On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:10:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
On 11/12/2010 01:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Compare both "lsmod | grep ata" outputs.
Good suggestion:
h...@debian:/$ grep ata 11.2.6.32-5-686.lsmod
ata_generic 2047 0
libata115745 3 ata_generic,sata_via,pata_
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:10:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 01:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Compare both "lsmod | grep ata" outputs.
>>
>>
> Good suggestion:
>
> h...@debian:/$ grep ata 11.2.6.32-5-686.lsmod
> ata_generic 2047 0
> libata115745 3 ata_generic,
On 11/12/2010 02:10 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
On 11/12/2010 01:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:16 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I have 2 kernels: Debian's 2.6.32-5-686 and my own 2.6.36-hvw.
The former no longer has /dev/hd* the latter does as shown by blkid. [1]
blkid for 2
On 11/12/2010 02:10 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
On 11/12/2010 01:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:16 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I have 2 kernels: Debian's 2.6.32-5-686 and my own 2.6.36-hvw.
The former no longer has /dev/hd* the latter does as shown by blkid. [1]
blkid for 2
On 11/12/2010 01:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:16 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I have 2 kernels: Debian's 2.6.32-5-686 and my own 2.6.36-hvw.
The former no longer has /dev/hd* the latter does as shown by blkid. [1]
blkid for 2.6.32-5-686 and [2] for 2.6.36-hvw.
What kernel
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:16 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I have 2 kernels: Debian's 2.6.32-5-686 and my own 2.6.36-hvw.
>
> The former no longer has /dev/hd* the latter does as shown by blkid. [1]
> blkid for 2.6.32-5-686 and [2] for 2.6.36-hvw.
>
> What kernel option is responsible for that
Hi,
I have 2 kernels: Debian's 2.6.32-5-686 and my own 2.6.36-hvw.
The former no longer has /dev/hd* the latter does as shown by blkid. [1]
blkid for 2.6.32-5-686 and [2] for 2.6.36-hvw.
What kernel option is responsible for that? Obviously I don't have that
set in 2.6.36-hvw.
Thanks.
Hug
Bhasker C V writes:
> The native driver can directly do all the tasks and SCSI emulation
> is not needed anymore.
>
> For programs like growisofs, cdrecord in the option dev=
> instead of giving 0,0,0 etc., you can give /dev/hdc directly.
Thank you. That is great new
Hi,
The native driver can directly do all the tasks and SCSI emulation
is not needed anymore.
For programs like growisofs, cdrecord in the option dev=
instead of giving 0,0,0 etc., you can give /dev/hdc directly.
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Martin McCormick wrote:
I upgraded my kernel from an
I upgraded my kernel from an old 2.6.5 kernel to a newer 2.6.18
kernel and noticed that the boot process ignored the passing of
/dev/hdc to scsi emulation. The drive worked fine after I
mounted it as /dev/cdrom rather than /dev/hcd0. Do I need to do
anything different to such programs as cdrecord
On (14/04/06 23:32), Christopher Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the "Could not find USB device", run it as root.
>
> And if that works, add yourself to the 'camera' group rather than
> continuing to run it as root everytime you want it.
>
Thankyou, this works also.
James.
--
James Westby
On (14/04/06 23:44), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:44:11 -0500
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:45 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > On
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> > > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> > > Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:45 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (15/04/06 10:58), David Purton wrote:
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > From: David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB ca
On (15/04/06 10:58), David Purton wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> On Fri, Apr 1
On (15/04/06 11:24), John O'Hagan wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: John O'Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:24:50 +1000
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52 am, James Westby wrote:
>
&g
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> > mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> > X.org, udev and
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52 am, James Westby wrote:
>
> I tried writing a udev rule for the camera
>
> BUS="usb", SYSFS{vendor}="Canon Inc.", SYSFS{product}="Canon Digital
> Camera", NAME="camera%n"
>
> but this has no effect. I have neither /dev/sd* nor /dev/camera* with
> or without this rule.
