Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Tom
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 04:51:22AM +, Pigeon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:58:15PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > > > newbiedoc > >

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Pigeon
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:58:15PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > > newbiedoc > > > > I thought I'd read newbiedoc. The read a bit about runlevel

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Hoyt Bailey
- Original Message - From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 12:27 Subject: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working] > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > newbiedoc > >

Re: newbiedoc error [Re: Testing URIs not working]

2003-11-07 Thread Wayne Topa
Tom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:04:25PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > > apt-cache search newbiedoc > > > newbiedoc > > I thought I'd read newbiedoc. The read a bit about runlevels (since I > didn't know about them), the first thing I read is incorre

Re: OT // Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] Re: cvs server saga -- continued

2001-07-10 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:23:23PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:10:15PM -0400, D-Man wrote: > > Maybe just "touch syslog damon.log"? > > i did that, but it didn't seem to be all that was needed. > i got 'round to "telinit 1" and then falling through back to > runlevel

OT // Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] Re: cvs server saga -- continued

2001-07-08 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:10:15PM -0400, D-Man wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 09:58:29PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > > | now that i've renamed the huge logfiles (syslog and > | daemon.log among them) i've restarted various servers > | (mysql, postgresql, apache) but how to i re-es

Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] limiting "ps" command on every user..

2001-07-03 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:48:53AM +0800, louiem+ wrote: > > is it possible to limit the "ps ax"/etc.. ? commands on every user? > i mean, example i have the id/user "luwi" > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ps ax > > > it will only show the process which i ran, and not all the process that > the machine ru

Re: [Newbiedoc-discuss] Re: Tutorial for kernel compiling the Debian way, RFC

2001-04-22 Thread Jesse Goerz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 22 April 2001 08:13, David Raeker-Jordan wrote: > Jesse > > In "Making sure you have everything you need," you wrote: > > "This should create a directory called kernel-source-2.2.19. Inside that > directory you should find another called Docu

Re: newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-13 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:03:01PM -0400, D-Man wrote: > It is titled "The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e, or LaTeX2e in > 90 minutes". (It appears that the time has changed in various > editions of the doc) The number of minutes printed on the cover is actually the number of pages in the d

Re: newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-12 Thread Glyn Millington
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:47:10PM -0500, will trillich wrote: >| > >| > Can I write it in LaTeX? I want to learn to use latex effectively. Benji Fisher has some nice stuff for writing Latex with Vim on his site http://sites.netscape.net/bbenjif

Re: newbiedoc, vim and latex

2001-04-11 Thread D-Man
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:47:10PM -0500, will trillich wrote: | On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:18:08PM -0400, D-Man wrote: | > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 01:59:02PM -0500, will trillich wrote: | > | i think vim is abominable, deplorable and inconsiderate. it uses | > | modes for this, modes for that... a

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 08:23:04AM -0500, David B . Harris wrote: > To quote will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > # please run your eyeballs over them -- and any of the other > # documents we've got there -- and feel free to post some feedback > # to the newbieDoc project at > # > # http://www

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:42:33PM -0900, Britton wrote: > > Are these docs going to be included somewhere in the distro when complete, > or live permanently on the web? They look handy. > > Britton Kerin > > On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, will trillich wrote: > > i've got another newbieDoc that scratches

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread Britton
Are these docs going to be included somewhere in the distro when complete, or live permanently on the web? They look handy. Britton Kerin On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, will trillich wrote: > i've got another newbieDoc that scratches the surface of > Debian runlevels... > > http://www.eGroups.com/f

Re: newbieDoc: Debian runlevels intro

2001-01-02 Thread David B . Harris
To quote will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # please run your eyeballs over them -- and any of the other # documents we've got there -- and feel free to post some feedback # to the newbieDoc project at # # http://www.eGroups.com/messages/newbieDoc Well, I must admit I don't like this phrase

Re: newbieDoc

2000-11-16 Thread will trillich
Myles Green wrote: > > Hi Will, > > I saw your posts on the debian-user list and saw something in your sig > about a project you are involved in: > > volunteer to document your experience for next week's > newbies -- http://www.eGroups.com/group/newbieDoc > > This sounds very similar (in a way

Re: newbiedoc at intranets.com -- bad dog?

2000-11-08 Thread Chris Gray
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 03:18:20PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > and here everything seemed to be perfect... until... > > fooey. intranets.com is windo~1-based and relies heavily > on cookies and javascript. if enough of you have trouble > getting in, we'll have to look for another venue; but > ri