Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-21 Thread adcarlson
To add my bit to the matter: When setting up a friend's Win XP machine, I stumbled across the fact that IEEE1394 can actually be used in networking. So obviously this applies to all OSes as well. Never tried it yet though. On 20-Jan-2004 Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-20 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tuesday, Jan 20, 2004, at 19:59 America/Denver, Bruce Best (ACTO) wrote: Based on the above it appeared to me reasonable to assume that, once I loaded the correct modules (eth1394), I could configure and use the firewire device, using ethX, in much the same way as a real ethernet device. Whi

Re: Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-20 Thread Bruce Best (ACTO)
> > Based on the above it appeared to me reasonable to assume that, once I > > loaded the correct modules (eth1394), I could configure and use the > > firewire device, using ethX, in much the same way as a real ethernet > > device. Which, it turns out, I could. > Wow. I'll be damned. Learn some

Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:38:17AM -0500, Bruce wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:54:47AM -0500, Bruce wrote: > > > I am looking to set up an ethernet connection using ieee1394 > > > (Firewire/ILink) between two Debian sid machines, and haven't had

Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-19 Thread Bruce
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:54:47AM -0500, Bruce wrote: > > I am looking to set up an ethernet connection using ieee1394 > > (Firewire/ILink) between two Debian sid machines, and haven't had much > > luck. > Right. Firewire is not ethernet. I apologize if I am not using the correct terminology.

Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-17 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:54:47AM -0500, Bruce wrote: > I am looking to set up an ethernet connection using ieee1394 > (Firewire/ILink) between two Debian sid machines, and haven't had much > luck. Right. Firewire is not ethernet. - -- .''`.

Re: ieee1394 ethernet

2004-01-15 Thread Jan Minar
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:54:47AM -0500, Bruce wrote: > RX packets:66 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > RX bytes:2112 (2.0 KiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) It actually received (RXed) 66 packets/2112 octets. So there /is/ some connection. Maybe you can't TX (transmit)?--Broke