>
I
On (14/04/06 18:52), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:52:17 -0500
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
[snip]
>
> Hmmm. Which version of libusb-0.1-4, usbutils &
3.1.1
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:42:52 -0500
> > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> >
> > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to wor
On (14/04/06 17:42), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
> version=3.1.1
> X-Spam-Level:
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:42:52 -0500
> Sub
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> X.org, udev and linux-image and their dependencies).
>
[snip]
> snd_page_alloc
Hi all,
I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
X.org, udev and linux-image and their dependencies).
It appears to me that there is some problem with SCSI emulation of my
camera. I insert the camera
emulation to make CD burning work and
have been lucky in that both a Sony and Plextor IDE drives have
not missed a beat when burning CD's. The lines in /etc/lilo.conf are:
append = "hdc=scsi"
append = "hdd=scsi"
A message that SCSI emulation is deprecated for CD bu
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:19:20AM +1100, Ivan Teliatnikov wrote:
> What is for
> max_scsi_luns=1
>
> System has internal SCSI drive and 2 IDE cdroms. What should be a
> max_scsi_luns?
from /usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/BootPrompt-HOWTO.gz
(one of the ldp howtos, in the doc-linux-text package):
> Lsmod shows that after reboot both cdrom and ide-cd modules are running
> I can mount CDROMS to /dev/hdx. I have /dev/scdX setup properly.
> Mounting of /dev/scdX fails, "dmesg shows that ise-scsi emulation does
> not work.
I believe you need to tell ide-cd to ignore your ide
Here is a good question. I am trying to get generic Sarge 2.4.26 system
to recognise and configure IDE CD-writer and CD-reader at a startup
using ide-scsi emulation as described in
file:///usr/share/doc/cdrecord/README.ATAPI.setup
/boot/grub/menu.lst
title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel
> >
> Indeed. In Unix, everything's a file.
>
except for interfaces.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roel Schroeven wrote:
Joerg Schilling, the cdrecord author, argues that cdrecord uses SCSI
commands to do its work, so everything should work according to the
SCSI standard. That means, amongst others, addressing devices by
bus,target,lun.
The kernel developers argue that in Linux, as in Unix,
Jim McCloskey wrote:
|> > should work, but it is better to write
|> >
|> > cdrecord dev=ATAPI:0,1,0 etc
|>
|> why is it better than dev=/dev/hdc?
There was a huge to-do about this on the kernel mailing list not so
long ago (between the kernel developers and the author of
cdrecord)[1]. The conse
> There was a huge to-do about this on the kernel mailing list not so
> long ago
Boy, you're not kidding.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> > should work, but it is better to write
|> >
|> > cdrecord dev=ATAPI:0,1,0 etc
|>
|> why is it better than dev=/dev/hdc?
There was a huge to-do about this on the kernel mailing list not so
long ago (between the kernel developers and the author of
cdrecord)[1]. The consensus among the kernel
On 26. August 2004 at 1:26PM -0400,
Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:52:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Rob Benton wrote:
> >
> > >OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
> &g
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:40:06 +0200, Rob Benton wrote:
> OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
> that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. Unfortunately
> the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't agree. Has
>
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 12:26, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:52:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Rob Benton wrote:
> >
> > >OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
> > >that in the 2.6 kernels
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:52:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Rob Benton wrote:
>
> >OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
> >that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated.
> >Unfortunately the version of cdrecord I hav
Incoming from Rob Benton:
> OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
> that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. Unfortunately
> the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't agree. Has
> anybody had any success getting
Rob Benton wrote:
OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated.
Unfortunately the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't
agree. Has anybody had any success getting cdrecord to work with an
OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day
that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. Unfortunately
the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't agree. Has
anybody had any success getting cdrecord to work with an IDE target
like, dev
Enrique Samson Jr. wrote:
1) Make a file (I called it cdrw) in /etc/modules that loads proper
it's /etc/modutils
Yes, you are right. That was a mistake on my part. Apologies.
->HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) Make a file (I called it cdrw) in /etc/modules that loads proper
it's /etc/modutils
# This assumes IDE-CD is a module rather than copmiled into kernel.
#
options ide-cd ignore="hdd"
alias scd0 sr_mode
pre-install sg modprobe ide-scsi
pre-install sr_mod modprobe ide-scsi
pre-insta
Incoming from Enrique Samson Jr.:
> >I haven't seen this whole thread, but have you told the kernel on
> >bootup to assign that to the ide-scsi module? The ide-cd module will
> >grab it first if not told to ignore it...
>
> on grub: kernel /vmlinuz ro root=/dev/hda5 hdd=ide-scsi
.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:43:06PM +0800, Enrique Samson Jr. wrote:
> >I haven't seen this whole thread, but have you told the kernel on
> >bootup to assign that to the ide-scsi module? The ide-cd module will
> >grab it first if not told to ignore it...
>
> on grub: kernel /vmlinuz ro root=/dev/h
Apparently, _Enrique Samson Jr._, on 03/17/04 23:43,typed:
I haven't seen this whole thread, but have you told the kernel on
bootup to assign that to the ide-scsi module? The ide-cd module will
grab it first if not told to ignore it...
on grub: kernel /vmlinuz ro root=/dev/hda5 hdd=ide-scsi
i t
I haven't seen this whole thread, but have you told the kernel on
bootup to assign that to the ide-scsi module? The ide-cd module will
grab it first if not told to ignore it...
on grub: kernel /vmlinuz ro root=/dev/hda5 hdd=ide-scsi
i think you meant this line. it didn't work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:38:23AM +0800, Enrique Samson Jr. wrote:
...
> on the other hand, i had just tested sarge netinst. it has the default
> kernel 2.4.25-1-386. ide-cd and ide-scsi modules are loaded by default
> but cdrecord -scanbus can't detect my cdwriter. xcdroast als
he info hasn't helped.
I'm running sid, with a stock 2.6.3-1-686 kernel.
Then why do you want to use ide-scsi emulation? The kernel and the
userspace programs like cdrecord and cdrdao should be new enough to use
the writer without the emulation. I use my writer with the ide-cd
driver
th it.
> >
> > The fact that nobody has bothered to fix ide-scsi seems to be a
> > result of nobody _wanting_ to really fix it.
> >
> > So don't use it. Or if you do use it, send the fixes over.
> >
> > Linus
>
> FWIW windoze uses
to really fix it.
>
> So don't use it. Or if you do use it, send the fixes over.
>
> Linus
FWIW windoze uses an ide-scsi emulation for writing CDs... :-)
--
Pigeon
Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e Linux configuration documentation about ide-scsi:
SCSI emulation support (BLK_DEV_IDESCSI)
WARNING: ide-scsi is no longer needed for cd writing applications!
The 2.6 kernel supports direct writing to ide-cd, which eliminates
the need for ide-scsi + the entire scsi stack just for writing a
cd. The new method
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In other words, because experience and "documentation" tell me to, and
> I've found no documentation other than what you and Kirk have said
> that indicate that I should be doing otherwise.
>From the Linux configuration d
Hello
Rodrigo Agerri (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/westk:> ls -l /dev/sg*
>> crw---1 root root 21, 0 2003-12-31 18:31 /dev/sg0
>> crw---1 root root 21, 1 2003-12-31 18:31 /dev/sg1
>
> I think that /dev/sg* sho
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 09:25:03AM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> Note that, as is posted on bootup, ide-scsi is deprecated in 2.6 kernels. They
> recomment ide-cd instead. I am not clear how to make the switch.
>
I am running 2.6.4 and have no problems with cdrecord. I have no experience
w
Kent West wrote:
>
> I'm running sid, with a stock 2.6.3-1-686 kernel.
>
As someone else has said, using scsi emulation for 2.6.x kernels is
deprecated.
However,
> I've tried adding
> append="hdc=scsi"
> to lilo.conf (and rerunning lilo and reboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Kent West:
# I've gotten a new Dell with a cdburner; the burner works fine in WinXP
# (yech!), but I can't seem to get it working in Debian.
#
# I'm running sid, with a stock 2.6.3-1-686 kernel.
# ide_scsi 15236 0
I am n
Hello
Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> As I mentioned, the eroaster FAQ and google did not tell me this info;
> have you got any pointers to documentation that ide-scsi is really
> deprecated?
Check your syslog. The Kernel says it when ide-scsi is loaded. As far as
I have heard the ide-s
Note that, as is posted on bootup, ide-scsi is deprecated in 2.6 kernels. They
recomment ide-cd instead. I am not clear how to make the switch.
However, ide-scsi is still around and does work. The mounting moints of the
CDs has changed. In 2.4 kernel, they got to /dev/hd*, in 2.6 they get
to /d
he info hasn't helped.
I'm running sid, with a stock 2.6.3-1-686 kernel.
Then why do you want to use ide-scsi emulation? The kernel and the
userspace programs like cdrecord and cdrdao should be new enough to use
the writer without the emulation. I use my writer with the ide-cd
driver
info hasn't helped.
>
> I'm running sid, with a stock 2.6.3-1-686 kernel.
Then why do you want to use ide-scsi emulation? The kernel and the
userspace programs like cdrecord and cdrdao should be new enough to use
the writer without the emulation. I use my writer with the ide-cd
dri
I CD
> Writer, and then later warns me that this is not the recommended way
> to go and I need to get ide-scsi emulation working.
ide-scsi is deprecated. The xcdroast warning will probably go away soon.
I've been burning CD-Rs using native ATAPI mode with much success,
particularly sin
I too recently got my CRX216E working, although with 2.4.
Forgive me if it's different.
I have this in lilo.conf, note the ide-
append="hdc=ide-scsi"
By the looks of your lsmod, ide-cd grabbed the CD-ROM
so hopefully this is your problem.
I had the ignore in /etc/modules.conf but took i
Tue Mar 16 15:55:18
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/westk:> ls -l /dev/hdc
brw-rw1 root disk 22, 0 2003-12-31 18:31 /dev/hdc
When I run "sudo xcdroaster", it scans the bus and finds the ATAPI CD
Writer, and then later warns me that this is not the reco
Hi Peter
Thanks for the good advice. It worked perfectly.
Cheers
MB
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:31:24 +
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Martin Batermann]
> > Just some clarification please: When recreating
> /dev/scd1, should I
> > first delete the /dev/scd1 that I created manu
[Martin Batermann]
> Just some clarification please: When recreating /dev/scd1, should I
> first delete the /dev/scd1 that I created manually and should I type
> MAKEDEV scd or MAKEDEV scd1?
I'd delete 'em first but I really don't think it matters:
cd /dev; rm scd*; MAKEDEV scd
Peter
signat
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because I had symlinks all over the place, I tried to
> tidy it up a
> > bit and ended up deleting /dev/scd1. Not knowing how
> to get
> > /dev/scd1 back, I renamed /dev/scd16 to /dev/scd1. Now
> I cannot
> > mount my dvd-writer.
>
> Right - to
[Martin Batermann]
> Before I emulated scsi, I referred to it as /cdrom and it worked
> fine. However, when I changed to the scsi emulation I couldn't get
> /usr/sbin/base-config to work. Every time I try to install a
> package, it wants me to insert my debian cd in /cdrom wh
I'm running Woody (2.4.22) and have two cd-roms. The first
(/dev/scd0 mounted at /scsi) is a genuine scsi drive and I
have no problems with it. The second is an IDE dvd-writer.
I enabled scsi emulation and put an entry for it in my
fstab as /dev/scd1, mounted at /dvd.
Before I emulated
Le 05 février à 20:16, j smith a écrit:
> i have Debian 3.0 and CD-Writer, so i have to use scsi
> emulation. i compile the kernel and cdrecord works,
> but with scsi emulation i can't use CD-Writer to read
> CD. i enter the command:
>
> mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
>
> i
On Thursday 05 February 2004 11:16 pm, j smith wrote:
> i have Debian 3.0 and CD-Writer, so i have to use scsi
> emulation. i compile the kernel and cdrecord works,
> but with scsi emulation i can't use CD-Writer to read
> CD. i enter the command:
>
> mount /dev/scd0 /cdro
i have Debian 3.0 and CD-Writer, so i have to use scsi
emulation. i compile the kernel and cdrecord works,
but with scsi emulation i can't use CD-Writer to read
CD. i enter the command:
mount /dev/scd0 /cdrom
it complains that /dev/scd0 is not valid device.
