On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:32:23 +1100
M-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] thought about and sent this:
> >> I am running Sarge, linux 2.4.27, and grub with a NEC cdrom. I have
> > run > into what seems to be a common problem, but can find no pointe
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] thought about and sent this:
>> I am running Sarge, linux 2.4.27, and grub with a NEC cdrom. I have
> run > into what seems to be a common problem, but can find no pointer
> to the > solution. How can I tell the kernel that I want
> "/dev
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 05:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running Sarge, linux 2.4.27, and grub with a NEC cdrom. I have run
> into what seems to be a common problem, but can find no pointer to the
> solution. How can I tell the kernel that I want "/dev/hdc=ide-scsi"? Or,
> better
I am running Sarge, linux 2.4.27, and grub with a NEC cdrom. I have run
into what seems to be a common problem, but can find no pointer to the
solution. How can I tell the kernel that I want "/dev/hdc=ide-scsi"? Or,
better yet, can I upgrade from 2.4 to a fairly late 2.6 without installing
the d
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:18:56 +0100
Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:25:47 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joachim Fahnenmueller) wrote:
>
> > > > > > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > > > > > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
> > >
> > > This may not be the ans
[loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
hi there
even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
installations, i am asking for hints.
problem solved.
apparently one has to compile ide and ide-mod statically into the
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> > In this case, ide-cd won't probe any drives on /dev/hdc
> >
>
> whyle trying this, i could no longer mount the drive as hdc (of course),
> but the ide-scsi stuff did not work either.
you have to boot the right kernel ..
- if lilo
Alexei Chetroi wrote:
If you can do that, then I think your dvd drive is using ide-cd module.
Please, make sure your /etc/modules.conf contain line like
options ide-cd ignore=hdc
In this case, ide-cd won't probe any drives on /dev/hdc
whyle trying this, i could no longer mount the drive as hdc (
I'm no expert here, but I think the fact that this works means that ide-cd
has got /dev/hdc, which is why ide-scsi doesn't grab it. I think there's
an option to tell ide-cd to explicitly ignore /dev/hdc, but I don't know
what it is.
ap
-
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 12:47:54PM +0200, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> From: "[loonyx | rolf joho]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: ide-scsi problem on woody
>
> >i bet that this works ( assuming the
i bet that this works ( assuming the kernel has been told by grub/lilo
the hdc=ide-scsi option )
mount -t iso9660 -o ro /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom
and if it does ... make a link
cd /dev ; ln -s ./hdc cdrom ( for reading cd's )
cd /dev ; ln -s ./hdc cdrw ( for writing )
c ya
al
hi ya rolf
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> dmesg gives me that:
> Oct 22 23:37:05 looney kernel: hdc: Hewlett-Packard DVD Writer 300,
> ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> Oct 22 23:37:05 looney kernel: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> Oct 22 23:37:05 looney kernel: hdc: ATAPI 40X
Alexei Chetroi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:28:56AM +0300, Alexei Chetroi wrote:
From: Alexei Chetroi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> lsmod-output:
Module Size Used byNot tainted
nls_iso8859-1 2880 0 (autoclean)
ide-cd 26176 0 (autoclean)
Have you
Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hello
[loonyx | rolf joho] (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
installations, i am asking for hints.
through /etc/modules i successfully load th
Alvin Oga wrote:
hi ya loonyx
if your dvd writer is on /dev/hdc
try using /dev/hdc instead of /dev/scd0
if it works .. link /dev/sg0 to /dev/hdc and fix fstab
also stick a boot (real) cdrom into the dvd drive, and see if it boots the
cdrom to eliminate any hardware/bios/cable issues
c y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rolf,
does /dev/scd0, /dev/sr0 and /dev/sg0 exist?
any info from dmesg or from /var/log/messages?
-Kev
yes they do exist:
brw-rw1 root cdrom 11, 0 Mar 14 2002 /dev/scd0
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Aug 22 11:08 /dev/sr0 -> scd0
crwSrwS
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:25:47 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joachim Fahnenmueller) wrote:
> > > > > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > > > > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
> >
> > This may not be the answer, but I find that if I do
> > cdrecord -scanbus
> > when this happens, and then try the m
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:34:52PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:36:21 +0200
> Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > > > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
>
> This may not be the answer, but I find that if I do
> cdr
> Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 17:34]:
>
> > Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 17:00]:
> >
>
> > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:36:21 +0200
> > Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > > > > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block
Richard,
> Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 17:10]:
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:36:21 +0200
> Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have been experiencing the same problems on 2.4.22:
>
> Why do you have this set like this?
>
> Reply-To: LIST-Reply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 17:00]:
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:36:21 +0200
> Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > > > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
>
> This may not be the answer, but I find that if I do
> cdrecor
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:36:21 +0200
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been experiencing the same problems on 2.4.22:
Why do you have this set like this?
Reply-To: LIST-Reply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It defeats Sylpheed's automatic reply-to-list facility.
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
htt
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:36:21 +0200
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
This may not be the answer, but I find that if I do
cdrecord -scanbus
when this happens, and then try the mount, it works.
