Not sure how to report this (I am not on this list).
There is a problem with this script when it does not set STATS_LOGS
(no old rotated files present) but carries on anyway. I have
log rotation turned off on my system.
I think that it needs to exit is there is no work to do:
if [ -f ${LOGFILE}.
For now, I removed the qmail stuff since I had not the foggiest on how to make
use of it. Smail was removed when qmail was installed so I tried to get that
back. This attempted to install exim as well, OK, but the exim would not
install--FCQN identity did not agree. I do not recall ever having
Hi - I can't get mail (sending) to work.
With ssmtp I got the message: no recipients supplied.
Than I changed to another MTA (smail) - here I got the message: Usage: smail [flags]
address ...
It seems that mutt doesn't deliver the recipients address.
* How can I tell mutt to do t
he lights are flickering like crazy...
timshel# apt-get -s install exim
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
smail
The following NEW packages will be installed:
exim
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 423 not up
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:02:23PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
| Vineet Kumar said:
| > * Rick Macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 15:31]:
| >> I've never tried to replace a package that has many packages that
| >> require it. What do I tell apt to get it to remove smail
Vineet Kumar said:
> * Rick Macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 15:31]:
>> I've never tried to replace a package that has many packages that
>> require it. What do I tell apt to get it to remove smail and install
>> its replacement?
>
> apt-get install exi
* Rick Macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 15:31]:
>
> smail keeps dropping off my woody system and I have to continually restart
> it.
>
> Rather than deal with the problem I thought I'd just replace it. A newer
> woody system seems to have exim. The system with
smail keeps dropping off my woody system and I have to continually restart
it.
Rather than deal with the problem I thought I'd just replace it. A newer
woody system seems to have exim. The system with smail has been running
Debian _before_ the first offical release (buzz I think).
Sho
edit the From: header in nano with the
body of the message. Then in the confirmation screen, you should see
the correct From: line (instead of a blank). If it still doesn't work,
then something along the way (smail, perhaps) is rewriting it.
Vineet
* monolith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010629
I've tried it, thought I had written that in my previous mail. Any other
ideas?
David
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:55:02AM +0200, Matthias Richter wrote:
> monolith wrote on Fri Jun 29, 2001 at 01:02:17AM:
> > No matter how I edit my .muttrc (using realname/from variables or even
> > using my_hdr)
monolith wrote on Fri Jun 29, 2001 at 01:02:17AM:
> No matter how I edit my .muttrc (using realname/from variables or even
> using my_hdr) I cannot get it to display the from line properly.
[...]
> set from = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
what about setting:
my_hdr From: David Orman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ht
Hi,
I'm using smail as my mda on this debian machine, fetchmail to grab the
mail off my mailserver (running postfix). I use mutt as my mailreader.
No matter how I edit my .muttrc (using realname/from variables or even
using my_hdr) I cannot get it to display the from line properly. In the
at was similar. I
> installed the xterm package from 'woody' and noticed that sendmail was
> being replaced. When I try to send a mail in mutt, I can't, get
> 'operating system error' message. So I apt-get install smail and it says
> it can't find the package b
erating system error' message. So I apt-get install smail and it says
it can't find the package but I can use ssmtp instead. When I try to
send a mail with it I get 'error unable to open port smtp port 25'
message. I tried removing ssh but that didn't make any difference, also
Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
>
> I thought I had exim working well, but then I found I was unable to send
> mail to the mail server at one of my ISPs. Eventually I commented out
> "qualify_domain" in /etc/exim.conf and this seemed to fix the problem,
> but I didn't understand why.
>
Usually it's th
On 27 Sep 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Why does Debian install exim by default? I've always had slight
> >difficulties with configuring it, whereas smail always works for me
> >faultlessly.
>
> What difficu
Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why does Debian install exim by default? I've always had slight
>difficulties with configuring it, whereas smail always works for me
>faultlessly.
What difficulties have you had? I've never had any problems, and the
confi
Why does Debian install exim by default? I've always had slight
difficulties with configuring it, whereas smail always works for me
faultlessly.
I used exim at first when I upgraded to potato but now that smail has
reappeared in woody I've gone back to it with some relief.
Anyone
>>>>> "cxpx" == cxpx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cxpx> I get the following error after 'apt-get install linuxconf' (which in
turn
cxpx> wants smail or exim- both get the same error).
cxpx> Setting up smail (3.2.0.111-1) ...
I get the following error after 'apt-get install linuxconf' (which in turn
wants smail or exim- both get the same error).
Setting up smail (3.2.0.111-1) ...
