On 07.09.23 13:56, Anssi Saari wrote:
basti writes:
My changes where attached in my last mail. Did you seen it?
Have a look at the mailing archive:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/09/msg00157.html
No, you posted only your new versions so I can't know what you
actually changed. You
basti writes:
> My changes where attached in my last mail. Did you seen it?
> Have a look at the mailing archive:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/09/msg00157.html
No, you posted only your new versions so I can't know what you
actually changed. You posted originally that you have:
On 07.09.23 10:27, Anssi Saari wrote:
basti writes:
Am 06.09.23 um 09:37 schrieb Marco:
Am 06.09.2023 09:24 schrieb Anssi Saari:
That should be enough but I don't really know how pppoe works, I've
only used IPv6 with tunneling, 6rd and 6in4 with the late route48.org.
With PPP IPv6CP (RFC 2
basti writes:
> Am 06.09.23 um 09:37 schrieb Marco:
>> Am 06.09.2023 09:24 schrieb Anssi Saari:
>>
>>> That should be enough but I don't really know how pppoe works, I've
>>> only used IPv6 with tunneling, 6rd and 6in4 with the late route48.org.
>> With PPP IPv6CP (RFC 2472 is being used.
>> It
Am 06.09.23 um 09:37 schrieb Marco:
Am 06.09.2023 09:24 schrieb Anssi Saari:
That should be enough but I don't really know how pppoe works, I've
only used IPv6 with tunneling, 6rd and 6in4 with the late route48.org.
With PPP IPv6CP (RFC 2472 is being used.
It negotiates a 64 bit interface ide
Am 06.09.2023 09:24 schrieb Anssi Saari:
> That should be enough but I don't really know how pppoe works, I've
> only used IPv6 with tunneling, 6rd and 6in4 with the late route48.org.
With PPP IPv6CP (RFC 2472 is being used.
It negotiates a 64 bit interface identifier to create the link-local
add
basti writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have switch my network config from ifup to systemd-networkd.
>
> IPv4 is working well but IPv6 is broken now.
>
> In the past I used dhcpcd to delegate the ipv6 prefix to my LAN
> interface. It seems not working with systemd.
>
> On my PPP interface I get an IPv4 and
Hi,
no idea if that is required for your ISP, but I have two options in my
working pppd config related to IPv6:
+ipv6
ipv6 ,
The second line is ipv6[space][comma]. See "man pppd". It means that
local and remote interface identifiers are randomized.
You don't mention any DHCP clients. At least f
On Sb, 05 iun 21, 20:07:56, Antonio wrote:
>
> The problem is my ISP uses pppoe for my symmetric 1 gbps connection and I
> know this type of connection requires a quite performant cpu, as it is
> single-threaded and uses only one cpu core. I'm currently using a supermicro
> motherboard with a (fou
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 08:07:56PM +0200, Antonio wrote:
The problem is my ISP uses pppoe for my symmetric 1 gbps connection and I know
this type of connection requires a quite performant cpu, as it is
single-threaded and uses only one cpu core.
That's not correct for linux kernel mode pppoe; i
Hello,
you can use PPPoE with rp-pppoe (kernel-modul). On my RPi 3 it has a
better performance as run PPPoE in userspace.
I do not know if it multiple cores.
Am 05.06.21 um 20:07 schrieb Antonio:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to setup a router and firewall based on debian for my home
> lab.
>
> I know
John Hasler wrote:
Henrique writes:
I have Debian Sarge R3.1 installed. I ran pppoeconf to configure my adsl
connection.
I wrote:
Are you sure you need to? Most ADSL modems handle PPPoE themselves and act
as routers.
H.S. writes:
If he wants to make the ADSL modem work in bridge mode then
Henrique writes:
> I have Debian Sarge R3.1 installed. I ran pppoeconf to configure my adsl
> connection.
I wrote:
> Are you sure you need to? Most ADSL modems handle PPPoE themselves and act
> as routers.
H.S. writes:
> If he wants to make the ADSL modem work in bridge mode then yes, he does.
John Hasler wrote:
Henrique writes:
I have Debian Sarge R3.1 installed. I ran pppoeconf to configure my adsl
connection.
Are you sure you need to? Most ADSL modems handle PPPoE themselves and act
as routers.
If he wants to make the ADSL modem work in bridge mode then yes, he does.
--
To U
Henrique writes:
> I have Debian Sarge R3.1 installed. I ran pppoeconf to configure my adsl
> connection.
