul Leiber: Paul [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-10/msg00796.html [2] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0098/la

Re: Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 08:02 +0100, Paul Leiber wrote: > Am 25.01.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Paul Leiber: > > Dear Debian user list members, > > > > I am trying to run network related stuff (Samba, Zabbix) on a Raspberry > > Pi 4B in a virtualized environment using Debian Bookworm and Xen. I am > > ru

Re: Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 08:02:47AM +0100, Paul Leiber wrote: > Am 25.01.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Paul Leiber: > > > > Paul > > > > [1] > > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-10/msg00796.html > > [2] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0098/latest/ > > [3] > > https://d

Re: Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

Am 25.01.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Paul Leiber: Dear Debian user list members, I am trying to run network related stuff (Samba, Zabbix) on a Raspberry Pi 4B in a virtualized environment using Debian Bookworm and Xen. I am running into reproducible complete system crashes/reboots due to a Xen watc

Debian/Xen on ARM: How to identify source of an unhandled SMC call during boot?

Dear Debian user list members, I am trying to run network related stuff (Samba, Zabbix) on a Raspberry Pi 4B in a virtualized environment using Debian Bookworm and Xen. I am running into reproducible complete system crashes/reboots due to a Xen watchdog triggering under certain, seemingly stra

Version matching in kernel source and patch source?

I'd like to try to compile my own kernel, using the realtime patch set. At kernel.org, I see that the 6.6 kernel source is 6.6, but the 6.6 realtime patch set is 6.6-rt12. Does that matter, or is it enough that both are given as 6.6? Similarly, if I see that the 6.5 series is at 6.5.10 fo

Re: Linux source 6.1.38 with Debian patches

On 12/10/23 at 17:47, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 12 Oct 2023 17:13 +0200, from martelli...@gmail.com (Franco Martelli): The system seems rock solid with 6.1.38 so I'm looking for the Linux source packages of the kernel 6.1.38 that is a previous kernel release of the current stable distrib

Re: Linux source 6.1.38 with Debian patches

On 12 Oct 2023 17:13 +0200, from martelli...@gmail.com (Franco Martelli): > The system seems rock solid with 6.1.38 so I'm looking for the Linux source > packages of the kernel 6.1.38 that is a previous kernel release of the > current stable distribution (maybe 12.1) does anybody kn

Linux source 6.1.38 with Debian patches

kernel installed but no longer the package (I deleted it after installation... big mistake). The system seems rock solid with 6.1.38 so I'm looking for the Linux source packages of the kernel 6.1.38 that is a previous kernel release of the current stable distribution (maybe 12.1) does anybo

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

n the kernel 5.4 and it is. Infact the > default running kernel is 5.4.14. But for the project that I'm working on,I > also need to install the linux source and the headers packages for the same > kernel (5.4.14),but unfortunately,between the packages I only see versions > 4.19 and 5.1

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

Any suggestions to fix it ? thanks. On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:10 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/09/2023 04:15, Mario Marietto wrote: > > I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and > > header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

On 02/09/2023 04:15, Mario Marietto wrote: I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? Kernel image from one project and headers+sources

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > Hello. > > I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and > header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to > debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? Tha

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and > header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to > debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? That's becaus

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

Hello. I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? That's because I prefer Debian over Ubuntu. Thanks. On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:25 PM

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

n the kernel 5.4 and it is. Infact the > default running kernel is 5.4.14. But for the project that I'm working on,I > also need to install the linux source and the headers packages for the same > kernel (5.4.14),but unfortunately,between the packages I only see versions > 4.19 and 5.1

How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

t I'm working on,I also need to install the linux source and the headers packages for the same kernel (5.4.14),but unfortunately,between the packages I only see versions 4.19 and 5.10. Is there a method to install the sources and headers packages also for the kernel 5.4.14 ? The point is that for t

Re: New open source project

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:26:35PM +0200, the2nd wrote: > i am developing an open source OTP authentication server and currently > searching for someone to test it. I hope its okay to ask for this on this > list. > > There is no documentation yet but i can write a step by step gui

New open source project

Hi, i am developing an open source OTP authentication server and currently searching for someone to test it. I hope its okay to ask for this on this list. There is no documentation yet but i can write a step by step guide if someone is interested in testing my project. Installation

Re: How to download source package using only console?

On 15.05.2023 15:19, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2023-05-15 10:25:45 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: I see. That explains why I can request source package "golang-github-xenolf-lego/testing" directly and get the right one. So, in my case, I won't be able to reliably get a so

Re: How to download source package using only console?

You need to fix that. > What is the best approach to fix that? [...] That: [...] > I see. That explains why I can request source package > "golang-github-xenolf-lego/testing" directly and get the right one. > So, in my case, I won't be able to reliably get a source package(-

Re: How to download source package using only console?

9.1-1. You need to fix that. What is the best approach to fix that? Keep in mind, I only need a source package(-s) from "testing". So, just to be safe, "deb" source for "testing" was commented out: $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list | grep -iE "testing" #d

Re: How to download source package using only console?

rt of a package, I sometimes find it > > > difficult > > > to obtain actual source package(-s) from Debian repos using console. > > > Following advice from a wiki page [1], after "apt update", doesn't do it: > > > > > > $ apt source lego/testing

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >