Paul E Condon wrote:
I'm having malfunction of X-windows is Sarge while running XFree.
I suspect that my hardware (video care) is intermittently bad.
I have several old cards that I would like to try to see if
the intermittent problem will go away, *but*
I can't discover how to make Debian go
Jay Oliveri wrote:
> Eddy wrote:
>> Hendrik Boom a écrit :
>>> InputDevice"Configured Mouse"
>>>InputDevice"Generic Mouse"
>>
>> By the way, I see that you have two InputDevices for probably only one
>> mouse. I wonder why that is. In fact I had just the same and it didn't
>> bot
Hello
Eddy (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Hendrik Boom a écrit :
>
>> InputDevice"Configured Mouse"
>>InputDevice"Generic Mouse"
>
> By the way, I see that you have two InputDevices for probably only one
> mouse. I wonder why that is.
Default Debian configuration: one entry for
Eddy wrote:
> Hendrik Boom a écrit :
>> InputDevice"Configured Mouse"
>>InputDevice"Generic Mouse"
>
> By the way, I see that you have two InputDevices for probably only one
> mouse. I wonder why that is. In fact I had just the same and it didn't
> bother me too much until I reali
Hendrik Boom a écrit :
> Sudden trouble with X. I don't know what I might have done, but is
> was all
> working yesterday. I did try to configure ALSA (without any apparent
> success)
> but that shouldn't have messed up X, should it? I looks as if it can
> no longer open /dev/psaux, and it refu
Hello
Hendrik Boom (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Sudden trouble with X. I don't know what I might have done, but is
> was all working yesterday. I did try to configure ALSA (without any
> apparent success) but that shouldn't have messed up X, should it? I
> looks as if it can no longer open
Hello!
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Nicolaus Kedegren wrote:
> Why in heavens name did Xfree86 change their license? Was it the
> previous license too restrictive? Sponsors needed/wanted the ability to
> incorporate proprietary code?
> Waste of BW probably, but does anybody know?
In
* Anders Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-09 12:20] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> | On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:39AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> |>On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> |>
> |>>The d-i team is h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Nelson wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:39AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
|>On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
|>
|>>The d-i team is having nightmares right now because packages they depend
|>>on keep changing.
|>
|
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:39AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > The d-i team is having nightmares right now because packages they depend
> > on keep changing.
>
> What ever happened to the idea of a "freeze"?
I seem to recall
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> The d-i team is having nightmares right now because packages they depend
> on keep changing.
What ever happened to the idea of a "freeze"?
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 05:02:09 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more platforms than
ever before, m
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:04:31PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
> >>Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 05:02:09 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris Metzler wrote:
>>On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
>>John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more platforms than
>>>ever before, more packages than ev
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Mark my words, Sarge+1 will not take 3 or 4 years to release. 1 to 1.5
years is my estimate. 2 years, tops.
How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Mark my words, Sarge+1 will not take 3 or 4 years to release. 1 to 1.5
>> years is my estimate. 2 years, tops.
>
>
> How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more platforms than
> e
Brian Nelson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than Debian will with
Sarge when it's released, and Sarge++ is probably three or four years
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
> Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than Debian will with
> Sarge when it's released, and Sarge++ is probably three or four years away.
Mark my
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
> Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than Debian will with
> Sarge when it's released, and Sarge++ is probably three or four years away.
Actually,
Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:50AM -0500, Nathan Kroll wrote:
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make
Nathan Kroll wrote:
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make xorg the new default x server?
I'm just wondering because it seems odd t
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:50AM -0500, Nathan Kroll wrote:
> I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
> XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
> converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
> make xorg the new d
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:12, Nathan Kroll wrote:
> I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
> XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
> converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
> make xorg the new default x server?
>
>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:15:35PM +0200, kevin thackray wrote:
> not load font
> -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,-*-*-medium-r-*-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-*-*.
> Trying fixed.
> /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/WPrefs.app/WPrefs warning: could
> not load font
> -*-helvetica-medium-r-n
It may be a WMaker problem
Install wmakerconf (apt-get install wmakerconf).
launch it and go to Appearance Tab, you can choose the font for each
component.
Aurel.
kevin thackray wrote:
I was using previewsly a slackware so i am not very handy with debian
scripts (which i find it quit powerfull
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Great news! 4.4 version is out.