Are you sure you need to? Most ADSL modems handle PPPoE themselves and act
as routers.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Hi all,
I installed a PPPoE server and it's up and running. I added users for
those tunnels and my defaulted Eth. interface is not configured to any
IP address.
If I run
#pppoe-server -L 12.0.0.2 -R 12.0.0.100 -N 2
I can have my client (i.e. for test a PPPoE clien
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:52:13AM +0100, rag rag wrote:
> hi,
> i need pppoe client c code for linux so can u
> provide the link that will have pppoe client.
Add "deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main" to your
sources.list, do an apt-get update and do apt-get source pppoe.
HTH.
K
ccostin wrote:
Hello
What are the best combination of values for lcp-echo-interval,
lcp-echo-failure, lcp-restart, lcp-max-terminate or other parameters,
to protect a PPPoE link against ARP requests floods or UDP floods
(generated by M$ SQL worms) wich cause PPPoE interface (ppp0) or pppd
daemo
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:18:23 +0600
"S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this possible to get static ip from pppoe ?
>
If your ISP provides static IPs, you have to explicitly request it. You
may have to pay an extra fee though.
--
Szia:
Nyizsa.
--
To UNSUBS
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 23:40 +0530, Anuj Singh wrote:
> ISP (Threw my telephone line) ---> Connected to ADSL ROUTER (Connected
> with a splitter +phone line, ethernet port to linux machine) --->
> [Debian machine with eth0 and eth1]
>
> eth0 Connected to my adsl router(on which pppoe is not configu
ISP (Threw my telephone line) ---> Connected to ADSL ROUTER (Connected
with a splitter +phone line, ethernet port to linux machine) --->
[Debian machine with eth0 and eth1]
eth0 Connected to my adsl router(on which pppoe is not configured cause
I want to use my os for this pppoe)
eth1 is for LAN m
Hiee,
Now it's working,
Ok I tried found one difference between, my routing table on fedora
and debian
Fedora routing table
#route -n
Gives me Default gateway =59.94.128.1
Whereas I found on debian Linux my Default gateway was not updated.
On Debian my Default gateway is not updated and it is
richard writes:
> ISP -->GPRSmodem--> usb -- Eth1 --> router --> home lan
> '---computer---'
What's the router for?
> The issue is I think my imperfect understanding of routing, particularly
> how to achieve a different default route for inward and outward traffic.
You neither
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:25:07PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:32:40PM +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Anuj Singh wrote the following on 25.12.2006 06:28:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
>
Telephone Line (ISP) ---> ---> [eth0, eth1 < [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:32:40PM +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Anuj Singh wrote the following on 25.12.2006 06:28:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
> >>>I c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:32:40PM +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
Anuj Singh wrote the following on 25.12.2006 06:28:
I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
I configured my adsl with pppoeconf, logs shows me I am connected, and
ifconfig give
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:32:40PM +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
> Anuj Singh wrote the following on 25.12.2006 06:28:
>
>
>
> > I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
> > I configured my adsl with pppoeconf, logs shows me I am connected, and
> > ifconfig gives me ppp0 ad
Anuj Singh wrote the following on 25.12.2006 06:28:
> I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
> I configured my adsl with pppoeconf, logs shows me I am connected, and
> ifconfig gives me ppp0 address too.
I you use a router to connect over dsl, this router will do
> hello,
> Yes my router is set as a default gw,
> output of route is
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx * 255.255.255.255 UH0 0
> 0 ppp0
> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.2
Hello Celejar and everyone else,
now second problemI have to create a gateway server with squid,
content filter (dansguardian) and virus filter, after installing debian
sarge things are ready, now facing problem with masquerading, as i have
to masquerade few machines. I am using shorewall iptab
hello,
Yes my router is set as a default gw,
output of route is
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx * 255.255.255.255 UH0 0
0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 10:58:27 +0530
Anuj Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Greetings,
> This is my first mail to to users list.
> Recently I installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (`sarge')
Welcome!
>
> I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
> I configured my ads
Hi All,
I have find the reason of the problem.
In our network are two PPPoE servers: cross and spider. I'm registered
in cross, but "pon dsl-provider" try to connect me to spider.
How can i explain to my pppoe client to use "cross" server??
I have try it. Yes i use pppoeconf to set up connection.
I have try to set MRU and MTU too.