Please
Gregory K. Johnson a écrit :
I got an error much like this a few days ago while updating my kernel.
I stayed up late looking into and found:
* It's a known bug, #213663.[1]
* The changelog for the upstream 2.4.23-rc2 kernel release says:
"Fix ide-scsi initialization lockup (kudos to Alan)
lly hit Reply instead of
Followup. Here it is for the list in case anyone else is interested:
marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Question #1 : is it true we have to use scsi emulation in order to
> burn CDs with a IDE cd burner ?)
Yup---to use cdrecord, that is.
> kernel: scsi :
Lucas Bergman a écrit :
This could be a bug in your drive or in the ide-scsi kernel module.
If no one else chimes in with clever ideas, then this may be a
question for the Linux (kernel) hackers. [Ominous music begins
playing in the background.]
Thanks for answering.
I've got an email saying
marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
Hi.
> (Question #1 : is it true we have to use scsi emulation in order to
> burn CDs with a IDE cd burner ?)
Not exactly. However, it is true that the most popular free software
CD recording application -- cdrecord -- works only w
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 16:31, marcos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm having big troubles when I try to use my ide CD burner with scsi
> emulation.
>
> (Question #1 : is it true we have to use scsi emulation in order to burn
> CDs with a IDE cd burner ?)
>
> The problem
Hello
I'm having big troubles when I try to use my ide CD burner with scsi
emulation.
(Question #1 : is it true we have to use scsi emulation in order to burn
CDs with a IDE cd burner ?)
The problems begin when the system tries to load the ide-scsi module
(when I manually load it
Derek Chew En-Hock wrote:
> ...
> 1) Add SCSI Emulation support by running 'modconf' and selecting the
> 'ide-scsi' module
> 2) Add 'append="hdc=ide-scsi"' to the correct kernel image section
> under the Kernel Command line options in lilo.co
Hello Otto,
I don't know how much this will help, but these are the exact steps I
used to get my IDE CDRW working in debian... maybe you can run down
these step again and see whether you missed anything?
1) Add SCSI Emulation support by running 'modconf' and selecting the
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 21:16, Alvin Oga wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Otto Wyss wrote:
>
> > I knew I could read and write CD's on my system but I lost it during my
> > upgrades about a year ago. I remember when I switched the system I
> > couldn't write CD and I had documented the "hdd=ide-scsi". B
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Otto Wyss wrote:
> I knew I could read and write CD's on my system but I lost it during my
> upgrades about a year ago. I remember when I switched the system I
> couldn't write CD and I had documented the "hdd=ide-scsi". But after
> changeing lilo.conf I can't read CD's anymo
ms in your kernel (or as module ide-scsi
> and cdrom - the name may be different, I'm using 2.6 kernels and they
> don't need scsi emulation).
I haven't perfected the art of juggling ide-scsi and cdrom myself, but
having them both as modules saves you having to reboot. I hav
". But after
> changeing lilo.conf I can't read CD's anymore. So I looked into the
> CD-Writing-Howto but it didn't help.
You have to support for scsi cdroms in your kernel (or as module ide-scsi
and cdrom - the name may be different, I'm using 2.6 kernels and th
I knew I could read and write CD's on my system but I lost it during my
upgrades about a year ago. I remember when I switched the system I
couldn't write CD and I had documented the "hdd=ide-scsi". But after
changeing lilo.conf I can't read CD's anymore. So I looked into the
CD-Writing-Howto but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-23 21:33]:
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 12:54 pm, Garrett Patrick McLean wrote:
> > i'm running kernel 2.4.22 as well. i read somewhere that it could
> > also be because i'm using the latest gcc in sid to compile my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 12:54 pm, Garrett Patrick McLean wrote:
> i'm running kernel 2.4.22 as well. i read somewhere that it could
> also be because i'm using the latest gcc in sid to compile my kernel,
> but that was a forum on test releases of
> TR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 20:52]:
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
> Garrett Patrick McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > if anybody has any clue or ANY suggestion i haven't tried yet i'd
> > gladly take itleft my computer off over night to be sure it wasn't
> > over
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:30:56 -0700
"Garrett P. McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how's about cdrdao? i'd like to not have gaps between tracks on my
> audio cds...