>
> http://www.xfree.org/#newrel
>
> Finally my card is there (ati radeon 9800)
Look for the Xfree86 license problem in lwn.net before you get too happy.
Until that mess is sorted out one way or another, you will fi
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:40:13 +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
> debian-installer (12-01-04, FWIW, and it *rocks*!), but can't seem to
> get X to come up at all.
My usual approaches in such cases:
1. (as proposed by another pos
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 12:34:27AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Doing a bit of advocay, I've managed to convince a friend to try Debian
> on his newly put-together PC for a bit, while he saves up the £165 WinXP
> tax.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 12:34:27AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> I'll happily post any config files here, but (off the top of my head)
> the problem is that X bombs after a couple of seconds with "no screens
> found". He's got a NVidia FX mumble in there.
I know that some nvidia cards will
Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Doing a bit of advocay, I've managed to convince a friend to try Debian
on his newly put-together PC for a bit, while he saves up the £165 WinXP
tax.
Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
debian-installer (12-01-04, FWIW, and it *rocks*!), b
Have you tried Knoppix or something like that to see if that works graphically? If
so, you can take the X config stuff from there
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, January 18, 2004 11:34 am
Subject: Xfree setup: does AGP require anything spec
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 19:19, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 17:57, GCS wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this alre
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 17:57, GCS wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this already be
known?
Yup, you are right. Anyway, they did break it last time: I had a h
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 17:57, GCS wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this already be
> > known?
> Yup, you are right. Anyway, they did break it last time: I had a hard
> session on up
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this already be
> known?
Yup, you are right. Anyway, they did break it last time: I had a hard
session on upgrading 4.3.0pre4 to pre5 without apt would remove
Colin Watson wrote:
I heard from someone that the reason 4.2 is still in unstable is
because they don't want 4.3 filtering into testing before sarge is
released. That true?
I think that's a misrepresentation, at least at the moment. They don't
want it filtering into testing before it *works* on a
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:37:46PM +1100, Jon wrote:
> And further, will 4.4 be out by then? If so, what happens to the work
> that's gone into packaging 4.3, ie. the stuff in experimental? Will
> they just skip that and start packaging 4.4?
You could, of course, answer questions like this by look
> what's holding up x 4.3 from going into sid?
> Is it going to be a long time?
I'd also like to know this. Why is it that the Debian 'X Strike Force' can't
get 4.3 into unstable? Note that 4.3 was released on the 27th of February
2003.
Let's have a bet. Who thinks this 'strike force' can get 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:03:22PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> Should I just do it manually? Is it going to be a long time?
No. Go pull it from experimental.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:22:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >
> Hi Nano Nano (are you from Mork's planet?),
> I'm using 4.3 from experminatal. Are you aware that 'expermintal' is not
> a complete distro like stable/testing/unstable. So you only get the
> package you need and when you update, you
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:03:22PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> what's holding up x 4.3 from going into sid?
>
> There's some xv-enhancements for my old C&T chip I need.
> I did it manually once. I don't feel like messing with experimental.
>
Hi Nano Nano (are you from Mork's planet?),
I'm using 4.
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 17:01:38 -0700 Terry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XFree cannot start. When I select the option to start the program to
make adjustments, the monitor flashes from black to a small window
with the monitor's settings and the message "out of range".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hello
James Hosken (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I've just installed woody for the first time and I can't get X to run.
> It was surgested that I upgrade to xfree V4.2.1-6 from
> http://people.fsn.hu/~pasztor/debian
> I did that and still it will not run.
>
> I've tried running
> dpkg-recomfigu
Louie Miranda declaimed:
> btw, Matrox G450 is working under 4.1.0-16 (xfree-86 - stable package from
> debian)
> Its working on my machine now.. :D hehe.
You've probably figured this out by now, but just to state a couple of
points explicitly:
The HorizSync and VertRefresh ranges are Monitor cha
D]>
Cc: "Debian-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: xfree, matrox millennium G450 problem..
> Hi, based on the xfree.org website, (btw, my xfree86 version is 4.1.0-16)
> so.. on the
> website of xfree, G450 is already supported usin
roulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: xfree, matrox millennium G450 problem..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Louie Miranda wrote:
> (EE) MGA: Failed to load module "mga_hal" (module does not exist, 0)
> (II) MGA(0): Matrox HAL module not found - using builtin mode setup instead
This is not a complete answer. Just another data point.