Error: system's FQDN hostname (the_kernel) doesn't match
RFC1035 syntax; cannot configure the mail system.
Can't
Hi list,
i'm writing this mail from a fake box so please don't replay here
i've to do this since the last smail pkg is seriously broken
After upgrading it in woody (i guess it's also on potato) is no more working
it reports the following error:
laptop# smail -bd -q10m
smail: [
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:39:40PM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> Aha, smailconfig. OK, I tried reinstalling smail before and now running
> smailconfig, same error. Guess I'll try exim next.
exim is the standard MTA for Debian these days - in fact, smail was
removed from potato due
Bwahahaha
upon removing smail apt-get installed sendmail which comes with its
own e-z konfiguration skrypt and runs great. Can't see why anyone would
want to use anything else. Can't see either why anyone would want to have
a mail daemon on their box other than for mailing cron out
> You should try reconfiguring smail - there's probably a program called
> smailconfig in /usr/sbin that will do that for you, or failing that
> removoing and reinstalling should do the trick. If smail doesn't
> configure itself I'd try another MTA (exim is the default
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:39:08AM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> Sendmail (which is smail, anyway) doesn't work either.
Invoking the sendmail binary gets you the same MTA but it bypasses many
of the checks MTAs perform
> It neither sends the mail nor returns it to the sender like i
Sendmail (which is smail, anyway) doesn't work either.
It neither sends the mail nor returns it to the sender like it claims to.
-chris
09:33:06$ sendmail root
aoeusnaohe
09:33:20$ smail: mail moved to /var/spool/smail/error/13FJGC-0006PKC
09:33:43# cat /var/spool/smail/error/13FJGC-00
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 09:58:47AM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> 550 You are not permitted to send mail
localhost isn't in the list of systems that smail will allow to forward
mail through it. How you tell smail about that I don't know.
> What gives? The only reason I'm
Since everyone else is asking questions that are completely unrelated
to Debian I'll do my bit and ask one that's only slightly related.
I've got Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 with the default
(ie empty) config files. Here's the problem:
09:54:21# ./smail restart
Resta
you can find the comparison among the products above at
http://www.linuxcare.com/products/prodmore.epl?PRODUCT_GROUP=Mail+Transfer+A
gents
t.bedlam writes:
> Exim is GPL and Sendmail is BSD ; *and* currently administered by Allman's
> Sendmail, Inc., or some such joint stock for profit corporation. Big diff
> to a Debian.
No. It may or may not be a "big diff" to a small minority of Debian
developers, but it is no diff at all to Debi
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 11:59:49AM +0930, John Pearson was only
escaped alone to tell thee:
> Additionally, at one stage Eric Allman definitely had his nose
> out of joint over Linux; while that may be long past, people
> take these things personally and that may have contributed.
Personalit
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:08:07AM +1000, Richard Lindner wrote
> Would someone explain Debian's logic behind choosing exim over sendmail
> or smail for slink and potato (and I presume woody). The exim web page
> is excruciatingly coy regarding comparisons between it an the other
>
Would someone explain Debian's logic behind choosing exim over sendmail
or smail for slink and potato (and I presume woody). The exim web page
is excruciatingly coy regarding comparisons between it an the other
mainstream MTAs. What's exims advantage (other than a simplified config)
tha
I think I did it when I installed smail. Currently I can send emails through
mail.snacker.net ( my mail server), but I can't receive emails when someone
sends to e.g [EMAIL PROTECTED](guest is regular user on smail.snacker.net)
Do I forget to configure something on smail?
Here is my DNS re
Does anyone suggest some documents on how to
configure smail to send and receive emails. Thanks.
Daniel
Hi, everyone
I installed smail on my linux server. I didn't do a lot of
configuration on smail and I am able to send email through smail. However, I
can't receive any email from outside of domain.Here is the details.The domain is
called snacker.net
Here is my DNS record
In the last days I disturbed you all about exim, because I wasn't able
to send e-mail.
A lot of you helped me and I wish to thank you all for the attention.
But exim didn't work anyway on my system.
I SOLVED my problem using 'smail' than 'exim' and BINGO !!!
When
I'm having trouble sending mail with smail (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2
#2) from my Debian (potato) system.
I can receive mail, and can send to local users, but mail to anywhere else
just goes to a temporary file in /var/spool/smail/input/.
Empty files with the same name as the above temp
Hi,
I tried that, and indeed when I have set this sort of thing up before using TIS
Gauntlet this is what you do. However, because I am on a dial-up line smail is
delivering to the smarthost as soon as it sees that the mail is not local ie it
never checks DNS.
