Thanks, Guus, for your reply.
I just wanted to confirm that the workaround
up ip -6 route add default via fe80::1 dev $IFACE onlink
works flawless for me.
I will upgrade to Stretch with one of the next point releases.
Thanks again,
Rainer
Am Samstag, 15. Juli 2017, 21:30:27 CEST schrieb Guu
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 07:31:29PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > I added a IPv6 support to a KVM virtualized Jessie system following the
> > instructions by the hoster
> >
> > https://www.netcup-wiki.de/wiki/Zus
> > %c3%a4tzliche_IP_Adresse_konfigurieren#IPv6%7C
That should still work, but I s
Am Montag, 10. Juli 2017, 10:24:43 CEST schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> Hi,
>
> I added a IPv6 support to a KVM virtualized Jessie system following the
> instructions by the hoster
>
> https://www.netcup-wiki.de/wiki/Zus
> %c3%a4tzliche_IP_Adresse_konfigurieren#IPv6%7C
>
> I my case, I added
>
> (for
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:04:19 +1100
Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 02/01/12 19:27, J. Bakshi wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > First of all A very Happy new year to all of you :-)
> >
> > I have DHCP server running on my debian box and I have two internet
> > broadband connections. I have configured one
On 02/01/12 19:27, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> First of all A very Happy new year to all of you :-)
>
> I have DHCP server running on my debian box and I have two internet
> broadband connections. I have configured one of them as the gateway
> in my DHCP server. sometimes my users ( both li
On Wed September 30 2009, Wayne Topa wrote:
> resolv.conf and resolvconf are not the same thing. You should install
> the resolvconfig package to help solve your problem, and be sure to read
> the man page.
>
I have resolvconf installed. I think I ran this:
SYNOPSIS
cat FILE | resolvconf -a
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Sun September 27 2009, Celejar wrote:
I'm still not sure what's modifying your resolv.conf, but I'll point
out that those dns-nameserver lines won't work without resolvconf. The
basic networking infrastructure doesn't provide any way to publish
static nameserver inform
On Sun September 27 2009, Celejar wrote:
> I'm still not sure what's modifying your resolv.conf, but I'll point
> out that those dns-nameserver lines won't work without resolvconf. The
> basic networking infrastructure doesn't provide any way to publish
> static nameserver information in the inter
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:01:07 -0400
Paul Cartwright wrote:
...
> my interfaces file has a static setup that I NORMALLY use, and a DHCP
> setup when I am..working on stuff, like adding a router,
> troubleshooting..
> #new dhcp setup
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> auto eth0
> dns-nameserver 208.67.222.2
On Sun September 27 2009, Celejar wrote:
> IIUC, on a basic installation, nothing should be touching resolv.conf
> except for things that you configure explicitly. There are several
> packages that will alter it: resolvconf, IIUC, the GUI network
> configuration utilities (NM, wicd, etc), and anyt
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:22:21 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > There are several packages that will alter it: resolvconf, IIUC, the
> > GUI network configuration utilities (NM, wicd, etc), and anything
> > you put in /etc/network/interfaces. What network configuration
> > utilities
Celejar writes:
> There are several packages that will alter it: resolvconf, IIUC, the
> GUI network configuration utilities (NM, wicd, etc), and anything you
> put in /etc/network/interfaces. What network configuration utilities
> do you have installed?
Given the number of things that depend on
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:55:38 -0400
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I'm not sure what file I need to mess with . Now when I
> reboot, /etc/resolv.conf is empty, and my default route doesn't work,
> so I manually add:
> nameserver 208.67.222.222
> nameserver 208.67.220.220
> nameserver 192.168.1.254
>
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 19:05, trace.localh...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> Show us your arp table too
>>
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>arp -a
>
> Interface: 210.73.34.32 --- 0x2
> Internet Address Physical Address Type
>
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 18:12, a...@samad.com.au wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> do you have a vpn up it looks like a point to point setup very strange.
>>
>
> To be frankly, I cann't see the infrastructure of this network
> considering that I'm not the
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:02:05PM +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 17:54, da...@ceu.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> > On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 17:40 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
>
[snip]
> > specified somewhere.
>
> > What does "route print" give you from Win XP?
On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 17:40 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can you run a traceroute and reply back with the results?
