On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 09:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:57:42PM +1000, Gary Hodder wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > In midnight commander if I go to the / directory mc freezes.
> > This also happens in leafpad the cursor just stays spinning and
> > nothing
> > happens.
> >
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:57:42PM +1000, Gary Hodder wrote:
> Hi all,
> In midnight commander if I go to the / directory mc freezes.
> This also happens in leafpad the cursor just stays spinning and nothing
> happens.
> Both mc and leathpad were started from a root console.
> I have 2
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> I believe this is likely a network issue but I'm having difficulty
> tracking it down. I had a very similar problem a while back that seemed to
> be from having too many NFS shares. I'd reduced the number to 4 and it
> cleared up.
>
> I had anot
On Jun 2, 2012 7:51 AM, "Aubrey Raech" wrote:
> Any and all advice/recommendations are appreciated!
You could have a look at retroshare and tonido.
Both are not in Debian repositories.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun 03 Jun 2012 at 02:28:43 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> > here's another interesting one:
> > http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
> >
> > From the description:
> >
> > ---
> > Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a diff
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:51:12 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
> similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
> for direct transfer, ho
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:31:02AM -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:19 +0100
> Chris Davies wrote:
>
> > 7. Use rsync (over ssh) or sftp to copy the files. Remember to tell
> > them to use port 10022 (or whatever you decided in #1) instead of the
> > default port 22.
>
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:41:40AM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> > I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon login
> > like this:
>
> I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
>
Fair enough!
>
> > It's simpler to just AllowUsers user1
Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
Woof is excellent! Woof's also in the debian package repositories, as
is fex (from your previous message). Thank you for finding these, tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:41:40 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> > I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon
> > login like this:
>
> I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
Yes. :-/
>
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:24:22 -0500
"Christofer C. Bell" wrote:
[snip]
>
> That said, there have been a number of suggestions towards modifying
> the OP's requirements and I'm interested in seeing the reasoning
> behind the requirements themselves.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:19 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
> > Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for
> > email to a friend directly [...]
>
> > 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> > 2. No usernames? (scp,
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:10:53 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 02.06.2012 09:21, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
> > Tom Rausner wrote:
> >
> >> Dropbox ?
> >
> > Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd
> > prefer not to have my files "out the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:28:22 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:34:55 -0500, green wrote:
>
> > Brian, you seem to be assuming that the router has a public IP (on
> > the WAN side), which is often not true. Unfortunately, many ISPs
> > pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:16:09 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:27:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > I guess it depends on which packages you tell the installer to
> > load. One of the options is "web server," but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> here's another interesting one:
> http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
>
> From the description:
>
> ---
> Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a different approach. It assumes that
Brian wrote:
> ssh is a waste of time and effort in the circumstances as we know them.
I wasn't suggesting ssh as an application. I was recommending ssh as
a transport, on which one would layer an application such as WinSCP
or FileZilla.
But others are already making this point so I'll sit back
Rob Owens wrote:
> I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon login
> like this:
I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
> It's simpler to just AllowUsers user1 user2 user3
Fair point in the circumstances.
>> 6. Make sure that your password, and yo
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:24:22 -0500 "Christofer C. Bell"
napísal:
> The point, however, is that there is no file transfer method that
> meets her requirements.
>
> 1. No dedicated server (no web, no sftp, no ftp, NFS, Samba, etc).
> 2. No usernames/logins (no sftp, scp, no ftp, etc, see ab
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:16:19PM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
> > Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> > a friend directly [...]
>
> > 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> > 2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
> > 3. Preferably does not require
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
From the description:
---
Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a different approach. It assumes that
everybody has a web-browser or a commandline web-client installed. Woof
is a small simple stupid webserver that can ea
Christofer C. Bell wrote:
That's just it. Using anything *other* than ssh is a "waste of time
and effort" most of the time as ssh requires no setup and effort to
use out of the box not only in Debian but any modern Linux/Unix.