So the problem appears to be
Hi
I want to block the messages bigger than 150K in size.I've setup
"max_message_size=150K" option in smail config file and it's not
blocking.What should i change to make it enable?Could anybody plase give me
some solution?
Thanks & Regards,
Moe Thu Kyaw
Hi,
I am using smail to receive mail to my machine which acts as the gateway for my
LAN. I have a new domain and would like to send the mail for this domain
through my gateway to a machine on the LAN. Problem is that smail seems to be
processing the mail fine but then sends it back out to
I seem to be misunderstanding something about configuring smail.
My email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I try to send mail to anyone else at doctors.org.uk the mail is
always bounced by my system with the message:
"no valid recipients found"
I think this is saying that it
Dearest people,
I want to know how I can denied relay of mails in SMAIL 3.1.
I will appreciate if you people reply.
Regards,
Jaff, Arif
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread
Index]
How to block mail relaying in smail (bo
distribution)?
To: debian-user
-0700, Tom Kuiper wrote:
> I need to disable mail relaying on my system. I have smail 3.2.0.92-3,
> which came as the default with my Debian system, installed. We cannot figure
> out how to turn off mail relaying (an institutionally required anti-spam
> measure), since smail does not
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:42:04AM -0700, Tom Kuiper wrote:
> I need to disable mail relaying on my system. I have smail 3.2.0.92-3,
> which came as the default with my Debian system, installed. We cannot figure
> out how to turn off mail relaying (an institutionally required anti-spam
I need to disable mail relaying on my system. I have smail 3.2.0.92-3,
which came as the default with my Debian system, installed. We cannot figure
out how to turn off mail relaying (an institutionally required anti-spam
measure), since smail does not use a sendmail.cf file. Can anyone advise
.
-paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Abdul Aziz
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 1999 1:25 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Smail help needed from newbie
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote:
&
o the ISP's mail server but
stays in local machine, and gets bounced back to user who sent it.
I did try exim but had exactly the same problem, so installed smail
instead.
How far does the mail get before it bounces? (does it get to your ISP's mail
server?) It could be that your machine name is not a valid domain name, and
therefore DNS confirmation fails.
BTW I use exim instead of smail, and it works like a charm.
On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 07:16:53PM +,
Hi, I'm new to Debian and am trying to get smail working (using Elm) on
2.1 Slink - standard install from CD's. I keep getting the message
cannot parse fully qualified domain. I filled in the name of my ISP
(lineone.net) for the smarthost part of the config (I also tried
smtp.lineone.net
user on this machine. What must I
> write in the config file to be able to receive mails
> on all 3 domain names?
> This is a cut from my smail/config:
>
Its not totally a matter of config for smail. DNS also needs to be set
up. You need to contact whomever administers DNS for the h
ns.node.at.:
>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
'markus' exists as user on this machine. What must I
write in the config file to be able to receive mails
on all 3 do
TED]>
I don't use smail, though, so if smail is overwriting the From: header
after it gets the message, you may have to switch to a different MTA.
(exim, qmail and sendmail should be fine.)
--
Greg Wooledge| Distributed.NET http://www.distributed.net/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Steve George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently use a Debian machine as my main machine at work but am having a
> problem with mail. The problem is that I need the from address to be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com but smail keeps making the From address
> [EMAIL P
I once used smail (use sendmail now). If the "From" header
rewrite problem is the same as it was, you can go to the
www.debian.org site, follow the "Documentation" link, then follow
the "FAQ-O-MATIC" link to find your answer. Yes, you can change
a smail config
Hi,
I currently use a Debian machine as my main machine at work but am having a
problem with mail. The problem is that I need the from address to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .com but smail keeps making the From address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Because we have a firewall (and for some other
weird reasons
Hi all!
I want to receive mails on my server with the addresse
eg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a cut from my smail/config:
-
visible_name=www.htu.tuwien.ac.at
more_hostnames=localhost
-domains
hostnames=www.htu.tuwien.ac.at:htu.at:www.htu.at
ne last time: I must type runq at the console after
> running fetchmail in order for my e-mail reader to see my new mail. This
> never happened before, that is until I installed Netscape 4.61 the other day;
> before, I would run fetchmail and smail ran the queue automatically.
>
>
efore, that is until I installed Netscape 4.61 the other day;
> before, I would run fetchmail and smail ran the queue automatically.
> Some info: When installing Netscape, the configuration script said that smail
> may have to be restarted, and so it was. Also, when reconfiguring smail las
I'll post this problem one last time: I must type runq at the console after
running fetchmail in order for my e-mail reader to see my new mail. This never
happened before, that is until I installed Netscape 4.61 the other day; before,
I would run fetchmail and smail ran the queue automati
After installing Netscape 4.61, via dselect using Slink, a message came up
during the configuration of the packages that smail might have to be restarted
. So I let smail restart.
