Re: gv (gs) not producing full plots on AMD64 with nVidia

2008-09-30 Thread michael
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 19:01 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:27:19 +0100, michael wrote: > > I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600 > > card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use > > 'gv' to display an IDL-produce

Re: gv (gs) not producing full plots on AMD64 with nVidia

2008-09-30 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:27:19 +0100, michael wrote: > I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600 > card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use > 'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot it gives a partial plot, the cursor > shows that interpret

Re: Gv package..

2006-11-24 Thread Angelina Carlton
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am running a debian derivative (Kanotix). > I installed gv-3.6.2-1 after update but seems to have > a problem. How can I reinstall older version gv-3.6.1-12? > > -ishwar Assuming Kanotix uses .debs and apt-get (if not, your better off posting to a Kan

Re: gv bug, maintainer please?

2006-02-03 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:51:14PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: | On Thursday 26 January 2006 13:35, Linas Zvirblis wrote: | >> Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is? | > | >Martin A. Godisch $ aptitude show gv | fgrep Maintainer: Maintainer: Martin A. Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The "control"

Re: gv stuck in a loop when printing?

2006-01-26 Thread gcrimp
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:12:38AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > Need quick answer folks, I'm burning paper by the ream here. > > I have gv, running on a BDI-4.30 install, printing the docs for a piece > of the emc2 software package. I told it to print odd pages only as I > no

Re: gv bug, maintainer please?

2006-01-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 26 January 2006 13:35, Linas Zvirblis wrote: >> Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is? > >Martin A. Godisch > Humm, I googled for ghostview, and came up with a different name & sent him a short message describing what happened. >> I have a bug report for him. > >Bug are not report

Re: gv stuck in a loop when printing?

2006-01-26 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:12:38 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings all; > > Need quick answer folks, I'm burning paper by the ream here. > > I have gv, running on a BDI-4.30 install, printing the docs for a piece > of the emc2 software package. I told it to print odd pages o

Re: gv bug, maintainer please?

2006-01-26 Thread Linas Zvirblis
Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is? Martin A. Godisch I have a bug report for him. Bug are not reported against maintainers, but against packages they maintain. Read [ http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting ]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: gv and filenames with spaces

2003-11-26 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:35:38AM +, Dave Howorth wrote: > (why do programs not let you copy messages from errors and instead force > you to type them again!) Perhaps a candidate for a wishlist-bug? -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gv and filenames with spaces

2003-11-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:35:38AM +, Dave Howorth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > There seems to be a problem with gv and filenames with spaces in them. > I don't use it regularly but when I open a file whose name contains a > space (e.g. 'junk space.pdf') and then try to print it, I see an erro

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:48:38AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:55:25PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I am currently running sarge. When I wanted to view a ps file using gv, > > it segfaulted. Then I ran gv without any filename and got this message

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-03 Thread Oki DZ
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 01:09:29AM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > That version really needs to be >= 1.5+E-2. This issue has been > recorded in the BTS multiple times. And it didn't work; so, is it the way by the packagers to lure users out of gv? If yes, wel

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 06:50:48AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: | tried to get the latest gv yesterday, apt-get said that it was the | newest (but segfaulting, of course). Correct. | Why didn't the package retrieve xaw3dg? Insufficient version in the dependency: Package: gv Version: 1:3.5.8-30.

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:55:25PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am currently running sarge. When I wanted to view a ps file using gv, > it segfaulted. Then I ran gv without any filename and got this message: > > $ gv > Warning: Representation size 2 must match superclass's to

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Oki DZ
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:04:24PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > Looked at the bts for gv. Found that xaw3dg has to be upgraded to the > version in unstable. Did that and gv is working fine. Hey, thanks a lot, it's working now. I had been looking for this solution since yesterday. It was pretty str

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: | > Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 14:27]: | > $ gv | > Warning: Representation size 2 must match superclass's to override | > internalWidth | > Segmentation fault | search the archives. This has been handled several times

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:07:25PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > However, it helped upgrading, at least for me (don't remember which > package but assuming 'gv'). > Looked at the bts for gv. Found that xaw3dg has to be upgraded to the version in unstable. Did that and gv is working fine

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Asbjørn Sæbø
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:07:25PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Asbj?rn S?b? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 16:03]: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > > > Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 14:27]: > > > > > > I am currently running sarge. When I wa

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:07:25PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Asbj?rn S?b? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 16:03]: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > > > Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 14:27]: > > > > > > I am currently run