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.google.cn
>
> Tracing route to google.cn [203.208.33.100]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>
> 1<1 ms<
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 16:10, da...@ceu.ox.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 12:41 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> -
>>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
>>>
On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 12:41 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> -
> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
> Subnet Mask
On Thu,02.Apr.09, 15:25:46, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> This is _NOT_ my case. I mean, in my case, the IP and Gateway are not
> on the same subnet. In this case, I must also add some route in order
> to send the packet from my host the Gateway first but I don't know how
> to do it.
'man route' should
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:20:09 +0200, Ron Johnson
wrote:
>The config file you need is /etc/network/interfaces. Mine is:
>
>$ cat /etc/network/interfaces | grep -v \#
>
>auto lo
>iface lo inet loopback
>
>allow-hotplug eth0
>iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.10
> netmask 255.25
Hi,
You simply need to edit the file: /etc/network/interfaces
Although, from the IP address you provided i'm not sure how it can reach
your gateway, coz looking at it, seems like IP and Gateway are not on
the same subnet.
Regards,
Ron
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've a host which
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:41:44PM +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a host which has windowsxp installed on it and has the following
> ip configurations:
>
> -
> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
> Dhcp Enab
On 2009-04-01 23:41, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've a host which has windowsxp installed on it and has the following
ip configurations:
-
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Mark Goldshtein wrote:
a) AFAIR, Debian has a special mailing list fully deducated to
laptops. That may be more useful.
b) Try one of the Debian stable LiveCD, for example:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.0-live/i386/iso-cd/debian-live-500-i386-gnome-desktop.iso
and that will give you
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:43 PM, tech lists wrote:
> Before spending over $1000 on this laptop I'm just trying to confirm
> that linux (hopefully debian) works with it. [...] Last Windows I've used
> was 3.11/95sr2/98SE. I'm finished with Windows.
> Just trying to protect my money for an expens
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM, tech lists wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed & used Debian on either this
> (P-7805u) or the simiilar 7811 Gateway laptops? I'm having trouble
> finding any success stories on Google ( or this mailing list, or the
> debian-laptop mailing list, or linux la
On 3/20/09, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> tech lists wrote:
>> Has anyone successfully installed & used Debian on either this
>> (P-7805u) or the simiilar 7811 Gateway laptops? I'm having trouble
>> finding any success stories on Google ( or this mailing list, or the
>> debian-laptop mailing list, or linu
tech lists wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed & used Debian on either this
(P-7805u) or the simiilar 7811 Gateway laptops? I'm having trouble
finding any success stories on Google ( or this mailing list, or the
debian-laptop mailing list, or linux laptops website) for these
laptops or any
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:54:57AM +0500, meekaaku kaaku wrote:
I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
(etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
debian server is 192.168.0.254.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:54:57AM +0500, meekaaku kaaku wrote:
> I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
> (etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
> Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
> debian server is 192.168.0.254. The client machiens ar
On Sunday 28 Oct 2007, meekaaku kaaku wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
> (etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
> Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
> debian server is 192.168.0.254. The client machiens are configure
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:19:33 -0300
"Andre Novelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[moved his quote of my message here]
> On 4/18/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:44 -0300
> > Andre Novelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all!
> > > I`m a new happy owner
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:54:34PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 10, Anthony Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > and how it is meant to be used, specific to this list and which
> > propagates to linux.debian.user only, may be a good idea?
> Maybe. Do you want to write one?
Yup.
> Send i
On Jun 10, Anthony Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other linux.debian.* gateways are fine because people using those can be
> expected to know how gateways work. An faq about what the gateway is
There are no other gateways.
> and how it is meant to be used, specific to this list and which
> pr
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:36:33AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 10, Tony Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All of these are signs that the message has been posted somehow
> > to Usenet but not gated to the list.
> If they can post them, their news server is misconfigured.
> If you see t
On Jun 10, Tony Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice in the following forwarded message: munged From: field, no
> X-Original-Message-ID:, no X-Original-Date:, no debian-user Unsubscribe
> footer. All of these are signs that the message has been posted somehow
> to Usenet but not gated to th
On Tuesday May 10 2005 7:10 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hey I need windows 98 bypass code for the reg. do you have one?
