On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:39:12 -0500
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:24:35 -0500
> Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:49:30 +0200
> > Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:24:35 -0500
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:49:30 +0200
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > >
> > > Stra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:49:30 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> > Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying
> > Sylpheed started to segfault e
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> Strange problem. In the middle of reading the list and replying Sylpheed
> started to segfault everytime I sent out mail. I have it setup to put a
> copy into the "sent" folder so each time it tried it crashed.
>
> Any ideas ?
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:01:09 +0200
Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:07:21 -0400
> Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:26:41 +0200
> > Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wro
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:07:21 -0400
Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:26:41 +0200
> Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wrote:
> > > I'm using thread view (...) and sorting by date.
> > > When I delete a message, Syl
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:26:41 +0200
Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wrote:
> > I'm using thread view (...) and sorting by date.
> > When I delete a message, Sylpheed jumps to the next message by date,
> > not to what I want, the next message i
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:50 -0400 Celejar wrote:
> I'm using thread view (...) and sorting by date.
> When I delete a message, Sylpheed jumps to the next message by date,
> not to what I want, the next message in the current thread.
> Is there any way to change this?
Yes, sorting should be switch
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:15:29 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:20:47 GMT, s. wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT "s. keeling"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:28:34 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WMII is a dynamic windowmanager that defaults to a "tiled" setup. Each
> window occupies a set area of the screen which is adjusted depending
> on how many windows you open. The windows don't overlap, they are la
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:35:23 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > does it behave well in a tiled WM?
> > >
> > > A
> >
> > I don't know what you mean. I use IceWM and have no issues whatsoever.
>
> Well, now I'm repeating myself, but I've fallen in love with WMII
Sorry
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:05:35PM -0700, Michael M. wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >
> >Well, now I'm repeating myself, but I've fallen in love with WMII
> >lately and it dynamically sizes windows based on how many windows are
> >open. The problem is some apps are slightly broken vis
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Well, now I'm repeating myself, but I've fallen in love with WMII
lately and it dynamically sizes windows based on how many windows are
open. The problem is some apps are slightly broken vis a vis some of
the protocols, or they do lots of window rezising and respawn
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:04:41PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > WMII is a dynamic windowmanager that defaults to a "tiled" setup. Each
> > window occupies a set area of the screen which is adjusted depending
> > on how many windows you open. The windows don't overlap,
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> WMII is a dynamic windowmanager that defaults to a "tiled" setup. Each
> window occupies a set area of the screen which is adjusted depending
> on how many windows you open. The windows don't overlap, they are laid
> out on the screen like tiles would be on a floor.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:14:49AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable and it
> > has never crashed on me. The only strange thing I'm noticing is
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:34:31AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstabl
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 21:22 +0200, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:34:31 -0700 Rodney D. Myers wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:34:31 -0700 Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable
> > > a
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable and it
> > has never crashed on me. The only strange thing I'm noticing is
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable and it
> has never crashed on me. The only strange thing I'm noticing is that
> sometimes mail I just read is marked as unread again, probably because
> at a shutdown
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:05:54 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:57:35AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > > > 2 separate programs now.
> > >
> > > Ah, ok. What's the benefit of -claws, or the difference?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:57:35AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > > 2 separate programs now.
> >
> > Ah, ok. What's the benefit of -claws, or the difference?
> >
> > --
> > -
> > Ron Johnson, Jr.
> > Jefferson, LA USA
> >
>
>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:46:28 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 06:40 -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:22:18 -0500
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:48 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > On Mon
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 06:40 -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:22:18 -0500
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:48 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:56:44 -0400
> > > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:22:18 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:48 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:56:44 -0400
> > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Frank. I finally made the move and am happy with the chan
Roy Pluschke wrote:
>
> Sylpheed doen't have spell checking -- use sylpheed-claws instead they call it
> a bleeding edge version but I have always found it stable enough for day to
> day use.
>
> Hope this helps
> R. Pluschke
Thanks Roy, that will do fine. I never looked in woody thinking a 'b
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:11:28 +0800
Russ Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been through both the FAQ and the sylpheed-doc manual and can't
> even find a mention of spellchecking anywhere.