It's my /etc/peers/dsl-provider. I removed comments.
noipdefault
usepeerdns
defaultroute
hide-password
lcp-echo-interval 20
lcp-echo-failure 3
connect /bin/true
noauth
persist
mtu 1452
mru 1452
noaccomp
Yes, I could just use the router but a)I run a firewall and DHCP
server on my linux box and don't want to duplicate the functionality,
b) I wanted know why it doesn't work, because, hey, I leave a lot to
be desired and could use some improvement , and c) there's just
something cool about pl
Hi All, I have problems with PPPOE.
It's my /etc/ppp/chap-secrets file:# Secrets for authentication using CHAP# client server secret IP addresses"my_login" * "my_password"I think I had that message too, many moons ago. The problem? I mixed up the username and password. Try flipping them.
How did y
Mar 2 12:30:54 localhost pppd[3346]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500
Mar 2 12:30:54 localhost pppd[3346]: Couldn't increase MRU to 1500
Try to use MRU and MTU 1492 or 1452 as PPPoE requires
MIchal Sedlak
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Dmitri Kostioukov wrote:
Hello, I've recently started using a provider that needs pppoe and I'm having
problem configuring my box for it. My debian box acts as a router/firewall for
several other computers on the network.
It seems to connect fine through pppoe, gets an IP address and DNS serve
On Friday 10 February 2006 11:27, Dmitri Kostioukov wrote:
>Hello, I've recently started using a provider that needs pppoe and I'm
> having problem configuring my box for it. My debian box acts as a
> router/firewall for several other computers on the network.
>
>It seems to connect fine through pp
Atlast solved.i reported this as a bug.but it isn't.the maintainer of
pppoe package asked in email to remove the gateway address and will
work.so my new /etc/network/interfaces looks like this:
cosmic:~# vi /etc/network/interfaces
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your syste
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:26:36 +0100
Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got it working.
>
> I used the unstable version of PPPoE and PPPoEconf.
>
> When I ran pppoeconf I got that gettext.sh didn't exist. I then
> installet gettext-base and ran pppoeconf again.
>
> Then it works!
>
> Sometimes
Ken Gilmour wrote:
Other than that I'm not sure, sorry. I don't use PPPoE but i do know
routing in general :-)
Thanks ken! :-))
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got it working.
I used the unstable version of PPPoE and PPPoEconf.
When I ran pppoeconf I got that gettext.sh didn't exist. I then
installet gettext-base and ran pppoeconf again.
Then it works!
Sometimes one need to run the unstable to get things working and this
isn't the first time I found
Captain's Log, stardate Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:02:35 +0100, from the fingers of
Kim came the words:
> Ken Gilmour wrote:
>> Hmm maybe your old route needs to be deleted first
>>
>> route del default
>>
>> then
>>
>> route add default gw 10.254.0.1
>>
>
> Still the same. I looked in the /etc/ppp/peers
Ken Gilmour wrote:
> Hmm maybe your old route needs to be deleted first
route del default
then
route add default gw 10.254.0.1
Still the same. I looked in the /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider and
defaultroute is set - if that has anything to say.
plog gives:
Dec 18 17:07:35 coolzone-box pppd[6446]:
Captain's Log, stardate Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:51:46 +0100, from the fingers of
Kim came the words:
> Ken Gilmour wrote:
>> That routing table is not routing all IP addresses. Just ones in
>> the
>>
> 10.254.0.0 range
>
>> Try these:
>>
>> route add default gw 10.254.0.1
>>
>> and / or
>>
>> route ad
Ken Gilmour wrote:
> That routing table is not routing all IP addresses. Just ones in the
10.254.0.0 range
Try these:
route add default gw 10.254.0.1
and / or
route add 0.0.0.0 gw 10.254.0.1
Thanks but that doesn't cange anything. :-)
Kim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Captain's Log, stardate Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:15:34 +0100, from the fingers of
Kim came the words:
> All looks fine and ppp0 has got the right IP. If I run route I get:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
> Use Iface
> 10.254.0.1 *
Greetings!
On 21 Mar 2004 10:34:18 -0300 Hector Scaramelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am doing nat with a i486/16MB behind a 256/64Kb adsl dynamic ip. I
> cannot seem to be able to download at more than 10Kb/s. However the
> same box was giving me 26KB/s when I had a router between the adsl
>
> I am doing nat with a i486/16MB behind a 256/64Kb adsl dynamic ip. I
> cannot seem to be able to download at more than 10Kb/s. However the same
> box was giving me 26KB/s when I had a router between the adsl modem and
> the i486's eth0. That router provided a static ip.