Don't ask me w
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 14:54, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
>
> What if you use /dev/sda ?
$ mount /dev/sda /cdrom
mount: /dev/sda is not a valid block device
--
--- Magnus von Koeller ---
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
add
I have been experiencing the same problems on 2.4.22:
> Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 15:21]:
>
> >
> > $ mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
> > mount: /dev/scd0 is not a valid block device
>
> What if you use /dev/sda ?
>
uccellina:~# mount -t iso9660 /dev/sda /mnt
mount: /dev/sda is not a
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 12:05, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
> > Good idea. Not only look for error messages but also for _success_
> > messages, at some point it should say that it found the device.
>
> Now, what if it does report success but s
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 12:05, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
> Good idea. Not only look for error messages but also for _success_
> messages, at some point it should say that it found the device.
Now, what if it does report success but still doesn't work:
$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached device
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:02:10PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
>
> > Hi Rolf,
> >
> > maybe load ide-scsi *before* sr_mod ?
>
> if a module needed to be loaded in the right order,
> it'd complain about missing symbols not yet defined
> when i
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> hi there
>
> even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
> ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
> installations, i am asking for hints.
>
> through /etc/modules i successfully load this:
> s
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:28:56AM +0300, Alexei Chetroi wrote:
> From: Alexei Chetroi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> lsmod-output:
> > Module Size Used byNot tainted
> > nls_iso8859-1 2880 0 (autoclean)
> > ide-cd 26176 0 (autoclean)
> Have you tried
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:27:04PM +0200, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:27:04 +0200
> From: "[loonyx | rolf joho]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ide-scsi problem on woody
>
> even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mo
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> maybe load ide-scsi *before* sr_mod ?
if a module needed to be loaded in the right order,
it'd complain about missing symbols not yet defined
when its dependency modules needed to be loaded first
manually loading um might show y
Hi Rolf,
maybe load ide-scsi *before* sr_mod ?
Joachim
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:27:04PM +0200, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> hi there
>
> even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
> ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
> installations
hi ya loonyx
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, [loonyx | rolf joho] wrote:
> hi there
>
> even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
> ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
> installations, i am asking for hints.
list of modules look good from eyebal
Hello
[loonyx | rolf joho] (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
> ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
> installations, i am asking for hints.
>
> through /etc/modules i successfully load this:
> sr_mod
hi there
even though i load the ide-scsi module at boottime, i can not mount my
ide-dvd-writer. since i was perfectly able to do that on earlier
installations, i am asking for hints.
through /etc/modules i successfully load this:
sr_mod
ide-scsi
my complete lsmod can be found at the end of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:20:42AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> The point is that cdrdao requires root priveledge to run, period
No, I meant I don't understand why someone would protect cdrao with sudo...
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:42:17AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> > Using a setuid root program (sudo) to avoid having cdrecord or cdrdao set
> > up as setuid root just does not any sense to me at all.
>
> Well, sudo can be used as a means of authenticati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:42:17AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> Using a setuid root program (sudo) to avoid having cdrecord or cdrdao set up
> as setuid root just does not any sense to me at all.
Well, sudo can be used as a means of authentication to l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:35:02AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Shoot the maintainer of xcdroast an email asking him about the issue,
> or open a wishlist bug.
Submitted wishlist bug against xcdroast.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:59, Qian Gong wrote:
> > >
> > > Sudo is a solution.
> >
> > Well, that way a user that can run cdrdao can run basically everything,
> > can't he?
>
> No. By sudo you can limit the user to run a specific program, even with
> specific options.
sudo is a setuid program, it need
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
>
> OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
> command line since xcdroast will do it all in on
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:24:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> > I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> > on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> > setuid.
> > > Sudo is a solution.
> >
> > Well, that way a user that can run cdrdao can run basically everything,
> > can't he?
> >
> No. By sudo you can limit the user to run a specific program, even with
> specific options.
In that case sudo might be worth looking into and I will do just that, :-)
Davi
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:23:59AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> > > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > > cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do it all in one shot for me.
- --
.'
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:24:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> > I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> > on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> > setuid.
> > Here is the way Debian installs cdrecord
> >
> > -rws--x---1 root cdrom177k Apr 9 2002 /usr/bin/cdrecord
>
> The package I see in unstable installs as -rwsr-xr-- if you're running
> setuid, which is much more sensible (there's a comment in the Debian
> policy manual noting tha
> > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> > permissions or something like that I should be able to control wh
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:41:29PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> permission
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> setuid. Afaik that is because
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:17:45AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:22, David Fokkema wrote:
> > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > cdrdao to run without setuid. Fur
> > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> > permissions or something like that I should be able to control wh
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:22, David Fokkema wrote:
>
> Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> permissions or somethin
> > > I think you might need to setuid cdrdao
> > >
> > > hth
> > > Bob
> >
> > If there is any other way, I'd rather not do that, :-)
>
> I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> se
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:56, David Fokkema wrote:
> >
> > I think you might need to setuid cdrdao
> >
> > hth
> > Bob
>
> If there is any other way, I'd rather not do that, :-)
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
> > be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
> >
> > cdrdao scanbus
> >
> > should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
> > up as normal, everything works fine. The problem is th
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:07, David Fokkema wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
> be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
>
> cdrdao scanbus
>
> should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
> up as normal, everything
Hi,
I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
cdrdao scanbus
should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
up as normal, everything works fine. The problem is that I don't get it to
work for a r
Shawn D'Alimonte wrote:
>
> On November 19, 2000 08:49 pm, Lee Elliott wrote:
> > Seems like it's just a conflict between the controller and the
> > scanner because the other devices work ok. As it crashes anyway,
> > with termination on the controller, try it without.