That is the Hardware Abstraction Layer and is part of the matrox
drive
it w/ me what did you put on ur BusID, etc?
I'm looking for it at matrox website, but could not find it.
--- -
Thanks,
Louie Miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Louie Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednes
ks i'll try it now. Email you guys again,
wait..
What's type is your maxtrox card?
--- -
Thanks,
Louie Miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: xf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 06:06 pm, Louie Miranda wrote:
> Anyone, had similar problems on a matrox G450 (Dual head) Videocard
> on a ibm intellistation?
>
> I think, i entered the values correctly V=120 & H=130 DAC: 360MHz,
> etc.
>
> I also choose on
LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
L> There is a section named Modules in the XF86Config-4 file. Has
L> somebody a howto, or doc page where is some explanation about
L> the modules? For example "dbe" "ddc" "vbe" "dri" "extmod"
L> "glx" "pex5" "record" "xie" "xtrap" "speedo" "type1" "GLcore"
L> "bitm
LeVA wrote:
Hi!
I'm using 4.1.0 xfree, and a m$ intellimouse explorer 3.0a usb mouse.
The mouse has 5 buttons. I want to use all of the 5 buttons, and the
scrolling wheel too, which also has button numbers, what I must assign
to the 'ZAxisMapping' option in the XF86Config file.
Here is my conf
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:04:37PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> I'm using 4.1.0 xfree, and a m$ intellimouse explorer 3.0a usb mouse.
> The mouse has 5 buttons. I want to use all of the 5 buttons, and the
> scrolling wheel too, which also has button numbers, what I must assign
> to the 'ZAxisMapping' opt
Quoting Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> > Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or
> > > posterior to 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I
> > > can find
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or posterior to
> > 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I can find it even before ?
>
> I tried to have a look in incoming
Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or posterior to
> 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I can find it even before ?
I tried to have a look in incoming.debian.org but XFree was not there. Is it
reasonnable to install the binar
[Please don't top post.]
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 06:12:20PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're Xfree86 config file is all wrong. You're trying to use the fbdev
> driver (and it looks like you don't even have the framebuffer enabled in
> your kernel so that will not work). If you do
Hi,
You're Xfree86 config file is all wrong. You're trying to use the fbdev
driver (and it looks like you don't even have the framebuffer enabled in
your kernel so that will not work). If you don't want 3d acceleration,
just use the 'nv' driver instead of 'fbdev' (and then change your
resolution
Hi Yall & Russell,
I went to the DRI project & added that to my apt list, grabed &
installed them & have not looked back.
Give it a try man!
*BFN*
Greek Geek :-)
Support your local Search and Rescue unit -- get lost!
Russell Neches wrote:
Interesting. I'm able to start XFree86 this way,
I use sid and just apt-get dist-upgrade to Xfree 4.2.x My card is a
Quadro2 MXR, when using the older version of XFree 4.x , it randomly
crashes when switching screen. This problem hasn't happened eversince I
get 4.2.x ... it has been solid for me.
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:01:02 -0400
"Justin
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:03:12AM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:28:11PM -0500, Nick Traxler wrote:
> > Just one thing--back up /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 before you install 4.2.
> > I've apt-gotten 2 revisions from unstable, and it overwrote my
> > XF86Config both times. Pretty an
>I see that XFree 4.2.1 has made it into unstable a few weeks ago. I
> am curious, has anyone tried to install it? How has that gone? Would you
> say it's better to install from the unstable .debs or manually using the
> XFree installer?
Don't if it was the specific problem, but I had random,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:28:11PM -0500, Nick Traxler wrote:
> Just one thing--back up /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 before you install 4.2.
> I've apt-gotten 2 revisions from unstable, and it overwrote my
> XF86Config both times. Pretty annoying.
You once told debconf to manage your XF86Config-4. Run
`
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:56:12PM +0200, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
> Me.I'm using it for some time and it's great.
> The installation from .debs went very smoothly. I recommend using .debs
> because of upgrades of packages.
Was there a huge list of dependencies that do not match stable tha
Just one thing--back up /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 before you install 4.2.
I've apt-gotten 2 revisions from unstable, and it overwrote my
XF86Config both times. Pretty annoying.
--
Nick
This one time, at band camp, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka said:
> Me.I'm using it for some time and it's great.