> I run pppoeconf and chan
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 12:03, Jeff Elkins wrote:
> On Sunday 21 March 2004 08:34 am, Hector Scaramelli wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I am doing nat with a i486/16MB behind a 256/64Kb adsl dynamic ip. I
> >cannot seem to be able to download at more than 10Kb/s. However the same
> >box was giving me 26KB/s when I
On Sunday 21 March 2004 08:34 am, Hector Scaramelli wrote:
>Hi,
>I am doing nat with a i486/16MB behind a 256/64Kb adsl dynamic ip. I
>cannot seem to be able to download at more than 10Kb/s. However the same
>box was giving me 26KB/s when I had a router between the adsl modem and
>the i486's eth0.
Hi,
pppoeconf is your friend.
And the place to fiddle is /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider
look for the exlanations about
demand
persist
options.
This is probably, what you want. No redial is needed, since this is handled
by the DSL-modem itself.
Cheers,
Erich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 03:45 pm, Ian Perry wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have been asked to set up a box with a pppoe connection to an ISP,
> never having used it before.
>
>
>
> Does pppoe keep the connection alive automatically, or do I need a
> script
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:11:32PM +0200, Evgeny Boksha wrote:
> hi2all
> Can somebody post working settings for PPPoE server ?
> (kernel, pppd, pppoe)
>
> I have
> 2.4.21 kernel
> 2.4.2b3 ppp (cvs)
> 3.3-1.1 pppoe
>
> woody 3.0 r1
>
These are the options enabled in my kernel:
CONFIG_PPP=y
CON
* Buchholcz Gergo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030609 14:06]:
> I've encountered the following problem:
> I tried to configure a pppoe client(RP-PPPoE) to access my ISP. After
> running adsl-start, connection fails with a TIME-OUT. The debug message
> shows: "Couldn't set tty to PPP dicipline: Invalid arg
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:02:30PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What package contains 'adsl-start'? I couldn't find it...
It is pppoe. It is altered a bit. As far as I remember (have to use
dialup again :( ) you can either fire it up during the booting or use
the command "pppd cal
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 22:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What package contains 'adsl-start'? I couldn't find it...
I think it's part of the pppoe or pptp source (not the debian package. I don't
know why but it was taken out). just google for it.
Bye
>
> I too can't connect with my n
Hi All,
What package contains 'adsl-start'? I couldn't find it...
I too can't connect with my new PPPoE/DSL setup.
Thanks,
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04 Apr 2003 12:04:18 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian P. Flaherty) wrote:
Both of you should try adsl-start as an alternative. I had been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04 Apr 2003 12:04:18 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian P. Flaherty) wrote:
Both of you should try adsl-start as an alternative. I had been using
pppd at boot-time to get my DSL connection up and it has worked for
months. However, about a week ago, it stopped working. I f
On 04 Apr 2003 12:04:18 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian P. Flaherty) wrote:
> Both of you should try adsl-start as an alternative. I had been using
> pppd at boot-time to get my DSL connection up and it has worked for
> months. However, about a week ago, it stopped working. I fought with
> it fo
Both of you should try adsl-start as an alternative. I had been using
pppd at boot-time to get my DSL connection up and it has worked for
months. However, about a week ago, it stopped working. I fought with
it for a while. Just to see what happened, I tried adsl-start and it
worked immediately.
On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 21:30:31 -0500 (EST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it behaved perfectly. It just smply stopped working. I'm connecting
> right now through a Win98 box using Verison's PPPOE software for
> Windows.
I formerly used pppoe to connect to Verizon, but now I usually go
through a gateway
Erik "Svderstrvm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, but how can I setup the serverside of the
> connection?
I haven't done that before. Anyone else?
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
ok, but how can I setup the serverside of the
connection?
I'm not using a dsl-link, only a regular wavelan
connection there i want to use pppoe.
// Erik
--- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erik "Svderstrvm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does someone know how to setup the PPPoE
> c
Erik "Svderstrvm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does someone know how to setup the PPPoE connection
> over this link?
The directions in /usr/share/doc/pppoe/README.Debian.gz worked for me.
In addition, I added the following to /etc/network/interfaces:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet ppp
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:25:08 -0500
JP Glutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ethenet connection). Kmail was not running, and since I had never
> figured out to get pppoe running without rebooting, I decided to try to
> figure it out once and for all. The normal boot gets pptpd and
> ppp_on_boot
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> adsl-start is Redhat-specific.