*Everything else* requires effort to setup and use.
The point, howe
Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
(on a Windows machine, incidentally) do
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
>> > idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
> >
> > There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
> > idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
> > (on a Windows machine, incidentally)
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:27:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>
> I guess it depends on which packages you tell the installer to load.
> One of the options is "web server," but I haven't set up a desktop
> installation lately (all my Debian is server-side), so I'm not really
>
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
>
> There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
> idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
> (on a Windows machine, incidentally) doesn't bear thinking about for one
> thing.
1. Why would the client h
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:34:55 -0500, green wrote:
> Brian, you seem to be assuming that the router has a public IP (on the WAN
> side), which is often not true. Unfortunately, many ISPs provide their
> customers with only private/local IPs behind NAT; inbound connections are
> therefore not p
Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:14:12 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
Pretty much all modern o/s's come with both a web server and ftp
pre-installed. It's a matter of turning them on, and configuring them
(if your target is running a
Andrei POPESCU wrote at 2012-06-02 13:34 -0500:
> On Sb, 02 iun 12, 16:02:05, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> > No. I was not referring to a static but to a public IP address. If
> > the user has a public, i. e. internet-routable IP address, everything
> > is fine, even if it is not static. However, if the
Brian wrote at 2012-06-02 08:13 -0500:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> > Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
> > that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
> > establish the connection.
>
> A third party is not required.
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:14:12 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
>>
>> 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
>
> Pretty much all modern o/s's come with both a web server and ftp
> pre-installed. It's a matter of turning them on, and configuring them
> (if your target is running
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 16:02:05, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>
> No. I was not referring to a static but to a public IP address. If
> the user has a public, i. e. internet-routable IP address, everything
> is fine, even if it is not static. However, if the user sits behind a
> NAT or something similar that b
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:16:19 +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Yes. A "proper" server (http, ftp, ssh) would satisfy this requirement
> but you've excluded those with #1, #2. If your PCs can have Internet
> facing ports configured, I'd go for ssh/rsync every time.
I have a similar, if not exactly th
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a
Aubrey Raech wrote:
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly [...]
> 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> 2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
> 3. Preferably does not require a chat protocol (XMPP, IRC's DCC)
> - From what I can find it seems like X
On 02.06.2012 09:21, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
> Tom Rausner wrote:
>
>> Dropbox ?
>
> Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd prefer
> not to have my files "out there" on the web... more of a direct
> person-to-person transfer.
>
> I've als
Hello Brian,
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> > Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
> > that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
> > establish the connection.
>
> A third party is not required. For the oc
Aubrey Raech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could us
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
> >
> > Any and all advice/recommendations are appreciated!
>
> Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
> that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
> establish the connec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Aubrey,
Aubrey Raech wrote:
> 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> 2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
> 3. Preferably does not require a chat protocol (XMPP, IRC's DCC)
>
> - From what I can find it seems like XMPP would probably be the best bet
On Fri 01 Jun 2012 at 22:51:12 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
> similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
> for direct transfer,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:08:44AM BST, Tom Rausner wrote:
> Dropbox ?
OP explicitly mentioned "direct" so it rules Dropbox out.
Dropbox is closed source and only works on Intel-compatible platform
so it rules it out for me for example.
nc (netcat) is what the user is looking for.
Cheers,
--
rj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
Tom Rausner wrote:
> Dropbox ?
Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd prefer
not to have my files "out there" on the web... more of a direct
person-to-person transfer.
I've also considered
Dropbox ?
On Jun 2, 2012 7:51 AM, "Aubrey Raech" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Debian users!
>
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
> similar projects). I
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
> > least with the later kernels.
>
> No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That dire
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
least with the later kernels.
No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not
exist in current Debian kernels because of the
On 08/19/08 04:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
least with the later kernels.
No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not
exist in current Debian ker
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
> least with the later kernels.
