hello,
Yes my router is set as a default gw,
output of route is
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx     *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0
0 ppp0
192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
eth0
10.1.1.0        *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
eth1
default         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
eth0


my plog
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: Couldn't increase MRU to 1500
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: CHAP authentication succeeded:
Authentication success,Welcome!
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: peer from calling number
00:90:AC:25:2F:93 authorized
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: not replacing default route to
eth0 [192.168.1.1]
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: Cannot determine ethernet address
for proxy ARP
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: local  IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: remote IP address xxx.xxx.xxx
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: primary   DNS address
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Dec 25 13:49:51 localhost pppd[1586]: secondary DNS address
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

ifconfig

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:x7  
          inet addr:192.168.1.4  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:195 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:132 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:21028 (20.5 KiB)  TX bytes:8527 (8.3 KiB)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xd800 

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx  
          inet addr:10.1.1.3  Bcast:10.1.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:39 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:2626 (2.5 KiB)  TX bytes:1206 (1.1 KiB)
          Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe000 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:7132 (6.9 KiB)  TX bytes:7132 (6.9 KiB)

ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol  
          inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx  P-t-P:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1492  Metric:1
          RX packets:63 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:3 
          RX bytes:10643 (10.3 KiB)  TX bytes:54 (54.0 b)

I can ping my local machines, my router , but not outside (from my
gateway server hence same from local to out too)

regards 

anuj
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 00:54 -0500, Celejar wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 10:58:27 +0530
> Anuj Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > Greetings,
> > This is my first mail to to users list.
> > Recently I installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (`sarge')
> 
> Welcome!
> 
> > 
> > I have eth0 connected to my adsl router and eth1 to my local network.
> > I configured my adsl with pppoeconf, logs shows me I am connected, and
> > ifconfig gives me ppp0 address too.
> > route -n gives me ip address of my router (that is correct =
> > 192.168.1.1), my eth0 has ip 192.168.1.3 and eth1 has 10.1.1.3
> > I can ping router/ local machines , but can not ping outside,
> > my /etc/resolv.conf is updated and I tried given nameserver from my isp
> > as well as automatically detected dns. 
> 
> Is your router set to be the default gateway? What is the exact output
> of 'route'? Does outside ping fail for the other machines on the local
> net or even for the box connected directly to the modem? Does ping fail
> even for manually entered IP addresses or only when you use DNS?
> 
> > 
> > Same configuration is working smoothly on Redhat/Fedora, but I am facing
> > problems on debian. I can use redhat/fedora but so far I found debian
> > much better (used it before), don't want to stick with redhat/fedora.
> > 
> > regards 
> > anuj
> 
> Celejar
> 
> -- 
> ssuds.sourceforge.net - Home of Ssuds and Ssudg, a Simple Sudoku Solver
> and Generator
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to