No, it's not, and I think you can trust me on that. :-)
--
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:34:00AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> > Jan 9 10:39:56 seal pppoe[12969]: PPP session is 6497
> > Jan 9 10:39:59 seal pppd[12966]: Couldn't set pass-filter in kernel: Invalid
>argument
>
> Dunno what the previous message means, but it should not be fatal.
yes,
#include
* Brenda J. Butler [Thu, Jan 09 2003, 11:25:03AM]:
> However, debian has modified the rp-pppoe setup to suit
> itself. rp-pppoe comes with scripts such as adsl-start,
adsl-start is Redhat-specific. We have "pppoeconf" which should already
be on your system.
> Jan 9 10:39:56 seal pppoe
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 04:09:25PM +0200, daniel meier wrote:
> hi there i'm having troubles with my system on startup.
> i use pppoe as the ppp-connection is not ready on boot i have to
> restart the following services before everything works fine:
>
> ipmasq
> bind
>
>
> is there a solution t
Once upon a time Ross Tsolakidis said...
> Hi all,
>
> Running Debian Woody on my gateway box at home.
> 1 NIC connected to ADSL modem, the other to my network (standard setup).
>
> I use the debian package to do pppoe, (roaring penguin).
>
> I seem to be having issues when I drop line sync for
On Friday 30 August 2002 05:23 pm, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > You mean, when you deactivate ppp_on_boot (by moving or removing
> > > /etc/ppp/ppp_on_boot) and reboot your system, the _exact_ same error
> > > (messages) occur?
> >
> > No, I don't deactivate ppp_on_boot. Here is what happens
Am Freitag, 30. August 2002 23:01 schrieb Slaven Peles:
> On Friday 30 August 2002 04:44 pm, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 30. August 2002 15:54 schrieb Slaven Peles:
> > > > Looks like you're automatically establishing a connection on startup.
> > > > If yes there must be a /etc/pp
On Friday 30 August 2002 04:44 pm, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. August 2002 15:54 schrieb Slaven Peles:
> > > Looks like you're automatically establishing a connection on startup.
> > > If yes there must be a /etc/ppp/ppp_on_boot file? Is this the case?
> >
> > Yes, that's what I
>> Hi!
>>
>> I need your help once again. I can't connect to my DSL provider.
>> I modified everything as described in the docs and tried 'pon dsl-provider'
>> as root. This what the logs are saying:
>>
>> pppd[1628]: pppd 2.4.1 started by root, uid 0
>> pppd[1628]: Serial connec
Are PTY's activated?
Frank
--
$ Hello World!
$ I am [Ff]rank ;)
1024D/EC4CE5CC 2002-05-14 Frank Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fingerprint = 193D 62EC 03A5 1066 A951 4DA3 947A D578 EC4C E5CC
pgpaFEOoQxAGh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Christian Schoenebeck writes:
> And another question: the username my provider sent me contains a slash
> (/) int it. Should that be a problem?
No.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
> And another question: the username my provider sent
> me contains a slash (/) int it. Should that be a problem? Or
> is that a sign that I'll be only able to connect to them
with
> their windows dial software?
As for you sending a "wrong" username, i.e. without the slash,
I don't know if any of
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 01:53, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Osamu Aoki wrote on Thu Mar 28, 2002 um 12:08:19PM:
> > > If so, why is the GUI interface tkpppoe missing? Is there a separate
> > > package available for it? I could not find it in woody ...
> >
> > No I do not see it in woody nor i
#include
Osamu Aoki wrote on Thu Mar 28, 2002 um 12:08:19PM:
> > If so, why is the GUI interface tkpppoe missing? Is there a separate
> > package available for it? I could not find it in woody ...
>
> No I do not see it in woody nor in unstable. Binary package
> file name was changed when update
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Steffen Evers wrote:
> pppoe seems to be the same as rp-pppoe. Is this correct?
Yes. Source package is same.
> If so, why is the GUI interface tkpppoe missing? Is there a separate
> package available for it? I could not find it in woody ...
No I do not
On 24-Mar-2002 Romuald PERINELLE wrote:
> I have a local network at home and an ADSL connexion. I would like to install
> my linux box as a firewall for my network.
> Unfortunately I can't upgrade my debian version (1.3) because of
> compatibility reasons with my hardware and my bios.
> Is there a
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 07:06:09PM +0100, Frodo Baggins wrote:
> Hi debianers,
> well, I have a debian system connected to a ISP using
> pppoe. Everithing works well with the 2.2.x kernels, but for different
> reasons, I need to install a 2.4.x kernel.