However, now when I run fetchmail I must runq in order for smail to pick up the
mail fetchmail received and get it
After installing Netscape 4.61, via dselect using Slink, a message came up
during the configuration of the packages that smail might have to be restarted
. So I let smail restart.
However, now when I run fetchmail I must runq in order for smail to pick up the
mail fetchmail received and get it
eived mail, I get this error:
> X-Fetchmail-Warning: ; SMTP listener rejected local recipient addresses:
> pcr387
It seems like smail is set up OK, but fetchmail is not. You don't
actually have a user on your local machine named pcr387, do you? You need
to tell fetchmail to deliver ma
Last night I set up fetchmail and smail. At first smail bounced back all
my remote messages (local messages were OK). But I made some changes and both
are working, I think, but I have some questions so that I'll get less error
messages.
Perhaps someone could give me hints on h
Hi,
I'm a happy debian user with an old server that i haven't figured until
this weekend
that it was open relayed, and even worse, the version of smail it's
currently using doesn't support relay options, my system is a Debian
1.2, and i really would like to stick on the libc5,
I use apt-get to keep my system up to date. Suddenly, smail shows an
annoying behaviour: When mail for local users arrives, it is stored in
/var/spool/smail/input and only delivered to /var/spool/mail the next
time smail runs through the queue (about 10 to 15 minutes later).
Any idea why smail
On 24-Aug-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am having problems with spam relay. I am using smail 3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2
> which doesn't seem to support the security attribute "smtp_remote_allow".
> What do i need in order to make this attribute work? is the
Hi
I am having problems with spam relay. I am using smail 3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2
which doesn't seem to support the security attribute "smtp_remote_allow".
What do i need in order to make this attribute work? is there any other
viable alternative to smail... qmail perhaps?
Ps. d
I have two computers with Debian stable up to date version and smail.
One works fine, but the other gives the following error message in the
smail logfile whenever mail is received. What file is the output file
that it can't open? Working on the assumption that it was the mail
file /var/
According to John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andy writes:
> > Is there an equivalent option for smail?
>
> Put 'queue_only' in /etc/smail/config .
I did that right away and it works great. Just one thing
is too bad now: local mails aren't delivered any
Andy writes:
> Is there an equivalent option for smail?
Put 'queue_only' in /etc/smail/config .
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can;
Hi!
A while ago I switched from sendmail to the Debian-defaulted smail.
I am pretty happy with it except for one thing:
As soon as any user sends a mail my system dials my ISP. With sendmail
I could specify an "expensive" option so that all mails were queued and
only sent out with the
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 08:52:58AM +0200, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using smail on my debian slink box with 2.2.10 kernel.
> I set up my ~/.forward file in order to sort my mail through procmail
> ("|/usr/bin/procmail") but it didn't work.
> Trying various .forward
Hi,
I am using smail on my debian slink box with 2.2.10 kernel.
I set up my ~/.forward file in order to sort my mail through procmail
("|/usr/bin/procmail") but it didn't work.
Trying various .forward files, I figured out that this file is not
read at all.
My /etc/smail/config
George Bonser wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Bruce Jackson wrote:
>
> > messages are allowed in to the Groupwise. I have tried various things
> > and have gotten various 5xx error messages on smail. The novell machine
> > does not have a fully qualified dns entry.
I have a network that consists of a debian slink machine as a firewall
running smail. It has local email on it for some users. These users
can access their email either through POP3 or IMAP. It works great.
The problem is that I have a Novell machine inside the network running
Groupwise 5.5
is shipping the mail off to my ISP when
it should just be sending it to NON_LINUX_BOX. If anyone reading this
is using smail and mails boxes on their own LAN, could you show me the
relevent snippits of your /etc/smail/* files?
Thanks,
Christopher
can I get smail to behave that way?
TIA,
Stefan
(Please cc me)
the mail appeared. I didn't have this problem prior to the upgrade.
I can get my mail right away if I run "runq", so I think the problem is
that smail is queing the mail instead of running in foreground, but I
can't find where the delivery_modes is set. I looked at the
/etc/sma
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Max wrote:
> AFAIK, smail will not work properly with libc later than 2.0.7t. I
> had the same problem as you and was forced to switch to exim. But I
> don't regret the switch because exim is an actively supported MTA that
> performs better and is easier
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> smail used to work on my 'slink'-debian system to my full
> satisfaction: incoming mail was delivered into my INBOX
> /var/spool/mail/$USER immediately and xbiff beeped.