> The insta
Me.I'm using it for some time and it's great.
The installation from .debs went very smoothly. I recommend using .debs
because of upgrades of packages.
Vlada
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 18:01, Justin F. Knotzke wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I see that XFree 4.2.1 has made it into unstable a few weeks ago.
%% Charles Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cb> I have been told that my laptop won't do graphics without version
cb> 4.2 of xfree. I tried downloading some files in a directory
cb> "branden" with names like xfreecommonv14.2.deb and also a
cb> v24.2.deb.
??? No idea what those are.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:17, Charles Blair wrote:
>I have been told that my laptop won't do graphics without
> version 4.2 of xfree. I tried downloading some files in a
> directory "branden" with names like xfreecommonv14.2.deb and
> also a v24.2.d
My thanks to François, Robert, Balazs and the others who have written. I have
gotten the Xserver working, and now I just need to complete the monitor
configurations. Hopefully I won't need any more assistance.
Chuck Percy
n7fz-at-arrl-dot-net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
I have also the same card and it works with the downloaded drivers.
Try checking the refresh rate section of your XFree config.
One problem I fequently had is that the debconfig script asks you
for the frequency range your monitor supports, and if I put in
the _maximum_ frequency it supports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I am planning to run dual-head when I get this working. I _don't_ want to
>> use a distro other than Debian, although I may be forced to, if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
> HELP!! This newbie is having major problems getting XFree86 to run.
>
> The problem: my video card is the Matrox G550, and Debian 3.0
> installs XFree86 version 4.1.0.1, which does not support it. And every driver I've
> tried, including the generic VGA, gives
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am planning to run dual-head when I get this working. I _don't_ want to
> use a distro other than Debian, although I may be forced to, if I can't
> solve this.
>
I have a G450 which I use in dual head mode. Once the card is wo
Le mer 04/09/2002 à 19:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> HELP!! This newbie is having major problems getting XFree86 to run.
Hi.
> The problem: my video card is the Matrox G550, and Debian 3.0
> installs XFree86 version 4.1.0.1, which does not support it. And every driver I've
> tried, inclu
Matthias Ellinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 after reinstalling the Nvidia kernel & glx
> solved it, X starts!
>
> However, now my USB Wheelmouse has stopped working under X (hotplug USB). ...
>
> How can I fix that?
>
> Thanks,
Depends on if you're running gpm or not.
Hi,
I found out that I forgot to enable full USB HID support before compiling the
kernel - so of course my USB mouse wouldn't work. Fixed it, and everything's
fine now, with my first self-compiled kernel working just fine!
Thanks for all the help!
all the best,
--
Matthias Ellinger
[EMAIL PR
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 02:59, Matthias Ellinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 after reinstalling the Nvidia kernel & glx
> solved it, X starts!
>
> However, now my USB Wheelmouse has stopped working under X (hotplug USB). ...
>
> How can I fix that?
Have a look at your rece
Hi,
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 after reinstalling the Nvidia kernel & glx
solved it, X starts!
However, now my USB Wheelmouse has stopped working under X (hotplug USB). ...
How can I fix that?
Thanks,
--
Matthias Ellinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP key at:
http://www.bernardel.de
Key finge
Matthias Ellinger wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>I tried updating my Woody box to the 2.4.19 kernel using the kernel.org
>tar.bz2 and make-kpkg
>
>Everyting seems to have worked well, except that X won't start anymore. I use
>4.01 with the NVidia.com kernel (apt-get).
>
>XFree86.0.log tells me that scree
On Saturday 31 August 2002 15:16, Matthias Ellinger wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I tried updating my Woody box to the 2.4.19 kernel using the kernel.org
> tar.bz2 and make-kpkg
>
> Everyting seems to have worked well, except that X won't start anymore. I
> use 4.01 with the NVidia.com kernel (apt-get).
Thanks ;-)
François
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:09:50 +0200 (MEST), Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Hello,
| >
| > I was retreiving XFree4.2 packages from
| >
| > http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x/.
| >
| > But the server seems to
> Hello,
>
> I was retreiving XFree4.2 packages from
>
> http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x/.
>
> But the server seems to be down
>
> Is there any official place for thoses packages ?