No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not
exist in current Debian kernels because of the reckless decisio
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:10 +
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:34:50 +
> > Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrius wrote:
> >>> Hi lads,
> >>>
> >>> any advices what to use for connection with phone via bluetooth
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:10 +
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:34:50 +
> > Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrius wrote:
> >>> Hi lads,
> >>>
> >>> any advices what to use for connection with phone via bluetooth
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:34:50 +
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrius wrote:
Hi lads,
any advices what to use for connection with phone via bluetooth
please?
Regards,
Andrius
Find myself.
Andrius
Can you list them here for us? It means that fu
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:34:50 +
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrius wrote:
> > Hi lads,
> >
> > any advices what to use for connection with phone via bluetooth
> > please?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andrius
> >
> >
>
> Find myself.
>
> Andrius
Can you list them here for us? It m
Andrius wrote:
Hi lads,
any advices what to use for connection with phone via bluetooth please?
Regards,
Andrius
Find myself.
Andrius
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> when I type nmap(just the text version initiates) or kdessh
> in a terminal console.Nmap,I guess,is built with GUI and
> kdessh is a graphical interface to ssh,so what is the
> problem here?
>
nmapfe - The Network Mapper Front End
that is the nmap gui version. I do
> > If you have menu installed ("apt-get menu"), chances are it'll just
> > automagically appear (unless gschem is broken in regard to providing its
> > own menu entries.)
>
> > Kent
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:19:15PM -0800, cfk wrote:
> It must be that as 'apt-get install menu' indicates menu i
> > I have installed a number of programs, such as gschem with apt-get today
> > and although I can invoke from a term, the name gschem, I dont it or any
> > other program on the KDE menu.
> >
> > How do I go about getting programs installed with apt-get onto the menu?
> >
> >Charles
>
> If
cfk wrote:
Gentlemen:
I have installed a number of programs, such as gschem with apt-get today and
although I can invoke from a term, the name gschem, I dont it or any other
program on the KDE menu.
How do I go about getting programs installed with apt-get onto the menu?
Charles
If y
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:09:47 +0100,
Jan Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Iwan van der Kleyn wrote:
> > My three month old daughter loves to watch glxgears running
> > maximized on one of my monitors while I work at the ot
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:09:33PM +0100, Alex Bartok wrote:
> > From: Jan Minar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > xmms(1) visualization plugins.
> >
> Whoa, those give even me the creeps sometimes, that's gotta work ;)
You could even hook a microphone and/or a mechanical movement to
electrical poten
Alex Bartok wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jan Minar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Programs with colourful, moving, images???
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Iwan van der Kleyn wrote:
My three month old
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:09:47PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Iwan van der Kleyn wrote:
> > My three month old daughter loves to watch glxgears running maximized on
> > one of my monitors while I work at the other. The big, revolving and
>
> Won't this ru
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Minar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Programs with colourful, moving, images???
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Iwan van der Kleyn wrote:
&
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Iwan van der Kleyn wrote:
> My three month old daughter loves to watch glxgears running maximized on
> one of my monitors while I work at the other. The big, revolving and
Won't this ruin her vision? My sister wouldn't allow her 8-months-old
to watch TV
Alex Bartok wrote:
I'm not sure if it's healthy to have her stare into a computer screen for an
extended period of time, with her being so young. Seriously, maybe youshould check with a doc first.
Well, I did :-) and if you keep it restricted to a few minutes, say 5 to
10, then there no reaso
I'm not sure if it's healthy to have her stare into a computer screen for an
extended period of time, with her being so young. Seriously, maybe you
should check with a doc first.
(TFTs on the other hand are less problematic)
Best regards,
Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Iwan van der Kl
Hi Duncan,
you wrote :
> What is the recommended way to stop the
> colourdisplay of most terminal programs in Debian Woody?
how about buying a braille terminal ? :-)
have fun
Siward
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Are there any tools that will let me fill in forms in pdf?
>
> Ideally, the output would be pdf as well.
>
> Thanks.