No, but if you're in the kind of situation where you need a CD key for
windows and don't have one, you might find this to be a far better,
longer lasting solution to that p
[KS] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey I need windows 98 bypass code for the reg. do you have one?
Everyone on the list would have one! Microsoft gives it to every Debian
GNU/Linux user.
lol that is great
i am roflmao on that one!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hey I need windows 98 bypass code for the reg. do you have one?
>
Everyone on the list would have one! Microsoft gives it to every Debian
GNU/Linux user.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
hey I need windows 98 bypass code for the reg. do you have
one?
I WANT TO KNOW THE SOLO PASS WORLD
___ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger -
all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:29:53 -0500, Llsf49 wrote:
>
> > i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is
> > running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor
> Debian is a Linux op
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:43:37 -0500
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:16:27 -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
>
> > On Friday January 2 at 11:39am
> > Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> >>
> >> >
>
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:16:27 -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Friday January 2 at 11:39am
> Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Don't feed the trolls!
>> >
>>
>> He's not a troll, he's an AOLer,
>
> Which are, by
On Friday January 2 at 11:39am
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>
> >
> > Don't feed the trolls!
> >
>
> He's not a troll, he's an AOLer,
Which are, by definition, trolls.
--
-johann koenig
Now Playing: Somehow Hollow - Walki
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>
> Don't feed the trolls!
>
He's not a troll, he's an AOLer, and I felt like being kind this morning :)
--
paul
Programming without a hex editor is like watchmaking without a hammer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:29:53 -0500, Llsf49 wrote:
>
> > i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is
> > running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor
> > allowing us to fin
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:29:53 -0500, Llsf49 wrote:
> i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is
> running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor
> allowing us to find out what the password was i imagine anybody with the name
> debian u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 January 2002 11:28 am, Bob Underwood wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Thanks. Adding the hostname to /etc/dhclient.conf did the trick.
>
> Bob
No prob. I needed the assistance of someone who made the
switch to dhcp back in November.
- --
+
On Thursday 10 January 2002 11:11, Eric C. Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:50:42AM -0500, Bob Underwood wrote:
> > the /etc/network/interfaces file reads as follows:
> > [...]
> > iface eth1 inet dhcp
> > hostname: what @ home gave me
>
> Try it without the hostname.
>
> > When I at
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:50:42AM -0500, Bob Underwood wrote:
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet dhcp
> hostname: what @ home gave me
>
>
> There is no gateway in the routing table. How do I get one?
>
>
if you are using pump, try: pump -i eth1 --status
g
pgpI0mBEjbNo0.pgp
Descripti
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:50:42AM -0500, Bob Underwood wrote:
> the /etc/network/interfaces file reads as follows:
> [...]
> iface eth1 inet dhcp
> hostname: what @ home gave me
Try it without the hostname.
> When I attempt to configure this, the following routing table appears:
> [...]
>
on Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 06:56:59PM +0200, Daniel Link ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hi ,
>
> i want to use a p133 as a gateway so the other computers on my
> network have access to the internet. i have one network card and one
> isdn cards which both run fine. what do i need to install/config
iling as a module and seeing if it helps, then removing
it if not.
--adam b.
-Original Message-
From: Hereward Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 10:51 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Gateway Bandwidth Control
On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:20,
On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:20, Adam Bell wrote:
> I could be off base here, but isn't that what the QoS/Fair-Sharing
> options in the kernel config are for?
I've found qos for IRDA in Knl2.4.6, but not networking. Do you know where i
can find it, and set it up?
Hereward
> --adam b.
>
>
I could be off base here, but isn't that what the QoS/Fair-Sharing
options in the kernel config are for?
--adam b.
-Original Message-
From: Hereward Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 8:58 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Gateway Bandwidth Control
on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:48:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for some docs in order to configure one of my computers as
> a gateway (just which file I have to configure for the packet coming
> from the lan through eth1 to go to the net through eth0) Th
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:48:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm looking for some docs in order to configure one of my
> computers as a gateway (just which file I have to configure for
> the packet coming from the lan through eth1 to go to the net
> through eth0) Thanks by advance fred
mos
In /etc/network/interfaces, add the following line in the eth0 section:
gateway x.x.x.x
where x.x.x.x is the default route (e.g., your ISP's gateway)
See 'man interfaces' for details.