While not an ideally simple solution, you can probably define an Action
to run the message through the
On August 21, 2003 10:11 pm, Russ Pitman wrote:
> I tried for several times to sub to the sylpheed mail list to ask this but
> no go so far, probably my error, however perhaps someone using sylpheed can
> help.
>
> Briefly I installed a debian woody system for a elderly friend to use as a
> browser
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:14:41 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > it's looking for a file called gtk-config, which appears NOT to be
> > installed;
>
> You will also need libgtk1.2-dev.
Yep. After I tinkered with alot of things using "apt-get install"
Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> it's looking for a file called gtk-config, which appears NOT to be
> installed;
You will also need libgtk1.2-dev.
--
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philosophy, when superficially studied, excites doubt; when thoroughly
explored, it dispels it. - Francis Bacon
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:28:12 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:32:27PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
> > Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > > > In attempting to ./configure ,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:32:27PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
> Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > > latest glibc;
> > > checking for GLIB - versi
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > latest glibc;
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
>
> glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of t
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > latest glibc;
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
>
> glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of t
Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> latest glibc;
> checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of the GNU C Library,
packaged as libc6. glib is a library used by GTK and Gnome apps. You
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:27:25 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I see merit in simply saying that binary packages
> cannot be automatically removed to allow for an upgrade of a doc
> package. I dislike the idea of having different rules for doc
> packages.
To the extent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I understand that apt doesn't know anything about packages other than
> what it't told about dependencies and conflicts.
>
> Let's get to the big picture -- is the doc there to support the use of
> the binary, or is the binary there to support the use of the doc?
The d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that apt doesn't know anything about packages other than
what it't told about dependencies and conflicts.
Let's get to the big picture -- is the doc there to support the use of
the binary, or is the binary there to support the use of the doc?
If we can agree th
I understand that apt doesn't know anything about packages other than
what it't told about dependencies and conflicts.
Let's get to the big picture -- is the doc there to support the use of
the binary, or is the binary there to support the use of the doc?
If we can agree that the binary is primar
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:57:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:21:34 +
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure; not one that filing's going to particularly help, though ...
>
> If you're saying the maintainer will ignore it, I guess that's possible.
No,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm saying there are probably several ways to resolve this, but throwing
> out a binary (without an available upgrade) because the doc package for
> a later release is available is not one of them.
Well, the normal apt behavior when you request to install a particular
p
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:31:46 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you objecting to the idea that a doc package and a binary package
> can conflict simply because the documentation is for a different
> version of the program? Or are you suggesting that apt should simply
> refuse to
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:21:34 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure; not one that filing's going to particularly help, though ...
If you're saying the maintainer will ignore it, I guess that's possible.
But if the maintainer is in the habit of specifying dependencies this
way, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It may resolve itself when sylpheed moves into testing, but it's still a
> bug.
>
> Installing a doc package shouldn't cause removal of a binary package,
> even if the binary package an older version.
Does Debian policy say anything about this? If not, then the maintai
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 04:56:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:30:44 -0800
> Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > version of sylpheed itself. Unstable has a newer sylpheed that is
> > compatible with sylpheed-doc, but it hasn't been moved into testing
> > yet. T
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:30:44 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> version of sylpheed itself. Unstable has a newer sylpheed that is
> compatible with sylpheed-doc, but it hasn't been moved into testing
> yet. That's what's causing your problem.
>
> There is no need to file a bug about
Randall Hansen wrote:
> I'm trying to install the sylpheed-doc package, but it conflicts with
> the slypheed package (see below). This strikes me as odd, but I don't
> know enough about debs to debug it.
>
> I installed the doc package, copied the files, then installed Sylpheed
> again (which rem
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 02:00:50 + Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 01:39:33AM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > Found my old bugreport, its #132405 (from Feb the 5th) and its
> > status is"Forwarded to upstream software authors". This implies that
> > the persons responsible for bugs aga
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 01:39:33AM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> Found my old bugreport, its #132405 (from Feb the 5th) and its status is
> "Forwarded to upstream software authors". This implies that the persons
> responsible for bugs against lists.debian.org decided it was a Sylpheed
> bug, not a p
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:26:46 + Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:09:35PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:34:31AM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > > I reported this bug almost a year ago (can't find it in the BTS
> > > though), and got an answer from up
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 23:16:27 +
Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Concerning the issue of Sylpheed not showing debian-user-digest
> messages in their entirety, in some cases...