I've found one interesting solution: GIMP. It will import pdf, which
you can then mark up. Of course, the result i
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:33:27PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:51:51PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > | Are there any tools that will let me fill in forms in pdf?
> >
> > acroread
> >
> > | Ide
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:51:51PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> | Are there any tools that will let me fill in forms in pdf?
>
> acroread
>
> | Ideally, the output would be pdf as well.
>
> The only output acroread provides
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
| Are there any tools that will let me fill in forms in pdf?
acroread
| Ideally, the output would be pdf as well.
The only output acroread provides is via printing. When run on a pdf
with a form to fill in acroread reports the followi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 January 2003 19:26, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I used apt-get to install a few games -- most not ably, Enigma, and
> Mirror Magic. Whenever I try to run either from the console, I get:
>
> error while loading shared libraries: libvorbisfile.s
This one time, at band camp, Lance Hoffmeyer said:
> I don't think using ~/.Xsession will work with kdm. I put the items
> in ~/.Xsession and things worked fine with startx. Nothing happens
> when I start kdm. There is a /etc/kde2/kdm/Xsession file and I put a
> line in it to see if the program
I don't think using ~/.Xsession will work with kdm.
I put the items in ~/.Xsession and things worked fine
with startx. Nothing happens when I start kdm.
There is a /etc/kde2/kdm/Xsession file and I put
a line in it to see if the program would start. Still
no luck. Any ideas?
Lance
>
> On
On Fri Oct 25, 2002 at 06:15:52PM -0500, the boisterous
Lance Hoffmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote to me:
> Does it matter if I am running a startup manager like
> KDM?
I'm not aware of this, but maybe man Xsession will give you some hints.
Oh, and yes, I forgot to reply to debian-user, so here is
This thread gave me the clues to fix my problem--my Debian menus were
empty. Instead of having to edit the xterm file, I had to edit doc-linux-html,
going to (approximately) line 420, and removing the extra quotes from the word
"Pocket." Thanks to all, hope this helps somebody else.
Aidan
On Tue
joe golden said:
> I am running the testing version of debian and have recently
> installed povray, zed, circlepack and cooledit among others. None
> of these recently installed programs appear on my desktop. I can
> call them from an xterm, but can't get them directly from the
> desktop
On Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 16-Oct-2001 joe golden wrote:
> > I am running the testing version of debian and have recently installed
> > povray, zed, circlepack and cooledit among others. None of these
recently
> > installed programs appear on my desktop.
I too am running testing, and have had this prob in the past and have
ignored it ... lately, some of these seem to have been resolved by
running update-menus; others ... (like, oddly vim ... a recent
development) remain.
You can edit the menu files by hand, of course, butcha hafta -find- 'em
firs
On 16-Oct-2001 joe golden wrote:
> I am running the testing version of debian and have recently installed
> povray, zed, circlepack and cooledit among others. None of these recently
> installed programs appear on my desktop. I can call them from an xterm, but
> can't get them directly from th
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
>> (2) That it can download other packages that depend on WINE or
>> Netscape.
kmself> There's a way to create a pseudopackage to do this. I'm
kmself> not sure of how, I'd double-check Debian docks and/or
kmself> Google. I also suspect the
on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:58:46PM -0800, Keith Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have put a more recent version of WINE and a copy of Netscape4 from
> the Netscape site onto my otherwise, strict potato system. I had
> various reasons for doing this and put both packages into the
At 12:55 PM 8/26/1998 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi,
>Will programs such as applix and WP7 for linux run on debian?
>Thanks
>
>Rick
>
>Rick Knebel
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded and installed the 15-day trial of WP7 just today. It seems to
work. I was able to create a short doc and print it to a network
Debian *IS* linux. Any linux application should run fine on any
distribution of linux. I personally have used wp7.
Rick Knebel wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Will programs such as applix and WP7 for linux run on debian?
> Thanks
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Knebel
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s u
84 matches
Mail list logo