Bob
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:48:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking for some docs in or
You can set a gateway option for each interface. Add a line "gateway
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" under the nic settings. Also, see man interfaces.
-Rick Jansen
**
Server Administrator [Linux - FreeBSD]
Websites: www.shellz.nl www.tweakers.net
ICQ#: 374
Install ipmasq package. Done.
Additional ipchain script may help firewall setting.
Close NNTP port so you will not be taged by ISP.
Close ftp, netbios and rpc port at least for script kiddie.
You get attacked everyday if you are on network.
osamu
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 02:26:41PM -0600, Jaso
Jason Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have two Debian boxes and I want one to act as a proxy server for
> the other. I have done this before using mandrake on the
> proxy/gateway machine but I'm not sure how to do it now that I've
> installed Debian. What configuration do I need to change?
I have the exact same problem as you ('cept my Gateway is a E-4200). I'm
new to Debian, and not well aquainted with the install, but here is what I
tried:
The ATA/100 patches are only (as far as I can see) for kernel
2.4.0-test1 with ac12 patch applied. I haven't tried it on other kernels
yet -
> In a small office network of five NT machines and one Linux box, what should
> the gateway be set to?
to the host with connection to an external network connection, if any.
> The IP block is 198.168.1.x, the netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the WINS/DHCP
> server is on 192.168.1.10 All the NT mac
you don't do anything, you run pppconfig and it will do it for you, since
ppp is usually not a dedicated link(modem) so pppd will handle bringing
the gateway up and down for a ppp connection.
nate
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
runner >Hi folks !
runner >
runner >I'd like to setup
do a whois on the domain and you get them
Domain Name: GATEWAY.NET
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Referral URL: www.networksolutions.com
Name Server: DNS-03.NS.AOL.COM
Name Server: DNS-04.NS.AOL.COM
nate
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Rick Dunn
Here they are.
Art
- From whois gateway.net|mailx -s "ns" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Registrant:
Gateway 2000, Inc. (GATEWAY16-DOM)
[address and other impertinent info ommitted]
Domain Name: GATEWAY.NET
Record last updated on 04-Nov-1999.
Record created on 23-Sep-1997.
Datab
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> I use Gateway.net for an ISP and have been
> unsuccessful in retrieving their IP addresses for
> their name servers. Does anyone else use gateway.net?
> And if so, do you know the IP addresses?
Alas, I do not, but how about this fo
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 01:23:35PM -0400, Harlan Crystal wrote:
I recently set up a DHCP server on my local lan, as well as an
internet gateway. I've searched through the man page of DHCP and
the man page of dhcpd.conf.. does anyone know the "option" line to
include into dhcpd.conf so
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 01:23:35PM -0400, Harlan Crystal wrote:
> I recently set up a DHCP server on my local lan, as well as an internet
> gateway. I've searched through the man page of DHCP and the man page of
> dhcpd.conf.. does anyone know the "option" line to include into dhcpd.conf
> so that
"Stephen R. Gore" wrote:
> > Steve, you're also likely to run into problems with the
> > Rage128-based video card if you install X. You can download a
> > driver from www.suse.com, which worked for me.
>
> Kent, the NIC problem was easy to fix using the advice given. However,
> I'm having more di
Kent West wrote:
> Seth R Arnold wrote:
> > > I'm trying to install slink on a Gateway E-4200 (PIII 400). This is
> > > a testbed install, eventually to be an entire lab. I've had no problems
> > > installing to an older E-3200 (PII 300).
> > >
> > > The problem is that the network card (3COM 3c9
Kent West wrote:
> Seth R Arnold wrote:
> >
> > Steve, I can let you know what I have learned --
> >
> > the 3c59x.c file included with the kernel (even 2.2.12) is old and out of
> > date. You need to go to Donald Becker's webpage (cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov, iirc)
> > and download the 0.99L or newer v
Seth R Arnold wrote:
>
> Steve, I can let you know what I have learned --
>
> the 3c59x.c file included with the kernel (even 2.2.12) is old and out of
> date. You need to go to Donald Becker's webpage (cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov, iirc)
> and download the 0.99L or newer version of the 3c59x.c file, rep
Steve, I can let you know what I have learned --
the 3c59x.c file included with the kernel (even 2.2.12) is old and out of
date. You need to go to Donald Becker's webpage (cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov, iirc)
and download the 0.99L or newer version of the 3c59x.c file, replace the
3c59x.c file that comes
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 11:50:07PM +1000, Andrew J.F. Clark wrote:
> I have a problem with my IP Masq gateway (slink, 2.0.36) hanging during
> accesses via the LAN. What happens is that whenever one of the machines
> on the LAN (NT4, Win98 or Debian Slink) accesses anything on the gateway a
> coup
On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 05:45:14PM -0700, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> I'm looking into getting a gateway laptop.