>
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:23:31 + Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:26:46 + Colin Watso
Concerning the issue of Sylpheed not showing debian-user-digest messages
in their entirety, in some cases...
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:23:31 + Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:26:46 + Colin Watson wrote:
> > Somebody who knows the details should file a bug on lists.debian.org,
> >
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:26:46 + Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:09:35PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:34:31AM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > > I reported this bug almost a year ago (can't find it in the BTS
> > > though), and got an answer from up
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:09:35PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:34:31AM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > I reported this bug almost a year ago (can't find it in the BTS
> > though), and got an answer from upstream, through the Debian
> > maintainer, saying that Sylpheed
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:34:31AM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> I reported this bug almost a year ago (can't find it in the BTS
> though), and got an answer from upstream, through the Debian
> maintainer, saying that Sylpheed follows the relevant RFC's
> scrupulously and they *won't* change the co
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 03:34:31 +
Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:29:24 -0500 Marc Shapiro wrote:
> > Sometimes, when I receive mail-list digests, some of the message
> > will display, but not all of it.
> (...)
> > Obviously, using a more complex, and less likel
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:29:24 -0500 Marc Shapiro wrote:
> I have found another problem with Sylpheed that I do not think has
> been mentioned before:
>
> Sometimes, when I receive mail-list digests, some of the message will
> display, but not all of it.
(...)
> Obviously, using a more complex, and
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:06:50 -0500
Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:29:24 -0500
> Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have found another problem with Sylpheed that I do not think has
> > been mentioned before:
> >
> > Sometimes, when I receive mail-lis
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:29:24 -0500
Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found another problem with Sylpheed that I do not think has
> been mentioned before:
>
> Sometimes, when I receive mail-list digests, some of the message will
> display, but not all of it. I had tried Sylpheed lo
I have found another problem with Sylpheed that I do not think has been
mentioned before:
Sometimes, when I receive mail-list digests, some of the message will
display, but not all of it. I had tried Sylpheed long ago and had come
across this problem and written to the maintainer, then I forgot a
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> Did you right click on "Mailbox (MH)" folder and "rebuild folder tree" ?
No, but that does seem to fix it. I wonder why it keeps getting off in
its counts.
> >http://hank.org/images/sylpheed.png
> That image looks just like mine - it looks lik
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:12:41 -0800
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:31 AM 12/18/02 +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
>
> Sorry for taking so long to get back to this -- it's been one of those weeks.
>
> >On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
> >> That version of Sylpheed
At 08:31 AM 12/18/02 +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this -- it's been one of those weeks.
>On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
>> That version of Sylpheed doesn't seem to deal well with counting new
>> messages, and when I use the threaded vi
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
> That version of Sylpheed doesn't seem to deal well with counting new
> messages, and when I use the threaded view I seem to miss new
> messages. I need to figure out how to show messages in *received*
> order.
Must be a temporary breakage.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:50:04 -0300 Marcelo Chiapparini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am trying to give sylpheed a try in an Athlon machine which runs
> woody. I would like to hear about the experience of other users of
> this list. Actually I've installed sylpheed but since the installation
> I a
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:13:21 +0200
"Waldemar Gorus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using sylpheed since some month, and I like it. Can't remeber a real
> problem. And dont worry about the among of mails, you have in your
> mailbox.
>
I am using Sylpheed-claws, and even that is very st
Hi,
I'm using sylpheed since some month, and I like it. Can't remeber a real
problem. And dont worry about the among of mails, you have in your
mailbox.
Sylpheed works great and stable on my Athlon machine using the woody
distribution.
I just have about 12003 mails in my debian-user-group Folder
> "Sean" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Tatsuya> It seems ja_JP locale was not configured.
>>
Tatsuya> Select `ja_JP.EUC-JP EUC-JP' with `dpkg-reconfigure
Tatsuya> locales' as root. See also the file `/etc/locale.gen'.
>> Does this work for most
>
> Tatsuya> It seems ja_JP locale was not configured.
>
> Tatsuya> Select `ja_JP.EUC-JP EUC-JP' with `dpkg-reconfigure
> Tatsuya> locales' as root. See also the file `/etc/locale.gen'.