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> François
>
Just read DWN..
dont use my xlibs
see what I wrote months ago
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2002/debian-x-200204/msg00054.html
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> So... Being one of those who has an unsupported video card in wody I
> somewhat boldly installed the unofficial debs from:
>
> deb
Ah, forgot to mention:
> 5 On the main system, startup xfs (apt-get install xfs, remove
> the `no-listen = tcp' line in /etc/X11/fs/config),
> and install xdm and activate it
> (easiest way is to add a "*" line in /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess),
> and maybe remove those pesky `no tcp' lines from
I'll try it, thanks a lot ;-)
François
On 04 Jun 2002 09:42:15 -0700
Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Here are unofficial debs.
|
| deb http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x ./
|
| beware of Locale issues. see:
|
|
http://www.debianhelp.org/modules.php?op=
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Quenten Griffith wrote:
> I SENT YOU AN EMAIL ON HOW TO UNSUB. please stop spamming this email box.
I realise I'm contributing to the problem, but could people please stop
replying to this guy on the list? It's just making matters worse.
Oh, and prover, mailbombing the list
ILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
THANK YOU.
- Original Message -
From: "Nicos Gollan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Xfree 4.2.0 and KDM
On Thursday 30 May 2002 20:30, Stephen J. Thompson
From: "Jeff Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Francois Chenais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: XFree 4.2
> Here are unofficial debs.
>
> deb http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x ./
>
> beware of Locale is
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED] IS ONLY FORWARD FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
THANK YOU.
- Original Message -
From: "Fr
From: "Nicos Gollan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Xfree 4.2.0 and KDM
> On Thursday 30 May 2002 20:30, Stephen J. Thompson ""(CaSS) wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have just insta
Here are unofficial debs.
deb http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x ./
beware of Locale issues. see:
http://www.debianhelp.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=2111&mode=flat&order=0&thold=0
good luck, and please let me know of your success,
-jeff
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 05:
On Thursday 30 May 2002 20:30, Stephen J. Thompson ""(CaSS) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have just installed XFree 4.2.0 on two machines and found KDM has
> stopped working. Has anyone else encountered this problem. Does
> anyone have any pointers on how to solve it?
I can only tell you that it works
d.
Regards,
Jose Manuel
-Mensaje original-
De: Stephen J. Thompson (CaSS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: sábado, 01 de junio de 2002 0:22
Para: debian-user
Asunto: RE: Xfree 4.2.0 and KDM
What is the best way to downgrade? Is it to remove all X components and
reinstall? or
What is the best way to downgrade? Is it to remove all X components and
reinstall? or is there an automatic way?
Thanks.
Regards,
Stephen.
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 08:12, José Manuel Pérez wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've got that problem too. OpenOffice and Acroread stop working as well.
> Finally I've do
Hi.
I've got that problem too. OpenOffice and Acroread stop working as well.
Finally I've downgrade to XFree 4.1 again.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Thompson (CaSS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: jueves 30 de mayo de 2002 20:30
To: debian-user
Subject: Xfree 4.2.0 and KDM
Hello
We just set up 6 new Dell's with the following ATI card (output from lspci)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro TF
XFree86 4.1 also fails to work with this card, but as I researched it on
the web, I was sure that I read XFree86 logs for 4.1 which listed the
ca
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 05:35, Tom Cook wrote:
> > 3) how do I delete the self-installed version and not hurt the debianized
> > one?
>
> I wouldn't worry.
>
Use cruft (apt-get install cruft) to find out which files don't belong
on your system...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
This is purely how *I* would do it, there is sure to be a Better Way
(TM).
On 0, Jeff Maxson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Awhile back I purchased a video card that was only supported by version
> 4.1 of Xfree86. At the time, woody didn't have it in it's repertoire, so
> I install
Sorry, there's no 4.2 right now. Branden hasn't even put it into
unstable yet cuz it would mess up woody's stabilization process. If I
were you I'd wait for woody to official come out (hopefully soon) and
then see if XFree 4.1 works.
Brandt Dusthimer
(BTW, if your card absolutely needs XFre
What kind of keyboards are you guys using?
Are they USB keyboards?
On Sun Apr 28, 2002 at 10:51:04PM +1000, mobtek mobtekl wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:22:47 +0200
> Bart Matthaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> banged a keyboard:
>
> I'm using XFree86 4.2.0 on sid and I get the exact same thing, does you
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
