On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:05:59AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:36:17PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...] > > Uh-oh. We set the standards, but won't tell you what they are. > > But they did! They say PDF/A. But you have a point that this maybe is > not enough. Which version of PDF/A are we talking about? Don't get me wrong. The idea of PDF/A is great, the idea of using it is too... but judging by the Wikipedia entry, the actual implementation seems to be a mess, with several "levels", one semi-official validator and a whole bunch of pairwise incompatible validators. So just specifying PDF/A sounds like a sadistic torture coming out of Catbert's Evil Human Resources Department :-) Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