>
> One thing I'm very leery of, however, is that both the CD-ROM drive and
> floppy are hot-swappable PCMCIA. I've directed an inquiry at gateway's
> techies about whether Linux wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 2 May 1999 18:29:06 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>Why not just "ifconfig ..."? That's what I do.
Easier this way than trying to remember the syntax for ifconfig. 'sides,
I have a script to spew out all of the network/netmask/ip/broadcast
On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 12:12:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Well, I can't speak for the Gateway series, but anything that is pcmcia,
> by definition, is hot swapable. My network card and 14.4k modem work fine
> and I swap them in and out all the time. In fact, the NIC is nice that way.
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 1 May 1999 17:45:14 -0700, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
>Anyone with any series on the solo 2500 series from gateway, could you get
>back to me? Thanks in advance!
Well, I can't speak for the Gateway series, but anything that is pcmcia,
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Tun Yang wrote:
> # ping www.yahoo.com
> ping: unknown host www.yahoo.com
Do you have your DNS IP address(es) on /etc/resolv.conf !?
> I then got one of yahoo's ip addresses from the windows bootup and tried
> this:
>
> # ping 204.71.200.74
> PING 204.71.200.74 (204.71.2
On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, David Wright wrote:
> On 10 Sep 1998, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
>
> > Brian Sheehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > i would be glad to hear from people who have gotten (or not) X running
> > > with a gateway monitor (in particular an EV700)
> > >
> > Have you tried the
On 10 Sep 1998, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> Brian Sheehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i would be glad to hear from people who have gotten (or not) X running
> > with a gateway monitor (in particular an EV700)
> >
> Have you tried the Linux Monitor Data Base
> (http://cande.dyn.ml.org/monito
>
> > i would be glad to hear from people who have gotten (or not) X running
> > with a gateway monitor (in particular an EV700)
> >
I have a 15" Gateway Vivitron (Sony manufactured) that works fine.
Gateway was very helpful when I called about technical specs, but they
didn't have many. I had t
Brian Sheehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i would be glad to hear from people who have gotten (or not) X running
> with a gateway monitor (in particular an EV700)
>
Have you tried the Linux Monitor Data Base
(http://cande.dyn.ml.org/monitors/)?
Greetings
jtr
On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Brian Sheehan wrote:
> i would be glad to hear from people who have gotten (or not) X running
> with a gateway monitor (in particular an EV700)
Unlike Viglen's Envy 17ES, it's unable to perform adequately at
1280x1024, managing only 60Hz which is really flickery. 1152x864
is j
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, matthew tebbens wrote:
>
> Has anyone recently installed Debian on a new Gateway system ?
> What works, doesn't work ?
>
There are too many different Gateway models for someone else's experience
to be meaningful. Computer brand isn't very important for compatibility
purposes
Ben Szyc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm tryin to connect my Win95 and WinNT machines across why LAN through
> a debian box and on to the NET.
Look at /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.gz.
> My debian box works fine on the net and
> i can use Lynx. I feel it's got something to do with the way
just add the following to /etc/pcmcia/config:
card "Gateway 2000 Telepath Combo Card"
version "GATEWAY2000","XJEM3336","Telepath Combo Card"
bind "smc91c92_cs","serial_cs"
works fine here with pcmcia-cs version 2.9.12 (also it worked with 10
and 11).
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is
Tres,
I had a similar problem on a Solo 2100 and re-installed from the
"stable" area built a custom kernel (2.0.27) from the distributed kernel
source and all's well so far, it hasn't hung since (2 days).
--Bob
Tres Hofmeister wrote:
>
> I've just installed 1.2.7 on a Gateway Solo 2100
91 matches
Mail list logo