>
> Now this changed (apparently after I installed a few packages fr
Same behavior here (Full Potato from the I-net)
Please let me know if you have a solution to this
with best regards
Reiner Stallknecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
smail used to work on my 'slink'-debian system to my full
satisfaction: incoming mail was delivered into my INBOX
/var/spool/mail/$USER immediately and xbiff beeped.
Now this changed (apparently after I installed a few packages from
'potato' to get licq version 0.61). Incoming
On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, Dan Willard wrote:
> I've apparently hosed smail. Mail still comes in, but doesn't get put into
> my mailbox, it just sits in /var/spool/smail/input. I must have killed it
> while getting a Wascom tablet to work last weekend, played with libs. Can
>
>> "AC" == Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AC> I'm registering for an ISP which gives the server for outgoing mail
AC> (relay.force9.net).
AC> Can anyone tell me where this has to be configured please?
Run smailconfig, use Option "Internet site" and enter the name as the
smarthost
I'm registering for an ISP which gives the server for outgoing mail
(relay.force9.net).
Can anyone tell me where this has to be configured please?
I thought it should be in /etc/hosts but I don't know what format it should
have.
The ISP also provides dotted quad addresses for primary and secon
I've a linux server with debian 1.3 and smail 3.2-3, when I'm trying to put
in smail config the parameter: smtp_remote_allow=[IP range] the server
respond that the comand smtp_remote_allow is unknown.
Help Me!!!
I've apparently hosed smail. Mail still comes in, but doesn't get put into
my mailbox, it just sits in /var/spool/smail/input. I must have killed it
while getting a Wascom tablet to work last weekend, played with libs. Can
anyone point me in the right direction? Should I just kill
I'm relatively new to the unix world, so please forgive me if this is a
stupid question. I keep getting messages that mail is being placed in the
/var/spool/smail/error directory. When I look at the
/var/log/smail/logfile, the errors say "Failed TO: ERROR:(ERR100)
unknown user".
This
configuration is for workstation, which have mounted /var/spool/mail from
a central server) which sounds like what I wanted to do. I setup to run
smail as a daemon at boottime. After entering the information needed, I
tried to send a test message only to have it not work. I then stopped the
>> "SZ" == Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SZ> Some sites block the emails sent from an unqualified domain. How
SZ> do I configure smail so that I can send the mail via a qualified
SZ> smtp, or as it looks like my domain is qualified.
First make sure you
>> "ML" == Michael Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ML> In the near future I may need to handle daily bulkmail to a list
ML> of users in the 20,000-100,000 range.
I would check the documentation on www.exim.org. debian.org runs with
exim, and it does pretty well.
Ciao,
Martin
Please help me in installing Smail in my unix machine
through UUCP.
Please give me detailed instructions.
Thanks in advance.
- Anil
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin:vcard
n:J I;Anil Kumar
tel;pager:9612-316762
tel;fax:+91-40-3730652
tel;home:+91-8712-26887
tel;work:+91-40-3735430
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
You didn't say what your hostname is. What is the output of hostname
--fqdn ?
The message that generated this error:
What was the content of the From: header and the To: header?
Who is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?
YOu can try to set visible_name=linuxfreak.com i
Hi,
I tried this for many times and still does not work.
Some sites do a smtp look up and I cannot send mails to these sites
because
my local domain name is not qualified. How do I fix this?? By putting
a qualified domain name does not fix the problem.
Her
You'll have to find docs to make your email headers be rewritten with yoour
qualified domain name
-Original Message-
From: Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Mail List
Date: Friday, 7 May 1999 11:41
Subject: smail problem
>Hi,
> Some sites block the em
Hi,
Some sites block the emails sent from an unqualified domain.
How do I configure smail so that I can send the mail via a qualified
smtp, or as it
looks like my domain is qualified.
Thanks.
Shao
Can someone make a recommendation to me of which to use?
I am going to be handling email for 30-100 busy users.
There are 3 domains, but only one user list, i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the
same as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using smail right now and a text '/etc/aliases' file, generally
th
:-) Done, and with the new version the attrib you suggested is exactly
what I needed :-)
I put this link in /usr/lib:
/usr/lib/libnsl.a -> libident.a
Compilation of smail-3.2.0.102-1 needed libnsl, none of the packages in the
Debian1.3.1 binary CD contained such file, but I started thinking
>> "NB" == Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NB> Alas I fear that the version string "Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2"
NB> means _before_ that feature was added, sendmail does not work any
NB> more, the above line is what I got when I tried to sen
1 - 100 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