>
> Reading the file /usr/doc/pppoe/KERN
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 07:06:09PM +0100, Frodo Baggins wrote:
> Hi debianers,
> well, I have a debian system connected to a ISP using
> pppoe. Everithing works well with the 2.2.x kernels, but for different
> reasons, I need to install a 2.4.x kernel.
>
> Reading the file /usr/doc/pppoe/KERN
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:06, Frodo Baggins wrote:
> Is there another, more debian conformant, way to do it?
Yes : use the Debian ppp and pppoe packages. This way, you shall run
pppoe purely in user mode instead of using the kernel module which is
still rather developmental as far as I have read
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:47:03AM -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I used pppoeconf to set up. It found eth0 and my Access Concentrator.
> When I started with 'pon dsl-provider', I got the following error in
> plog:
>
> Feb 18 10:07:57 myname pppd[495]: pppd 2.4.1 started by root, uid 0
> Feb 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on 18 Feb 2002 at 10:47):
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet ppp
> provider dsl-provider
>
>
> Any ideas?
Yeah. Did this last week--sorry, the computer is in Berlin so at
the moment I only have my memory to consult. But I believe the
deal was, don't put "ppp" and "pro
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:38:30AM -0800, Anton Graham wrote:
> With Woody base frozen, is there any plan to move the pppoe package to
> base?
I thought it already was. Certainly debootstrap thinks it's part of
base, and it's part of the basedebs.tar available in
debian/dists/woody/main/disks-i386
#include
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote on Tue Nov 20, 2001 um 08:23:19AM:
> I couldn't make it work, so I downloaded the original (upstream) package
> (Roaring Penguin).
Well, if you was not able to make it work, please test pppoeconf (woody)
and if you still are not able to make it work, try to fin
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:53:40AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> Your /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider file should look something like
> this:
>
> ...
>
> You can use any other pppoe options on the pty line too.
Thanks!
J.
--
Jeronimo Pellegrini, 2001-Nov-20 15:36 -0200:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:15:57AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> > You need PPP compile into the kernel or as a module. I usually
> > set it up as a module since I don't use PPP all the time.
>
> Er, yes, I meant there's no need for the pppoe module.
>
> >
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:15:57AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> You need PPP compile into the kernel or as a module. I usually
> set it up as a module since I don't use PPP all the time.
Er, yes, I meant there's no need for the pppoe module.
> With the PPPoE package, I use the following string to make
Jeronimo Pellegrini, 2001-Nov-20 08:23 -0200:
> > This was the output from plog:
> >
> > # plog
> > Nov 19 09:18:49 gateway pppd[402]: Serial connection established.
> > Nov 19 09:18:49 gateway pppd[402]: Using interface ppp0
> > Nov 19 09:18:49 gateway pppd[402]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
>
> This was the output from plog:
>
> # plog
> Nov 19 09:18:49 gateway pppd[402]: Serial connection established.
> Nov 19 09:18:49 gateway pppd[402]: Using interface ppp0
> Nov 19 09:18:49 gateway pppd[402]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
>
> In the docs, it says a succesfull connection should
* Reto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi!
> I have just configured PPPoE on my Debian Sid. I finally managed to get it
> online. When starting plog, I get my current (dynamic) IP-adress (local and
> remote), and the primary+secondary DNS listed.
> But I cannot ping anything, I cannot get out. Ping
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 02:18:47PM +0200, Sven Geggus wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > According to changelog.Debian, the pppoe patch was removed in ppp
> > 2.4.1.uus-1 because it broke demand dialing:
>
> > * Removed kernel mode pppoe patch. Breaks demand dialling. Upstrea
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> According to changelog.Debian, the pppoe patch was removed in ppp
> 2.4.1.uus-1 because it broke demand dialing:
> * Removed kernel mode pppoe patch. Breaks demand dialling. Upstream
> is planning on native pppoe support for 2.4.2 (Closes: #103843
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Sven Geggus wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been using debian woody with the pppoe plugin provided by the standard
> ppp package which comes with the distribution (2.4 Kernel-Mode pppoe).
>
> Because of a strange lookup of the system I tried to upgrade some p
Moin John!
John Griffiths schrieb am Donnerstag, den 02. August 2001:
> Holy Hell.
>
> That's sounds like a VERY insecure setup.
Bullshit.
> I could be wrong but hub's broadcast... and running the ADSL straight into
> the hub would make it possible for an outsider to sniff your network
PP
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