> >
> > man sane-scsi only
On November 19, 2000 08:49 pm, Lee Elliott wrote:
> Seems like it's just a conflict between the controller and the
> scanner because the other devices work ok. As it crashes anyway,
> with termination on the controller, try it without.
>
> man sane-scsi only briefly refers to the ncr53c8xx control
Seems like it's just a conflict between the controller and the scanner
because the other devices work ok. As it crashes anyway, with
termination on the controller, try it without.
man sane-scsi only briefly refers to the ncr53c8xx controller in the
context of 2.0 kernels. You could try setting t
Does your kernel have scsi CD-ROM and generic support? I also have an
internal scsi CD-ROM and a scsi scanner: my CD-ROM is detected as sr0
and the scanner comes in as sg2 - do you see anything like these being
detected later on in dmesg?
Also, ensure that you have scsi termination set on the sc
I am trying to hook a scanner up to my NCR 3350 using the built in SCSI
controller but the machine is crashing when I try to use it. I tried
searching with Google and Deja but couldn't find anything.
The machine is:
NCR 3350 (486dx2 upgraded to AMD586, 16MB RAM, MCA bus)
Debian Potato 2.2r1/D
Robert Kasunic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Dawicontrol 2975U SCSI Controller with three devices (CD-ROM,
> CD-Writer and Scanner) connected to it. Some time ago I encountered some
.
.
.
> That goes on forever. It's impossible to work with the system in that
> state and I have to reboot. I'm not ab
Hi,
I have a Dawicontrol 2975U SCSI Controller with three devices (CD-ROM,
CD-Writer and Scanner) connected to it. Some time ago I encountered some
problems. Everytime I insert the module for the controller I get the
following in my syslog:
Sep 2 18:14:06 kasunic kernel: ncr53c8xx: at PCI bus 0,
I am trying to install Debian on an old machine (Pentium) but the
installation stops after detecting the SCSI hardrive. I have searched the
old messages on Debian and found differing views as to what one should do
to get it to install.
I was wondering if the final solution has been found? The pro
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Holtz, Mike IS wrote:
> Subject: SCSI problem
> Trying to install Debian 2.02 and the rescue disk boot system is
> having problems with the aha2940 scsi adapter.
> Basically it sees it ok, but at the point where it goes to scan
> for devices it get
Hi,
Trying to install Debian 2.02 and the rescue disk boot system is
having problems with the aha2940 scsi adapter.
Basically it sees it ok, but at the point where it goes to scan
for devices it gets the following error:
"Parity error during phase Message-In
Doose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Monday, November 02, 1998 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: SCSI problem, can't instal Debian
>On Sat, 31 Oct 1998, Reagan Doose wrote:
>
>> I am trying to install Debian 2.0 from a Bootable, SCSI CD. I have a
Dell
>&g
Just fyi, I think I finally did fix my SCSI problem (had a 1 in 3 chance
of booting without the infinite reset errors). The problem was that I
have a device that was incorrectly set to UW instead of U (40 max trans
rate, instead of 20). The old aic7xxx driver I had in RH4 somehow didn't
h
On Sat, 31 Oct 1998, Reagan Doose wrote:
> I am trying to install Debian 2.0 from a Bootable, SCSI CD. I have a
Dell
> Dimension XPS H266 computer with an Adaptec 2940UW SCSI adapter and a
2GB UW
> hard drive.
>
> All starts off well, I get the boot prompt, and the system looks like
it is
> co
On Sat, 31 Oct 1998, Reagan Doose wrote:
> I am trying to install Debian 2.0 from a Bootable, SCSI CD. I have a Dell
> Dimension XPS H266 computer with an Adaptec 2940UW SCSI adapter and a 2GB UW
> hard drive.
>
> All starts off well, I get the boot prompt, and the system looks like it is
> comi
I am trying to install Debian 2.0 from a Bootable, SCSI CD. I have a Dell
Dimension XPS H266 computer with an Adaptec 2940UW SCSI adapter and a 2GB UW
hard drive.
All starts off well, I get the boot prompt, and the system looks like it is
coming up, then I get this:
(scsi0:-1:-1:-1) Bad scbptr 1
I need help or suggestions with the following problem. I'm getting desparate!
(Maybe this would better be posted in one of the comp.os.linux newsgroups, but
since I don't understand what's happening, I can't rule out that it's somehow
Debian-specific.)
I have a Linux root partition on my (first)
76 matches
Mail list logo