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Lukas Ruf
> Asbj?rn S?b? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 16:03]: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > > Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 14:27]: > > > > I am currently running sarge. When I wanted to view a ps file using gv, > > > it segfaulted. [...] > > > search

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Asbjørn Sæbø
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 14:27]: > > I am currently running sarge. When I wanted to view a ps file using gv, > > it segfaulted. [...] > search the archives. This has been handled several times already. Where? I

Re: gv segfaulting

2003-10-02 Thread Lukas Ruf
> Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-02 14:27]: > > I am currently running sarge. When I wanted to view a ps file using gv, > it segfaulted. Then I ran gv without any filename and got this message: > > $ gv > Warning: Representation size 2 must match superclass's to override > internalWidt

Re: gv

2003-08-14 Thread MJM
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 09:02, JG wrote: > Hi, > > Paul Yeatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Summary: 'gv' is suddenly not viewing postscript files correctly on my > > Debian machines although it used to. I make regular security updates > > on all machines. Can the recent changes in kernel h

Re: gv

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Yeatman
Hi, ->>In response to your message<<- --received from JG-- > > Hi, > > Paul Yeatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Summary: 'gv' is suddenly not viewing postscript files correctly on my > > Debian machines although it used to. I make regular security updates > > on all machines. Can the r

Re: gv

2003-08-14 Thread David Fokkema
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:20:00PM -0400, MJM wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gs > GNU Ghostscript 6.53 (2002-02-13) > Copyright (C) 2002 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved. > This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file COPYING for details. Well, I have Ghostscript 7.07. I don't

Re: gv ps.bz2 instead of ps.gz

2003-07-08 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:27:07PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > is it possible to configure gv such that it supports bzip2-compressed > postscript files in addition to gzip-compressed ones? Under zsh, 'gv =(bzcat file.ps.b2)' opens it up fine. '=(bzcat file.ps.bz2)' runs 'bzcat file.ps.bz2', stores

Re: gv ps.bz2 instead of ps.gz

2003-07-05 Thread Brian Potkin
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:27:07PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote: > is it possible to configure gv such that it supports bzip2-compressed > postscript files in addition to gzip-compressed ones? Google is amazing and good fun. Using 'gv' and 'bzip2-compressed' as the search terms comes up with two metho

Re: GV & full screen

2002-11-25 Thread Hubert Chan
> "Gregory" == Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Gregory> Unless you are truly dedicated to the Open Source Way, I Gregory> recommend using PDF (I think there is a pstopdfm or pstopdf Gregory> script installed with ghostscript, if you currently have Gregory> Postscript) for wh

Re: GV & full screen

2002-11-25 Thread Brian Potkin
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:10:54PM +0200, Egor Tur wrote: > Hi Folk. > I want to use gv with full screen without panel ans menu. > How can I do this? Is it possible? > Does anybody have an idea on how to resolve this little problem? I am not sure that what you want is entirely possible to achieve

Re: GV & full screen

2002-11-25 Thread Gregory Seidman
Egor Tur sez: } Hi Folk. } I want to use gv with full screen without panel ans menu. } How can I do this? Is it possible? Probably not with gv, exactly, but gv is a wrapper around ghostscript anyway. If you want no-frills Postscript (or PDF) display, use gs directly. With a combination of commandl

Re: Solved: Re: gv: various font errors, "code 1 in findfont"

2002-01-03 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:23:07AM -0800, Eric G. Miller (egm2@jps.net) wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:00:00 -0800, "Karsten M. Self" > wrote: > > > on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:03:18AM -0800, Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > > I'm finding gv

Re: Solved: Re: gv: various font errors, "code 1 in findfont"

2002-01-03 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:00:00 -0800, "Karsten M. Self" wrote: > on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:03:18AM -0800, Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > I'm finding gv is almost unusable under Sid due to font errors, e.g.: > > > > > > > > > Error: /invalidf

Re: Solved: Re: gv: various font errors, "code 1 in findfont"

2002-01-02 Thread Craig Dickson
Karsten M. Self wrote: > > Do you have the GS_LIB environment variable set to these two directories? > > If not, try that and see if it helps. > > Interesting. I've got that in my /etc/profile (I *thought* I'd added > something like it), added Dec 13: > > export GS_LIB=/usr/share/gs/6.51:/u

Solved: Re: gv: various font errors, "code 1 in findfont"