>
> Does this work for most programs in general?
>
> For example, Evolution doesn't display Japa
> "Tatsuya" == Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tatsuya> At Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:18:58 +0900,
Tatsuya> Artur Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> the LANGUAGE, LC_CTYPE and LC_ALL to ja_JP; it still doesn`t
>> work, but it does show the following warning message in
Thank you all for the info. Now Sylpheed is working properly. Thank you.
--
---
Artur Matos
ALife Core Lab (http://www2.create.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp)
Graduate School of Human Informatics | Nagoya University
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L
At Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:18:58 +0900,
Artur Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the LANGUAGE, LC_CTYPE and LC_ALL to ja_JP; it still doesn`t work,
> but it does show the following warning message in the prompt line:
> "Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library". I think I have
> all the relev
On 11-Jun-2002 Artur Matos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My sylpheed instalation is not showing japanese email properly,
> only garbled characters. All of the other X-Windows, non-GTK
> applications seems to be showing japanese correctly.
>
> I`ve tried to set the option "Display 2 byte alphabet and numeric
On Sun, 26 May 2002 15:20:25 +0100
Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 18:19:18 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > what's up with sylpheed-doc? or, in other words, where can i get it?
>
> have you tried apt-get install sylpheed-doc? That's how I installed
> it...
I'v
On Fri, 24 May 2002 18:19:18 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what's up with sylpheed-doc? or, in other words, where can i get it?
have you tried apt-get install sylpheed-doc? That's how I installed
it...
> (...)
> though i configured the line wrap at 72, it doesn't wrap by default.
> has anyon
On 10 May 2002 22:21:23 -0400
"Tomasz Kosinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know whether there exists a (rolodex, bbdb type) addressbook
> for integration with sylpheed? An address book which has fields for
> phone numbers, mailing addresses, etc, in addition to the e-mail address
> p
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:16:15 -0700
Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im using libranet, a debian derivative, and would love to be able to use
>the Sylpheed mail/news client.However, it needs libgtk-1.2.6, and i
> can't find that for debian. Am I just confused or is that not yet availab
> How do I upgrade a single package and it's dependencies from the stable
> versions to a less stable version like testing?
a similar question (about samba) was posted and discussed on Debian
Planet: see
http://www.debianplanet.org/debianplanet/article.php?sid=322
pietro.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Change the apt sources.list file, do a apt-get update (or dselect update),
> and then request: apt-get install sylpheed.
>
> Now, change the apt sources.list file back, and run apt-get/dselect update
> again to reset state.
Thanks, I'm trying this now.
> Lo
On Thu, 06 Sep 2001, Shawn Yarbrough wrote:
> no luck even though I'd bet a zillion dollars that this question has
> been asked before...
Well, I am not sure it was asked before :P
> How do I upgrade a single package and it's dependencies from the stable
> versions to a less stable version like t
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Lambrecht Joris wrote:
> Anyone knows of a good sources.list entry to get hold of sylpheed
> and any required additional libraries it needs ?
>
deb http://people.debian.org/~kov/debian stable/
unofficial deb's, however!
[]s
Mario O.de Menezes"Many are the plans
Lambrecht Joris wrote:
> Anyone knows of a good sources.list entry to get hold of sylpheed and
> any required additional libraries it needs ?
It's in Debian unstable, but presumably you aren't using unstable or you
wouldn't be asking. Other than that, the only thing I can suggest is
that you buil
To quote "Marcelo Chiapparini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Hi everyone!
#
# It is possible to install sylpheed in potato without updating any
library?
# In the Debian site sylpheed belongs
# to unstable, but the shylpheed web page says that it runs under
potato...
Well, what you can do is build the S
Christoph Simon wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:46:01 -0800
> It's now installed here :-)
>
> I apt-get it from helix.
>
Thanks, Christoph. Based on your suggestion, I went looking, and found
it. Didn't occur to me to include "unstable" in my search. <:-/
Cam
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:46:01 -0800
Cam Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen a couple of references to this application (suppposedly a
> .deb package) over the last few months, but can't seem to find it at the
> US, Canada, and Japan (where it apparently was originally) sites. Does
> a
87 matches
Mail list logo