I believe that cdrdao uses cdrecord in the background, not sure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
how's about cdrdao? i'd like to not have gaps between tracks on my audio
cds...
thanks
-garrett
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:48:34PM -0400, TR wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
> Garrett Patrick McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > if anybody has any clue or ANY suggestion i h
ase) compiler.
If I compile this version of kernel my old version gcc compiler (2.95.4-0.010424) scsi
emulation
work well.
Why this happen? And how can I do support scsi in this case?
Thnx.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my kernel.
> Garrett P. McLean wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>
>>i've been trying to get scsi emulation working. i've compiled and
>> installed my own custom kernel the debian way and i enabled the
>>following as modules: ide-cd, scsi_mod, sr_mod, sg, and ide-scsi.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Garrett Patrick McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if anybody has any clue or ANY suggestion i haven't tried yet i'd
> gladly take itleft my computer off over night to be sure it wasn't
> overheating...still no luck. i've also tried unloading the ide-c
Garrett P. McLean wrote:
hi,
i've been trying to get scsi emulation working. i've compiled and
installed my own custom kernel the debian way and i enabled the
following as modules: ide-cd, scsi_mod, sr_mod, sg, and ide-scsi. i've
also added a file called ide-cd to /etc/mo
> hi,
>
> i've been trying to get scsi emulation working. i've compiled and
> installed my own custom kernel the debian way and i enabled the
> following as modules: ide-cd, scsi_mod, sr_mod, sg, and ide-scsi. i've
> also added a file called ide-cd to /etc/modutils
hi,
i've been trying to get scsi emulation working. i've compiled and
installed my own custom kernel the debian way and i enabled the
following as modules: ide-cd, scsi_mod, sr_mod, sg, and ide-scsi. i've
also added a file called ide-cd to /etc/modutils with the following in
i
Hi,
I 'm running Debian Woody and I have ide cd writer LiteOn 40x24x10. For
burning I use scsi emulation. All modules like ide-cd, ide-scsi, ... are
compiled as modules.
But copying from cd to the hdd is very slow, approx 2.5MB/s and
processor usage is 100%(like PIO??). I tried to use hdpa
Am Dienstag, 27. Mai 2003 20:37 schrieb Joel Konkle-Parker:
> Somewhere during the process of installing Woody and updating to
> kernel-image- 2.4.18-686, my Zip drive came under the control of ide-scsi.
> I can't think of any good reason to have scsi emulation for my Zip drive,
>
Somewhere during the process of installing Woody and updating to kernel-image-
2.4.18-686, my Zip drive came under the control of ide-scsi. I can't think of
any good reason to have scsi emulation for my Zip drive, so how do I turn it
off? I want my two cd-rom drives as scsi, so I can&#
Bob Hilliard wrote:
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Can anybody provide a howto on scsi emulation in
Debian ? I'm using a 2.2.20 kernel and I hope I don't
have to compile a hole new kernel for this scsi
emulation;
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/CD-Writing-HOWTO.gz deals
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anybody provide a howto on scsi emulation in
> Debian ? I'm using a 2.2.20 kernel and I hope I don't
> have to compile a hole new kernel for this scsi
> emulation;
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/CD-Writing-HOWTO.gz deals
have it yet.
I did a search on "scsi emulation" but I got limited
results - one of the best is
http://www.apexdesignsllc.com/linux_6.htm but it is
SUSE specific and the line in /etc/modules.conf
"alias scsi_hostadapter off " isn't there
Can anybody provide a howto on scsi em
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