2002-01-02 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:03:18AM -0800, Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > I'm finding gv is almost unusable under Sid due to font errors, e.g.: > > > > > > Error: /invalidfontGNU Ghostscript 6.51: Unrecoverable error, exit > > code 1 in findfont >

Re: gv: various font errors, "code 1 in findfont"

2002-01-02 Thread Craig Dickson
Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'm finding gv is almost unusable under Sid due to font errors, e.g.: > > > Error: /invalidfontGNU Ghostscript 6.51: Unrecoverable error, exit > code 1 in findfont > Operand stack: >F6_0 1 1 --nostringval-- Helvetica Font Helvetica >

Re: gv: various font errors, "code 1 in findfont"

2002-01-02 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:33:11 -0800, "Karsten M. Self" wrote: > I'm finding gv is almost unusable under Sid due to font errors, e.g.: > > > Error: /invalidfontGNU Ghostscript 6.51: Unrecoverable error, exit > code 1 in findfont > Operand stack: >F6_0 1 1 --nostringval--

Re: gv

2000-06-09 Thread kmself
I had a problem at one time with one of the font definition files distributed with either gv or ghostscript being corrupted. Literally some binary barfage in the middle of a text file. I fixed it manually, notified the package manager, and Peter Deutsch. IIRC it was a font that he doesn't includ

Re: gv

2000-06-08 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 07:14:10AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > BTW, what kind of tool do you use to convert .ps to .pdf? gv can do .pdf > to .ps, acroread does the same thing too. ps2pdf. It should be in the gs package, I think. A -- Andrew Sullivan Computer S

Re: gv

2000-06-07 Thread John Pearson
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 07:14:10AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote > > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, John Pearson wrote: > > Ghostscript uses its own fonts when interpreting postscript, > > provided in gsfonts. Try installing that. Xfonts may be used > > by gv to draw your document, but that comes later. > > Tha

Re: gv

2000-06-07 Thread dyer
> > > BTW, what kind of tool do you use to convert .ps to .pdf? gv can do .pdf > to .ps, acroread does the same thing too. > > Oki > > Strangely enough, it's called ps2pdf. I think it's in the gs package. Works great, just used it today. dyer

Re: gv

2000-06-07 Thread Oki DZ
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, John Pearson wrote: > Ghostscript uses its own fonts when interpreting postscript, > provided in gsfonts. Try installing that. Xfonts may be used > by gv to draw your document, but that comes later. Thanks, it's working now. One might wonder why gsfonts pkg is not included

Re: gv

2000-06-07 Thread John Pearson
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:32:14AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote > Hi, > > When I run gv, I have the following: > Error: /invalidfontGNU Ghostscript: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 > in findfont > Operand stack: >1 --dict:4/4-- --dict:4/4-- Times-Roman Font Times-Roman > 28765 Times-Roman

Re: gs -anitialias * cause core dump(Re: gv -antialias?)

1996-10-28 Thread joost witteveen
> > > Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error > > messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ? > > I (think I) heard somewhere that problems with gs giving > errors (illegal operations and so forth) are due to a bug in gcc > when gs is compiled with certain opt

Re: gs -anitialias * cause core dump(Re: gv -antialias?)

1996-10-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
> Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error > messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ? I (think I) heard somewhere that problems with gs giving errors (illegal operations and so forth) are due to a bug in gcc when gs is compiled with certain optimisations, and

Re: gs -anitialias * cause core dump(Re: gv -antialias?)

1996-10-27 Thread joost witteveen
> > > When I try 'gs -anitialias *.ps' it gives me a core dump. I > > have gs-aladdin_4.03-2_i386.deb > > Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error > messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ? > > Also, since gs does not know the option "-antialias" (or "-ani

Re: gs -anitialias * cause core dump(Re: gv -antialias?)

1996-10-27 Thread Johannes Plass
> When I try 'gs -anitialias *.ps' it gives me a core dump. I > have gs-aladdin_4.03-2_i386.deb Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ? Also, since gs does not know the option "-antialias" (or "-anitalias") it shoul

gs -anitialias * cause core dump(Re: gv -antialias?)

1996-10-27 Thread David Puryear
David Puryear wrote: > I noticed that some ps files gives error when using > gv -antialias > Does anyone know why? I looked at man and docs and couldn't not find > why. Okay, I play around with it some more. It's not gv problem but ghostscript. When I try 'gs -anitialias *.ps' it gives me a core